Agnieszka Halas

The influence of the mismatch-repair system on stationary-phase mutagenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract. Stationary-phase (also called adaptive) mutation occurs in non-dividing cells during prolonged non-lethal selective pressure, e.g. starvation for an essential amino acid. Because in such conditions no DNA replication is observed, mutations probably arise as a result of inefficient DNA repair. In order to understand the role of the yeast mismatch-repair (MMR) system in the mutagenesis of stationary-phase cells, we studied the effects of deletions in genes encoding MutS- and MutL-related proteins on the reversion frequency of the lys2ΔBgl frameshift mutation. We found that the level of Lys+ reversion was increased in all MMR mutants, with the strongest effect observed in a MSH2 (MUTS homologue)-deprived strain. Disruption of the MSH3 or MSH6 genes (also MUTS homologues) resulted in elevation of the mutation frequency and rate, but to a lesser degree than that caused by the inactivation of MSH2. MutL-related proteins were also required for mutation avoidance in stationary-phase cells, but to a lesser extent than MutS homologues. Among MutL homologues, Mlh1 seems to play the major role in this process, while Pms1 and Mlh3 are partially redundant and appear to substitute for each other. These data suggest that MMR proteins, particularly MutS homologues, are involved in the control of mutability in stationary-phase yeast cells.

Involvement of the RE V3 gene in the methylated base-excision repair system. Co-operation of two DNA polymerases, δ and Rev3p, in the repair of MMS-induced lesions in the DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The ability of four yeast DNA polymerase mutant strains to carry out the repair of DNA treated with MMS was studied. Mutation in DNA polymerase Rev3, as well as the already known mutation in the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase δ, were both found to lead to the accumulation of single-strand breaks, which indicates defective repair. A double-mutant strain carrying mutations in DNA polymerase δ and a deletion in the REV3 gene had a complete repair defect, both at permissive (23°C) and restrictive (38°C) temperatures, which was not observed in other pairwise combinations of tested polymerase mutants. Other polymerases are not involved in the repair of exogenous DNA methylation damage, since neither mutation in the DNA polymerase ɛ, nor deletion in the DNA polymerase IV (β70) gene, caused defective repair. The data obtained suggest that DNA polymerases δ and Rev3p are both necessary to perform repair synthesis in the base-excision repair of methylation damage. The results are discussed in the light of current concepts on the role of DNA polymerase Rev3 in mutagenesis.

The roles of PCNA SUMOylation, Mms2‐Ubc13 and Rad5 in translesion DNA synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mms2, in concert with Ubc13 and Rad5, is responsible for polyubiquitination of replication processivity factor PCNA. This modification activates recombination‐like DNA damage‐avoidance mechanisms, which function in an error‐free manner. Cells deprived of Mms2, Ubc13 or Rad5 exhibit mutator phenotypes as a result of the channelling of premutational DNA lesions to often error‐prone translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). Here we show that Siz1‐mediated PCNA SUMOylation is required for the stimulation of this TLS, despite the presence of PCNA monoubiquitination. The stimulation of spontaneous mutagenesis by Siz1 in cells carrying rad5 and/or mms2 mutations is connected with the known role of PCNA SUMOylation in the inhibition of Rad52‐mediated recombination. However, following UV irradiation, Siz1 is engaged in additional, as yet undefined, mechanisms controlling genetic stability at the replication fork. We also demonstrate that in the absence of PCNA SUMOylation, Mms2‐Ubc13 and Rad5 may, independently of each other, function in the stimulation of TLS. Based on this finding and on an analysis of the epistatic relationships between SIZ1, MMS2 and RAD5, with respect to UV sensitivity, we conclude that PCNA SUMOylation is responsible for the functional differences between the Mms2 and Rad5 homologues of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Evaluation of the roles of Pol zeta and NHEJ in starvation-associated spontaneous mutagenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The vast majority of microorganisms live under starvation-associated stress conditions that cause mutagenesis despite the limitation of DNA replication and cell division. In this study, we compared the roles of polymerase zeta (Pol zeta) and non-homologous DNA-end joining (NHEJ) in starvation-associated spontaneous base substitutions and frameshifts, using yeast mutants carrying deletions of REV3 (encoding the catalytic subunit of Pol zeta), YKU80 (encoding a protein involved in the initiation of NHEJ), or both genes. We found that approximately 50% of starvation-associated spontaneous frameshifts and 40% of base substitutions required NHEJ to occur. The role of Pol zeta was only slightly less pronounced, with 30–40% of frameshifts and 35–45% of base substitutions being dependent on Rev3. In comparison with the single mutants, the rev3 yku80 double mutant showed an additive decrease in the level of both base substitutions and frameshifts, indicating that Pol zeta and NHEJ function independently in starvation-associated mutagenesis. Our results also imply that about 30% of starvation-associated base substitutions and frameshifts arise by some unknown mechanism that does not involve Pol zeta or NHEJ.

The steady-state level and stability of TLS polymerase eta are cell cycle dependent in the yeast S. cerevisiae.

Polymerase eta (Pol eta) is a ubiquitous translesion DNA polymerase that is capable of bypassing UV-induced pyrimidine dimers in an error-free manner. However, this specialized polymerase is error prone when synthesizing through an undamaged DNA template. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, both depletion and overproduction of Pol eta result in mutator phenotypes. Therefore, regulation of the cellular abundance of this enzyme is of particular interest. However, based on the investigation of variously tagged forms of Pol eta, mutually contradictory conclusions have been reached regarding the stability of this polymerase in yeast. Here, we optimized a protocol for the detection of untagged yeast Pol eta and established that the half-life of the native enzyme is 80 ± 14 min in asynchronously growing cultures. Experiments with synchronized cells indicated that the cellular abundance of this translesion polymerase changes throughout the cell cycle. Accordingly, we show that the stability of Pol eta, but not its mRNA level, is cell cycle stage dependent. The half-life of the polymerase is more than fourfold shorter in G1-arrested cells than in those at G2/M. Our results, in concert with previous data for Rev1, indicate that cell cycle regulation is a general property of Y family TLS polymerases in S. cerevisiae.

PCNA SUMOylation protects against PCNA polyubiquitination-mediated, Rad59-dependent, spontaneous, intrachromosomal gene conversion

Homologous recombination is crucial in both the maintenance of genome stability and the generation of genetic diversity. Recently, multiple aspects of the recombination machinery functioning at arrested DNA replication forks have been established, yet the roles of diverse modifications of PCNA, the key platform organizing the replication complex, in intrachromosomal recombination have not been comprehensively elucidated. Here, we report how PCNA SUMOylation and/or polyubiquitination affects recombination between direct repeats in S. cerevisiae. Our results show that these PCNA modifications primarily affect gene conversion, whereas their effect on the recombination-mediated deletion of intervening sequence is much less obvious. Siz1-dependent PCNA SUMOylation strongly limits Rad52/Rad51/Rad59-dependent gene conversion. A 5- to 10-fold increase in the frequency of such recombination events is observed in Siz1-defective strains, but this increase is fully suppressed when PCNA polyubiquitination is also compromised. PCNA polyubiquitination can stimulate gene conversion in both PCNA SUMOylation-proficient and SUMOylation-deficient strains. On the other hand, in PCNA polyubiquitination-deficient strains, the lack of PCNA SUMOylation does not affect GC levels. Therefore, we postulate that the antirecombinogenic activity of Siz1 mainly concerns recombination induced by PCNA polyubiquitination. In the absence of PCNA SUMOylation, the frequency of PCNA polyubiquitination-mediated gene conversion is not only increased, but it is also channeled into the Rad59-dependent pathway. Additionally, we show a weak inhibitory effect of Rad5 on Rad52/Rad59-directed single-strand annealing.