Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Adrian D. Sandler is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Adrian D. Sandler.


Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics | 2010

Conditioned placebo dose reduction: a new treatment in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder?

Adrian D. Sandler; Corrine E. Glesne; James W. Bodfish

Objective: This study examined if pairing a placebo with stimulant medication produces a placebo response that allows children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to be maintained on a lower dose of stimulant medication. The primary aim was to determine the efficacy, side effects, and acceptability of a novel conditioned placebo dose reduction procedure. Method: Participants included 99 children ages 6 to 12 years with ADHD. After an initial double-blind dose finding to identify optimal dose of mixed amphetamine salts, subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments of 8-week duration: (a) conditioned placebo dose reduction condition (50% reduced dose/placebo [RD/P]) or (b) a dose reduction only condition (RD) or (c) a no reduction condition (full dose). The innovative conditioned placebo dose reduction procedure involved daily pairing of mixed amphetamine salts dose with a visually distinctive placebo capsule administered in open label, with full disclosure of placebo use to subjects and parents. Results: Seventy children completed the study. There were no differences in subject retention among the 3 groups. Most subjects in the RD/P group remained stable during the treatment phase, whereas most in the RD group deteriorated. There was no difference in control of ADHD symptoms between the RD/P group and the full dose group, and both RD/P and full dose groups showed better ADHD control than the RD group. Treatment emergent side effects were lowest in the RD/P group. Conclusion: Pairing placebos with stimulant medication elicits a placebo response that allows children with ADHD to be effectively treated on 50% of their optimal stimulant dose.


Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics | 1992

Neurodevelopmental study of writing disorders in middle childhood.

Adrian D. Sandler; Thomas E. Watson; Marianna M. Footo; Melvin D. Levine; William L. Coleman; Stephen R. Hooper

This study investigated patterns of neurodevelopmental dysfunction in children with writing disorders (WD). Records of children, ages 9 to 15 years, referred to a school problems clinic were examined. Using teacher questionnaire information, including ratings of writing legibility, mechanics, rate, linguistic sophistication, and spelling, 99 cases of WD were found. Sixty-three children without WD served as clinic controls. A cluster analysis revealed four discrete subtypes of WD and two non-WD control clusters. The four WD clusters were found to have different patterns of writing and reading characteristics. Neurodevelopmental tests discriminated among the clusters (F = 2.8, p < .0001), and an examination of neurodevelopmental performance characteristics among the clusters showed different patterns of strengths and weaknesses. An empirically derived subtyping of WD is proposed: WD with fine motor and linguistic deficits, WD with visualspatial deficits, WD with attention and memory deficits, and WD with sequencing deficits. This subtyping, if confirmed in a population study, may have important diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J Dev Behav Pediatr 13:17–23, 1992. Index terms: learning disorders, written language, dysgraphia, spelling, subtypes.


Pediatric Clinics of North America | 2010

Children with Spina Bifida: Key Clinical Issues

Adrian D. Sandler

Spina bifida is the most common of the neural tube defects, which include myelomeningocele, encephalocele, and anencephaly. Spina bifida is a complex and multisystem birth defect, in which one or more vertebral arches may be incomplete. This article discusses the sensory and motor impairments, neurologic disorders, orthopedic and cognitive impairments, and skin and other problems associated with spina bifida. This article also summarizes some of the key clinical issues in the care of children with this complex birth defect.


Assessment for Effective Intervention | 1993

Adolescents Talking About Thinking: Preliminary Findings of a Self-Report Instrument for the Assessment of Cognition and Learning

Adrian D. Sandler; Stephen R. Hooper; Anita A. Scarborough; Thomas E. Watson; Melvin D. Levine

The Survey of Teenage Readiness and Neurodevelopmental Status (STRANDS) is a new multidimensional measure designed to obtain a profile of abilities directly reported by the respondent. It is intended for use in clinical settings and schools to assist in the assessment of potential learning problems in high school students ages 15-19 years. It consists of a Questionnaire and Structured Interview, and takes 1 hour to administer. This study provides preliminary findings with respect to reliability and validity of the STRANDS. Subjects included 54 older adolescents who were divided into two groups: Learning Disability (n = 24) and Normal Achieving (n = 30). The two groups did not differ in terms of chronological age, race, gender, socioeconomic status, or Full Scale IQ. The STRANDS Questionnaire and Interview, and a number of benchmark measures were administered. Internal consistency measures for all scales on the STRANDS ranged from.66 to.91. Test-retest reliability of the Interview ranged from.72 to 97. Construct validity was examined for the scales of attention, memory, language, and visual-perceptual function using multi-trait/multi-method correlational analysis. Construct validity was supported by moderate, significant correlations between the latter three scales and a priori related measures. The construct validity for the attention scale was not well supported. Several scales on the Questionnaire and on the Interview significantly discriminated between the groups, with the Learning Disability group reporting significantly greater concerns than the Normal Achieving group. These results suggest the potential utility of such an assessment approach with adolescents, particularly those experiencing learning problems.


Community Mental Health Journal | 2017

Youth Views on Communication About ADHD and Medication Adherence

Betsy Sleath; Delesha M. Carpenter; Robyn Sayner; Kathleen DeLaney Thomas; Larry Mann; Adam Sage; Sandra H. Sulzer; Adrian D. Sandler

The purpose of this study was to examine youth perceptions of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) communication with their pediatric providers, their reported adherence to their ADHD medications, and their desired location for an ADHD educational program. Youth ages 7 through 17 with an ADHD diagnosis were recruited. A research associate interviewed the youth. Parents completed demographic questionnaires. Seventy families participated. One-third of the youth wanted more discussion about ADHD with their providers during visits. The average youth had over eight questions about ADHD and its treatment. Most youth wanted to learn about ADHD at their provider’s office. Non-white and older youth were significantly more likely to be less adherent to their ADHD medications. Youth want their providers to engage them more during visits. Providers should take advantage of this interest to engage youth more in discussions regarding ADHD and its treatment during pediatric ADHD visits.


Journal of Adolescent Health Care | 1990

Cognitive aspects of sexual decision making in adolescent females

Adrian D. Sandler; Thomas E. Watson; Meivin D. Levine

A comprehensive sexuality questionnaire was administered to 37 females, ages 13 through 16 years, who attended clinics for routine health care. Subjects completed standardized scales of self-concept, locus of control, and future orientation. They also were given a short battery of standardized cognitive tests. Three groups were identified: Group 1 was sexually active and using contraception reliably, Group 2 was not using contraception reliably, and Group 3 had not been sexually active. Group 1 adolescents had higher scores on the vocabulary subtest of the WISC-R (F = 3.4, p < .05) than did Group 2 adolescents, over and above the effect of socioeconomic status (SES). Group 1 subjects had higher scores on knowledge of sex and contraception than did Group 2 (F = 3.3, p < .05). Group 1 had more internal locus of control (F = 7.0, p < .005) than did Group 2 over and above the effect of SES. Mean scores for Group 3 adolescents were intermediate and not significantly different. The findings suggest that cognitive factors may influence contraceptive behavior in adolescent females. J Dev Behav Pediatr 13:202–207, 1992. Index terms: cognition, sex, contraception, adolescence.


Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews | 2005

Placebo effects in developmental disabilities: Implications for research and practice

Adrian D. Sandler


Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics | 2000

Placebo effects in autism: lessons from secretin.

Adrian D. Sandler; James W. Bodfish


Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics | 2001

Are over-referrals on developmental screening tests really a problem?

Adrian D. Sandler


Perceptual and Motor Skills | 1993

Talkative children : verbal fluency as a marker for problematic peer relationships in clinic-referred children with attention deficits

Adrian D. Sandler; Stephen R. Hooper; Thomas E. Watson; William L. Coleman; Marianna M. Footo; Melvin D. Levine

Collaboration


Dive into the Adrian D. Sandler's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas E. Watson

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William L. Coleman

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Melvin D. Levine

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen R. Hooper

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marianna M. Footo

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anita A. Scarborough

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Betsy Sleath

University of North Carolina at Asheville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Delesha M. Carpenter

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James W. Bodfish

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robyn Sayner

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge