Ahibur Rahaman
Lund University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ahibur Rahaman.
Organometallics | 2014
Ahibur Rahaman; Shishir Ghosh; David G. Unwin; Sucharita Basak-Modi; Katherine B. Holt; Shariff E. Kabir; Ebbe Nordlander; Michael G. Richmond; Graeme Hogarth
The mixed-valence triiron complexes [Fe3(CO)7–x(PPh3)x(μ-edt)2] (x = 0–2; edt = SCH2CH2S) and [Fe3(CO)5(κ2-diphosphine)(μ-edt)2] (diphosphine = dppv, dppe, dppb, dppn) have been prepared and structurally characterized. All adopt an anti arrangement of the dithiolate bridges, and PPh3 substitution occurs at the apical positions of the outer iron atoms, while the diphosphine complexes exist only in the dibasal form in both the solid state and solution. The carbonyl on the central iron atom is semibridging, and this leads to a rotated structure between the bridged diiron center. IR studies reveal that all complexes are inert to protonation by HBF4·Et2O, but addition of acid to the pentacarbonyl complexes results in one-electron oxidation to yield the moderately stable cations [Fe3(CO)5(PPh3)2(μ-edt)2]+ and [Fe3(CO)5(κ2-diphosphine)(μ-edt)2]+, species which also result upon oxidation by [Cp2Fe][PF6]. The electrochemistry of the formally Fe(I)–Fe(II)–Fe(I) complexes has been investigated. Each undergoes a quasi-reversible oxidation, the potential of which is sensitive to phosphine substitution, generally occurring between 0.15 and 0.50 V, although [Fe3(CO)5(PPh3)2(μ-edt)2] is oxidized at −0.05 V. Reduction of all complexes is irreversible and is again sensitive to phosphine substitution, varying between −1.47 V for [Fe3(CO)7(μ-edt)2] and around −1.7 V for phosphine-substituted complexes. In their one-electron-reduced states, all complexes are catalysts for the reduction of protons to hydrogen, the catalytic overpotential being increased upon successive phosphine substitution. In comparison to the diiron complex [Fe2(CO)6(μ-edt)], [Fe3(CO)7(μ-edt)2] catalyzes proton reduction at 0.36 V less negative potentials. Electronic structure calculations have been carried out in order to fully elucidate the nature of the oxidation and reduction processes. In all complexes, the HOMO comprises an iron–iron bonding orbital localized between the two iron atoms not ligated by the semibridging carbonyl, while the LUMO is highly delocalized in nature and is antibonding between both pairs of iron atoms but also contains an antibonding dithiolate interaction.
Organometallics | 2014
Ahibur Rahaman; Shishir Ghosh; David G. Unwin; Sucharita Basak-Modi; Katherine B. Holt; Shariff E. Kabir; Ebbe Nordlander; Michael G. Richmond; Graeme Hogarth
The mixed-valence triiron complexes [Fe3(CO)7–x(PPh3)x(μ-edt)2] (x = 0–2; edt = SCH2CH2S) and [Fe3(CO)5(κ2-diphosphine)(μ-edt)2] (diphosphine = dppv, dppe, dppb, dppn) have been prepared and structurally characterized. All adopt an anti arrangement of the dithiolate bridges, and PPh3 substitution occurs at the apical positions of the outer iron atoms, while the diphosphine complexes exist only in the dibasal form in both the solid state and solution. The carbonyl on the central iron atom is semibridging, and this leads to a rotated structure between the bridged diiron center. IR studies reveal that all complexes are inert to protonation by HBF4·Et2O, but addition of acid to the pentacarbonyl complexes results in one-electron oxidation to yield the moderately stable cations [Fe3(CO)5(PPh3)2(μ-edt)2]+ and [Fe3(CO)5(κ2-diphosphine)(μ-edt)2]+, species which also result upon oxidation by [Cp2Fe][PF6]. The electrochemistry of the formally Fe(I)–Fe(II)–Fe(I) complexes has been investigated. Each undergoes a quasi-reversible oxidation, the potential of which is sensitive to phosphine substitution, generally occurring between 0.15 and 0.50 V, although [Fe3(CO)5(PPh3)2(μ-edt)2] is oxidized at −0.05 V. Reduction of all complexes is irreversible and is again sensitive to phosphine substitution, varying between −1.47 V for [Fe3(CO)7(μ-edt)2] and around −1.7 V for phosphine-substituted complexes. In their one-electron-reduced states, all complexes are catalysts for the reduction of protons to hydrogen, the catalytic overpotential being increased upon successive phosphine substitution. In comparison to the diiron complex [Fe2(CO)6(μ-edt)], [Fe3(CO)7(μ-edt)2] catalyzes proton reduction at 0.36 V less negative potentials. Electronic structure calculations have been carried out in order to fully elucidate the nature of the oxidation and reduction processes. In all complexes, the HOMO comprises an iron–iron bonding orbital localized between the two iron atoms not ligated by the semibridging carbonyl, while the LUMO is highly delocalized in nature and is antibonding between both pairs of iron atoms but also contains an antibonding dithiolate interaction.
Organometallics | 2014
Ahibur Rahaman; Shishir Ghosh; David G. Unwin; Sucharita Basak-Modi; Katherine B. Holt; Shariff E. Kabir; Ebbe Nordlander; Michael G. Richmond; Graeme Hogarth
The mixed-valence triiron complexes [Fe3(CO)7–x(PPh3)x(μ-edt)2] (x = 0–2; edt = SCH2CH2S) and [Fe3(CO)5(κ2-diphosphine)(μ-edt)2] (diphosphine = dppv, dppe, dppb, dppn) have been prepared and structurally characterized. All adopt an anti arrangement of the dithiolate bridges, and PPh3 substitution occurs at the apical positions of the outer iron atoms, while the diphosphine complexes exist only in the dibasal form in both the solid state and solution. The carbonyl on the central iron atom is semibridging, and this leads to a rotated structure between the bridged diiron center. IR studies reveal that all complexes are inert to protonation by HBF4·Et2O, but addition of acid to the pentacarbonyl complexes results in one-electron oxidation to yield the moderately stable cations [Fe3(CO)5(PPh3)2(μ-edt)2]+ and [Fe3(CO)5(κ2-diphosphine)(μ-edt)2]+, species which also result upon oxidation by [Cp2Fe][PF6]. The electrochemistry of the formally Fe(I)–Fe(II)–Fe(I) complexes has been investigated. Each undergoes a quasi-reversible oxidation, the potential of which is sensitive to phosphine substitution, generally occurring between 0.15 and 0.50 V, although [Fe3(CO)5(PPh3)2(μ-edt)2] is oxidized at −0.05 V. Reduction of all complexes is irreversible and is again sensitive to phosphine substitution, varying between −1.47 V for [Fe3(CO)7(μ-edt)2] and around −1.7 V for phosphine-substituted complexes. In their one-electron-reduced states, all complexes are catalysts for the reduction of protons to hydrogen, the catalytic overpotential being increased upon successive phosphine substitution. In comparison to the diiron complex [Fe2(CO)6(μ-edt)], [Fe3(CO)7(μ-edt)2] catalyzes proton reduction at 0.36 V less negative potentials. Electronic structure calculations have been carried out in order to fully elucidate the nature of the oxidation and reduction processes. In all complexes, the HOMO comprises an iron–iron bonding orbital localized between the two iron atoms not ligated by the semibridging carbonyl, while the LUMO is highly delocalized in nature and is antibonding between both pairs of iron atoms but also contains an antibonding dithiolate interaction.
Chemical Communications | 2011
Shishir Ghosh; Graeme Hogarth; Katherine B. Holt; Shariff E. Kabir; Ahibur Rahaman; David G. Unwin
Polyhedron | 2016
Shishir Ghosh; Ahibur Rahaman; Katherine B. Holt; Ebbe Nordlander; Michael G. Richmond; Shariff E. Kabir; Graeme Hogarth
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry | 2014
Md. Kamal Hossain; Subas Rajbangshi; Ahibur Rahaman; Md. Arshad H. Chowdhury; Tasneem A. Siddiquee; Shishir Ghosh; Michael G. Richmond; Ebbe Nordlander; Graeme Hogarth; Shariff E. Kabir
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry | 2015
Md. Arshad H. Chowdhury; Subas Rajbangshi; Ahibur Rahaman; Li Yang; Vladimir N. Nesterov; Michael G. Richmond; Shaikh M. Mobin; Shariff E. Kabir
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry | 2013
Ahibur Rahaman; Fakir Rafiqul Alam; Shishir Ghosh; Matti Haukka; Shariff E. Kabir; Ebbe Nordlander; Graeme Hogarth
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry | 2016
Mohd. Rezaul Haque; Md. Jakir Hossain; Ahibur Rahaman; Shishir Ghosh; Shariff E. Kabir; Graeme Hogarth; Derek A. Tocher
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry | 2014
Ahibur Rahaman; Fakir Rafiqul Alam; Shishir Ghosh; Derek A. Tocher; Matti Haukka; Shariff E. Kabir; Ebbe Nordlander; Graeme Hogarth