Ahmed Shoker

A randomized, prospective multicenter pharmacoepidemiologic study of cyclosporine microemulsion in stable renal graft recipients. Report of the Canadian Neoral Renal Transplantation Study Group.

BACKGROUNDnThe safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of conventional cyclosporine (ConCsA) and cyclosporine microemulsion (MeCsA) were compared under conditions of normal clinical practice in a prospective, randomized, concentration-controlled, pharmacoepidemiologic study.nnnMETHODSnBetween September 1994 and March 1995, 1097 stable renal transplant recipients in 14 Canadian centers were randomized 2:1 to treatment with MeCsA or ConCsA. Patients were commenced on each study drug at a dose equal to their previous therapy with ConCsA, and the dose was adjusted to maintain predose whole blood cyclosporine concentrations within the therapeutic range established for each center. Prednisone and azathioprine were continued unless dose adjustment was required for clinical reasons.nnnRESULTSnThe mean cyclosporine concentration was comparable in both treatment groups at all time points throughout the 6 months of follow-up. The mean dose of cyclosporine was 3.6 mg/kg/day in both treatment groups at entry to the study, and declined by 0.3% and by 2.8% in patients receiving ConCsA and MeCsA, respectively. The nature and severity of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups, but there was a transient increase in neurological and gastrointestinal complications in the group receiving MeCsA within the first month after conversion (P<0.05). Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance did not change in either treatment group throughout the study. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in three patients (0.8%) receiving ConCsA and in seven patients (0.9%) receiving MeCsA, with non-histologically proven acute rejection in an additional three patients (0.8%) receiving ConCsA and five patients (0.6%) receiving MeCsA (P=NS). Serum creatinine rose transiently in 35 patients (9.8%) receiving ConCsA and 138 patients (18.7%) receiving MeCsA (P<0.05) and resolved either spontaneously or after a reduction in the cyclosporine dose. One graft was lost in the MeCsA group due to irreversible rejection, and seven patients died, three in the group receiving ConCsA and four of those receiving MeCsA (P=NS). Absorption of cyclosporine was more rapid and complete from MeCsA than from ConCsA during the first 4 hr of the dosing interval, resulting in almost 40% greater exposure to the drug (P<0.001). There was close correlation between area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) over the first 4 hr of the 12-hr dosage interval and AUC over the entire 12-hr dosage interval for both formulations, making AUC over the first 4 hr a good predictor of total cyclosporine exposure. Using this parameter, patients with low absorption randomized to receive MeCsA showed a marked increase in drug exposure by months 3 and 6, whereas there was no change in those who continued on ConCsA. A limited sampling strategy utilizing samples at the predose and postdose trough levels provided an excellent correlation with drug exposure, particularly for patients receiving MeCsA (r2=0.94 MeCsA vs. r2=0.89 ConCsA).nnnCONCLUSIONSnMeCsA appears to be a safe and effective therapy in stable renal transplant patients and provides superior and more consistent absorption of cyclosporine when compared with ConCsA. Transient toxicity after conversion to MeCsA occurs in some patients, and may reflect the increased exposure to cyclosporine. Use of a limited sampling approach combining trough and 2-hr postdose concentrations may provide an effective way to monitor this exposure.

Intravenous mycophenolate mofetil: safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics

An intravenous (i.v.) formulation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; CellCept®, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) that will enable its administration to patients unable to tolerate oral medication is available. Two separate studies, an open‐labeled pharmacokinetic (PK) study and a double‐blind safety study, were performed. Within 24 h after transplant, 153 (safety study) and 45 (PK study) first or second renal transplant recipients were started on i.v. MMF 1 g Q12h or placebo (used in the safety study only, 2:1 MMF:placebo), given over 2 h via a dedicated peripheral venous catheter. In the safety study, per os (p.o.) MMF (1g Q12h) or placebo was administered, starting within 72 h after transplant, whereas in the PK study, p.o. MMF was started on the evening of day 5. Sequential blood samples obtained on study days 5 (i.v. MMF) and 6 (p.o. MMF) before and up to 12 h after the AM dose were analyzed for mycophenolic acid (MPA) and MPA glucuronide (MPAG) concentrations by high‐performance liquid chromatography. The area under the concentration curve (AUC) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule. The MPA AUC0–12 was higher for i.v. MMF than p.o. MMF (40.8±11.4 μg·h/mL vs. 32.9±15, p<0.001). There were no other significant PK differences for plasma MPA or MPAG. In the safety study (n=98 i.v. MMF vs. n=55 placebo), 11 patients (11%, i.v. MMF) and 4 patients (7%, placebo) discontinued their use of the drug because of an adverse event (AE). Overall, AEs were similar between i.v. MMF and placebo. Injection site phlebitis (4%) and thrombosis (4%) were observed only with i.v. MMF. MMF i.v. 1 g twice daily (b.i.d.) should provide efficacy at least equivalent to p.o. MMF without increased toxicity, and it provides an acceptable alternative dose form in the immediate period after transplant.

Safety and tolerability of cyclosporine and cyclosporine microemulsion during 18 months of follow-up in stable renal transplant recipients: a report of the Canadian Neoral Renal Study Group.

BACKGROUNDnThere has been concern that the increased drug exposure associated with treatment with cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) would lead to an increase in adverse events.nnnMETHODSnThe long-term safety and tolerability of conventional cyclosporine (CsA) and CsA-ME were compared in a randomized, multicenter, pharmacoepidemiologic study involving 1097 stable renal transplant patients after 18 months of follow-up.nnnRESULTSnNo significant difference was seen in change in serum creatinine or calculated creatinine clearance between the two groups. Episodes of deterioration in renal function (change in serum creatinine > or = 20%) were categorized with the following results for CsA-ME versus CsA, respectively: acute rejection, 4.5% vs. 4.5%; chronic rejection, 8% vs. 11%; CsA nephrotoxicity, 12% vs. 7% (P=0.008); transient changes, 17% vs. 12%; other causes, 4% vs. 6%. During the first 6 months of the study, a transient increase in the incidence of gastrointestinal and neurological adverse events was seen in the CsA-ME group compared with the CsA group. Up to 18 months, patients in the CsA group reported significantly fewer hearing and vestibular disorders, but more cardiovascular problems than those in the CsA-ME group (P=0.035).nnnCONCLUSIONSnTolerance to CsA and CsA-ME was similar. Renal function over 18 months was not adversely affected by the increased drug exposure with CsA-ME, although there was a transient increase in nephrotoxicity. The frequency of acute and chronic rejection did not change.

Heightened CD40 ligand gene expression in peripheral CD4+ T cells from patients with kidney allograft rejection.

BACKGROUNDnCD40 ligand (CD40L) gene expression is increased in rejecting allograft biopsies. We, therefore, tested the possibility that CD40L gene expression is heightened in peripheral CD4+ T cells during renal allograft rejection.nnnMETHODSnCD40L gene expression in peripheral blood CD4+ T cells from two renal transplant groups was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Group 1: 20 patients with excellent renal transplant function; group 2: 25 patients with findings of acute and/or chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN); and group 3 of 12 normal controls. CD4+ cells were isolated by positive selection. The modifying effect of cyclosporine (CsA) and FK506 on CD40L gene expression was further tested in vitro in CD4+ T lymphocytes separated from pokeweed mitogen- (PWM) activated peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) preparations.nnnRESULTSnMean+/-SD expressions of CD40L gene, in aM, in groups 1-3 were as follows: 0.0052+/-0.0094; 0.022+/-0.023 (P=0.0038 vs. group 2); and 0.014+/-0.005. Levels of CD40L gene expression correlated significantly with acute rejection Banff 97 score (R2=0.44, P=0.0004) and severity of intertubular capillary changes (ITCC) (R2=0.33, P=0.011). After in vitro activation, CD40L gene expression increased by approximately 4-fold and the addition of CsA or FK506 diminished CD40L gene expression to a base level.nnnCONCLUSIONnPeripheral CD4+ T cell CD40L gene expression increases significantly in acute rejection and CAN and may serve as a non-invasive method to monitor allograft function and determine the biological response to CsA and FK506.

The CLEAR Study: A 5-day, 3-g Loading Dose of Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Standard 2-g Dosing in Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESnAdequate early mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure is associated with lower rates of acute rejection in renal transplantation. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if higher initial mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) doses increased the proportion of patients reaching therapeutic MPA levels (30 to 60 mg.h/L) by day 5.nnnDESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTSnDe novo renal transplant patients were randomized to receive intensified dosing of MMF (1.5 g twice daily on days 1 to 5, then 1.0 g twice daily) or standard dosing (1.0 g twice daily). All recipients received tacrolimus and prednisone. Full MPA areas under the curve (AUCs) were completed on days 3 and 5, whereas a limited sampling strategy was utilized at four subsequent time points.nnnRESULTSnAt day 5, 47.5% of the MMF 3-g arm achieved the MPA therapeutic window versus 54.4% of the MMF 2-g arm. However, MPA AUC levels were significantly higher in the 3-g arm at day 3 and 5. This resulted in a trend for fewer treated acute rejections at 6 months. Significantly more acute rejections (treated, biopsy-proven including and excluding borderline) occurred in patients with MPA AUC levels<30 mg.h/L compared with those >or=30 mg.h/L at day 5. No significant differences were seen in common adverse events.nnnCONCLUSIONSnA limited intensified dose of MMF increased early MPA exposure and was well tolerated. Further studies are required to determine whether limited intensified MMF dosing can reduce acute rejection.

Epstein-Barr virus infection in transplant recipients: Summary of a workshop on surveillance, prevention and treatment.

Diseases caused by the Epstein-Barr virus are of great significance among organ transplant recipients. One of these diseases, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, is a major complication among organ transplant recipients. Management of this entity is problematic due to the difficulties with laboratory surveillance, diagnosis, prevention and treatment. A group of Canadian and American experts was assembled to discuss these aspects of Epstein-Barr virus diseases in Canadian organ transplant recipients. This report summarizes the relevant background literature and levels of evidence in relation to the outcomes of the deliberations and recommendations by the expert panel.

Factors associated with progression of interstitial fibrosis in renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil.

Background. We recently reported a randomized study in renal transplant patients (RTP) receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone in which patients who had early protocol biopsies (PBx) derived no benefit compared with controls (no PBx) at 6 months, likely due to the low prevalence of subclinical rejection. We report on the follow-up of these patients to 24 months at which time a repeat PBx and tests of renal function were performed. Methods. Of the 240 RTP randomized, 22 were excluded for a protocol violation. Approximately 75% of the remaining 218 (111 PBx and 107 controls) completed the study. Results. At 24 months, graft function was excellent with a mean creatinine clearance of approximately 74 mL/min and negligible proteinuria; however, the prevalence of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA)—ci + ct more than or equal to 2—increased from approximately 3% at baseline to up to 40% to 50%. By logistic regression analysis, the only independent positive correlate of IF/TA was transplantation with a deceased donor. However, by post hoc analysis, use of angiotensin-II-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers was negatively correlated with both the prevalence of IF/TA at 24 months and its progression between 6 and 24 months in RTP that had paired biopsies. Conclusions. A regimen of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone results in excellent renal function at 24 months posttransplant but with a progressive increase in IF/TA. A potential inhibitory effect of angiotensin-II-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blockers on IF/TA is suggested that requires confirmation in a randomized study.

Immunopharmacologic therapy in renal transplantation.

The long‐term kidney allograft survival rate is still far from optimum. Conventional immunosuppressive drugs used to prevent allograft rejection are associated with significant side effects. Moreover, withdrawal of these agents is often associated with graft loss due to rejection. No treatment is available for chronic rejection. Graft tolerance is difficult to achieve in humans, and therefore a continued goal in organ transplantation is to develop immunosuppressive regimens that are associated with fewer side effects and decreased rates of rejection, and that promote graft tolerance. The advent of newer pharmacologic agents and bioreagents is expected to improve patient and graft survival rates.

A Prospective 3-yr Evaluation of Tacrolimus-based Immunosuppressive Therapy in Immunological High Risk Renal Allograft Recipients

Abstract:u2002 Background:u2002 There have been no published data on use of the the newer immunosuppressants tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in high immunological risk renal transplantation. We therefore undertook a prospective study to systematically assess outcomes using these agents as part of an aggressive immunosuppressive regimen.

Accuracy to estimate rates of decline in glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant patients

Background. We examined the use of the Cockroft Gault (C-G) test, Modified Diet in Renal Disease 2 (MDRD2) test, and inverse serum creatinine (&Dgr;1/Scr) to estimate rates of decline in renal transplant function using isotope glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as a reference test. Methods. Percent changes in estimated GFR (&Dgr;eGFR) were compared to simultaneous changes in isotope GFR (&Dgr;iGFR) in 72 patients. Results. The number of iGFR was 508 with a mean of 7.15±3.15 scans per patient. There was a decline in iGFR of 16.14±21.37 ml/min over the study duration of 88.9±57.6 months. &Dgr;eGFR and &Dgr;1/Scr correlated significantly with &Dgr;iGFR. Accuracy to predict &Dgr;iGFR from the eGFRs was limited to <65% concordance within 30% range from changes in iGFR. Slope analyses showed a significantly lower percent annual loss in mean iGFR of 6.03% than that of the C-G of 8.62% and MDRD2 of 8.96% (P<0.001). The within patient variability measured from the standard deviation (ml/min) of root mean square of 4.69 for iGFR was significantly higher than that for C-G and MDRD2 of 2.46 and 2.94, respectively. iGFR and eGFR at first observation correlated significantly (P<0.001) with last observation. Conclusions. iGFR is significantly more variable within patient than the other predictors, and the two estimators predict the iGFR with a high sensitivity but low specificity. This is a clinically reasonable combination. Predicted percent of annual loss in iGFR appears to be smaller than that using the two estimators.