Adrian Paz
Barzilai Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Adrian Paz.
European Urology | 2003
Shmuel Cytron; Adrian Paz; Sergei Kravchick; Dimitri Shumalinski; Jan Moore
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate is a promising new modality for the treatment localized prostate cancer. However, better protection of the rectal wall during cryoablation of the peripheral zone of the prostate (PZP) may permit deeper freezing of the PZP and for longer time, rendering the procedure safer and more effective. We present a modified cryoablation technique of the prostate using the SeedNet system (Galil Medical, Uniondale, NY, USA), in which the rectum is actively protected during cryoablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS During a 12-month period, 31 patients (32 procedures) with localized and histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma of various stages and grades were treated in this fashion. We evaluated the feasibility of a new method of active rectal wall protection during cryoablation of the prostate. Fourteen ultrathin, 17-gauge, probes, cryo-needles were percutaneously introduced under transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance into the prostate. Peripheral region of the prostate and the area between the prostate and rectal wall were real time monitored for temperature changes. Two cryo-needles placed between the prostate and rectal wall served for active warming using the thawing mode when the temperatures dropped to approximately 0 degrees C, and rectal lumen washing with hot water (+40 degrees C) when the temperature reading dropped further to -8 degrees C or -10 degrees C. RESULTS Active protection of the rectal wall using the cryosurgical modification of active thawing by the two additional cryo-needles placed in the space between the prostate and rectum, while freezing the prostate was performed in every patient, thus enabling us a safe generation of an iceball at the peripheral zone of the prostate with an average temperature ranging from -35 degrees C to -60 degrees C, for 10 min per cycle. During a follow-up of up to 18 months (mean 13.2 months) there was a PSA decrease to values equal or less than 0.5ng/ml in 25 patients (80.6%) and to values equal or less than 1 ng/ml in 21 patients (67.7%). There were no cases of rectal injury or postoperative rectal pain in any of these patients. CONCLUSIONS This new cryotechnique of active rectal wall protection during cryotherapy of the prostate was safe and simple to perform, resulting in no rectal injuries. It was also very effective in ablating the prostate gland, as expressed by the low follow up PSA values.
Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2013
Corinna Melchert; Eliahu Gez; Günther Bohlen; G. Scarzello; Isaac Koziol; Mitchell S. Anscher; Shmuel Cytron; Adrian Paz; T. Torre; Mathew Bassignani; Fabrizio Dal Moro; Dieter Jocham; Rami Ben Yosef; Benjamin W. Corn; György Kovács
PURPOSE To evaluate dose reduction caused by the implantation of an interstitial inflatable and biodegradable balloon device aiming to achieve lower rectal doses with virtual 3D conformal external beam radiation treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS An inflatable balloon device was placed, interstitially and under transrectal ultrasound guidance, into the rectal-prostate interspace prior treatment initiation of 26 patients with localized prostate cancer, who elected to be treated with radiotherapy (3D CRT or IMRT). The pre- and post-implant CT imaging data of twenty two patients were collected (44 images) for the purpose of the 3D conformal virtual planning presented herein. RESULTS The dorsal prostate-ventral rectal wall separation resulted in an average reduction of the rectal V70% by 55.3% (± 16.8%), V80% by 64.0% (± 17.7%), V90% by 72.0% (± 17.1%), and V100% by 82.3% (± 24.1%). In parallel, rectal D2 ml and D0.1 ml were reduced by 15.8% (± 11.4%) and 3.9% (± 6.4%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Insertion of the biodegradable balloon into the prostate-rectum interspace is similar to other published invasive procedures. In this virtual dose distribution analysis, the balloon insertion resulted in a remarkable reduction of rectal volume exposed to high radiation doses. This effect has the potential to keep the rectal dose lower especially when higher than usual prostate dose escalation protocols or hypo-fractionated regimes are used. Further prospective clinical investigations on larger cohorts and more conformal radiation techniques will be necessary to define the clinical advantage of the biodegradable interstitial tissue separation device.
The Journal of Urology | 2009
Rahamim Ben-Yosef; Adrian Paz; Yair Levy; S Alani; Yossi Muncher; Shaul Shohat; Avi Domb; Ben Corn
PURPOSE Hypofractionation schemes and associated higher rectal doses have evoked the need for improved protection of the rectum during prostate cancer irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS An implantable, biodegradable, inflatable, preshaped triangular balloon of commercially used poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) co-polymer material was developed to provide separation between prostate and rectum. Biocompatibility and degradability of the balloon implanted subcutaneously or perineally, and in the context of transperineal implantation and local irradiation were evaluated in several in vivo studies. RESULTS The device was found to be biocompatible in subcutaneously implanted rabbits up to 42 days, in a transperineally implanted dog up to 12 months and in 8 transperineally implanted pigs up to 6 months. Upon inflation in situ the balloon separated the tissues, remained inflated for several months and subsequently biodegraded. No systemic or local toxicity was noted, as shown by histopathology. Device insertion into the perineal area using a dedicated introductory kit was convenient and feasible. Three-month followup in irradiated pigs that received 15 Gy in 3 fractions 1 week apart showed a stable balloon position with no local or systemic side effects. CONCLUSIONS This novel device was safe and effective for its intended use of separating tissues for a desired duration. A clinical study will commence to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this device during irradiation in patients with prostate cancer.
European Urology Supplements | 2011
F. Dal Moro; Shmuel Cytron; Adrian Paz; I. Koziol; Reza Ghavamian; Dieter Jocham; Eliahu Gez; T. Torre; J. Bassignani; S. Kalnicki; K. Garg; G. Kovacs; Mitchell S. Anscher; Filiberto Zattoni; G. Scarzello
1Padova University Hospital, Urology Padova, Italy; 2Barzilai Medical Center, Urology, Ashkelon, Israel; 3VA Urology, Urology, Richmond, VA, USA; 4Montefiore Medical Center, Urology, New York City, NY, USA 5University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Urology, Lubeck, Germany; 6TASMC, Radiotherapy, Tel Aviv, Israel; 7VA Urology, Radiotherapy, Richmond, VA, USA; 8Montefiore Medical Center, Radiotherapy, New York City, NY, USA; 9University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Radiotherapy, Lubeck, Germany; 10Virginia Commonwealth University, Radiotherapy, Richmond, VA, USA; 11Padova University Hospital, Radiotherapy, Padova, Italy. 795
Archive | 2007
Shaul Shohat; Roni Shabat; Elazar Segal; Adrian Paz
Archive | 2005
Adrian Paz; Abraham J. Domb
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B | 2009
Yair Levy; Adrian Paz; Rami Ben Yosef; Benjamin W. Corn; Boris Vaisman; Shaul Shuhat; Abraham J. Domb
European Urology | 1997
Adrian Paz; Arie Lindner; Amnon Zisman; Yoram I. Siegel
European Urology | 1997
Amnon Zisman; Soffer Y; Yoram I. Siegel; Adrian Paz; Arie Lindner
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2007
R. Ben-yosef; Adrian Paz; Yair Levy; Y. Muchner; S. Shohat; Benjamin W. Corn; A. Vexler; Avi Domb