África Holguín

Geographic and Temporal Trends in the Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Mechanisms of Transmitted HIV-1 Drug Resistance: An Individual-Patient- and Sequence-Level Meta-Analysis

Background Regional and subtype-specific mutational patterns of HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance (TDR) are essential for informing first-line antiretroviral (ARV) therapy guidelines and designing diagnostic assays for use in regions where standard genotypic resistance testing is not affordable. We sought to understand the molecular epidemiology of TDR and to identify the HIV-1 drug-resistance mutations responsible for TDR in different regions and virus subtypes. Methods and Findings We reviewed all GenBank submissions of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase sequences with or without protease and identified 287 studies published between March 1, 2000, and December 31, 2013, with more than 25 recently or chronically infected ARV-naïve individuals. These studies comprised 50,870 individuals from 111 countries. Each set of study sequences was analyzed for phylogenetic clustering and the presence of 93 surveillance drug-resistance mutations (SDRMs). The median overall TDR prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), south/southeast Asia (SSEA), upper-income Asian countries, Latin America/Caribbean, Europe, and North America was 2.8%, 2.9%, 5.6%, 7.6%, 9.4%, and 11.5%, respectively. In SSA, there was a yearly 1.09-fold (95% CI: 1.05–1.14) increase in odds of TDR since national ARV scale-up attributable to an increase in non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance. The odds of NNRTI-associated TDR also increased in Latin America/Caribbean (odds ratio [OR] = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.06–1.25), North America (OR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.12–1.26), Europe (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01–1.13), and upper-income Asian countries (OR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.12–1.55). In SSEA, there was no significant change in the odds of TDR since national ARV scale-up (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.92–1.02). An analysis limited to sequences with mixtures at less than 0.5% of their nucleotide positions—a proxy for recent infection—yielded trends comparable to those obtained using the complete dataset. Four NNRTI SDRMs—K101E, K103N, Y181C, and G190A—accounted for >80% of NNRTI-associated TDR in all regions and subtypes. Sixteen nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) SDRMs accounted for >69% of NRTI-associated TDR in all regions and subtypes. In SSA and SSEA, 89% of NNRTI SDRMs were associated with high-level resistance to nevirapine or efavirenz, whereas only 27% of NRTI SDRMs were associated with high-level resistance to zidovudine, lamivudine, tenofovir, or abacavir. Of 763 viruses with TDR in SSA and SSEA, 725 (95%) were genetically dissimilar; 38 (5%) formed 19 sequence pairs. Inherent limitations of this study are that some cohorts may not represent the broader regional population and that studies were heterogeneous with respect to duration of infection prior to sampling. Conclusions Most TDR strains in SSA and SSEA arose independently, suggesting that ARV regimens with a high genetic barrier to resistance combined with improved patient adherence may mitigate TDR increases by reducing the generation of new ARV-resistant strains. A small number of NNRTI-resistance mutations were responsible for most cases of high-level resistance, suggesting that inexpensive point-mutation assays to detect these mutations may be useful for pre-therapy screening in regions with high levels of TDR. In the context of a public health approach to ARV therapy, a reliable point-of-care genotypic resistance test could identify which patients should receive standard first-line therapy and which should receive a protease-inhibitor-containing regimen.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV‐2) in Portugal: Clinical spectrum, circulating subtypes, virus isolation, and plasma viral load

The human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV‐2) is responsible for 4.5% of AIDS cases in Portugal. Six HIV‐2 subtypes have been described so far, subtype A being proposed as more pathogenic than the rest. The relationship between the clinical status and levels of both cellular and plasma HIV‐2 viraemia is not well known, nor their modifications under antiretroviral therapy. Thirty‐two consecutive HIV‐2 infected persons (17 men, 15 women) attending two different hospitals in Lisbon in 1997 were enrolled prospectively in the study. All but 4 individuals most likely acquired the infection through heterosexual contact. More than half of the study population was of African origin, mainly from Guinea‐Bissau. Eleven (34.4%) patients had developed clinical manifestations included within the B or C groups of the CDC classification system for HIV infection, with the rest being asymptomatic. Half of the population was undergoing antiretroviral treatment at the time of the study. HIV‐2 subtypes were investigated using a new Nef‐based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method that allows differentiation of the main two variants, A and B. Plasma viral load was quantified using a new quantitative competitive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (QcRT‐PCR) procedure as well as the Amp‐RT assay. Virus isolation was attempted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. All but one person carried HIV‐2 subtype A. Plasma viraemia examined by QcRT‐PCR was measurable in 15 (50%) of 30 subjects, yielding in all instances values below 20,000 HIV‐2 RNA copies per ml. Plasma RT activity could be detected in only 10 (33%) of 30 subjects, a rate much lower than that seen in HIV‐1 infection. Virus was isolated from 16 (53.3%) of 30 patients. A significant correlation was found between CD4+ counts, clinical status, rate of virus isolation, and plasma viral load by both QcRT‐PCR and Amp‐RT. In conclusion, HIV‐2 subtype A is the predominant variant circulating in Portugal among both natives and immigrants. A lower cellular and plasma viral load with respect to HIV‐1 was seen in persons without immunosuppression, from whom the rate of virus recovery was extremely low. J. Med. Virol. 61:111–116, 2000.

Discordances between Interpretation Algorithms for Genotypic Resistance to Protease and Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Are Subtype Dependent

ABSTRACT The major limitation of drug resistance genotyping for human immunodeficiency virus remains the interpretation of the results. We evaluated the concordance in predicting therapy response between four different interpretation algorithms (Rega 6.3, HIVDB-08/04, ANRS [07/04], and VGI 8.0). Sequences were gathered through a worldwide effort to establish a database of non-B subtype sequences, and demographic and clinical information about the patients was gathered. The most concordant results were found for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (93%), followed by protease inhibitors (84%) and nucleoside RT inhibitor (NRTIs) (76%). For therapy-naive patients, for nelfinavir, especially for subtypes C and G, the discordances were driven mainly by the protease (PRO) mutational pattern 82I/V + 63P + 36I/V for subtype C and 82I + 63P + 36I + 20I for subtype G. Subtype F displayed more discordances for ritonavir in untreated patients due to the combined presence of PRO 20R and 10I/V. In therapy-experienced patients, subtype G displayed a lot of discordances for saquinavir and indinavir due to mutational patterns involving PRO 90 M and 82I. Subtype F had more discordance for nelfinavir attributable to the presence of PRO 88S and 82A + 54V. For the NRTIs lamivudine and emtricitabine, CRF01_AE had more discordances than subtype B due to the presence of RT mutational patterns 65R + 115 M and 118I + 215Y, respectively. Overall, the different algorithms agreed well on the level of resistance scored, but some of the discordances could be attributed to specific (subtype-dependent) combinations of mutations. It is not yet known whether therapy response is subtype dependent, but the advice given to clinicians based on a genotypic interpretation algorithm differs according to the subtype.

High prevalence of HIV-1 subtype G and natural polymorphisms at the protease gene among HIV-infected immigrants in Madrid.

Objectives Genetic characterization of HIV-1 subtypes among immigrants and natives infected overseas. Methods Phylogenetic analysis of HIV-1 protease sequences obtained from 109 foreigners (mainly Africans) and 32 native individuals infected overseas attending a reference HIV/AIDS centre located in Madrid, Spain. Results The overall rate of infection with HIV-1 non-B subtypes was 50.3% (71/141). Whereas 94.3% (67/71) belonged to immigrants (mostly Africans, 60/67), only 5.6% (4/71) were from native individuals (P < 0.05). The distribution of non-B subtypes was: 49 G, eight C, six A, four D, two F and two H. The high prevalence of subtype G was mainly related to individuals from west-central Africa. Interestingly, substitutions at three or more positions associated with protease inhibitor (PI) resistance were recognized in 52.6% of naive subjects carrying non-B subtypes, but only in 8% of those infected with B viruses (P < 0.05). The genotypes most frequently recognized among non-B and B subtypes occurred, respectively, at positions 36 (100 versus 12%), 20 (77.2 versus 0%), 63 (40.3 versus 64%), 82 (17.5 versus 0%), 10 (14 versus 12%), 77 (3.5 versus 34%), and 71 (0 versus 2%). Accordingly, changes I-36 and I-20 may be considered specific genetic markers for non-B, group M variants and subtype G infections, respectively. Conclusion Nearly two-thirds of foreigners with HIV-1 infection in Madrid carry non-B subtypes, subtype G (protease) being the most common among west-central African immigrants. The high rate of natural polymorphisms at the protease gene in non-B viruses may compromise the response to PI. Therefore, HIV subtyping should be considered in treatment guidelines.

Increase of Non-B Subtypes and Recombinants Among Newly Diagnosed HIV-1 Native Spaniards and Immigrants in Spain

Although HIV-1 clade B variants are predominant in Western Europe, non-B subtypes are rapidly spreading, mainly due to immigration from endemic regions. All newly diagnosed HIV-1-infected individuals at a HIV/AIDS clinic in Madrid from 2000 to 2007 were identified. Subtype assignment was based on phylogenetic analysis of pol sequences from plasma specimens collected at first visit. A total of 1,430 newly diagnosed HIV-1 individuals were identified: 902 Spaniards, 232 South Americans, and 162 Africans, among others. The proportion of South-Americans and Africans among diagnosed HIV-1 patients increased from 2000 to 2007 (from 17% to 22% and from 4% to 21%, respectively). Half of diagnosis of HIV-1 in 2007 was in foreigners whereas in previous years Spaniards were predominant. Non-B variants were found in 157 (24%) of the 649 subjects who could be subtyped: 11A, 6C, 2D, 1F2, 13G, 4H, 1J, 3CRF01_AE, 64CRF02_AG, 2CRF03_AB, 3CRF06_cpx, 3CRF10_CD, 7CRF11_cpx, 9CRF12_BF, 9CRF14_BG, 1CRF18_cpx, 1CRF19_cpx, 2CRF31_BC, 10 URF and 5 outgroups. They represented 93%, 14% and 4% of newly-diagnosed HIV-1 Africans, South-Americans and native Spaniards, respectively. Non-B subtypes increased from 9% in 2000 to 32% in 2007, specially among South-Americans (from 11% to 20%) and native Spaniards (from 4% to 10%). Most (75%) were recombinant viruses. The highest number and diversity of HIV-1 variants among natives was observed in 2007. HIV-1 non-B subtypes are increasingly present among newly diagnosed HIV-1 individuals in Madrid, representing a third of cases in 2007, whereas 10% of newly diagnosed HIV-1 native Spaniards had non-B viruses.

Comparison of Three Different Commercial Methods for Measuring Plasma Viraemia in Patients Infected with Non-B HIV-1 Subtypes

Abstract In order to determine whether commercial assays presently in use for the quantification of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels detect different genetic viral subtypes with the same reliability, a panel of 38 samples corresponding to 22 HIV-1-infected patients, representing non-B subtypes A–F, was examined. One to three plasma samples belonging to each individual were tested by the second-generation HIV-1 branched DNA (bDNA) assay (Chiron, Spain), the Nuclisens assay (Organon-Teknika, Spain), the Amplicor Monitor reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay (Roche, Spain), and the Ultradirect Monitor (Roche) using primers specifically designed to amplify non-B HIV-1 subtypes. Each of the different methods for measuring viral load showed a distinct sensitivity for non-B HIV-1 subtypes. Values higher than the assay detection limit were obtained in 22 (57.9%), 33 (86.8%), and 37 (93.3%) samples using the bDNA, Nuclisens, and Monitor assays, respectively. Significantly different values (>0.5 logs) were found in 55.3%, 81.6%, and 71.1% of specimens comparing results provided by bDNA and Nuclisens, bDNA and Monitor, and Nuclisens and Monitor, respectively. Quantitative values provided by the Ultradirect Monitor test using non-B primers were particularly discordant with the other tests. Overall, 44.7% of samples yielded higher viral load values with this assay than with the regular Monitor assay, reflecting its enhanced sensitivity for non-B subtypes; however, the reproducibility of this test was low. These results support the recommendation of always using the same assay when monitoring plasma viraemia.

Performance of Three Commercial Viral Load Assays, Versant Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) RNA bDNA v3.0, Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2, Testing HIV-1 Non-B Subtypes and Recombinant Variants

ABSTRACT Monitoring antiretroviral therapy requires that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viremia assays are applicable to all distinct variants. This study evaluates the performance of three commercial viral load assays—Versant HIV-1 RNA bDNA v3.0, Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2—in testing 83 plasma specimens from patients carrying HIV-1 non-B subtypes and recombinants previously defined by phylogenetic analysis of the pol gene. All 28 specimens from patients under treatment presented viremia values below the detection limit with the three methods. In the remaining 55 specimens from naive individuals viremia could not be detected in 32.7, 20, and 14.6% using the NucliSens, Versant, or TaqMan tests, respectively, suggesting potential viral load underestimation of some samples by all techniques. Only 32 (58.2%) samples from naive subjects were quantified by the three methods; the NucliSens test provided the highest HIV RNA values (mean, 4.87 log copies/ml), and the Versant test provided the lowest (mean, 4.16 log copies/ml). Viremia differences of greater than 1 log were seen in 8 (14.5%) of 55 specimens, occurring in 10.9, 7.3, and 5.4%, respectively, of the specimens in comparisons of Versant versus NucliSens, Versant versus TaqMan, and TaqMan versus NucliSens. Differences greater than 0.5 log, considered significant for clinicians, occurred in 45.5, 27.3, and 29% when the same assays were compared. Some HIV-1 strains, such as subtype G and CRF02_AG, showed more discrepancies in distinct quantification methods than others. In summary, an adequate design of primers and probes is needed for optimal quantitation of plasma HIV-RNA in non-B subtypes. Our data emphasize the need to use the same method for monitoring patients on therapy and also the convenience of HIV-1 subtyping.

HIV-1 subtypes in Spain: a retrospective analysis from 1995 to 2003.

To perform a retrospective analysis of all HIV‐1 non‐B variants circulating in Spain from 1995 to 2003 and extend their virological characterization.

Prevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Non-B Subtypes in Foreigners Living in Madrid, Spain, and Comparison of the Performances of the AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Version 1.0 and the New Automated Version 1.5

ABSTRACT Plasma specimens collected in 1999 from 32 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected foreigners living in Madrid, Spain, were examined for the presence of non-B subtypes. Furthermore, plasma viremia was quantified using two different AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR tests, version 1.0 and the new upgraded and automated version 1.5 (COBAS). Most patients came from Africa, where they most likely had acquired HIV-1 infection through sexual contact. HIV-1 genetic subtyping was based on the phylogenetic analysis of theprotease gene. Twenty-two subtype B, six subtype G, two subtype C, one subtype A, and one D subtype infection were found. Overall, non-B subtypes represented 31.25% of the study population. Irrespective of the HIV-1 variant, viral load values above the detection limit (200 HIV RNA copies/ml) increased from 56.2 to 71.9% for results obtained using MONITOR version 1.0 and COBAS, respectively. Moreover, significant differences in viral load values (>0.5 logs) were recognized in up to 37.5% of samples. In summary, COBAS seemed to be more reliable for testing plasma viral load in HIV-infected immigrants living in Spain, one third of whom carried non-B subtypes.

Protease Gene Analysis of HIV Type 1 Non-B Subtypes in Spain

The protease gene of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) clinical isolates found in 15 immigrants (most of African origin) living in Spain was examined. Phylogenetic analyses were performed, taking as reference a panel of 26 HIV protease gene sequences deposited with GenBank. All specimens belonged to four distinct HIV-1 non-B subtypes: C (three cases), F (one), G (nine), and H (two). Five patients harboring subtype G strains were further classified within the IbNg recombinant clade. A high degree of genetic polymorphism at the protease gene was seen in all subtypes. Moreover, changes at positions associated with drug resistance were seen in subtype G viruses carried by patients who had not been exposed to protease inhibitors. Plasma viremia was lower than expected for some samples, according to the clinical features and the CD4+ cell count, suggesting that viral load titers were underestimated by all three commercially available techniques. This work represents the first genetic characterization of subtypes C, F, G, and H in Spain.