Adrien Hertault

The Benefits of EVAR Planning Using a 3D Workstation

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the influence of planning endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with a three-dimensional (3D) workstation on early and midterm outcomes. METHODS All patients undergoing infrarenal EVAR performed between 2006 and 2009 at our institution were included in the current study. Prior to 2008 (group 1), endograft sizing was performed by interrogation of computed tomography angiography axial images. After 2008 (group 2), endograft sizing was routinely performed using a 3D workstation (Aquarius, Terarecon), allowing for multiplanar reconstruction and centerline analysis. Pre-, peri-, postoperative, and follow-up data were prospectively entered in an electronic database. All postoperative complications and subsequent secondary interventions depicted during the 2-year period following EVAR were compared. Secondary intervention and mortality rates were defined at 2 years and compared. Freedom from secondary intervention and overall survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method during follow-up and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 295 patients (149 patients in group 1 and 146 patients in group 2) were included. All patients had completed a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. During this 2-year period following EVAR, the type 1 endoleak rate was 8.7% in group 1 and 1.4% in group 2 (p = .004) respectively. Secondary intervention rates related to type 1 endoleak was 5.4% in group 1 and 0 in group 2 (p < .001). No difference was observed regarding all-cause mortality, aneurysm-related death, and freedom from secondary intervention rates during follow-up. CONCLUSION The routine use of 3D workstations for EVAR planning significantly reduces the rate of type 1 endoleaks and, therefore, the rate of related secondary interventions.

Evaluation of Visceral Artery Displacement by Endograft Delivery System Insertion

Purpose To assess the displacement of the aorta and its visceral branch ostia after insertion of a rigid system including a stiff guidewire and endograft delivery system during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods Between January and May 2013, 20 consecutive patients (19 men; mean age 67.2 years, range 61–83) undergoing EVAR (n=13) or fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR, n=7) were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent an intraoperative contrast-enhanced cone beam computed tomography (ceCBCT) acquisition after the insertion of the endograft delivery system. Each ceCBCT was loaded on a workstation and manually registered with the preoperative computed tomographic angiogram (CTA) in a way that optimized superposition of the spine from both images. The locations of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and of both renal artery ostia were depicted in 3D multiplanar reconstructions by 3 independent operators on the CTA and on the ceCBCT. Motion of the aortic segment at the level of the visceral arteries was estimated by the barycenter of the origin of the SMA and both renal arteries. Results The ostium displacement between the CTA and ceCBCT images was 6.7 mm (range 2.2–13.5) for the SMA; 6.2 mm (2.5–13.5) and 6.4 mm (1.9–14.5) for the right and the left renal arteries, respectively; and 5.5 mm (2.3–11.4) for the aortic segment. The displacement was mostly posterosuperior and to the left (65%). The radiation dose and contrast volume required to perform the ceCBCT were 30% and 41%, respectively, of the amounts used in the EVAR procedures. Conclusion This study demonstrates a significant displacement of the main aortic branches after rigid material insertion. Image fusion applications aimed at providing intraoperative guidance must allow an easy and rapid repositioning of the overlay during the procedure to match the deformation of the aortic anatomy during the procedure.

Benefits of Completion 3D Angiography Associated with Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound to Assess Technical Success after EVAR.

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated a new strategy to assess technical success after standard and complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), combining completion contrast enhanced cone beam computed tomography (ceCBCT) and post-operative contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS Patients treated with bifurcated or fenestrated and branched endografts in the hybrid room during the study period were included. From December 2012 to July 2013, a completion angiogram (CA) was performed at the end of the procedure, and computed tomography angiography (CTA) before discharge (group 1). From October 2013 to April 2014, a completion ceCBCT was performed, followed by CEUS during the 30 day post-operative period (group 2). The rate of peri-operative events (type I or III endoleaks, kinks, occlusion of target vessels), need for additional procedures or early secondary procedures, total radiation exposure (mSv), and total volume of contrast medium injected were compared. RESULTS Seventy-nine patients were included in group 1 and 54 in group 2. Peri-operative event rates were respectively 8.9% (n = 7) and 33.3% (n = 18) (p = .001). Additional procedures were performed in seven patients (8.9%) in group 1 versus 17 (31.5%) in group 2 (p = .001). Two early secondary procedures were performed in group 2 (3.7%), and three (3.8%) in group 1 (p = .978). Median radiation exposure due to CBCT was 7 Gy cm(2) (5.25-8) (36%, 27%, and 9% of the total procedure exposure, respectively for bifurcated, fenestrated, and branched endografts). CEUS did not diagnose endoleaks or any adverse events not diagnosed by ceCBCT. Overall radiation and volume of contrast injected during the patient hospital stay in groups 1 and 2 were 34 (25.8-47.3) and 11 (5-20.5) mSv, and 184 (150-240) and 91 (70-132.8) mL respectively (reduction of 68% and 50%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Completion ceCBCT is achievable in routine practice to assess technical success after EVAR. Strategies to evaluate technical success combining ceCBCT and CEUS can reduce total in hospital radiation exposure and contrast medium volume injection.

Endograft Repair of Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissections

OBJECTIVES This study aims to assess patient outcomes and aortic remodelling following coverage of the proximal entry tear with an endograft in complicated acute type B aortic dissections (caTBADs). MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients with caTBAD treated with a thoracic endograft in three high-volume vascular centres were retrospectively studied. Inclusion criteria were branch-vessel malperfusion, impending or overt aortic rupture, maximal aortic diameter ≥ 40 mm and persistent pain or uncontrolled hypertension despite maximum pharmacological treatment. Postoperative aortic remodelling was evaluated using computed tomography angiography (CTA) on a three-dimensional (3D) imaging workstation. RESULTS A total of 52 patients (71% male, median age 65 years) were included in the study. Median inclusion criteria per patient were 2 (range 1-4). Branch-vessel malperfusion was diagnosed in 42% and impending aortic rupture in 33% of 52 patients. Median follow-up was 25 months (range 2-109 months). The 30-day mortality rate was 9.6% (5/52); patient survival according to the Kaplan-Meier method was 90.4% at 12 months and 87.6% at 24 months. Secondary interventions were performed in seven patients a median of 3 days after the initial procedure (range 2-865). Imaging follow-up at 12 months was performed in 36 patients (69%): 75% presented stable or shrinking (> 5 mm) maximal aortic diameters and 86% had a completely thrombosed false lumen (vs. 5% before initial procedure) at thoracic level. CONCLUSION Endograft treatment of complicated caTBAD is associated with favourable early outcomes and possibly promotes aortic remodelling in the majority of patients.

Renal outcomes analysis after endovascular and open aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare renal outcomes (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] and renal volume) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS All AAA repairs performed between November 2009 and July 2011 were included in this retrospective study. Patients requiring suprarenal clamping and renal bypass or reimplantation and patients requiring fenestrated endografting were excluded from the OR and EVAR groups, respectively. All EVARs were performed with transrenal proximal fixation. Renal volume (calculated with a three-dimensional workstation) and GFR (estimated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) were evaluated before the procedure, at 12 months after the procedure, and yearly thereafter. RESULTS The study included 90 patients (41 ORs and 49 EVARs). Both groups were comparable except for age at intervention, body mass index, smoking, peripheral arterial disease, arrhythmia, and vitamin K antagonist treatment. Median follow-up was 2.8 years for OR (2.5-2.9 years) and 3.2 years for EVAR (3.0-3.4 years). In both groups, we found a significant decrease when comparing postoperative estimated GFR with 1-year (14.4% decrease [3.8%-23.8%]; P = .002) and 3-year (12.8% decrease [3.8%-20.9%]; P = .0007) levels. In both groups, total renal volumes significantly diminished. Median preoperative total renal volume (372 cm(3) [311-349]) significantly decreased (6.7% [2.8%-10.5%]; P = .008) between 1 year and 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Renal function impairment is similar after open and endovascular AAA repair. It is associated with a decrease in total renal volume, which seems to be an early and constant marker of postoperative renal impairment.

Results of F-EVAR in Octogenarians

BACKGROUND To evaluate the clinical outcomes after fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (F-EVAR) in octogenarians. METHODS Between 2002 and 2012, all data from patients treated with custom-made fenestrated endografts for elective juxtarenal or pararenal aortic aneurysms in 2 high-volume centers (Malmö, Sweden & Lille, France) were prospectively entered in a computer database. Demographics and perioperative and follow-up results of patients aged ≥80 years (group 1) and patients aged <80 (group 2) were compared. RESULTS A total of 288 patients (33 in group 1 and 255 in group 2) were treated with fenestrated endografts during the study period. Except for median age, tobacco use, and maximal transaortic diameter (P = 0.001), both groups were comparable. The number of fenestrations, procedure duration, contrast media volume, length of stay, and number of secondary interventions were comparable. The 30-day mortality rate was higher in the octogenarian group (9% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.041). Median follow-up was 25 months. Two-year survival rate according to Kaplan-Meier method was 77.8% in group 1 (95% confidence interval, 61.8-93.9) and 89.0% in group 2 (P = 0.121). Overall mortality during the follow-up period was significantly higher in octogenarians (P < 0.006). CONCLUSIONS F-EVAR in octogenarians is associated with a higher 30-day mortality rate but has similar midterm outcomes compared with younger patients and should be considered as an acceptable therapeutic option in patients with satisfactory life expectancy.

Debate: Whether branched/fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair procedures are better than snorkels, chimneys, or periscopes in the treatment of most thoracoabdominal and juxtarenal aneurysms.

Vascular surgeons are an innovative group, and during the last decade, we have seen unparalleled advances in the endovascular treatment of extensive aortic pathologies. Collaborative efforts between surgeons and industry have introduced fenestrated and branched devices that are becoming more widely used, with wider regulatory approval, availability, and less need for customization. Prior to this, parallel stent approaches had been developed to fill the void where this technology was not available or for urgent cases. A separate and distinct body of evidence and expertise subsequently developed for both strategies. This debate explores where these approaches now sit in the armamentarium of vascular surgeons.

Centerline is Not as Accurate as Outer Curvature Length to Estimate Thoracic Endograft Length

BACKGROUND To assess the accuracy of the aortic outer curvature length for thoracic endograft planning. METHODS Seventy-four patients (58 men, 66.4 ± 14 years) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair between 2009 and 2011 treated with a Cook Medical endograft were enrolled in this retrospective study. Immediate postoperative CT scans were analysed using EndoSize software. Three vessel lengths were computed between two fixed landmarks placed at each end of the endograft: the straightline (axial) length, the centerline length and the outer curvature length. A tortuosity index was defined as the ratio of the centerline length/straightline length. A Student t test and a Pearson correlation coefficient were used to examine the results. RESULTS We found a significant difference between the centerline length (135.4 ± 24 mm) and that of the endograft (160 ± 29 mm) (p < .0001). This difference correlates with the tortuosity index (r = .818, p < .0001), the endograft length (r = .587, p < .0001), and the diameter of the endograft (r = .53, p < .0001). However, the outer curvature length (161.3 ± 29 mm) and the endograft length (160 ± 29 mm) were similar (p = .792). CONCLUSION The outer curvature length more accurately reflects that of the deployed endograft and may prove more accurate than centerlines in planning thoracic endografts.

Total Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Arch Disease Using an Arch Endograft With 3 Inner Branches

Purpose: To report early experience with a new endovascular graft developed for aortic arch aneurysm repair in patients unfit for open surgery. Case Report: Three consecutive men (62, 74, and 69 years old) at high risk for open repair were treated for postdissection aortic arch aneurysms using a custom-made 3 inner branched endovascular graft. The 2 proximal branches are antegrade and perfuse the innominate artery and the left common carotid artery; the third branch is retrograde and perfuses the left subclavian artery. The latter is preloaded with a catheter and wire to aid cannulation. Technical success was achieved in each case. The mean procedure time, fluoroscopy duration, and contrast volume were 180 minutes, 35 minutes, and 145 mL, respectively. The perioperative period was uneventful. All branches were patent on 6-month computed tomography and duplex ultrasound imaging. Conclusion: This new patient-specific device allows total endovascular revascularization of the supra-aortic trunks during arch repair. These encouraging results support its more widespread use.

An Optimal Combination for EVAR: Low Profile Endograft Body and Continuous Spiral Stent Limbs

AIM to evaluate the outcomes of EVAR performed with a new generation of bifurcated endografts and limbs. METHODS prospectively collected data from fifty consecutive patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) treated at our institution with a Low Profile Zenith(®) bifurcated body/Zenith(®) Spiral-Z legs combo were analysed. AngioCT scans and Ultrasound exams were performed prior to discharge. Ultrasound examination was repeated 6 months after the procedure to assess endograft patency and to depict endoleaks RESULTS Median age was 70.6 years [50-88] and median ASA score was 3 [2-4]. Median aortic diameter was 56 mm [49-81]. Of the 100 external iliac access vessels, 14 had a diameter of 6 mm or lower. All endografts were successfully implanted. Post-operative Ultrasound examination and angioCT scan depicted both 1 type Ia, and 10 and 19 type 2 endoleaks respectively. An asymptomatic thrombosis of the left external iliac artery distal to the endograft limb was also depicted. 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Two patients died respectively three and four months after EVAR. Both deaths were not aneurysm related. All patients underwent an ultrasound exam 6-12 months after EVAR. All endografts main bodies and limbs were patent. Five endoleaks were depicted, all were type II endoleaks (the early type Ia endoleak had sealed spontaneously; it was confirmed by an angioCT scan). One patient presented a significant stenosis of the left iliac limb at the level of a narrow and calcified aortic bifurcation. It was successfully treated by bilateral iliac angioplasty and kissing balloon stenting. CONCLUSIONS EVAR performed with the Zenith LP main body in combination with Spiral-Z Iliac Legs is safe and effective. No limb occlusions were diagnosed at the 6 month follow up even in challenging iliac anatomies usually considered as contra indications for EVAR. Our first results are most satisfying and calling to be completed by a longer follow up.