Aimee J. Varewijck

Insulin and its analogues and their affinities for the IGF1 receptor

Insulin analogues have been developed in an attempt to achieve a more physiological replacement of insulin and thereby a better glycaemic control. However, structural modification of the insulin molecule may result in altered binding affinities and activities to the IGF1 receptor (IGF1R). As a consequence, insulin analogues may theoretically have an increased mitogenic action compared to human insulin. In view of the lifelong exposure and large patient populations involved, insulin analogues with an increased mitogenic effect in comparison to human insulin may potentially constitute a major health problem, since these analogues may possibly induce the growth of pre-existing neoplasms. This hypothesis has been evaluated extensively in vitro and also in vivo by using animal models. In vitro, all at present commercially available insulin analogues have lower affinities for the insulin receptor (IR). Although it has been suggested that especially insulin analogues with an increased affinity for the IGF1R (such as insulin glargine) are more mitogenic when tested in vitro in cells expressing a high proportion of IGF1R, the question remains whether this has any clinical consequences. At present, there are several uncertainties which make it very difficult to answer this question decisively. In addition, recent data suggest that insulin (or insulin analogues)-mediated stimulation of IRs may play a key role in the progression of human cancer. More detailed information is required to elucidate the exact mechanisms as to how insulin analogues may activate the IR and IGF1R and how this activation may be linked to mitogenesis.

The IGSF1 Deficiency Syndrome: Characteristics of Male and Female Patients

CONTEXT Ig superfamily member 1 (IGSF1) deficiency was recently discovered as a novel X-linked cause of central hypothyroidism (CeH) and macro-orchidism. However, clinical and biochemical data regarding growth, puberty, and metabolic outcome, as well as features of female carriers, are scarce. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to investigate clinical and biochemical characteristics associated with IGSF1 deficiency in both sexes. METHODS All patients (n = 42, 24 males) from 10 families examined in the university clinics of Leiden, Amsterdam, Cambridge, and Milan were included in this case series. Detailed clinical data were collected with an identical protocol, and biochemical measurements were performed in a central laboratory. RESULTS Male patients (age 0-87 years, 17 index cases and 7 from family studies) showed CeH (100%), hypoprolactinemia (n = 16, 67%), and transient partial GH deficiency (n = 3, 13%). Pubertal testosterone production was delayed, as were the growth spurt and pubic hair development. However, testicular growth started at a normal age and attained macro-orchid size in all evaluable adults. Body mass index, percent fat, and waist circumference tended to be elevated. The metabolic syndrome was present in 4 of 5 patients over 55 years of age. Heterozygous female carriers (age 32-80 years) showed CeH in 6 of 18 cases (33%), hypoprolactinemia in 2 (11%), and GH deficiency in none. As in men, body mass index, percent fat, and waist circumference were relatively high, and the metabolic syndrome was present in 3 cases. CONCLUSION In male patients, the X-linked IGSF1 deficiency syndrome is characterized by CeH, hypoprolactinemia, delayed puberty, macro-orchidism, and increased body weight. A subset of female carriers also exhibits CeH.

IGF-IR Targeted Therapy: Past, Present and Future.

The IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) has been studied as an anti-cancer target. However, monotherapy trials with IGF-IR targeted antibodies or with IGF-IR specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors have, overall, been very disappointing in the clinical setting. This review discusses potential reasons why IGF-I R targeted therapy fails to inhibit growth of human cancers. It has become clear that intracellular signaling pathways are highly interconnected and complex instead of being linear and simple. One of the most potent candidates for failure of IGF-IR targeted therapy is the insulin receptor isoform A (IR-A). Activation of the IR-A by insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) bypasses the IGF-IR and its inhibition. Another factor may be that anti-cancer treatment may reduce IGF-IR expression. IGF-IR blocking drugs may also induce hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, which may further stimulate cell growth. In addition, circulating IGF-IRs may reduce therapeutic effects of IGF-IR targeted therapy. Nevertheless, it is still possible that the IGF-IR may be a useful adjuvant or secondary target for the treatment of human cancers. Development of functional inhibitors that affect the IGF-IR and IR-A may be necessary to overcome resistance and to make IGF-IR targeted therapy successful. Drugs that modify alternative downstream effects of the IGF-IR, so called “biasing agonists,” should also be considered.

Insulin glargine is more potent in activating the human IGF-I receptor than human insulin and insulin detemir

OBJECTIVE To investigate whether human insulin (HI) and insulin analogues differ in their ability to activate the human IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR), the human insulin receptor A (IR-A) and the human insulin receptor B (IR-B) in vitro. METHODS HI, short-acting insulin analogues (insulin aspart; insulin lispro) and long-acting insulin analogues (insulin glargine; insulin detemir) were compared by using kinase receptor activation (KIRA) bioassays specific for IGF-IR, IR-A or IR-B, respectively. These assays quantify ligand activity by measuring receptor auto-phosphorylation upon ligand binding. HI and insulin analogues were tested in a range from 0.1 to 100 nM. RESULTS Short-acting analogues: Overall, short-acting insulin analogues did not differ substantially from HI, nor from each other. Insulin lispro was slightly more potent than HI and insulin aspart in activating the IGF-IR, only reaching statistical significance at 100 nM (p<0.01). Long-acting analogues: At <10 nM insulin glargine was as potent as HI in activating the IRs and IGF-IR. At 10-100 nM insulin glargine was significantly more potent than HI in activating the IR-B (p<0.05) and IGF-IR (p<0.001). Insulin glargine was more potent than insulin detemir in activating all three receptors (p<0.001). Insulin detemir was less potent than HI in activating the IRs at 1-10 nM (p<0.01) and IGF-IR at >1 nM (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Insulin glargine was more potent in activating the IGF-IR than HI and insulin detemir. Since KIRA bioassays do not mimic the exact in vivo situation, further research is needed to find out whether our data have implications for clinical use of insulin glargine.

IGF-I Bioactivity Better Reflects Growth Hormone Deficiency than Total IGF-I

CONTEXT GH is considered the main regulator of circulating IGF-I. Total (extractable) IGF-I is therefore routinely used for diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) and for monitoring treatment. Methods currently used for measurement of circulating total IGF-I may be hampered by interferences of IGF-binding proteins. Recently a kinase receptor activation assay was developed to determine IGF-I bioactivity in human serum. The principle of this assay is based on quantification of IGF-I receptor activation after stimulation with serum in vitro. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of IGF-I bioactivity in adults with GHD. DESIGN This was a single-center observational study. STUDY PARTICIPANTS Ninety-four GH-untreated patients diagnosed with GHD by GH-provocative tests were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES IGF-I bioactivity (determined by the IGF-I kinase receptor activation assay) and total IGF-I (determined by immunoassay) were measured in fasting blood samples. RESULTS IGF-I bioactivity was more frequently below the normal range (<-2 sd) in untreated GH-deficient patients than total IGF-I levels (81.9 vs. 61.7%, respectively), especially in patients older than 40 years of age. IGF-I bioactivity decreased with the duration of GHD, whereas total IGF-I did not. With a decreasing number of additional pituitary deficits, total IGF-I levels more frequently remained within the normal range, whereas the percentage below the normal range was high for IGF-I bioactivity, independent of additional deficits. CONCLUSION Determination of IGF-I bioactivity may offer advantages in the evaluation of adult GHD compared with total IGF-I as bioactivity better reflects GHD as defined by GH stimulation tests, especially in subjects older than 40 years of age.

Circulating insulin-like growth factors may contribute substantially to insulin receptor isoform A and insulin receptor isoform B signalling.

BACKGROUND Only a fraction of circulating insulin-like activity is due to insulin itself. The aim of this study was to determine total serum insulin-like activity mediated via the insulin receptor isoform A (IR-A) and isoform B (IR-B) by using kinase receptor activation (KIRA) assays specific for the IR-A and IR-B. METHODS The IR-A and IR-B KIRA assays use human embryonic kidney cells which have been transfected with the human IR-A or IR-B gene and quantify serum-mediated phosphorylation of the IR. RESULTS Both IR KIRA assays were sensitive (detection limit 32 pmol/L) and precise (intra- and inter assay CV: <12% and <15%). The EC₅₀s of insulin, IGF-I and IGF-II were 1.4, 11.2 and 6.7 nmol/L for the IR-A KIRA assay, and 1.3, 31.0 and 15.7 nmol/L for the IR-B KIRA assay. The operational range of both assays allowed for determination of total insulin-like activity in human serum. Analysis of serum samples showed that there was a significant positive correlation between serum insulin-like and immunoreactive insulin concentrations (IR-A: r = 0.56, p = 0.01, IR-B: r = 0.68, p = 0.001). Importantly, addition of IGF-I or IGF-II antibodies to human serum samples could substantially decrease the endpoint signal in both KIRA assays. CONCLUSIONS We showed that serum IGF-I and IGF-II may substantially contribute to IR signalling. Since IR isoform specific KIRA assays also take into account the contribution of IGFs present in serum on IR signalling, they may help to gain more insight into the roles of IGF mediated IR-A and IR-B activation in health and disease.

Insulin analogs and cancer: A note of caution

In view of the lifelong exposure and large patient populations involved, insulin analogs with an increased mitogenic effect in comparison to human insulin may potentially constitute a major health problem, since these analogs may possibly induce the growth of pre-existing neoplasms. At present, the available data suggest that insulin analogs are safe. In line with these findings, we observed that serum of diabetic patients treated with insulin analogs, compared to that of diabetic patients treated with human insulin, did not induce an increased phosphorylation of tyrosine residues of the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR). However, the classical model of the IGF-IR signaling may be insufficient to explain (all) mitogenic effects of insulin analogs since also non-canonical signaling pathways of the IGF-IR may play a major role in this respect. Although phosphorylation of tyrosine residues of the IGF-IR is generally considered to be the initial activation step within the intracellular IGF-IR signaling pathway, it has been found that cells undergo a signaling switch under hyperglycemic conditions. After this switch, a completely different mechanism is utilized to activate the mitogenic (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathways of the IGF-IR that is independent from tyrosine phosphorylation of the IGF-IR. At present it is unknown whether activation of this alternative intracellular pathway of the IGF-IR occurs during hyperglycemia in vivo and whether it is stronger in patients treated with (some) insulin analogs than in patients treated with human insulin. In addition, it is unknown whether the insulin receptors (IRs) also undergo a signaling switch during hyperglycemia. This should be investigated in future studies. Finally, relative overexpression of IR isoform A (IR-A) in (pre) cancer tissues may play a key role in the development and progression of human cancers during treatment with insulin (analogs). Further studies are required to unravel whether the IR-A is involved in the development of cancers and whether, in this respect (some) insulin analogs differ from human insulin.

IGF-I Bioactivity Might Reflect Different Aspects of Quality of Life Than Total IGF-I in GH-Deficient Patients During GH Treatment

CONTEXT No relationship has been found between improvement in quality of life (QOL) and total IGF-I during GH therapy. AIM Our aim was to investigate the relationship between IGF-I bioactivity and QOL in GH-deficient (GHD) patients receiving GH for 12 months. METHODS Of 106 GHD patients, 84 on GH treatment discontinued therapy 4 weeks before establishing baseline values and 22 were GH-naive. IGF-I bioactivity was determined by IGF-I kinase receptor activation assay, total IGF-I by immunoassay (Immulite), and QOL by the disease-specific Question on Life Satisfaction Hypopituitarism (QLS-H) module and by the general SF-36 questionnaire (SF-36Q). RESULTS IGF-I bioactivity increased after 6 months (-2.5 vs -1.9 SD, P < .001) and did not further increase after 12 months (-1.8 SD, P = .23); total IGF-I increased from -2.3 to -0.9 SD (P < .001) and to -0.6 SD (P = .005), respectively. QLS-H did not change over 12 months (-0.66 ± 0.16 to -0.56 ± 0.17 SD [P = .42] to -0.68 ± 0.17 SD [P = .22]). The mental component summary of the SF-36Q increased from 47.4 (38.7-52.8) to 50.2 (43.1-55.3) (P = .001) and did not further improve (49.4 [42.1-54.1], P = .19); the physical component summary did not change (47.5 [42.0-54.2] vs 47.0 [41.9-55.3], P = .91, vs 48.3 [39.9-55.4], P = .66). After 12 months, IGF-I bioactivity was related to QLS-H (r = 0.28, P = .01); total IGF-I was not (r = 0.10, P = .37). IGF-I bioactivity and total IGF-I were related to PCS (r = 0.35, P = .001; and r = 0.31, P = .003). CONCLUSION IGF-I bioactivity remained subnormal after GH treatment and was positively related to QLS-H, whereas total IGF-I was not. This suggests that IGF-I bioactivity reflects different aspects of QOL than total IGF-I in GHD patients during GH treatment.

The Introduction of the IDS-iSYS Total IGF-1 Assay May Have Far-Reaching Consequences for Diagnosis and Treatment of GH Deficiency

CONTEXT IGF-1 measurements are used for screening and monitoring GH deficiency (GHD) and acromegaly. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to study whether the introduction of the IDS-iSYS IGF-1 assay would lead to different clinical interpretations in GHD and acromegaly. DESIGN In 106 GHD subjects and in 15 acromegalic subjects visiting our university hospital, total IGF-1 levels were measured before and during therapy by using the Immulite (IM) assay and IDS-iSYS (ID) assay. Z-scores were calculated by using assay-specific age-specific normative range values. All treatment decisions were based upon results obtained by the IM assay. RESULTS In GHD subjects, absolute IGF-1 concentrations differed significantly between both IGF-1 assays before treatment (P < .001) but not during GH treatment (P = .32), and mean Z-scores for IGF-1 differed significantly before starting (IM, -2.23, vs ID, -1.43; P < .001) and during GH treatment (IM, -0.60, vs ID, +0.21; P < .001). In acromegalic subjects, absolute IGF-1 concentrations did not differ between both IGF-1 assays before treatment (P = .18) but were significantly different during treatment (P = 0.009), and mean Z-scores for IGF-1 were not different before starting (IM, 10.93, vs ID, 10.78; P = .41) or during treatment (IM, 3.60, vs ID, 3.18; P = .23). CONCLUSIONS In GHD subjects, mean IGF-1 Z-scores significantly differed when measured by the IM assay compared with the ID assay irrespective of treatment. In contrast, in acromegaly, mean IGF-1 Z-scores did not differ significantly between both assays. Our study suggests that replacement of the IM assay by the ID assay may have far-reaching consequences for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of GHD.

In active acromegaly, IGF1 bioactivity is related to soluble Klotho levels and quality of life

The value of measuring IGF1 bioactivity in active acromegaly is unknown. Soluble Klotho (S-Klotho) level is elevated in active acromegaly and it has been suggested that S-Klotho can inhibit activation of the IGF1 receptor (IGF1R). A cross-sectional study was carried out in 15 patients with active acromegaly based on clinical presentation, unsuppressed GH during an oral glucose tolerance test, and elevated total IGF1 levels (>+2 s.d.). Total IGF1 was measured by immunoassay, IGF1 bioactivity by the IGF1R kinase receptor activation assay and S-Klotho by an ELISA. Quality of Life (QoL) was assessed by Acromegaly QoL (AcroQoL) Questionnaire and Short-Form-36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36). Out of 15 patients, nine had IGF1 bioactivity values within the reference range. S-Klotho was higher in active acromegaly compared with controls. Age-adjusted S-Klotho was significantly related to IGF1 bioactivity (r=0.75, P=0.002) and to total IGF1 (r=0.62, P=0.02). IGF1 bioactivity and total IGF1 were inversely related to the physical component summary of the SF-36 (r=−0.78, P=0.002 vs r=−0.60, P=0.03). Moreover, IGF1 bioactivity, but not total IGF1, was significantly inversely related to the physical dimension of the AcroQoL Questionnaire (r=−0.60, P=0.02 vs r=−0.37, P=0.19). In contrast to total IGF1, IGF1 bioactivity was within the reference range in a considerable number of subjects with active acromegaly. Elevated S-Klotho levels may have reduced IGF1 bioactivity. Moreover, IGF1 bioactivity was more strongly related to physical measures of QoL than total IGF1, suggesting that IGF1 bioactivity may better reflect physical limitations perceived in active acromegaly.