Afshin Gharib
Dominican University of California
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Afshin Gharib.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes | 2004
Afshin Gharib; Christopher Gade; Seth Roberts
Two bar-press experiments with rats tested the rule that reducing expectation of reward increases the variation from which reward selects. Experiment 1 used a discrete-trial random-interval schedule, with trials signaled by light or sound. One signal always ended with reward; the other signal ended with reward less often. The 2 signals were randomly mixed. Bar-press duration (how long the bar was held down) varied more during the signal with the lower probability of reward. Experiment 2 closely resembled Experiment 1 but used a random-ratio schedule rather than a random-interval schedule. Again, bar-press duration varied more during the signal with the lower probability of reward. The results support the rule--the first well-controlled comparisons to do so.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Stuart Smith; Andrzej Witkowski; Ayesha Moghul; Yuko Yoshinaga; Michael Nefedov; Pieter J. de Jong; Dejiang Feng; Loren Fong; Yiping Tu; Yan Hu; Stephen G. Young; Thomas Pham; Carling Cheung; Shana M. Katzman; Martin D. Brand; Casey L. Quinlan; Marcel Fens; Frans A. Kuypers; Stephanie Misquitta; Stephen M. Griffey; Son Tran; Afshin Gharib; Jens Knudsen; Hans Kristian Hannibal-Bach; Grace Y. Wang; Sandra Larkin; Jennifer Thweatt; Saloni Pasta
A mouse model with compromised mitochondrial fatty acid synthesis has been engineered in order to assess the role of this pathway in mitochondrial function and overall health. Reduction in the expression of mitochondrial malonyl CoA-acyl carrier protein transacylase, a key enzyme in the pathway encoded by the nuclear Mcat gene, was achieved to varying extents in all examined tissues employing tamoxifen-inducible Cre-lox technology. Although affected mice consumed more food than control animals, they failed to gain weight, were less physically active, suffered from loss of white adipose tissue, reduced muscle strength, kyphosis, alopecia, hypothermia and shortened lifespan. The Mcat-deficient phenotype is attributed primarily to reduced synthesis, in several tissues, of the octanoyl precursors required for the posttranslational lipoylation of pyruvate and α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complexes, resulting in diminished capacity of the citric acid cycle and disruption of energy metabolism. The presence of an alternative lipoylation pathway that utilizes exogenous free lipoate appears restricted to liver and alone is insufficient for preservation of normal energy metabolism. Thus, de novo synthesis of precursors for the protein lipoylation pathway plays a vital role in maintenance of mitochondrial function and overall vigor.
Behavioural Processes | 2006
Seth Roberts; Afshin Gharib
Instrumental learning involves both variation and selection: variation of what the animal does, and selection by reward from among the variation. Four experiments with rats suggested a rule about how variation is controlled by recent events. Experiment 1 used the peak procedure. Measurements of bar-press durations showed a sharp increase in mean duration after the time that food was sometimes given. The increase was triggered by the omission of expected food. Our first explanation of the increase was that it was a frustration effect. Experiment 2 tested this explanation with a procedure in which the first response of a trial usually produced food, ending the trial. In Experiment 2, unlike Experiment 1, omission of expected food did not produce a large increase in bar-press duration, which cast doubt on the frustration explanation. Experiments 3 and 4 tested an alternative explanation: a decrease in expectation of reward increases variation. Both used two signals associated with different probabilities of reward. Bar presses were more variable in duration during the signal with the lower probability of reward, supporting this alternative. These experiments show how variation can be studied with ordinary equipment and responses.
Journal of Psychology Research | 2012
Afshin Gharib; William Phillips; Noelle Mathew
The differences between open-book, cheat sheet, and closed-book exams were examined in two different types of psychology courses. A total of 297 students enrolled in eight sections of Introductory Psychology and 99 students enrolled in four sections of Statistics participated in this study. Exam types were counterbalanced across sections of the same course. Students were given either open-book, cheat sheet, or closed-book exams, took a surprise quiz two weeks after the exams to measure retention of course material, completed a preference questionnaire, and took a pre-test measure of test anxiety on open-book and cheat sheet tests. While students did slightly better on open-book exam than on closed-book exams, they also much preferred open-book and cheat sheet exams over closed-book exams, and had lower levels of anxiety when taking open-book exams compared to cheat sheet exams. Based on these results, open-book exams may be a superior style of examination for a variety of psychology courses.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes | 2001
Afshin Gharib; Steven Derby; Seth Roberts
Psychology, Learning and Teaching | 2012
Afshin Gharib; William Phillips
Psychology International | 2009
LeeAnn Bartolini; Afshin Gharib; William Phillips
International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning | 2013
Afshin Gharib; William Phillips
Archive | 2013
William Phillips; Afshin Gharib; Matt Davis
Archive | 2010
William Phillips; Afshin Gharib; LeeAnn Bartolini; Gail Matthews; Matt Davis