Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Aimée Gayed is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Aimée Gayed.


Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica | 2010

Survival following an acute coronary syndrome: a pet theory put to the test

Gordon Parker; Aimée Gayed; Catherine Owen; Matthew P. Hyett; Therese M. Hilton; Gabriella A. Heruc

Objective:  The aim of this study was to revisit findings from previous studies reporting that pet ownership improves outcome following an admission for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).


Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 2018

Effectiveness of training workplace managers to understand and support the mental health needs of employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aimée Gayed; Josie S Milligan-Saville; Jennifer Nicholas; Bridget T. Bryan; Anthony D. LaMontagne; Allison Milner; Ira Madan; Rafael A. Calvo; Helen Christensen; Arnstein Mykletun; Nick Glozier; Samuel B. Harvey

Managers are in an influential position to make decisions that can impact on the mental health and well-being of their employees. As a result, there is an increasing trend for organisations to provide managers with training in how to reduce work-based mental health risk factors for their employees. A systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify workplace interventions for managers with an emphasis on the mental health of employees reporting directing to them. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled effect sizes using the random effects model for both manager and employee outcomes. Ten controlled trials were identified as relevant for this review. Outcomes evaluating managers’ mental health knowledge (standardised mean difference (SMD)=0.73; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.03; p<0.001), non-stigmatising attitudes towards mental health (SMD=0.36; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.53; p<0.001) and improving behaviour in supporting employees experiencing mental health problems (SMD=0.59; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.03; p=0.01) were found to have significant pooled effect sizes favouring the intervention. A significant pooled effect was not found for the small number of studies evaluating psychological symptoms in employees (p=0.28). Our meta-analysis indicates that training managers in workplace mental health can improve their knowledge, attitudes and self-reported behaviour in supporting employees experiencing mental health problems. At present, any findings regarding the impact of manager training on levels of psychological distress among employees remain preliminary as only a very limited amount of research evaluating employee outcomes is available. Our review suggests that in order to understand the effectiveness of manager training on employees, an increase in collection of employee level data is required.


Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology | 2018

Prevalence of PTSD and common mental disorders amongst ambulance personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Katherine Petrie; Josie S Milligan-Saville; Aimée Gayed; Mark Deady; Andrea Phelps; Lisa Dell; David Forbes; Richard A. Bryant; Rafael A. Calvo; Nick Glozier; Samuel B. Harvey

PurposeThere is increasing concern regarding the mental health impact of first responder work, with some reports suggesting ambulance personnel may be at particularly high risk. Through this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to determine the prevalence of mental health conditions among ambulance personnel worldwide.MethodsA systematic search and screening process was conducted to identify studies for inclusion in the review. To be eligible, studies had to report original quantitative data on the prevalence of at least one of the following mental health outcome(s) of interest (PTSD, depression, anxiety, general psychological distress) for ambulance personnel samples. Quality of the studies was assessed using a validated methodological rating tool. Random effects modelling was used to estimate pooled prevalence, as well as subgroup analyses and meta-regressions for five variables implicated in heterogeneity.ResultsIn total, 941 articles were identified across all sources, with 95 full-text articles screened to confirm eligibility. Of these, 27 studies were included in the systematic review, reporting on a total of 30,878 ambulance personnel. A total of 18 studies provided necessary quantitative information and were retained for entry in the meta-analysis. The results demonstrated estimated prevalence rates of 11% for PTSD, 15% for depression, 15% for anxiety, and 27% for general psychological distress amongst ambulance personnel, with date of data collection a significant influence upon observed heterogeneity.ConclusionAmbulance personnel worldwide have a prevalence of PTSD considerably higher than rates seen in the general population, although there is some evidence that rates of PTSD may have decreased over recent decades.


BMC Psychiatry | 2018

A protocol for the HeadCoach trial: the development and evaluation of an online mental health training program for workplace managers

Aimée Gayed; Bridget T. Bryan; Katherine Petrie; Mark Deady; Allison Milner; Anthony D. LaMontagne; Rafael A. Calvo; Andrew D. Mackinnon; Helen Christensen; Arnstein Mykletun; Nick Glozier; Samuel B. Harvey

BackgroundWithin high income countries, mental health is now the leading cause of long term sickness absence in the workplace. Managers are in a position to make changes and decisions that have a positive effect on the wellbeing of staff, the recovery of employees with mental ill health, and potentially prevent future mental health problems. However, managers report addressing workplace mental health issues as challenging. The aim of the HeadCoach trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed online training intervention to determine whether it is able to build managers’ confidence to better support individuals within their teams who are experiencing mental ill health, and the confidence to promote manager behaviour likely to result in a more mentally healthy workplace.Methods/DesignWe will conduct a cluster randomised control trial (RCT) to evaluate the effect of HeadCoach, an online training intervention for managers with a focus on the mental health of their employees, compared to a waitlist control. The target sample is 168 managers, and their direct employees. Managers and employees will be assessed at baseline and at 4-month follow up. Managers will have an additional, intermediate assessment 6-weeks post-baseline. The primary outcome is change from baseline in managers’ self-reported confidence when dealing with mental health issues within their team and promoting a mentally healthy workplace. The difference between the intervention and waitlist control groups will be assessed using linear mixed effects repeated measures (MMRM) analysis of variance (ANOVA). Secondary managerial outcomes include mental health literacy, attitudes towards mental health issues in the workplace and managerial behaviour in dealing with mental health matters with their staff. Employee outcomes will be perceived level of manager support, engagement, psychological distress, and rates of sickness absence and presenteeism.DiscussionTo our knowledge this will be the first RCT of a purely online training intervention developed specifically for managers that promotes confidence to both support staff experiencing mental ill health and create a mentally healthy work environment. If successful, this intervention has the potential to provide an effective and efficient method of training managers in workplace mental health and to enhance employee wellbeing.Trial RegistrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000279325


PLOS ONE | 2018

The importance of manager support for the mental health and well-being of ambulance personnel

Katherine Petrie; Aimée Gayed; Bridget T. Bryan; Mark Deady; Ira Madan; Anita Savic; Zoe Wooldridge; Isabelle Counson; Rafael A. Calvo; Nick Glozier; Samuel B. Harvey

Interventions to enhance mental health and well-being within high risk industries such as the emergency services have typically focused on individual-level factors, though there is increasing interest in the role of organisational-level interventions. The aim of this study was to examine the importance of different aspects of manager support in determining the mental health of ambulance personnel. A cross-sectional survey was completed by ambulance personnel across two Australian states (N = 1,622). Demographics, manager support and mental health measures were assessed. Hierarchical multiple linear regressions were conducted to determine the explanatory influence of the employee’s perception of the priority management places upon mental health issues (manager psychosocial safety climate) and managers’ observed behaviours (manager behaviour) on employee common mental disorder and well-being within ambulance personnel. Of the 1,622 participants, 123 (7.6%) were found to be suffering from a likely mental disorder. Manager psychosocial safety climate accounted for a significant amount of the variance in levels of employee common mental health disorder symptoms (13%, p<0.01) and well-being (13%, p<0.01). Manager behaviour had a lesser, but still statistically significant influence upon symptoms of common mental disorder (7% of variance, p<0.01) and well-being (10% of variance, p<0.05). The perceived importance management places on mental health and managers’ actual behaviour are related but distinct concepts, and each appears to impact employee mental health. While the overall variance explained by each factor was limited, the fact that each is potentially modifiable makes this finding important and highlights the significance of organisational and team-level interventions to promote employee well-being within emergency services and other high-risk occupations.


JMIR mental health | 2018

A New Online Mental Health Training Program for Workplace Managers: Pre-Post Pilot Study Assessing Feasibility, Usability, and Possible Effectiveness

Aimée Gayed; Anthony D. LaMontagne; Allison Milner; Mark Deady; Rafael A. Calvo; Helen Christensen; Arnstein Mykletun; Nick Glozier; Samuel B. Harvey

Background Mental health has become the leading cause of sickness absence in high-income countries. Managers can play an important role in establishing mentally healthy workplaces and coordinating their organization’s response to a mentally ill worker. Objective This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility, usability, and likely effectiveness of a newly developed online training program for managers called HeadCoach. HeadCoach aims to build managers’ confidence in supporting the mental health needs of staff and promote managerial behavior most likely to result in a more mentally healthy workplace. Methods In total, 66 managers from two organizations were invited to participate in this pre-post pilot study of HeadCoach, which was made available to managers to complete at their own pace over a 4-week period. Data were collected at baseline and post intervention via an online research platform. The difference in mean scores for each outcome between these two time points was calculated using paired samples t tests. Results Of all the invited managers, 59.1% (39/66) participated in the trial, with complete pre–post data available for 56.4% (22/39) of the participants. The majority of respondents reported positive engagement with the program. During the study period, managers’ knowledge regarding their role in managing mental health issues (P=.01) and their confidence in communicating with employees regarding mental illness (P<.001) significantly increased. In addition, a significant increase was observed from the baseline in managers’ self-reported actions to use strategies to prevent and decrease stress among their team members (P=.02). Conclusions Although caution is needed due to the absence of a control group, preliminary results of this study suggest that HeadCoach could be a feasible, acceptable, and efficient method of training managers in best workplace practices to help support the mental health needs of their staff.


BMJ Open | 2018

Smartphone application for preventing depression: study protocol for a workplace randomised controlled trial

Mark Deady; David Johnston; Nick Glozier; David N. Milne; Isabella Choi; Andrew Mackinnon; Arnstein Mykletun; Rafael A. Calvo; Aimée Gayed; Richard A. Bryant; Helen Christensen; Samuel B. Harvey

Introduction Depression is the leading cause of life years lost due to disability. Appropriate prevention has the potential to reduce the incidence of new cases of depression, however, traditional prevention approaches face significant scalability issues. Prevention programmes delivered by via smartphone applications provide a potential solution. The workplace is an ideal setting to roll out this form of intervention, particularly among industries that are unlikely to access traditional health initiatives and whose workplace characteristics create accessibility and portability issues. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a smartphone application designed to prevent depression and improve well-being. The effectiveness of the app as a universal, selective and indicated prevention tool will also be evaluated. Methods and analysis A multicentre randomised controlled trial, to determine the effectiveness of the intervention compared with an active mood monitoring control in reducing depressive symptoms (primary outcome) and the prevalence of depression at 3 months, with secondary outcomes assessing well-being and work performance. Employees from a range of industries will be invited to participate. Participants with likely current depression at baseline will be excluded. Following baseline assessment, participants, blinded to their allocation, will be randomised to receive one of two versions of the application: headgear (a 30-day mental health intervention) or a control application (mood monitoring for 30 days). Both versions of the app contain a risk calculator to provide a measure of future risk. Analyses will be conducted within an intention-to-treat framework using mixed modelling, with additional analyses conducted to compare the moderating effect of baseline risk level and depression symptom severity on the intervention’s effectiveness. Ethics and dissemination The current trial has received ethics approval from the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HC17021). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Trial registration number ACTRN12617000548336; Results.


Health Expectations | 2009

What happens after diagnosis? Understanding the experiences of patients with newly-diagnosed bipolar disorder.

Judith Proudfoot; Gordon Parker; Megan Benoit; Vijaya Manicavasagar; Meg Smith; Aimée Gayed


The Lancet Psychiatry | 2017

Workplace mental health training for managers and its effect on sick leave in employees: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Josie S Milligan-Saville; Leona Tan; Aimée Gayed; Caryl Barnes; Ira Madan; Mark Dobson; Richard A. Bryant; Helen Christensen; Arnstein Mykletun; Samuel B. Harvey


Occupational Medicine | 2018

Managers’ response to mental health issues among their staff

Bridget T. Bryan; Aimée Gayed; Josie S Milligan-Saville; Ira Madan; Rafael A. Calvo; Nick Glozier; Samuel B. Harvey

Collaboration


Dive into the Aimée Gayed's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Samuel B. Harvey

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Deady

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arnstein Mykletun

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bridget T. Bryan

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard A. Bryant

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ira Madan

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge