Agnes Schonbrunn

Classification and nomenclature of somatostatin receptors

There is considerable controversy about the classification and nomenclature of somatostatin receptors. To date, five distinct receptor genes have been cloned and named chronologically according to their respective publication dates, but two were unfortunately given the same appellation (SSTR4). Consensually, a nomenclature for the recombinant receptors has been agreed according to IUPHAR guidelines (sst1, sst2, sst3, sst4, and sst5). However, a more informative classification is to be preferred for the future, employing all classification criteria in an integrated scheme. It is already apparent that the five recombinant receptors fall into two classes or groups, on the basis of not only structure but also pharmacological characteristics. One class (already referred to by some as SRIF1) appears to comprise sst2, sst3 and sst5 receptor subtypes. The other class (SRIF2) appears to comprise the other two recombinant receptor subtypes (sst1 and sst4). This promising approach is discussed but it is acknowledged that much more data from endogenous receptors in whole tissues are needed before further recommendations on somatostatin receptor nomenclature can be made.

Immunohistochemical Localization of Somatostatin Receptors sst2A in Human Tumors

Human tumors frequently express somatostatin receptors. However, none of the receptor subtype proteins have been individually visualized in normal or neoplastic human tissues. Here, the distribution of the sst2A receptor was investigated using immunohistochemistry with the specific anti-peptide antibody R2-88 in 47 human tumors. All tumors selected for their abundance of sst2 mRNA and/or strong binding of the sst2-preferring ligand 125I-labeled Tyr3-octreotide were specifically immunostained with R2-88. Conversely, all tumors without somatostatin binding or expressing predominantly other somatostatin receptor subtype mRNAs (sst1 or sst3) were not specifically immunostained by R2-88. Specificity was shown in immunoblots, demonstrating receptor migration as a 70-kd broad band. In immunohistochemical and immunoblotting experiments, the abolition of staining after antibody blockade with antigen peptide was demonstrated. Immunostaining was identified in cryostat and in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. Heat-induced epitope retrieval was necessary to visualize sst2A receptors in formalin-fixed sections. Moreover, because of occasional high nonspecific staining, the demonstration of complete abolition of immunostaining by treatment with antigen peptide was a prerequisite for the correct identification of sst2A-positive tumors. The sst2A receptors were clearly located at the membrane of the tumor cells. These results provide the first localization of a somatostatin receptor subtype in human tissues at the cellular level. The sst2A receptor identification and visualization in tumors with simple immunohistochemical methods in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material will open new diagnostic opportunities for pathologists.

Immunohistochemical detection of somatostatin receptor subtypes sst1 and sst2A in human somatostatin receptor positive tumors.

Although in situ hybridization has been used to examine the distribution of messenger RNA for somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst) in human tumors, the cellular localization of sst1 and sst2A receptors has not been reported. In this study, we describe the cellular localization of human sst1 and sst2A receptor proteins in both cryostat- and paraffin-embedded sections of 25 human tumor tissues using two recently developed polyclonal antibodies. Six somatostatin (SS) receptor (SSR) positive tumors (two gastrinomas, three carcinoids, one pheochromocytoma) and one SSR negative tumor (renal cell carcinoma), selected by positive and negative SSR autoradiography, respectively, were studied by both immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. The six SSR positive tumors expressed sst2A, while 4 of 5 expressed sst1 as well. The SSR negative tumor did not express either sst1 or sst2A. Western blot analysis of wheat germ agglutinin purified membrane proteins confirmed the presence of the sst1 and sst2A glycosylated receptors. The paraffin-embedded sections gave best information with respect to the subcellular localization. Sst1 immunoreactivity was observed both on the membrane and in the cytoplasm, while sst2A showed predominantly membrane-associated immunoreactivity. This subcellular distribution of sst1 or sst2A receptors was confirmed in paraffin-embedded sections of 8 additional intestinal carcinoids, 5 gastrinomas and 5 pheochromocytomas. Sst1 receptors were detected in 7 out of 8 carcinoids, in all gastrinomas, and in 4 out of 5 pheochromocytomas, while 6 out of 8 carcinoids, all gastrinomas, and 3 out of 5 pheochromocytomas expressed sst2A receptors. In conclusion, sst1 and sst2A receptors show a differential subcellular localization in human SSR positive tumors. The use of SSR subtype selective antibodies to detect the subcellular distribution of SSR subtypes in individual tumor cells is an important step forward to understand more about the pathophysiological role of the different SSR subtypes in human tumors.

Immunohistochemical Localization of Somatostatin Receptor SST2A in the Rat Pancreas

The levels of adrenomedullin (ADM), a newly discovered vasodilating and natriuretic peptide, are elevated in plasma and ventricular myocardium in human congestive heart failure suggesting that cardiac synthesis may contribute to the plasma concentrations of ADM. To examine the time course of induction and mechanisms regulating cardiac ADM gene expression, we determined the effect of acute and short-term cardiac overload on ventricular ADM mRNA and immunoreactive ADM (ir-ADM) levels in conscious rats. Acute pressure overload was produced by infusion of arginine8-vasopressin (AVP, 0.05 microg/kg/min, i.v.) for 2 h into 12-week-old hypertensive TGR(mREN-2)27 rats and normotensive Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Hypertension and marked left ventricular hypertrophy were associated with 2.2-times higher ir-ADM levels in the left ventricular epicardial layer (178 +/- 36 vs. 81 +/- 23 fmol/g, P<0.05) and 2.6-times higher ir-ADM levels in the left ventricular endocardial layer (213 +/- 23 vs. 83 +/- 22 fmol/g, P<0.01). The infusion of AVP for 2 h in normotensive rats produced rapid increases in the levels of left ventricular ADM mRNA (epicardial layer: 1.6-fold, P<0.05) and ir-ADM (endocardial layer: from 83 +/- 22 to 140 +/- 12 fmol/g, P<0.05), whereas ventricular ADM mRNA and ir-ADM levels did not change significantly in hypertensive rats. Short-term cardiac overload, induced by administration of angiotensin II (33.3 microg/kg/h, s.c., osmotic minipumps) for two weeks in normotensive SD rats resulted in left ventricular hypertrophy (3.05 +/- 0.17 vs. 2.75 +/- 0.3 mg/g, P<0.05) and a 1.5-fold increase (P<0.05) in ventricular ADM mRNA levels. In conclusion, the present results show that pressure overload acutely stimulated ventricular ADM gene expression in conscious normotensive rats suggesting a potential beneficial role for endogenous ADM production in the heart against cardiac overload. Since pressure overload-induced increase in ADM synthesis was attenuated in hypertensive rats, alterations in the ADM system may contribute to the pathogenesis of hypertension in the TGR(mREN-2)27 rat.Somatostatin (SRIF) acts on specific membrane receptors to inhibit exocrine and endocrine pancreatic functions. Five SRIF receptor genes have been cloned, producing six receptor proteins (sst-s). We used a recently developed antibody to localize the sst2A splice variant in the rat pancreas. Western blots identified the sst2A receptor as an 90 kDa glycosylated protein in pancreatic tissue. In tyramide-amplified immunostainings all acinar cells, and the glucagon and pancreatic polypeptide immunoreactive cells (A and PP, respectively) were intensely labeled for sst2A, while no signal was detected in SRIF producing (D) cells. A very few insulin immunoreactive (B) cells were also labeled for sst2A, but the signal in these cells was lower than in exocrine, A or PP cells. Absorption of the sst2A antibody with the receptor peptide abolished specific staining in both immunoblots and tissue sections (negative control). These studies are the first to localize any SRIF receptor subtype in the rat pancreas. The specif...

Colocalization of Somatostatin Receptor sst5 and Insulin in Rat Pancreatic β-Cells1

Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin release-inhibiting factor (SRIF), is secreted by pancreatic δ-cells and inhibits the secretion of both insulin and glucagon. SRIF initiates its actions by binding to a family of six G protein-coupled receptors (sst1, -2A, -2B, -3, -4, and -5) encoded by five genes. Messenger RNA for both sst2 and sst5 have been reported in the rat pancreas, and the sst2A receptor protein has been localized to rat pancreatic α and pancreatic polypeptide-secreting cells in the islets as well as to pancreatic acinar cells. In this study we have used double immunostaining to show that the sst5 protein is expressed exclusively in the β-cells of rat pancreatic islets and localizes with insulin-secreting α-cells. The sst5 receptor is not colocalized with sst2A. Thus, in the rat SRIF inhibits pancreatic insulin and glucagon secretion via different sst receptor subtypes.

Cell specific expression of the sst2A and sst5 somatostatin receptors in the rat anterior pituitary.

Somatostatin (SRIF), originally described as a hypothalamic hormone that inhibits the release of growth hormone was subsequently shown to inhibit the secretion of multiple pituitary hormones. Five genes encoding six different SRIF receptors (sst1, 2A, 2B, 3, 4 and 5) have been cloned and mRNAs for all five are expressed in the anterior pituitary. We used double immunostaining to determine which cells in the anterior pituitary bear sst2A and sst5 receptors. Our results show that these two receptors are widely distributed in the pituitary gland and are both present in a large percentage of GH cells. In addition, sst5 occurs in a small population of corticotrophs and a large percentage of lactotrophs whereas sst2A is found in only a few lactotrophs but a large number of corticotrophs. The sst2A receptor is also expressed in about a third of the gonadotrophs and thyrotrophs. Interestingly, sst2A and sst5 receptors colocalize in a small percentage of cells, most likely somatotrophs demonstrating that the same cells can contain multiple sst receptor subtypes. These results indicate that sst subtype specific analogs are likely to be useful for the selective regulation of individual pituitary hormones.

Somatostatin receptor subtype 2A immunohistochemistry using a new monoclonal antibody selects tumors suitable for in vivo somatostatin receptor targeting.

High overexpression of somatostatin receptors in neuroendocrine tumors allows imaging and radiotherapy with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues. To ascertain whether a tumor is suitable for in vivo somatostatin receptor targeting, its somatostatin receptor expression has to be determined. There are specific indications for use of immunohistochemistry for the somatostatin receptor subtype 2A, but this has up to now been limited by the lack of an adequate reliable antibody. The aim of this study was to correlate immunohistochemistry using the new monoclonal anti-somatostatin receptor subtype 2A antibody UMB-1 with the gold standard in vitro method quantifying somatostatin receptor levels in tumor tissues. A UMB-1 immunohistochemistry protocol was developed, and tumoral UMB-1 staining levels were compared with somatostatin receptor binding site levels quantified with in vitro 125I-[Tyr3]-octreotide autoradiography in 89 tumors. This allowed defining an immunohistochemical staining threshold permitting to distinguish tumors with somatostatin receptor levels high enough for clinical applications from those with low receptor expression. The presence of >10% positive tumor cells correctly predicted high receptor levels in 95% of cases. In contrast, absence of UMB-1 staining truly reflected low or undetectable somatostatin receptor expression in 96% of tumors. If 1% to 10% of tumor cells were stained, a weak staining intensity was suggestive of low somatostatin receptor levels. This study allows for the first time a reliable recommendation for eligibility of an individual patient for in vivo somatostatin receptor targeting based on somatostatin receptor immunohistochemistry. Under optimal methodological conditions, UMB-1 immunohistochemistry may be equivalent to in vitro receptor autoradiography.

Somatostatin Receptor Subtypes in Human Thymoma and Inhibition of Cell Proliferation by Octreotide in Vitro

Somatostatin (SS) and SS receptor (SSR) subtypes, code-named sst1-5, are heterogeneously expressed in the normal human thymus. This suggests their involvement in controlling the immune and/or neuroendocrine functions in this organ. Moreover, recently a high in vivo uptake of [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]octreotide has been reported in patients bearing thymoma. The present study characterizes in vivo and in vitro, functional SS-binding sites in a human thymoma. A high uptake of [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]octreotide was observed in the chest of a patient with myasthenia gravis due to a cortical thymoma. Specific binding of [125I-Tyr11] SS-14 was found on a membrane preparation of the surgically removed thymoma. Scatchard analysis showed high affinity binding sites (Kd, 47.5 +/- 2.5 pmol/L) with low maximum binding capacity (23.5 +/- 2.5 fmol/mg membrane protein). RT-PCR analysis showed the presence of sst1, sst2A, and a predominant sst3 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression in the tumor tissue. Primary cultured tumor cells expressed sst3 mRNA only. In contrast to the normal thymus, SS mRNA was not expressed. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells highly expressed sst3 receptors, weakly expressed sst1 receptors, and showed no immunostaining for sst2A receptors. sst2A immunoreactivity was found in the stromal compartment of the tumor, particularly on the endothelium of small intratumoral blood vessels. In primary cultured tumor cells, both SS and octreotide (10 nmol/L) significantly inhibited [3H]thymidine incorporation by 40.6% and 43.2%, respectively. The following conclusions were reached. 1) As this tumor displayed a high immunoreactivity for sst3 and the cultured tumor cells expressed the sst3 mRNA only, this SSR may be the subtype involved in the inhibition of epithelial tumor cell proliferation by octreotide in vitro. 2) A loss of endogenous SS production in this thymoma might be implicated in the uncontrolled cell growth. 3) In this case, the sst3 may play a role in determining the uptake of [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]octreotide by in vivo SS receptor scintigraphy.

Agonist-Biased Signaling at the sst2A Receptor: The Multi-Somatostatin Analogs KE108 and SOM230 Activate and Antagonize Distinct Signaling Pathways

Somatostatin analogs that activate the somatostatin subtype 2A (sst2A) receptor are used to treat neuroendocrine cancers because they inhibit tumor secretion and growth. Recently, new analogs capable of activating multiple somatostatin receptor subtypes have been developed to increase tumor responsiveness. We tested two such multi-somatostatin analogs for functional selectivity at the sst2A receptor: SOM230, which activates sst1, sst2, sst3, and sst5 receptors, and KE108, which activates all sst receptor subtypes. Both compounds are reported to act as full agonists at their target sst receptors. In sst2A-expressing HEK293 cells, somatostatin inhibited cAMP production, stimulated intracellular calcium accumulation, and increased ERK phosphorylation. SOM230 and KE108 were also potent inhibitors of cAMP accumulation, as expected. However, they antagonized somatostatin stimulation of intracellular calcium and behaved as partial agonists/antagonists for ERK phosphorylation. In pancreatic AR42J cells, which express sst2A receptors endogenously, SOM230 and KE108 were both full agonists for cAMP inhibition. However, although somatostatin increased intracellular calcium and ERK phosphorylation, SOM230 and KE108 again antagonized these effects. Distinct mechanisms were involved in sst2A receptor signaling in AR42J cells; pertussis toxin pretreatment blocked somatostatin inhibition of cAMP accumulation but not the stimulation of intracellular calcium and ERK phosphorylation. Our results demonstrate that SOM230 and KE108 behave as agonists for inhibition of adenylyl cyclase but antagonize somatostatins actions on intracellular calcium and ERK phosphorylation. Thus, SOM230 and KE108 are not somatostatin mimics, and their functional selectivity at sst2A receptors must be considered in clinical applications where it may have important consequences for therapy.

Value of immunohistochemistry for somatostatin receptor subtype sst2A in cancer tissues: lessons from the comparison of anti-sst2A antibodies with somatostatin receptor autoradiography.

The somatostatin receptor sst2A is highly expressed at the cellular surface of neuroendocrine and other human tumor cells, allowing somatostatin receptor-targeted scintigraphic tumor imaging and tumor therapy. In vitro information on tumoral somatostatin receptor expression is provided mainly by receptor autoradiography, based on binding of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs to tumoral somatostatin receptors. Recent availability of anti-sst2A antibodies opens the possibility of sst2A assessment in human tumors with immunohistochemistry. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of several commercial anti-sst2A antibodies for this purpose in comparison with the extensively characterized antibody R2-88 and with receptor autoradiography. sst2A immunohistochemistry was performed in 64 formalin-fixed tumors known to frequently express sst2A (pancreatic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors, breast carcinomas, meningiomas, pituitary adenomas, neuroblastomas, medulloblastomas, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas); receptor autoradiography could be performed simultaneously in 37 of these cases. The commercial antibody SS-800 clearly identified sst2A and correlated excellently with R2-88: compared with R2-88, SS-800 immunohistochemistry generally yielded the same tissular and subcellular staining distribution. Results of R2-88 and SS-800 immunohistochemistry correlated excellently with those obtained with receptor autoradiography; compared with receptor autoradiography, immunohistochemistry with both R2-88 and SS-800 resulted in a slightly lower tumoral sst2A incidence, but a higher resolution, with frequent identification of heterogeneous sst2A distribution at high magnification. Finally, not only membranous, but also cytoplasmic, sst2A immunostaining was simultaneously observed with both antibodies in some tumors. In conclusion, the commercially available SS-800 antibody promises to be useful for the routine immunohistochemical assessment of sst2A in formalin-fixed human tumors.