Adrian Gheorghe
University of London
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Adrian Gheorghe.
BMJ | 2013
Thomas Pinkney; Melanie Calvert; David C. Bartlett; Adrian Gheorghe; Val Redman; George Dowswell; William J. Hawkins; Tony Wing Chung Mak; Haney Youssef; Caroline Richardson; Steven Hornby; Laura Magill; Richard Haslop; Sue Wilson; Dion Morton
Objective To determine the clinical effectiveness of wound edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery. Design Multicentre observer blinded randomised controlled trial. Participants Patients undergoing laparotomy at 21 UK hospitals. Interventions Standard care or the use of a wound edge protection device during surgery. Main outcome measures Surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, assessed by blinded clinicians at seven and 30 days and by patient’s self report for the intervening period. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, duration of stay in hospital, and the effect of characteristics of the patient and operation on the efficacy of the device. Results 760 patients were enrolled with 382 patients assigned to the device group and 378 to the control group. Six patients in the device group and five in the control group did not undergo laparotomy. Fourteen patients, seven in each group, were lost to follow-up. A total of 184 patients experienced surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, 91/369 (24.7%) in the device group and 93/366 (25.4%) in the control group (odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 1.36; P=0.85). This lack of benefit was consistent across wound assessments performed by clinicians and those reported by patients and across all secondary outcomes. In the secondary analyses no subgroup could be identified in which there was evidence of clinical benefit associated with use of the device. Conclusions Wound edge protection devices do not reduce the rate of surgical site infection in patients undergoing laparotomy, and therefore their routine use for this role cannot be recommended. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 40402832
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014
Gwenan M. Knight; Ulla K. Griffiths; Tom Sumner; Yoko V. Laurence; Adrian Gheorghe; Anna Vassall; Philippe Glaziou; Richard G. White
Significance To aid in prioritizing the development of tuberculosis (TB) vaccines most likely to reach the 2050 TB elimination goal, we estimated the impact and cost-effectiveness of a range of vaccine profiles in low- and middle-income countries. Using mathematical modeling, we show that vaccines targeted at adolescents/adults could have a much greater impact on the TB burden over a 2024–2050 time horizon than those vaccines targeted at infants. Such vaccines could also be cost-effective, even with relatively high vaccine prices. Our results suggest that to achieve the 2050 elimination goals, future TB vaccine development should focus on vaccines targeted at adolescents/adults, even if only relatively low efficacies and short durations of protection are technically feasible. To help reach the target of tuberculosis (TB) disease elimination by 2050, vaccine development needs to occur now. We estimated the impact and cost-effectiveness of potential TB vaccines in low- and middle-income countries using an age-structured transmission model. New vaccines were assumed to be available in 2024, to prevent active TB in all individuals, to have a 5-y to lifetime duration of protection, to have 40–80% efficacy, and to be targeted at “infants” or “adolescents/adults.” Vaccine prices were tiered by income group (US
Annals of Surgery | 2012
Adrian Gheorghe; Melanie Calvert; Thomas Pinkney; Benjamin R. Fletcher; David C. Bartlett; William J. Hawkins; Tony Wing Chung Mak; Haney Youssef; Sue Wilson
1.50–
PLOS ONE | 2014
Melanie Calvert; Derek Kyte; Helen Duffy; Adrian Gheorghe; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Jonathan Ives; Heather Draper; Michael Brundage; Jane M Blazeby; Madeleine King
10 per dose), and cost-effectiveness was assessed using incremental cost per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted compared against gross national income per capita. Our results suggest that over 2024–2050, a vaccine targeted to adolescents/adults could have a greater impact than one targeted at infants. In low-income countries, a vaccine with a 10-y duration and 60% efficacy targeted at adolescents/adults could prevent 17 (95% range: 11–24) million TB cases by 2050 and could be considered cost-effective at
PLOS ONE | 2014
Derek Kyte; Helen Duffy; Benjamin R. Fletcher; Adrian Gheorghe; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Madeleine King; Heather Draper; Jonathan Ives; Michael Brundage; Jane M Blazeby; Melanie Calvert
149 (cost saving to
Health Economics | 2016
Zoltán Kaló; Adrian Gheorghe; Mirjana Huic; Marcell Csanádi; Finn Boerlum Kristensen
387) per DALY averted. If targeted at infants, 0.89 (0.42–1.58) million TB cases could be prevented at
PLOS ONE | 2013
Derek Kyte; Heather Draper; Jonathan Ives; Clive Liles; Adrian Gheorghe; Melanie Calvert
1,692 (
PLOS ONE | 2013
Adrian Gheorghe; Tracy E Roberts; Jonathan Ives; Benjamin R. Fletcher; Melanie Calvert
634–
The Lancet | 2017
Irene Akua Agyepong; Nelson Sewankambo; Agnes Binagwaho; Awa M Coll-Seck; Tumani Corrah; Alex Ezeh; Abebaw Fekadu; Nduku Kilonzo; Peter Lamptey; Felix Masiye; Bongani M. Mayosi; Souleymane Mboup; Jean-Jacques Muyembe; Muhammad Pate; Myriam Sidibe; Bright Simons; Sheila Tlou; Adrian Gheorghe; Helena Legido-Quigley; Joanne McManus; Edmond S. W. Ng; Maureen O'Leary; Jamie Enoch; Nicholas J Kassebaum; Peter Piot
4,603) per DALY averted. This profile targeted at adolescents/adults could be cost-effective at
The Lancet | 2018
Stephen Jan; Tracey-Lea Laba; Beverley Essue; Adrian Gheorghe; Janani Muhunthan; Michael M. Engelgau; Ajay Mahal; Ulla K. Griffiths; Diane McIntyre; Qingyue Meng; Rachel Nugent; Rifat Atun
4,