Ai-Na He

Incidence and risk of hypertension with a novel multi-targeted kinase inhibitor axitinib in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS To investigate the overall incidence and risk of hypertension in cancer patients who receive axitinib and compare the differences in incidences between axitinib and the other four approved vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS Several databases were searched, including Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Eligible studies were phase II and III prospective clinical trials of patients with cancer assigned axitinib at a starting dose of 5 mg orally twice daily with data on hypertension available. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed or random effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials. RESULTS A total of 1908 patients from 10 clinical trials were included. The overall incidences of all grade and high grade hypertension in cancer patients were 40.1% (95% CI 30.9, 50.2%) and 13.1% (95% CI 6.7, 24%). The use of axitinib was associated with significantly increased risk of all grade (RR 3.00, 95% CI 1.29, 6.97, P = 0.011) and high grade hypertension (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.21, 2.43, P = 0.003). The risk of axitinib associated all grade and high grade hypertension in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was significantly higher than that in non-RCC. Additionally, the risk of hypertension with axitinib was substantially higher than other approved VEGFR-TKIs, while the risk of all grade hypertension with axitinib was similar to pazopanib (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.95-, 1.17, P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS While sharing a similar spectrum of target receptors with other VEGFR-TKIs, axitinib is associated with an unexpectedly high risk of developing hypertension. Close monitoring and appropriate management for hypertension are recommended during the treatment.

Incidence and risk of hypertension with vandetanib in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of clinical trials

To perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis of published clinical trials to determine incidence rate and overall risk of hypertension with vandetanib in cancer patients.

Risk of venous thromboembolic events associated with VEGFR-TKIs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been widely used in advanced cancers. Concerns have arisen regarding the risk of venous thromboembolism with the use of these drugs. Currently, the contribution of VEGFR‐TKIs to venous thromboembolism is still unknown. We performed a meta‐analysis to determine the incidence and relative risk (RR) of venous thromboembolism events (VTEs) associated with these agents. Eligible studies included phase II and III prospective trials evaluating US Food and Drug Administration approved VEGFR‐TKIs (pazopanib, sunitinib, sorafenib and vandetanib), and data on VTEs were available. Overall incidence rates, RR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed‐ or random‐effects models depending on the heterogeneity of included trials. A total of 14 studies (4,430 patients) were selected for this meta‐analysis. The incidence of VTEs related to VEGFR‐TKIs was 3% (95%CI: 1.7–5.1%), and there was no statistically significant increase in the risk of VTEs for VEGFR‐TKIs versus controls in overall population (RR0.912, 95%CI: 0.617–1.348, p = 0.643). On subgroup analysis, no significant increase in the risk of VTEs was found among different VEGFR‐TKIs or tumor types. No evidence of publication bias was observed. The use of VEGFR‐TKIs does not significantly increase the risk of VTEs, the risk of VTEs in patients with cancer is driven predominantly by tumor types, host factors and concomitant usage of anticancer agents. These results would provide important information for clinicians who use VEGFR‐TKIs to treat patients with solid cancer.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of EFGR tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy with standard second-line chemotherapy in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy (EFGR-TKIs: gefitinib or erlotinib) with standard second-line chemotherapy (single agent docetaxel or pemetrexed) in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS We systematically searched for randomized clinical trials that compared EGFR-TKI monotherapy with standard second-line chemotherapy in previously treated advanced NSCLC. The end points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), 1-year survival rate (1-year SR) and grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR), with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials. RESULTS Eight randomized controlled trials (totally 3218 patients) were eligible. Our meta-analysis results showed that EGFR-TKIs were comparable to standard second-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in terms of overall survival (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.92-1.10; p=0.943), progression-free survival (HR 0.90, 95%CI 0.75-1.08, P=0.258) and 1-year-survival rate (RR 0.97, 95%CI 0.87-1.08, P=0.619), and the overall response rate was higher in patients who receiving EGFR-TKIs(RR 1.50, 95%CI 1.22-1.83, P=0.000). Sub-group analysis demonstrated that EGFR-TKI monotherapy significantly improved PFS (HR 0.73, 95%CI: 0.55-0.97, p=0.03) and ORR (RR 1.96, 95%CI: 1.46-2.63, p=0.000) in East Asian patients, but it did not translate into increase in OS and 1-year SR. Furthermore, there were fewer incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and neurotoxicity in EGFR-TKI monotherapy group, excluding grade 3 or 4 rash. CONCLUSION Both interventions had comparable efficacy as second-line treatments for patients with advanced NSCLC, and EGFR-TKI monotherapy was associated with less toxicity and better tolerability. Moreover, our data also demonstrated that EGFR- TKI monotherapy tended to be more effective in East Asian patients in terms of PFS and ORR compared with standard second-line chemotherapy. These results should help inform decisions about patient management and design of future trials.

Overall survival benefits for combining targeted therapy as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer: a meta-analysis of published data.

Background Combining targeted therapy has been extensively investigated in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but it is still unclear whether combining targeted therapy might offer any benefits against standard monotherapy with erlotinib. We thus performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy and safety of combining targeted therapy versus erlotinib alone as second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. Methods Several databases were searched, including Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and grade 3 or 4 adverse event (AEs). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials. Results Eight eligible trials involved 2417 patients were ultimately identified. The intention to treatment (ITT) analysis demonstrated that combining targeted therapy significantly improved OS (HR 0.90, 95%CI: 0.82–0.99, p = 0.024), PFS (HR 0.83, 95%CI: 0.72–0.97, p = 0.018), and ORR (OR 1.35, 95%CI 1.01–1.80, P = 0.04). Sub-group analysis based on phases of trials, EGFR-status and KRAS status also showed that there was a tendency to improve PFS and OS in combining targeted therapy, except that PFS for patients with EGFR-mutation or wild type KRAS favored erlotinib monotherapy. Additionally, more incidence of grade 3 or 4 rash, fatigue and hypertension were observed in combining targeted therapy. Conclusions With the available evidence, combining targeted therapy seems superior over erlotinib monotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. More studies are still needed to identify patients who will most likely benefit from the appropriate combining targeted therapy.

Incidence and risk of hemorrhagic events with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: an up-to-date meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND We aimed at determining the overall incidence and risk of hemorrhagic events associated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs). METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases for relevant prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using either random-effects or fixed-effects models according to the heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS The overall incidence of all-grade and high-grade hemorrhagic events was 9.1% (95% CI: 6.8-12.1%) and 1.3% (95% CI 0.8% to 2.1%), respectively. And the use of VEGFR-TKIs was associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic events, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.67 (95% CI 1.19-2.33, P = 0.003), but not for high-grade hemorrhagic events (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.86-1.77, P = 0.25). The risk of developing all-grade hemorrhagic events varied significantly with tumor types (P < 0.001) and different VEGFR-TKIs (P < 0.001). Additionally, the most common causes of all-grade hemorrhagic events were hemoptysis (48.6%) and epistaxis (20.7%), while hemoptysis (41.8%) and CNS hemorrhage (13.4%) was the most common cause of high-grade hemorrhagic events. CONCLUSIONS While the use of VEGFR-TKIs is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing hemorrhagic events in cancer patients, this is primarily for lower grade events.

Incidence and risk of denosumab-related hypocalcemia in cancer patients: a systematic review and pooled analysis of randomized controlled studies

Abstract Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency and relative risk of hypocalcemia in cancer patients receiving denosumab. Methods: We searched the PubMed (data from 1966 to October 2012), Embase (data from 1980 to October 2012) and Cochrane Library (up to October 2012) electronic databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Abstracts presented at conferences were also searched. Phase II and III trials of denosumab in patients with any type of cancer that reported occurrence of hypocalcemia were eligible. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity among included trials. Results: A total of 8990 patients with a variety of solid tumors from seven RCTs were included for the meta-analysis. The overall incidences of all-grade and high-grade hypocalcemia in cancer patients were 5.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8–9.3%) and 2.0% (95% CI: 0.7–5.5%), respectively. The use of denosumab was associated with significantly increased risk of developing all-grade (RR 1.932, 95% CI: 1.590–2.347, p < 0.001) and high-grade hypocalcemia (RR 4.027, 95% CI: 2.346–6.912, p < 0.001) in comparison with controls. Conclusions: The use of denosumab is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing hypocalcemia (p < 0.001). Physicians should be aware of this adverse effect and should monitor cancer patients receiving denosumab.

CD133 expression predicts lung metastasis and poor prognosis in osteosarcoma patients: A clinical and experimental study

Identifying prognostic factors for osteosarcoma (OS) aids in the selection of patients who require more aggressive management. CD133 has been found to be a prognostic factor of certain tumor types. However, the association between CD133 expression and the prognosis of OS remains unknown. In this study, we analyzed the association of CD133 expression in OS with clinical factors and overall survival, and further investigated its potential role in metastasis in vitro. We found CD133 expression in 65.7% (46/70) of OS samples using immunohistochemistry, and it was positively correlated with lung metastasis analyzed by Chi-square test (P=0.002) and shorter overall survival time using the Kaplan-Meier method compared by log-rank test (P=0.000). Multivariate analysis showed that CD133 expression was an independent prognostic factor of patients with OS. To test for direct participation of CD133, we separated CD133+ and CD133− cells in the MG63 cell line using magnetic-activated cell sorting and found that CD133+ cells were more active in migration by scratch wound-healing assay and invasion by Matrigel invasion assay compared with CD133− cells. Elevated mRNA expression of the stemness gene octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct-4) and NANOG, and the metastasis-related receptor C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) were also found in CD133+ cells by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Thus, expression of CD133 was correlated with lung metastasis and poor prognosis in OS patients. CD133+ cells may be a type of cancer stem cell with high expression of self-renewal capacity and metastasis-related genes.

Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine-Docetaxel Combination Therapy for Recurrent or Refractory High-grade Osteosarcoma in China: A Retrospective Study of 18 Patients

OBJECTIVE In this study, we describe experiences with gemcitabine-docetaxel combination therapy as salvage treatment for Chinese patients with recurrent or refractory high-grade osteosarcoma. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 18 patients with recurrent or refractory high-grade osteosarcoma who had undergone gemcitabine-docetaxel combination treatment as salvage chemotherapy. Gemcitabine at 675 mg/m(2) was administered on Days 1 and 8, and docetaxel at 75-100 mg/m(2) was administered on Day 8. The combination therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS The patients (ages 12-57 years) received a total of 44 cycles of chemotherapy (median: 2 courses; range: 2-6 courses). The overall response rate was 5.6% and the disease control rate was 22.3%, with one partial response and three patients with stable disease. The median time to progression and overall survival time were 2 months (range: 2-6 months) and 8 months (range: 3-21 months), respectively. Major severe toxicities were hematologic toxicities, including Grade 3 or 4 anemia (9.1%), leucopenia (29.5%) and thrombocytopenia (18.1%) in total cycles; mild toxicities included Grade 1 or 2 nausea and vomiting (31.8%), fatigue (38.6%) and alopecia (20.5%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS In the current study, gemcitabine-docetaxel combination therapy at this dosage and schedule was found to be well tolerated and marginally effective, which could be considered as salvage therapy for patients with recurrent or refractory high-grade osteosarcoma.

Paclitaxel-based versus docetaxel-based regimens in metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Objectives: Docetaxel and paclitaxel show significant clinical activity in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and have been approved for MBC by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, but it is still unclear whether a paclitaxel-based regimen improves outcomes over a docetaxel-based regimen in patients with MBC. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the safety and efficacy of these two regimens in MBC. Methods: We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials that comparing paclitaxel-based with docetaxel-based regimens in patients with MBC in PubMed (up to January 2012), Embase (1980 to January 2012), and the Cochrane databases (up to January 2012). Abstracts presented at conferences (up to January 2011) were also searched. Data were extracted from the studies by two independent reviewers. The meta-analysis was performed by Stata version 12.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). Results: Seven eligible trials involving 1694 patients with MBC were selected. Our results showed that a paclitaxel-based regimen was comparable to a docetaxel-based regimen for MBC patients in terms of OS (HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.60–1.27, p = 0.48), PFS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58–1.00, p = 0.052), TTP (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.81–1.58, p = 0.46), and ORR (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.88–1.15, p = 0.92), but fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events including anemia (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44–0.94, p = 0.023), neutropenia (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.58–0.93, p = 0.011), febrile neutropenia (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15–0.96, p = 0.041), thrombopenia (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41–0.96, p = 0.033), mucositis (RR: 0.082, 95% CI: 0.025–0.27, p < 0.001), diarrhea (RR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.081–0.47, p < 0.001) and fatigue (RR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20–0.96, p = 0.039) were observed in the paclitaxel-based regimen. However, limitations of our study needed to be considered when interpreting these results: our study was a meta-analysis of published data, and there was significant heterogeneity among included trials. Potential publication bias might also exist. Conclusion: The present systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that both taxane-based regimens have comparable efficacy for patients with MBC, and the paclitaxel-based regimen is associated with less toxicity and better tolerability, especially in older patients and when used in weekly regimens.