Adriana Aroldi

Hypertension After Renal Transplantation

In 212 cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients with stable graft function at 1 year and with potential follow-up of 5 years the prevalence of arterial hypertension was 81.6% at 1 year and 81.2% at 5 years. The logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of hypertension before transplantation (P = 0.0001; odds ratio 3.5), a plasma creatinine level higher than 2 mg/dL at 1 year (P = 0.0001; odds ratio 3.8), and a maintenance therapy with corticosteroids (P = 0.008; odds ratio 3.3) were positively associated with hypertension at 1 year after transplantation. The mean number of graft failures between 1 and 5 years was significantly higher and the mean reciprocal of plasma creatinine was significantly worse at 1 and 5 years in patients with noncontrolled hypertension than in normotensive patients or in patients with hypertension well controlled by drugs. We also investigated the potential protective role of nifedipine. The episodes of acute tubular necrosis (four versus three), of acute rejections (28 versus 29), the mean arterial pressure at 1 year (105 +/- 9 versus 104 +/- 9 mm Hg) and 5 years (105 +/- 10 versus 108 +/- 12 mm Hg), and the mean plasma creatinine level at 1 year (1.4 +/- 0.4 versus 1.6 +/- 0.4 mg/dL) and 5 years (1.8 +/- 1 versus 1.9 +/- 1 mg/dL) were similar in 52 patients who were given nifedipine for at least 4 years and 58 hypertensive patients who never took calcium channel blockers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Natural history of hepatitis B and C in renal allograft recipients.

Background. In renal allograft recipients, most cases of liver dysfunction are caused by hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The natural history of hepatitis C and B was studied in 286 renal allograft recipients who received a kidney allograft between 1972 and 1989 when tests for anti-HCV became available. Methods. In all patients, hepatitis B (HB) surface (s) antigen (Ag) was tested before and anti-HCV (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay II) after transplantation. Results. At enrollment in 1989 (5.5±4 years after transplantation), 209 patients were anti-HCV positive (C+), 42 patients were HBsAg-positive (B+), and 35 patients were both B+ and C+ (C+B+). One hundred four patients were receiving azathioprine (AZA) and 182 were on cyclosporine A (CsA). Since transplantation, the median follow-up was 18 years in AZA-treated and 13 years in CsA-treated patients. Liver biopsy showed chronic hepatitis in 73 patients, cirrhosis in 20 patients, and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in 2 patients. In 34 patients, liver biopsy was repeated, and progression of fibrosis was observed in 24 patients. The 12-year patient survival rate was similar in B+, C+, and B+C+ patients (67%, 78%, and 71%, respectively; P=not significant). Liver-related death was the first cause of death in B+ and B+C+ infected patients (58% and 72%, respectively), whereas cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death in C+ patients (40%). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (>40 years) (relative risk [RR], 2.8), B+ status (RR, 2.36), and C+ status (RR, 1.65) were independently associated with a worse patient survival. Conclusions. In the long term, B+ patients had a higher risk of death related to liver disease than C+ patients, and co-infection did not worsen patient survival.

A randomized prospective trial comparing cyclosporine monotherapy with triple-drug therapy in renal transplantation

In a prospective trial 151 recipients of renal transplants were randomly assigned to treatment with CsA alone (74 patients) and to low dose of AZA, prednisolone, and CsA (77 patients). At two years, graft survival was 84% for the monotherapy and 90% for the triple therapy. This difference was not statistically significant. The number of rejection episodes was similar in the two groups, but the severity of rejection was significantly worse among the patients on monotherapy. More kidneys were lost because of rejection (6 versus 3), and a higher number of methylprednisolone pulses was used for treating rejection (5.2±2.3 versus 4.3±2.9; P=0.0077). CsA nephrotoxicity episodes were more frequent among patients on monotherapy (23 versus 7; P<0.02). Infectious episodes were equally distributed between the two groups. Creatinine clearance was poorer in the monotherapy-treated patients at the third month (42±16 ml/min versus 48±15 ml/min; P=0.02), but no differences were observed between the two groups since the sixth month after transplantation. Many patients on monotherapy required changes in maintenance therapy. In fact, one patient was switched to conventional immunosuppression because of Cremophor-induced anaphylaxis. Another patient who developed Kaposis sarcoma 4-months after surgery was switched to steroids alone. Excluding 5 patients who lost their grafts a few days after transplantation, only 30 of 74 patients (40%) could be kept without steroids. We conclude that both the therapeutic protocols can give good results in renal allotransplantation; however, monotherapy could create some problems in keeping the balance between drug toxicity and significant immuno-suppression. On the contrary, triple therapy is easier to handle, especially in the early posttransplant period when the differential diagnosis between acute rejection and CsA-related nephrotoxicity can be difficult even for a skilled clinician.

A randomized trial comparing triple-drug and double-drug therapy in renal transplantation

This is the 7-year update of a randomized trial comparing triple (TT) and double (DT) immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation. At 7 years, patient survival rate was 85% in DT vs. 87% in TT (P=NS); graft survival rate was 73% in DT and 68% in TT (P=NS); pure graft survival was 86% in DT vs. 77% in TT (P=0.096). The 7-year graft survival rate was 67% for cadaver graft recipients vs. 92% for living-related graft recipients (P=0.044). No difference in the slopes of plasma creatinine between the two groups was observed. Ten DT and 13 TT patients changed their original therapy: statistical analysis, however, was carried out according to intention to treat. Both CsA levels and doses were significantly higher in DT than in TT group (P<0.001) at any time point up to the 7th year. At univariate analysis, a living-related donor kidney (P=0.044) and immediate recovery of renal function (P<0.001) were the only two parameters associated with graft survival at 7 years. At multivariate analysis, only early graft function recovery was correlated with late graft survival (RR=10.480). Thus, even in the long-term, there is no difference between DT and TT, either in patient or in graft survival: at the doses we used, TT had a lower prevalence of late side effects than DT, however, long-term pure graft survival was better, although not significantly, in DT than in TT. The possibility of a safe shift from one regimen to the other one makes the two treatments complementary rather than alternatives.

Increased detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus in renal transplant patients by third-generation assays

To assess the sensitivity and specificity of third-generation assays for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), sera from 244 renal transplant patients (113 positive for anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]-2) were studied. Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected by a reverse-transcripted nested polymerase chain reaction. Antibody to HCV was detected by ELISA-3 in 108 (96%) ELISA-2-positive samples. Five (4%) ELISA-2-positive sera were negative by both ELISA-3 and polymerase chain reaction. In the anti-HCV-negative group, six (5%) additional cases were ELISA-3-positive; three of these were confirmed by recombinant immunoblot assay-3 (RIBA-3) and polymerase chain reaction. Recombinant immunoblot assay-3 was used to resolve 82 RIBA-2-indeterminate and three RIBA-2-negative sera. Using RIBA-3, 49 (60%) RIBA-2-indeterminate samples were positive, five (6%) ELISA-3-negative samples were negative, and 28 (34%) were remained indeterminate. Recombinant immunoblot assay-2-negative samples were indeterminate with RIBA-3. Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected in all RIBA-3-positive and 58% of the RIBA-3-indeterminate samples. Third-generation assays for anti-HCV are more sensitive and specific than second-generation assays in renal transplant patients.

The impact of azathioprine and cyclosporine on long-term function in kidney transplantation

To assess the impact of cyclosporine on long-term kidney function in transplant patients, we retrospectively analyzed 273 patients on azathioprine and 308 on CsA with graft functioning at 1 year. To balance the length of follow-ups, the observation of patients was cut at 5 years. Actual graft survival rate at 5 years was similar in Aza and CsA (88% vs. 90%). Multivariate analysis in Aza pts showed that proteinuria (P = 0.006) and hypertension at 1 year (P = 0.002) increased the probability of irreversible graft failure by 2.47 and 2.85, respectively. In CsA patients, proteinuria (P = 0.007) and plasma creatinine higher than 2.5 mg/dl (P = 0.006) increased the probability of graft failure by 5.12 and 6.48, respectively. In both Aza and CsA patients with a follow-up of at least 5 years, plasma creatinine levels were significantly worse at 5 years vs. 1 year (P = 0.004). The slopes of plasma creatinine values plotted vs time were not different between the two groups. Chronic graft dysfunction (CGD) was defined as a stable increase of plasma creatinine of at least 50% above stable values at 1 year. The probability of remaining without CGD at 5 years was 75% for CsA and 80% for Aza patients (P = N.S.). Multivariate analysis of factors influencing the development of CGD showed that hypertension (P = 0.003) and proteinuria at 1 year (P = 0.081) increased the probability of developing CGD by 2.19 and 1.76, respectively, in Aza, while in CsA patients proteinuria only (P = 0.063) increased the probability of developing CGD by 2.29. Graft survival at 5 years after development of CGD was 34% in Aza and 53% in CsA-treated patients. These data confirm that in the long-term CsA does not cause a higher prevalence of CGD and show that, in the presence of CGD, CsA has a superior protective effect than Aza.

Is cyclosporine in renal-transplant recipients more effective when given twice a day than in a single daily dose?

Background. It is still unknown whether it is better to administer cyclosporine (CsA) once or twice a day to renal-transplant patients. Methods. Fifty-four patients were randomized to receive CsA once a day (OD group, 28 patients) or twice a day (BD group, 26 patients). Clinical parameters and pharmacokinetic studies were regularly monitored over the first year. Results. Two patients lost their grafts because of renal vascular thrombosis. A patient in the BD group died. The other 51 patients were alive with graft functioning after a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Five patients per group had reversible acute rejection. There was a not significant trend toward a lower mean serum creatinine in OD than in BD (1.38±0.38 and 1.7±0.80 mg/dL at 1 year posttransplant, respectively). In 47 patients, 319 pharmacokinetic studies were performed. We measured the area under the concentration-time curve during the first 4 hours (AUC0–4) and CsA blood levels at 0, 2, and 4 hours after dosing. C0 was significantly lower in OD than in BD (P=0.0011), whereas C2 (P<0.0001) and C4 (P<0.0001) were significantly higher in OD than in BD. In OD, the AUC was higher than in BD (P<0.0001). OD allows us to reach high levels of C2 and AUC for several hours after dosing, whereas BD showed persistently high levels throughout the whole day. Conclusion. No difference in survival and rejection rates were observed between OD and BD groups.

Renal Transplant Recipients and Chronic Liver Disease: Statistical Evaluation of Predisposing Factors

278 azathioprine and methylprednisolone (AZA)-treated and 406 ciclosporin (CS) treated patients with a kidney graft functioning for more than 1 year were investigated for the presence of chronic liver disease (CLD), defined as an increase in transaminases of 1.5 times the upper normal limits for a period of at least 12 months. The prevalence of CLD was 36 and 27% in the two groups, respectively. The univariate analysis showed that male sex, alcohol abuse and HBsAg positivity correlated with CLD onset in the AZA group while blood transfusions, length of dialysis treatment, pretransplantation CLD, HBsAg positivity and ferritin levels over 800 ng/ml correlated with CLD onset in CS. The multivariate analysis identified male sex and HBsAg positivity in the AZA group and age over 18 years, high ferritin levels and HBsAg positivity in the CS group as risk factors predictive of CLD onset. Liver failure represented the 4th cause of death in the AZA group but 1 of the 2 most important causes of death in CS in the long term. However, these drawbacks were overcome by the overall low mortality rate in CS. Therefore, renal transplantation should not be refused to patients positive for HBsAg and/or with preexisting liver disease.

The clinical status of cadaveric renal transplant patients treated for 10 year with cyclosporine therapy

In this paper we assessed the clinical status of 150 cadaveric renal transplant patients who received cyclosporine without interruption for 10 yr. The mean creatinine clearance was 59.2±15.71 at 1 yr and 55.6±24.91 mL/min at 10 yr (p=0.039). Patients were subdivided into four quartiles according to the mean creatinine clearance at 1 yr. The 14 patients with the lowest quartile showed a significant decrease of creatinine clearance from the 1st to 10th year (from 31.5±5.83 to 24.8±14.00 mL/min; p=0.038) while no difference between the mean creatinine clearance at 1 and at 10 yr was found in the other three quartiles. At 10 yr, 84.6% patients needed antihypertensive therapy, a rate similar to that seen at 1 yr (81.4%). The mean plasma cholesterol (253±57.8 mg/dL) and triglyceride (197±113.1 mg/dL) at 10 yr were similar to those found at 1 yr (243±48.2 and 201±143.0 mg/dL, respectively). Most patients have a high degree of rehabilitation 10 yr after uninterrupted cyclosporine therapy and all patients but 3 were able to work.

Effect of kidney transplantation on bone mass and body composition in males

Background. Bone loss is a frequent and well-known complication in the first months after renal transplantation, but there are no data considering body composition variables (bone, fat, and lean mass) together in transplant recipients. This prospective study investigated total body bone density, fat mass, and lean mass before and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months after renal transplantation in male patients who underwent hemodialysis. Methods. Twenty consecutive renal transplant male patients aged 23–64 years (mean, 40 years; median, 41 years) received one of two immunosuppressive therapies (cyclosporine+methylprednisolone, or cyclosporine+methylprednisolone+azathioprine). The bone, fat, and lean mass of the total body and its related subregions were assessed by means of dual X-ray photon absorptiometry. Mixed factorial analysis of variance for repeated measurements was used for the statistical analysis. Results. During the 6 months after transplantation, there was a reduction in trabecular bone mass in the spine, ribs, and pelvis total body subregions; the reduction was statistically significant in the last two subregions. There was no statistically significant difference in the lean mass of the total body or its subregions over time, but there was a statistically significant increase in the fat mass of the total body and all of its subregions; the increase in total and trunk fat mass seemed to be greater in the patients not receiving azathioprine. Conclusions. Up to 6 months after renal transplantation in male patients who underwent hemodialysis, there is a marked increase in fat mass, a significant loss of trabecular bone mass, and no change in cortical bone and lean mass.