Agnieszka Rosławiecka

Predictors of Cerebral Reperfusion Injury After Carotid Stenting: The Role of Transcranial Color-Coded Doppler Ultrasonography

Purpose: To evaluate the possible role of transcranial color-coded Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) in predicting cerebral reperfusion injury (CRI) in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS) for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Methods: TCD was obtained in 210 patients (149 men; mean age 64.2±8.4 years, range 44–83) who underwent CAS for ICA stenosis averaging 86.7%±8.4%. Contralateral ICA occlusion or near occlusion (stenosis >90%) was present in 67 (31.9%) patients. TCD was performed before and 24 hours after CAS with assessment of peak systolic velocities (PSVs) in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (iMCA) and contralateral middle cerebral artery (cMCA). PSV ratios (PSVR) in the iMCA and cMCA were calculated from the PSVs before and after CAS. Results: CRI syndrome occurred in 3 (1.4%) patients (2 intracranial bleedings, 1 subarachnoid hemorrhage). The mean iMCA and cMCA PSVRs were 2.66±0.19 and 4.16±2.77, respectively, in CRI patients, while the PSVRs in CAS patients without neurological sequelae were 1.56±0.46 and 1.21±0.39, respectively (both p<0.001). The combination of iPSVR>2.4 and cPSVR>2.4 occurred in 4 patients with bilateral ICA disease; 3 (75%) of them developed CRI (100% sensitivity and 99% specificity for CRI prediction). The following independent CRI predictors were identified: combined iPSVR>2.4 and cPSVR>2.4 (RR 2.06, CI 1.89 to 2.24; p<0.001), high cMCA PSV after CAS (RR 1.23, CI 1.13 to 1.34; p<0.001), and contralateral ICA occlusion (RR 1.13, CI 1.03 to 1.23; p=0.007). Conclusion: TCD is an important tool in CRI risk evaluation. The combination of iPSVR>2.4 and cPSVR>2.4 is an independent CRI risk factor, along with contralateral ICA occlusion and high cMCA PSVs after CAS.

Safety of embolic protection device-assisted and unprotected intravascular ultrasound in evaluating carotid artery atherosclerotic lesions.

Summary Background Significant atherosclerotic stenosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) origin is common (5–10% at ≥60 years). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) enables high-resolution (120 μm) plaque imaging, and IVUS-elucidated features of the coronary plaque were recently shown to be associated with its symptomatic rupture/thrombosis risk. Safety of the significant carotid plaque IVUS imaging in a large unselected population is unknown. Material/Methods We prospectively evaluated the safety of embolic protection device (EPD)-assisted vs. unprotected ICA-IVUS in a series of consecutive subjects with ≥50% ICA stenosis referred for carotid artery stenting (CAS), including 104 asymptomatic (aS) and 187 symptomatic (S) subjects (age 47–83 y, 187 men). EPD use was optional for IVUS, but mandatory for CAS. Results Evaluation was performed of 107 ICAs (36.8%) without EPD and 184 with EPD. Lesions imaged under EPD were overall more severe (peak-systolic velocity 2.97±0.08 vs. 2.20±0.08m/s, end-diastolic velocity 1.0±0.04 vs. 0.7±0.03 m/s, stenosis severity of 85.7±0.5% vs. 77.7±0.6% by catheter angiography; mean ±SEM; p<0.01 for all comparisons) and more frequently S (50.0% vs. 34.6%, p=0.01). No ICA perforation or dissection, and no major stroke or death occurred. There was no IVUS-triggered cerebral embolization. In the procedures of (i) unprotected IVUS and no CAS, (ii) unprotected IVUS followed by CAS (filters – 39, flow reversal/blockade – 3), (iii) EPD-protected (filters – 135, flow reversal/blockade – 48) IVUS+CAS, TIA occurred in 1.5% vs. 4.8% vs. 2.7%, respectively, and minor stroke in 0% vs. 2.4% vs. 2.1%, respectively. EPD intolerance (on-filter ICA spasm or flow reversal/blockade intolerance) occurred in 9/225 (4.0%). IVUS increased the procedure duration by 7.27±0.19 min. Conclusions Carotid IVUS is safe and, for the less severe lesions in particular, it may not require mandatory EPD use. High-risk lesions can be safely evaluated with IVUS under flow reversal/blockade.

Determinants of long-term outcome in patients after percutaneous stent-assisted management of symptomatic subclavian or innominate artery stenosis or occlusion

AIMS Incidence and determinants of restenosis and adverse events after endovascular management (PTA±stent) of the subclavian/innominate artery (SA/IA) stenosis/occlusion remain unclear due to the relatively short-term follow-up or limited size of prior studies. This large-scale, long-term prospective study investigated safety, efficacy, and prognosis after SA/IA PTA±stent. METHODS AND RESULTS The study involved 411 consecutive patients with symptomatic SA/IA stenosis/ occlusion; 393 were followed annually after successful PTA±stent for up to 16 (minimum one) years. Primary outcomes were freedom from restenosis and MACCE (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke). Angiographic success rate was 99.7% in stenoses and 76.1% in occlusions. The incidence of any periprocedural complication was 4.4% (serious - 1.2%). Symptoms of limb ischaemia, vertebrobasilar insufficiency or angina resolved in 79.1%, decreased in 19.6%. Freedom from restenosis was 82.6% and 77.9% whereas freedom from MACCE was 86.6% and 78.3% at five and 10 years, respectively. MACCE determinants (HR; 95% CI) were previous myocardial infarction (5.36; 2.9-9.91), ischaemic stroke (2.03; 1.12-3.66), hs-CRP (1.04; 1.02-1.07), concurrent atherosclerosis (1.35; 1.00-1.82). Restenosis determinants were implantation of ≥2 stents (2.65; 1.23-5.72), stent diameter (0.45; 0.34-0.59), hs-CRP (1.06; 1.02-1.1), WBC (1.2; 1.07-1.35), age (0.97; 0.94-0.99), concurrent carotid or vertebral disease (1.85; 1.07-3.18), IA intervention (2.28; 1.08-4.84). CONCLUSIONS This study established long-term durability of stent-assisted PTA of symptomatic SA/IA disease and identified risk factors for restenosis and long-term MACCE. Patients at increased risk might benefit from targeted, intensified prevention measures.

Multiterritory Atherosclerosis and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness as Cardiovascular Risk Predictors After Percutaneous Angioplasty of Symptomatic Subclavian Artery Stenosis

To identify independent predictors of cardiovascular events among patients with subclavian artery stenosis.

Low prevalence of collateral cerebral circulation in the circle of Willis in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and recent ischemic stroke

Introduction The circle of Willis is thought to play a key role in development of collateral flow in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS). Aim To assess flow in the circle of Willis in patients with recent ischemic stroke (IS). Material and methods The study included 371 patients, 102 symptomatic with severe ICAS and recent IS (within the last 3 months) (group I) and 269 asymptomatic with severe ICAS (group II). Flow in the middle (MCA), anterior (ACA) and posterior (PCA) cerebral arteries and pattern of the cross-flow through anterior (ACoA) and posterior (PCoA) communicating arteries were assessed with transcranial color-coded Doppler ultrasonography (TCCD). Results The ACoA or PCoA was less prevalent in group I than in group II (54% vs. 78%, p < 0.001 and 20% vs. 42%, p < 0.001, respectively), resulting in lower peak-systolic velocity (PSV) in the MCA in group I vs. group II (p = 0.015). Any collateral pathway was present in 67% of patients in group I, compared to 86% in group II (p < 0.001). Both PSV and end-diastolic (EDV) flow velocity in the ACA were lower in patients with recent IS, compared to asymptomatic subjects (71 ±24 cm/s vs. 86 ±34 cm/s, p < 0.001 and 32 ±12 cm/s vs. 37 ±17 cm/s, p = 0.038, respectively). Presence of ACoA or PCoA and higher PSV in the MCA and ACA were associated with significant risk reduction of IS (RR = 0.28 (95% CI = 0.16–0.49, p < 0.001), RR = 0.28 (95% CI = 0.15–0.52, p < 0.001), RR = 0.97 (95% CI = 0.96–0.99, p < 0.001), RR = 0.99 (95% CI = 0.98–0.99, p < 0.032), respectively). However, ROC curves failed to show reliable MCA or ACA PSV cut-offs for IS risk assessment. Conclusions The ACoA and PCoA seem to play a key role in the evaluation of IS risk in subjects with severe ICAS.