Agnès Chompret

Toll-like receptor 4-dependent contribution of the immune system to anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy

Conventional cancer treatments rely on radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Such treatments supposedly mediate their effects via the direct elimination of tumor cells. Here we show that the success of some protocols for anticancer therapy depends on innate and adaptive antitumor immune responses. We describe in both mice and humans a previously unrecognized pathway for the activation of tumor antigen–specific T-cell immunity that involves secretion of the high-mobility-group box 1 (HMGB1) alarmin protein by dying tumor cells and the action of HMGB1 on Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expressed by dendritic cells (DCs). During chemotherapy or radiotherapy, DCs require signaling through TLR4 and its adaptor MyD88 for efficient processing and cross-presentation of antigen from dying tumor cells. Patients with breast cancer who carry a TLR4 loss-of-function allele relapse more quickly after radiotherapy and chemotherapy than those carrying the normal TLR4 allele. These results delineate a clinically relevant immunoadjuvant pathway triggered by tumor cell death.

Clinical and molecular genetics of patients with the Carney-Stratakis syndrome and germline mutations of the genes coding for the succinate dehydrogenase subunits SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) may be caused by germline mutations of the KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRA) genes and treated by Imatinib mesylate (STI571) or other protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, not all GISTs harbor these genetic defects and several do not respond to STI571 suggesting that other molecular mechanisms may be implicated in GIST pathogenesis. In a subset of patients with GISTs, the lesions are associated with paragangliomas; the condition is familial and transmitted as an autosomal-dominant trait. We investigated 11 patients with the dyad of ‘paraganglioma and gastric stromal sarcoma’; in eight (from seven unrelated families), the GISTs were caused by germline mutations of the genes encoding subunits B, C, or D (the SDHB, SDHC and SDHD genes, respectively). In this report, we present the molecular effects of these mutations on these genes and the clinical information on the patients. We conclude that succinate dehydrogenase deficiency may be the cause of a subgroup of GISTs and this offers a therapeutic target for GISTs that may not respond to STI571 and its analogs.

Features associated with germline CDKN2A mutations: a GenoMEL study of melanoma-prone families from three continents

Background: The major factors individually reported to be associated with an increased frequency of CDKN2A mutations are increased number of patients with melanoma in a family, early age at melanoma diagnosis, and family members with multiple primary melanomas (MPM) or pancreatic cancer. Methods: These four features were examined in 385 families with ⩾3 patients with melanoma pooled by 17 GenoMEL groups, and these attributes were compared across continents. Results: Overall, 39% of families had CDKN2A mutations ranging from 20% (32/162) in Australia to 45% (29/65) in North America to 57% (89/157) in Europe. All four features in each group, except pancreatic cancer in Australia (p = 0.38), individually showed significant associations with CDKN2A mutations, but the effects varied widely across continents. Multivariate examination also showed different predictors of mutation risk across continents. In Australian families, ⩾2 patients with MPM, median age at melanoma diagnosis ⩽40 years and ⩾6 patients with melanoma in a family jointly predicted the mutation risk. In European families, all four factors concurrently predicted the risk, but with less stringent criteria than in Australia. In North American families, only ⩾1 patient with MPM and age at diagnosis ⩽40 years simultaneously predicted the mutation risk. Conclusions: The variation in CDKN2A mutations for the four features across continents is consistent with the lower melanoma incidence rates in Europe and higher rates of sporadic melanoma in Australia. The lack of a pancreatic cancer–CDKN2A mutation relationship in Australia probably reflects the divergent spectrum of mutations in families from Australia versus those from North America and Europe. GenoMEL is exploring candidate host, genetic and/or environmental risk factors to better understand the variation observed.

Common Breast Cancer-Predisposition Alleles Are Associated with Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer high risks of breast cancer. However, evidence suggests that these risks are modified by other genetic or environmental factors that cluster in families. A recent genome-wide association study has shown that common alleles at single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FGFR2 (rs2981582), TNRC9 (rs3803662), and MAP3K1 (rs889312) are associated with increased breast cancer risks in the general population. To investigate whether these loci are also associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in a sample of 10,358 mutation carriers from 23 studies. The minor alleles of SNP rs2981582 and rs889312 were each associated with increased breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.20-1.45, p(trend) = 1.7 x 10(-8) and HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24, p(trend) = 0.02) but not in BRCA1 carriers. rs3803662 was associated with increased breast cancer risk in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, p(trend) = 5 x 10(-5) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 combined). These loci appear to interact multiplicatively on breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers. The differences in the effects of the FGFR2 and MAP3K1 SNPs between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers point to differences in the biology of BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer tumors and confirm the distinct nature of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Sensitivity and predictive value of criteria for p53 germline mutation screening.

Editor—The history of Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a good illustration of the delineation of dominantly inherited family cancer syndromes. The identification of this syndrome is the result of the combination of two kinds of evidence, firstly, a number of reports on particular familial aggregations1 ,2 and, secondly, systematic family studies of childhood sarcomas.3-6 Among these studies, the decisive contribution came from Li and Fraumeni3 who were the first to publish the results of a family study on 641 children with rhabdomyosarcoma which led to the identification of four families in which a sib or a cousin was affected by rhabdomyosarcoma or another soft tissue sarcoma (STS). These families also had several members who were affected by diverse types of malignant tumours, in particular sarcomas and breast cancer at a very young age. This prompted the authors to propose the existence of a new familial syndrome.7 A prospective study on these families over 12 years provided evidence of a strong predisposition to cancer with a strikingly high frequency of multiple tumours.8 The term “Li-Fraumeni syndrome” was used for the first time in 19829 and the criteria, which subsequently became the classical definition of the syndrome, were proposed by Li and Fraumeni in 1988.10 These were a proband with a sarcoma before 45 years of age, a first degree relative with cancer before this age, and another close (first or second degree) relative in the lineage with either cancer before this age or a sarcoma at any age. These criteria led to the selection of 24 families which exhibited a wide variety of tumours including bone sarcomas, STS, breast cancer, brain tumours, leukaemia, adrenocortical carcinoma, lymphoma, lung, stomach, pancreas, and prostate cancer, but only the first six types were significantly in excess …

Impact of the MDM2 SNP309 and p53 Arg72Pro polymorphism on age of tumour onset in Li-Fraumeni syndrome

Li-Fraumeni syndrome, resulting from p53 (TP53) germline mutations, represents one of the most devastating genetic predispositions to cancer. Recently, the MDM2 SNP309 (T→G variation) was shown to be associated with accelerated tumour formation in p53 mutation carriers. The impact of the common p53 codon 72 polymorphism on cancer risk remains controversial. We therefore investigated the effect of these two polymorphisms in 61 French carriers of the p53 germline mutation. The mean age of tumour onset in MDMD2 SNP309 G allele carriers (19.6 years) was significantly different from that observed in patients homozygous for the T allele (29.9 years, p<0.05). For the p53 codon 72 polymorphism, the mean age of tumour onset in Arg allele carriers (21.8 years) was also different from that of Pro/Pro patients (34.4 years, p<0.05). We observed a cumulative effect of both polymorphisms because the mean ages of tumour onset in carriers of the MDM2G and p53Arg alleles (16.9 years) and those with the MDM2T/T and p53Pro/Pro genotypes (43 years) were clearly different (p<0.02). Therefore, our results confirm the impact of the MDM2 SNP309 G allele on the age of tumour onset in germline p53 mutation carriers, and suggest that this effect may be amplified by the p53 72Arg allele. Polymorphisms affecting p53 degradation therefore represent one of the rare examples of modifier genetic factors identified to date in mendelian predispositions to cancer.

Radiation and genetic factors in the risk of second malignant neoplasms after a first cancer in childhood

BACKGROUND Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are associated with an increased risk of second malignant neoplasm (SMN). An association between SMN and familial aggregation has also been shown. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of familial factors in the risk of SMN and their potential interaction with the effect of treatment. METHODS We devised a case-control study of 25 children with SMN (cases) and 96 children with no SMN after a cancer treatment (controls), taken from a cohort of 649 children treated at our institution between 1953 and 1985. A complete family history was obtained for patients and controls and a familial index defined to evaluate the degree of familial aggregation. The radiation dose given at 151 sites in the body was estimated for each radiotherapy course for each child. FINDINGS Among family members of the 25 SMN cases, there were ten with early-onset (< or = 45 years) cancer, compared with eight among relatives of the 96 controls. Compared with patients who had no family history of early-onset cancer, those with one or more affected family members had an odds ratio for SMN of 4.7 (95% CI 1.3-17.1; p = 0.02). Adjustment for local radiation dose and exclusion of patients known to be predisposed to SMN (carriers of p53 mutation and those with Recklinghausens disease) did not affect this risk substantially. INTERPRETATION Both genetic factors and exposure to ionising radiation have independent effects on the risk of SMN. Follow-up of children treated for cancer should be especially vigilant when there is a family history of early-onset cancer.

The Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) has been the most common terminology used for the syndrome. It is a rare familial dominantly inherited cancer syndrome characterized by a wide spectrum of neoplasms occurring in children and young adults. The canonical definition of LFS includes a proband diagnosed with sarcoma before 45 years of age, a first-degree relative with cancer before this same age and another first- or second-degree relative in the lineage with any cancer before this age or sarcoma at any age. Multiple studies have reported p53 germline mutations in LFS families in various parts of the world. As in sporadic tumors, loss of heterozygosity leading to the inactivation of the wild-type allele by deletion or mutation is observed in LFS tumors. Cancer-risk in mutation carriers has been estimated to be 73% in males and nearly 100% in females, the difference almost entirely explained by breast cancer. The identification of germline p53 mutations in rare cancer-prone families has given rise to the medical, counseling, psychological and ethical problems.

Significant Contribution of Germline BRCA2 Rearrangements in Male Breast Cancer Families

Although screening for large deletions or duplications of the BRCA1 gene is becoming a routine component of the molecular diagnosis of familial breast cancer, little is known about the occurrence of such rearrangements in the BRCA2 gene. Because of the high frequency of BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer families with at least one case of male breast cancer, we selected a cohort of 39 such families, tested negative for mutations in the coding regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2, and developed an assay for BRCA2 rearrangements, based on quantitative multiplex PCR of short fluorescent fragments (QMPSF). We found three rearrangements: (1) a deletion of exons 12 and 13; (2) a duplication of exons 1 and 2; and (3) a complete deletion of BRCA2. We determined the boundaries of the deletion of exons 12 and 13, showing that it resulted from an unequal recombination between Alu sequences. We mapped the complete BRCA2 deletion, which extends over at least 298 kb and showed that it does not affect APRIN/AS3, previously characterized as a tumor suppressor gene, but it comprises several loci corresponding to proven or putative transcripts of unknown functional significance. These data suggest that screening for BRCA2 rearrangements should be done, especially in male breast cancer families tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

A Single Genetic Origin for the G101W CDKN2A Mutation in 20 Melanoma-Prone Families

Germline mutations within the coding region of CDKN2A have been observed in affected members of melanoma-prone families. G101W is the most common CDKN2A missense mutation identified to date. It has been reported in several families from around the world, with a particularly high occurrence in France and Italy. Given the frequency of this mutation, we were interested in determining whether the mutation resulted from a single origin or represented a mutational hotspot in the CDKN2A gene. In addition, given the geographical distribution of the mutation, we examined the date of origination of the mutation and its migratory spread. We examined 10 families from Italy, 4 families from the United States, and 6 families from France with the G101W mutation. The following eight markers were employed for the haplotype analysis: IFNA, D9S736, D9S1749, D9S942, D9S1748, D9S1604, D9S171, and D9S126. Our findings showed no significant evidence for mutational heterogeneity, suggesting that all studied families derived from a single ancestral haplotype on which the mutation arose. Using maximum-likelihood methods, we estimated the mutation to have arisen 97 generations ago (1-LOD-unit support interval 70-133 generations) providing some explanation for the wide geographical spread of this common mutation, particularly in southwestern Europe. The presence of a founder mutation in a defined geographic area can facilitate carrier detection and genetic counseling and can provide an opportunity to study disease penetrance and the effect of environmental factors on the background of a common genetic susceptibility.