Adrian R. Black

Sp1 and krüppel-like factor family of transcription factors in cell growth regulation and cancer.

The Sp/KLF family contains at least twenty identified members which include Sp1‐4 and numerous krüppel‐like factors. Members of the family bind with varying affinities to sequences designated as ‘Sp1 sites’ (e.g., GC‐boxes, CACCC‐boxes, and basic transcription elements). Family members have different transcriptional properties and can modulate each others activity by a variety of mechanisms. Since cells can express multiple family members, Sp/KLF factors are likely to make up a transcriptional network through which gene expression can be fine‐tuned. ‘Sp1 site’‐dependent transcription can be growth‐regulated, and the activity, expression, and/or post‐translational modification of multiple family members is altered with cell growth. Furthermore, Sp/KLF factors are involved in many growth‐related signal transduction pathways and their overexpression can have positive or negative effects on proliferation. In addition to growth control, Sp/KLF factors have been implicated in apoptosis and angiogenesis; thus, the family is involved in several aspects of tumorigenesis. Consistent with a role in cancer, Sp/KLF factors interact with oncogenes and tumor suppressors, they can be oncogenic themselves, and altered expression of family members has been detected in tumors. Effects of changes in Sp/KLF factors are context‐dependent and can appear contradictory. Since these factors act within a network, this diversity of effects may arise from differences in the expression profile of family members in various cells. Thus, it is likely that the properties of the overall network of Sp/KLF factors play a determining role in regulation of cell growth and tumor progression.

Cell cycle-regulated association of E2F1 and Sp1 is related to their functional interaction.

Because of the large number of growth-regulated genes containing binding sites for the transcription factors Sp1 and E2F and the reported ability of E2F to mediate cell cycle (growth) regulation, we studied interactions between E2F1 and Sp1. In transient transfection assays using Drosophila melanogaster SL2 cells, transfection with both Sp1 and E2F1 expression vectors resulted in greater than 85-fold activation of transcription from a hamster dihydrofolate reductase reporter construct, whereas cotransfection with either the Sp1 or E2F1 expression vector resulted in 30- or <2-fold activation, respectively. Therefore, these transcription factors act synergistically in activation of dihydrofolate reductase transcription. Transient transfection studies demonstrated that E2F1 could superactivate Sp1-dependent transcription in a promoter containing only Sp1 sites and that Sp1 could superactivate transcription of promoters through E2F sites, further demonstrating that these physically associated in Drosophila cells transfected with Sp1 and E2F1 expression vectors and in human cells, with maximal interaction detected in mid- to late G1. Additionally, E2F1 and Sp1 interact in vitro through specific domains of each protein, and the physical interaction and functional synergism appear to require the same regions. Taken together, these data demonstrate that E2F1 and Sp1 both functionally and physically interact; therefore this interaction, Sp1 and E2F1 may regulate transcription of genes containing binding sites for either or both factors.

Growth/Cell Cycle Regulation of Sp1 Phosphorylation

Sp1 sites can mediate growth/cell cycle induction of dihydrofolate reductase in late G1 (Jensen, D. E., Black, A. R. Swick, A. G., and Azizkhan, J. C. (1997) J. Cell. Biochem. 67, 24–31). To investigate mechanisms underlying this induction, effects of serum stimulation on regulation of Sp1 were examined. In Balb/c 3T3 cells, serum stimulation did not affect Sp1 synthesis or the relative binding of Sp1 family members to DNA; however, it did result in a rapid, ∼2-fold increase in Sp1 levels and an ∼3-fold increase in specific Sp1 phosphorylation in mid-G1. In normal human diploid fibroblasts, serum stimulation also increased Sp1 phosphorylation in mid-G1 but did not affect Sp1 levels. Therefore, Sp1 phosphorylation is regulated in a growth/cell cycle-dependent manner which correlates temporally with induction of dihydrofolate reductase transcription. Further studies revealed a kinase activity specifically associated with Sp1 in a growth-regulated manner. This activity is distinct from purified kinases previously shown to phosphorylate Sp1 in vitro and phosphorylates Sp1 between amino acids 612 and 678 in its C terminus, a region also phosphorylated in mid-G1 in vivo. Therefore, this study indicates that phosphorylation of the C terminus of Sp1 may play a role in the cell cycle regulation of its transcriptional activity.

Regulation of E2F: a family of transcription factors involved in proliferation control.

Members of the E2F family of transcription factors are key participants in orchestration of the cell cycle, cell growth arrest and apoptosis. Therefore, an understanding of the regulation of E2F activity is essential for an understanding of the control of cellular proliferation. E2F activity is regulated by the retinoblastoma family of tumor suppressors and by multiple other mechanisms. This review will describe our current knowledge of these mechanisms which together constitute a highly complex network by which the cell cycle and cellular proliferation can be controlled.

Intestinal tumor progression is associated with altered function of KLF5

Krüppel-like transcription factors have been linked to cell growth regulation and tumorigenesis in a number of systems. In the intestinal epithelium, expression of KLF5 (IKLF/BTEB2) is limited to proliferating crypt cells, indicating a growth-promoting role. Consistent with this role, we demonstrate that expression of KLF5 in non-transformed intestinal epithelial cells (ileal IEC-18 and Immorto-Min Colon Epithelial (IMCE) cells) enhances colony formation, cyclin D1 transcription, and cell growth. However, in contrast to these effects in non-transformed cells, KLF5 reduced colony number, failed to enhance cyclin D1 transcription, and was negatively correlated with cell growth in colon cancer cell lines. The relationship between tumor progression and KLF5 was further investigated using Ras-mediated transformation of IEC-18 and IMCE cells as syngeneic models. Ras-transformation recapitulated differences in the effects of KLF5 on cell growth and cyclin D1 transcription, providing a direct link between intestinal tumor progression and altered function of KLF5. Ras-transformation also markedly down-regulated KLF5; further analysis indicated that reduced expression of KLF5 mRNA and destabilization of KLF5 protein occur in intestinal tumors. Reduced levels of KLF5 mRNA were also detected in APCmin mouse and human familial adenomatous polyposis adenomas compared with normal crypt epithelium, indicating that down-regulation of KLF5 is an early event in intestinal tumorigenesis in vivo. Collectively, these data indicate that intestinal tumor progression is associated with a change in the growth-related functions of KLF5 and that intestinal tumors down-regulate KLF5 expression by multiple mechanisms.

Identification of a viral kinase that phosphorylates specific E2Fs and pocket proteins.

The transcription factor E2F and its regulation by pRB and related pocket proteins are central to cell cycle control in higher eukaryotes. Much of our knowledge of this regulation has come from studies using immediate-early proteins of DNA tumor viruses. Previously, we reported that the 72-kDa immediate-early region 1 gene product of the human cytomegalovirus, IE72, transactivates the dihydrofolate reductase promoter through the E2F site and that it physically interacts with E2F1 (M. J. Margolis, S. Pajovic, E. L. Wong, M. Wade, R. Jupp, J. A. Nelson, and J. C. Azizkhan, J. Virol. 69:7759-7767, 1995). In this study, we further characterized the mechanism by which IE72 modulates E2F-dependent transcription. In vitro phosphorylation reactions using gel-purified bacterially expressed proteins revealed that IE72 is a kinase that autophosphorylates and phosphorylates E2F1, -2, and -3 (but not E2F4 or -5) and the RB-related pocket proteins p130 and p107 (but not pRB). The region of IE72 spanning amino acids 173 to 197 shows a high level of homology to the ATP binding sites in over 500 kinases. The kinase-negative protein IE72deltaATP, from which this region has been deleted, cannot activate E2F-dependent transcription. The kinase activity of IE72 is also required for its ability to reduce the association of E2F4 with p107 and p130. Taken together, these data suggest that the kinase activity of IE72 is required for E2F-dependent transcriptional activation and that this is likely to result from phosphorylation of specific members of the E2F and pocket protein families by IE72.

Protein kinase C-mediated down-regulation of cyclin D1 involves activation of the translational repressor 4E-BP1 via a phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt-independent, protein phosphatase 2A-dependent mechanism in intestinal epithelial cells.

We reported previously that protein kinase Cα (PKCα), a negative regulator of cell growth in the intestinal epithelium, inhibits cyclin D1 translation by inducing hypophosphorylation/activation of the translational repressor 4E-BP1. The current study explores the molecular mechanisms underlying PKC/PKCα-induced activation of 4E-BP1 in IEC-18 nontransformed rat ileal crypt cells. PKC signaling is shown to promote dephosphorylation of Thr45 and Ser64 on 4E-BP1, residues directly involved in its association with eIF4E. Consistent with the known role of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mTOR pathway in regulation of 4E-BP1, PKC signaling transiently inhibited PI3K activity and Akt phosphorylation in IEC-18 cells. However, PKC/PKCα-induced activation of 4E-BP1 was not prevented by constitutively active mutants of PI3K or Akt, indicating that blockade of PI3K/Akt signaling is not the primary effector of 4E-BP1 activation. This idea is supported by the fact that PKC activation did not alter S6 kinase activity in these cells. Further analysis indicated that PKC-mediated 4E-BP1 hypophosphorylation is dependent on the activity of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). PKC signaling induced an ∼2-fold increase in PP2A activity, and phosphatase inhibition blocked the effects of PKC agonists on 4E-BP1 phosphorylation and cyclin D1 expression. H2O2 and ceramide, two naturally occurring PKCα agonists that promote growth arrest in intestinal cells, activate 4E-BP1 in PKC/PKCα-dependent manner, supporting the physiological significance of the findings. Together, our studies indicate that activation of PP2A is an important mechanism underlying PKC/PKCα-induced inhibition of cap-dependent translation and growth suppression in intestinal epithelial cells.

Involvement of the ERK Signaling Cascade in Protein Kinase C-mediated Cell Cycle Arrest in Intestinal Epithelial Cells

We have reported previously that protein kinase C (PKC) signaling can mediate a program of cell cycle withdrawal in IEC-18 nontransformed intestinal crypt cells, involving rapid disappearance of cyclin D1, increased expression of Cip/Kip cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, and activation of the growth suppressor function of pocket proteins (Frey, M. R., Clark, J. A., Leontieva, O., Uronis, J. M., Black, A. R., and Black, J. D. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 151, 763–777). In the current study, we present evidence to support a requisite role for PKC α in mediating these effects. Furthermore, analysis of the signaling events linking PKC/PKC α activation to changes in the cell cycle regulatory machinery implicate the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK cascade. PKC/PKC α activity promoted GTP loading of Ras, activation of Raf-1, and phosphorylation/activation of ERK. ERK activation was found to be required for critical downstream effects of PKC/PKC α activation, including cyclin D1 down-regulation, p21Waf1/Cip1 induction, and cell cycle arrest. PKC-induced ERK activation was strong and sustained relative to that produced by proliferative signals, and the growth inhibitory effects of PKC agonists were dominant over proliferative events when these opposing stimuli were administered simultaneously. PKC signaling promoted cytoplasmic and nuclear accumulation of ERK activity, whereas growth factor-induced phospho-ERK was localized only in the cytoplasm. Comparison of the effects of PKC agonists that differ in their ability to sustain PKC α activation and growth arrest in IEC-18 cells, together with the use of selective kinase inhibitors, indicated that the length of PKC-mediated cell cycle exit is dictated by the magnitude/duration of input signal (i.e. PKC α activity) and of activation of the ERK cascade. The extent/duration of phospho-ERK nuclear localization may also be important determinants of the duration of PKC agonist-induced growth arrest in this system. Taken together, the data point to PKC α and the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK cascade as key regulators of cell cycle withdrawal in intestinal epithelial cells.

Distinct roles for Sp1 and E2F sites in the growth/cell cycle regulation of the DHFR promoter

Dihydrofolate reductase activity is required for many biosynthetic pathways including nucleotide synthesis. Its expression is therefore central to cellular growth, and it has become a key target for cancer chemotherapy. Transcription of the dihydrofolate reductase gene is regulated with growth, being expressed maximally in late G1/early S phase following serum stimulation of quiescent cells. This regulation is directed by a promoter which contains binding sites for only the transcription factors Sp1 and E2F. In this study, the role of these promoter elements in growth/cell cycle regulation of dihydrofolate transcription was addressed directly by transient transfection of Balb/c 3T3 cells with mutant promoter‐reporter gene constructs. The E2F sites were found to repress transcription in G0 and early G1 but did not contribute to the level of transcription in late G1/S phase. In contrast, Sp1 sites were able to mediate induction of transcription from the dihydrofolate reductase promoter, as well as a heterologous promoter, following serum stimulation of quiescent cells. These findings add dihydrofolate reductase to a growing list of genes at which E2F sites are primarily repressive elements and delineate a role for Sp1 sites in the growth/cell cycle regulation of transcription. J. Cell. Biochem. 67: 24–31, 1997.

Protein Kinase C α Signaling Inhibits Cyclin D1 Translation in Intestinal Epithelial Cells

Cyclin D1 is a key regulator of cell proliferation, acting as a mitogen sensor and linking extracellular signaling to the cell cycle machinery. Strict control of cyclin D1 levels is critical for maintenance of tissue homeostasis. We have reported previously that protein kinase C α (PKCα), a negative regulator of cell growth in the intestinal epithelium, promotes rapid down-regulation of cyclin D1 (Frey, M. R., Clark, J. A., Leontieva, O., Uronis, J. M., Black, A. R., and Black, J. D. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 151, 763–778). The current study explores the mechanisms underlying PKCα-induced loss of cyclin D1 protein in non-transformed intestinal epithelial cells. Our findings exclude several mechanisms previously implicated in down-regulation of cyclin D1 during cell cycle exit/differentiation, including alterations in cyclin D1 mRNA expression and protein turnover. Instead, we identify PKCα as a novel repressor of cyclin D1 translation, acting at the level of cap-dependent initiation. Inhibition of cyclin D1 translation initiation is mediated by PKCα-induced hypophosphorylation/activation of the translational suppressor 4E-BP1, association of 4E-BP1 with the mRNA cap-binding protein eIF4E, and sequestration of cyclin D1 mRNA in 4E-BP1-associated complexes. Together, these post-transcriptional effects ensure rapid disappearance of the potent mitogenic molecule cyclin D1 during PKCα-induced cell cycle withdrawal in the intestinal epithelium.