Aikseng Ooi

Oncogenic KRAS Confers Chemoresistance by Upregulating NRF2

Oncogenic KRAS mutations found in 20% to 30% of all non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are associated with chemoresistance and poor prognosis. Here we demonstrate that activation of the cell protective stress response gene NRF2 by KRAS is responsible for its ability to promote drug resistance. RNAi-mediated silencing of NRF2 was sufficient to reverse resistance to cisplatin elicited by ectopic expression of oncogenic KRAS in NSCLC cells. Mechanistically, KRAS increased NRF2 gene transcription through a TPA response element (TRE) located in a regulatory region in exon 1 of NRF2. In a mouse model of mutant KrasG12D-induced lung cancer, we found that suppressing the NRF2 pathway with the chemical inhibitor brusatol enhanced the antitumor efficacy of cisplatin. Cotreatment reduced tumor burden and improved survival. Our findings illuminate the mechanistic details of KRAS-mediated drug resistance and provide a preclinical rationale to improve the management of lung tumors harboring KRAS mutations with NRF2 pathway inhibitors.

Brusatol overcomes chemoresistance through inhibition of protein translation

The NRF2 pathway activates a cell survival response when cells are exposed to xenobiotics or are under oxidative stress. Therapeutic activation of NRF2 can also be used prior to insult as a means of disease prevention. However, prolonged expression of NRF2 has been shown to protect cancer cells by inducing the metabolism and efflux of chemotherapeutics, leading to both intrinsic and acquired chemoresistance to cancer drugs. This effect has been termed the “dark side” of NRF2. In an effort to combat this chemoresistance, our group discovered the first NRF2 inhibitor, the natural product brusatol, however the mechanism of inhibition was previously unknown. In this report, we show that brusatols mode of action is not through direct inhibition of the NRF2 pathway, but through the inhibition of both cap‐dependent and cap‐independent protein translation, which has an impact on many short‐lived proteins, including NRF2. Therefore, there is still a need to develop a new generation of specific NRF2 inhibitors with limited toxicity and off‐target effects that could be used as adjuvant therapies to sensitize cancers with high expression of NRF2.

Fumarate mediates a chronic proliferative signal in fumarate hydratase-inactivated cancer cells by increasing transcription and translation of ferritin genes

ABSTRACT Germ line mutations of the gene encoding the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzyme fumarate hydratase (FH) cause a hereditary cancer syndrome known as hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC). HLRCC-associated tumors harbor biallelic FH inactivation that results in the accumulation of the TCA cycle metabolite fumarate. Although it is known that fumarate accumulation can alter cellular signaling, if and how fumarate confers a growth advantage remain unclear. Here we show that fumarate accumulation confers a chronic proliferative signal by disrupting cellular iron signaling. Specifically, fumarate covalently modifies cysteine residues on iron regulatory protein 2 (IRP2), rendering it unable to repress ferritin mRNA translation. Simultaneously, fumarate increases ferritin gene transcription by activating the NRF2 (nuclear factor [erythroid-derived 2]-like 2) transcription factor. In turn, increased ferritin protein levels promote the expression of the promitotic transcription factor FOXM1 (Forkhead box protein M1). Consistently, clinical HLRCC tissues showed increased expression levels of both FOXM1 and its proliferation-associated target genes. This finding demonstrates how FH inactivation can endow cells with a growth advantage.

Whole-Exome Sequencing Validates a Preclinical Mouse Model for the Prevention and Treatment of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC) are among the most common and highly mutated human malignancies. Solar UV radiation is the major factor in the etiology of cSCC. Whole-exome sequencing of 18 microdissected tumor samples (cases) derived from SKH-1 hairless mice that had been chronically exposed to solar-simulated UV (SSUV) radiation showed a median point mutation (SNP) rate of 155 per Mb. The majority (78.6%) of the SNPs are C.G>T.A transitions, a characteristic UVR-induced mutational signature. Direct comparison with human cSCC cases showed high overlap in terms of both frequency and type of SNP mutations. Mutations in Trp53 were detected in 15 of 18 (83%) cases, with 20 of 21 SNP mutations located in the protein DNA-binding domain. Strikingly, multiple nonsynonymous SNP mutations in genes encoding Notch family members (Notch1-4) were present in 10 of 18 (55%) cases. The histopathologic spectrum of the mouse cSCC that develops in this model resembles very closely the spectrum of human cSCC. We conclude that the mouse SSUV cSCCs accurately represent the histopathologic and mutational spectra of the most prevalent tumor suppressors of human cSCC, validating the use of this preclinical model for the prevention and treatment of human cSCC. Cancer Prev Res; 10(1); 67–75. ©2016 AACR.

The effects of NRF2 modulation on the initiation and progression of chemically and genetically induced lung cancer

Targeting the transcription factor NRF2 has been recognized as a feasible strategy for cancer prevention and treatment, but many of the mechanistic details underlying its role in cancer development and progression are lacking. Therefore, careful mechanistic studies of the NRF2 pathway in cancer initiation and progression are needed to identify which therapeutic avenue—activation or inhibition—is appropriate in a given context. Moreover, while numerous reports confirm the protective effect of NRF2 activation against chemical carcinogenesis little is known of its role in cancer arising from spontaneous mutations. Here, we tested the effects of NRF2 modulation (activation by sulforaphane or inhibition by brusatol) in lung carcinogenesis using a chemical (vinyl carbamate) model in A/J mice and a genetic (conditional KrasG12D oncogene expression, to simulate spontaneous oncogene mutation) model in C57BL/6J mice. Mice were treated with NRF2 modulators before carcinogen exposure or KrasG12D expression to test the role of NRF2 in cancer initiation, or treated after tumor development to test the role of NRF2 in cancer progression. Lung tissues were analyzed to determine tumor burden, as well as status of NRF2 and KRAS pathways. Additionally, proliferation, apoptosis, and oxidative DNA damage were assessed. Overall, NRF2 activation prevents initiation of chemically induced cancer, but promotes progression of pre‐existing tumors regardless of chemical or genetic etiology. Once tumors are initiated, NRF2 inhibition is effective against the progression of chemically and spontaneously induced tumors. These results have important implications for NRF2‐targeted cancer prevention and intervention strategies.

Binding Site Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans NR4A Nuclear Receptor NHR-6 During Development

Members of the NR4A subfamily of nuclear receptors make up a highly conserved, functionally diverse group of transcription factors implicated in a multitude of cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, metabolism and DNA repair. The gene nhr-6, which encodes the sole C. elegans NR4A nuclear receptor homolog, has a critical role in organogenesis and regulates the development of the spermatheca organ system. Our previous work revealed that nhr-6 is required for spermatheca cell divisions in late L3 and early L4 and spermatheca cell differentiation during the mid L4 stage. Here, we utilized chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) to identify NHR-6 binding sites during both the late L3/early L4 and mid L4 developmental stages. Our results revealed 30,745 enriched binding sites for NHR-6, ~70% of which were within 3 kb upstream of a gene transcription start site. Binding sites for a cohort of candidate target genes with probable functions in spermatheca organogenesis were validated through qPCR. Reproductive and spermatheca phenotypes were also evaluated for these genes following a loss-of-function RNAi screen which revealed several genes with critical functions during spermatheca organogenesis. Our results uncovered a complex nuclear receptor regulatory network whereby NHR-6 regulates multiple cellular processes during spermatheca organogenesis.

A catalogue of somatic NRF2 gain-of-function mutations in cancer

Identification and characterization of somatic mutations in cancer have important prognostication and treatment implications. Genes encoding the Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NRF2) transcription factor and its negative regulator, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1), are frequently mutated in cancer. These mutations drive constitutive NRF2 activation and correlate with poor prognosis. Despite its apparent significance, a comprehensive catalogue of somatic NRF2 mutations across different tumor types is still lacking. Here, we catalogue NRF2 mutations in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. 226 unique NRF2-mutant tumors were identified from 10,364 cases. NRF2 mutations were found in 21 out of the 33 tumor types. A total of 11 hotspots were identified. Of these, mutation to the R34 position was most frequent. Notably, R34 and D29 mutations were overrepresented in bladder, lung, and uterine cancers. Analyses of corresponding RNA sequencing data using a de novo derived gene expression classifier showed that the R34 mutations drive constitutive NRF2 activation with a selection pressure biased against the formation of R34L. Of all R34 mutants, R34L conferred the least degree of protein stabilization, suggesting a pro-tumor NRF2 half-life threshold. Our findings offer a comprehensive catalogue of NRF2 mutations in cancer that can help prognostication and NRF2 research.

RPA1 binding to NRF2 switches ARE-dependent transcriptional activation to ARE-NRE-dependent repression.

Significance Our findings shift the paradigm of NRF2 as a transcriptional activator to one in which NRF2 can also act as a transcriptional repressor, which we believe will stimulate new research areas and interests among scientists from other fields. While the majority of the data provided in this paper center on suppression of MYLK expression and the resulting pathological significance, the more far-reaching findings are the in silico and RNA-seq datasets indicating that the NRF2-replication protein A1 (RPA1)-ARE-NRE complex transcriptionally represses other genes as well, again highlighting the broad scope and significance of NRF2 repression of target genes. NRF2 regulates cellular redox homeostasis, metabolic balance, and proteostasis by forming a dimer with small musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma proteins (sMAFs) and binding to antioxidant response elements (AREs) to activate target gene transcription. In contrast, NRF2-ARE–dependent transcriptional repression is unreported. Here, we describe NRF2-mediated gene repression via a specific seven-nucleotide sequence flanking the ARE, which we term the NRF2-replication protein A1 (RPA1) element (NRE). Mechanistically, RPA1 competes with sMAF for NRF2 binding, followed by interaction of NRF2-RPA1 with the ARE-NRE and eduction of promoter activity. Genome-wide in silico and RNA-seq analyses revealed this NRF2-RPA1-ARE-NRE complex mediates negative regulation of many genes with diverse functions, indicating that this mechanism is a fundamental cellular process. Notably, repression of MYLK, which encodes the nonmuscle myosin light chain kinase, by the NRF2-RPA1-ARE-NRE complex disrupts vascular integrity in preclinical inflammatory lung injury models, illustrating the translational significance of NRF2-mediated transcriptional repression. Our findings reveal a gene-suppressive function of NRF2 and a subset of negatively regulated NRF2 target genes, underscoring the broad impact of NRF2 in physiological and pathological settings.

Fumarate hydratase inactivation in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer is synthetic lethal with ferroptosis induction

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC) is a hereditary cancer syndrome characterized by inactivation of the Krebs cycle enzyme fumarate hydratase (FH). HLRCC patients are at high risk of developing kidney cancer of type 2 papillary morphology that is refractory to current radiotherapy, immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Hence, an effective therapy for this deadly form of cancer is urgently needed. Here, we show that FH inactivation (FH−/−) proves synthetic lethal with inducers of ferroptosis, an iron‐dependent and nonapoptotic form of cell death. Specifically, we identified gene signatures for compound sensitivities based on drug responses for 9 different drug classes against the NCI‐60 cell lines. These signatures predicted that ferroptosis inducers would be selectively toxic to FH−/− cell line UOK262. Preferential cell death against UOK262‐FH−/− was confirmed with 4 different ferroptosis inducers. Mechanistically, the FH−/− sensitivity to ferroptosis is attributed to dysfunctional GPX4, the primary cellular defender against ferroptosis. We identified that C93 of GPX4 is readily post‐translationally modified by fumarates that accumulate in conditions of FH−/−, and that C93 modification represses GPX4 activity. Induction of ferroptosis in FH‐inactivated tumors represents an opportunity for synthetic lethality in cancer.

Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) differentially regulates nuclear factor erythroid-2–related factors 1 and 2 (NRF1 and NRF2)

Nuclear factor erythroid-2–related factor 1 (NRF1) and NRF2 are essential for maintaining redox homeostasis and coordinating cellular stress responses. They are highly homologous transcription factors that regulate the expression of genes bearing antioxidant-response elements (AREs). Genetic ablation of NRF1 or NRF2 results in vastly different phenotypic outcomes, implying that they play different roles and may be differentially regulated. Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) is the main negative regulator of NRF2 and mediates ubiquitylation and degradation of NRF2 through its NRF2-ECH homology–like domain 2 (Neh2). Here, we report that KEAP1 binds to the Neh2-like (Neh2L) domain of NRF1 and stabilizes it. Consistently, NRF1 is more stable in KEAP1+/+ than in KEAP1−/− isogenic cell lines, whereas NRF2 is dramatically stabilized in KEAP1−/− cells. Replacing NRF1s Neh2L domain with NRF2s Neh2 domain renders NRF1 sensitive to KEAP1-mediated degradation, indicating that the amino acids between the DLG and ETGE motifs, not just the motifs themselves, are essential for KEAP1-mediated degradation. Systematic site-directed mutagenesis identified the core amino acid residues required for KEAP1-mediated degradation and further indicated that the DLG and ETGE motifs with correct spacing are insufficient as a KEAP1 degron. Our results offer critical insights into our understanding of the differential regulation of NRF1 and NRF2 by KEAP1 and their different physiological roles.