Aileen Hogan

Identification of degradome components associated with prostate cancer progression by expression analysis of human prostatic tissues

Extracellular proteases of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and serine protease families participate in many aspects of tumour growth and metastasis. Using quantitative real-time RT–PCR analysis, we have undertaken a comprehensive survey of the expression of these enzymes and of their natural inhibitors in 44 cases of human prostate cancer and 23 benign prostate specimens. We found increased expression of MMP10, 15, 24, 25 and 26, urokinase plasminogen activator-receptor (uPAR) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI1), and the newly characterised serine proteases hepsin and matriptase-1 (MTSP1) in malignant tissue compared to benign prostate tissue. In contrast, there was significantly decreased expression of MMP2 and MMP23, maspin, and the protease inhibitors tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3), TIMP4 and RECK (reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs) in the cancer specimens. The expression of MMP15 and MMP26 correlated positively with Gleason score, whereas TIMP3, TIMP4 and RECK expression correlated negatively with Gleason score. The cellular localisation of the expression of the deregulated genes was evaluated using primary malignant epithelial and stromal cell cultures derived from radical prostatectomy specimens. MMP10 and 25, hepsin, MTSP1 and maspin showed predominantly epithelial expression, whereas TIMP 3 and 4, RECK, MMP2 and 23, uPAR and PAI1 were produced primarily by stromal cells. These data provide the first comprehensive and quantitative analysis of the expression and localisation of MMPs and their inhibitors in human prostate cancer, leading to the identification of several genes involved in proteolysis as potential prognostic indicators, in particular hepsin, MTSP1, MMP26, PAI1, uPAR, MMP15, TIMP3, TIMP4, maspin and RECK.

Expression of proteinases and proteinase inhibitors during embryo‐uterine contact in the pig

Implantation in pigs is noninvasive and characterized by interdigitation of embryonic and endometrial epithelial cell processes. However, when pig embryos are transferred to ectopic sites, trophoblast becomes invasive. The objective of this study was to evaluate expression of proteinases and proteinase inhibitors in pig embryos and uteri at the time of endometrial attachment. RNA was extracted from Day 15.75 pig embryos and uteri and reverse transcribed, and cDNA was amplified by polymerase chain reactions using primers specific for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9 (MMP-2 and -9), and tissue inhibitors of MMP-1, -2, and -3 (TIMP-1, -2, and -3). Localization of transcripts for the genes of interest in embryos and uteri was performed using in situ hybridization with antisense riboprobes. Day 15.75 pig embryos and uteri expressed transcripts for uPA, MMP-2 and -9, and TIMP-1, -2, and -3. In situ hybridization revealed weak expression of uPA in the trophectoderm and moderate expression in the adjacent extraembryonic endoderm. TIMP-1 transcripts were abundant in extraembryonic endoderm and scattered throughout the trophectoderm. TIMP-2 appeared to be expressed in all cells of the embryo. TIMP-3 expression was observed in the trophectoderm and, to a lesser extent, in the extraembryonic endoderm. Specific localization of MMP-2 and -9 transcripts above background was not observed by in situ hybridization in either embryos or uterus. Uterine expression of uPA and TIMP-1, -2 and -3 was localized to the endometrial stroma. Transcripts of these genes were not observed in either the luminal or glandular endometrial epithelium. These results suggest that pig embryos and uteri express a wide array of proteinases and proteinase inhibitors during the period of uterine association. The abundant expression of proteinases and proteinase inhibitors during the period of uterine association. The abundant expression of TIMP in pig embryos may partially explain the absence of invasive implantation in this species in contrast to implantation typified by rodents and primates.

Role for the submandibular gland in modulating pulmonary inflammation following induction of systemic anaphylaxis

Previous studies have shown that bilateral decentralization of the superior cervical ganglia (SCG; decentralization) attenuates allergen-induced pulmonary inflammatory responses in male rats sensitized to the nematode Nippostrongylus brasiliensis. The present report examines the neuronal and glandular mechanisms mediating the protection against pulmonary inflammation afforded by decentralization. Tissues and organs innervated by the SCG are responsible for this protection since, in a manner similar to decentralization, bilateral removal of the SCG (ganglionectomy) reduced anaphylaxis-induced accumulation of inflammatory cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Removal of the submandibular gland (sialadenectomy) did not modify the severity of the pulmonary inflammation, but concurrent sialadenectomy and decentralization abolished the protective effect of decentralization. Thus, we postulate that cervical sympathetic nerves tonically inhibit release of anti-inflammatory factors from submandibular glands. No relationship was found between noradrenaline and serotonin content of submandibular glands and the degree of protection against pulmonary inflammation offered by decentralization and ganglionectomy. Both decentralization and ganglionectomy appeared to increase the level of transcripts that encode immunomodulatory growth factors (nerve growth factor and epidermal growth factor) in submandibular glands, but these denervations evidently did not modify the transcripts for TGF beta 2. Systemic inflammatory events are regulated by the central nervous system at a level superior to the SCG probably through modulation of immunoregulatory factors in submandibular glands.

Activation of the Embryonic Genome: Comparisons Between Mouse and Bovine Development

Eutherian mammalian preimplantation development includes an essential transitional period during which the embryo proceeds from an initial interval of maternal control (established during oogenesis) to embryonic control resulting from the activation of transcriptional activity from the embryonic genome (1–3). As for most aspects of early mammalian development, the events surrounding the activation of the embryonic genome are most readily examined in the mouse. There is, however, evidence to suggest that the mouse may display a pattern of preimplantation development (certainly in the timing of the major events) that is unique. It is, therefore, essential to broaden the analysis of preimplantation development to include other mammalian species. A comparison of several species in Table 9.1 shows that there is considerable variation in the timing, cell number, and developmental stage at which the early embryos of these groups undergo the major morphogenetic events of preimplantation development (4, 5). As shown in Table 9.2, these variations also reflect contrasts in the timing of the molecular and biochemical events of preimplantation development.

Matrix metalloproteinase-9 maps to the distal end of chromosome 2 in the mouse

The activity and expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9/gelatinase B (MMP-9), an enzyme implicated in the implantation process in mice, was investigated in normal and parthenogenetic blastocyst outgrowths. Conditioned media from parthenogenetic blastocysts after 4 days of culture had reduced levels of MMP-9 activity compared to conditioned medium from normal outgrowths. Levels of MMP-9 mRNA assayed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction methods were also reduced in parthenogenetic blastocysts compared to normal outgrowths. Genetic mapping studies showed that Mmp9 maps to the distal end of chromosome 2 near the proximal boundary of a region affected by genomic imprinting. Both parental alleles of Mmp9, however, are expressed in 11.5-day embryos derived from interspecific crosses of Mus musculus and Mus spretus. Thus, loss of MMP-9 activity in parthenogenetic blastocysts does not appear to be due to imprinting but, rather, due to a defect of trophoblast giant cell proliferation and differentiation.