Adrian Schmidt-Recla

Forensic psychiatry in nineteenth-century Saxony: the case of Woyzeck.

&NA; In contrast to other areas of psychiatry, little work has been done on the history of forensic psychiatry, and such work is especially scarce regarding the first half of the 19th century, when forensic psychiatry began to develop together with the neurosciences. One newly discovered archival source bears immediate witness to the genesis of forensic psychiatry and is presented for the first time in this study. That source helps us to better understand, in particular, one of the most important cases in 19th‐century German forensic psychiatry—namely, that of Johann Christian Woyzeck, the murderer who became the lead figure and the decisive model for the famous eponymous drama by German poet Georg Büchner. Duke Friedrich August, the heir to the throne of the German kingdom of Saxony, submitted a separately recorded special vote (or, very roughly speaking, a brief) that denied the criminal responsibility of the murderer since he had committed his crime out of jealousy and in an emotionally agitated state of mind that eliminated the offenders free will. Though possessing no relevant professional training, the duke applied, and argued in support of, a syndrome—partial mania—that was then the subject of ongoing controversy in general psychiatry. In that context, his vote and analysis can be seen a part of the conceptual development not only of forensic psychiatry, but also of German psychiatry and criminal law.

Kommentar II zum Fall: „Schwangere Patientin mit fataler Hirnblutung“

Der Berichtsfall wirft wie der Fall der „Erlanger Schwangeren“ (Amtsgericht Hersbruck NJW 1992, S. 3245; dazu [1, 3–5]) Rechtsfragen auf: Darf bzw. muss die Schwangere aus Rechtsgründen weiterbehandelt werden, wenn ihr Leben nicht wird erhalten werden können? Wer trägt rechtlich die Fürsorgeverantwortung für das ungeborene Kind? Macht sich der Arzt strafbar, wenn er die Behandlung fortsetzt oder abbricht? Für die Hirntoddebatte ist hier kein Raum; es wird davon ausgegangen, dass die hirntote Patientin nicht mehr lebt. Das lässt sich bestreiten [6] – dann ändern sich alle unter 3. genannten Ergebnisse.