Aina Puce

Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans

Event-related potentials (ERPs) associated with face perception were recorded with scalp electrodes from normal volunteers. Subjects performed a visual target detection task in which they mentally counted the number of occurrences of pictorial stimuli from a designated category such as butterflies. In separate experiments, target stimuli were embedded within a series of other stimuli including unfamiliar human faces and isolated face components, inverted faces, distorted faces, animal faces, and other nonface stimuli. Human faces evoked a negative potential at 172 msec (N170), which was absent from the ERPs elicited by other animate and inanimate nonface stimuli. N170 was largest over the posterior temporal scalp and was larger over the right than the left hemisphere. N170 was delayed when faces were presented upside-down, but its amplitude did not change. When presented in isolation, eyes elicited an N170 that was significantly larger than that elicited by whole faces, while noses and lips elicited small negative ERPs about 50 msec later than N170. Distorted human faces, in which the locations of inner face components were altered, elicited an N170 similar in amplitude to that elicited by normal faces. However, faces of animals, human hands, cars, and items of furniture did not evoke N170. N170 may reflect the operation of a neural mechanism tuned to detect (as opposed to identify) human faces, similar to the structural encoder suggested by Bruce and Young (1986). A similar function has been proposed for the face-selective N200 ERP recorded from the middle fusiform and posterior inferior temporal gyri using subdural electrodes in humans (Allison, McCarthy, Nobre, Puce, & Belger, 1994c). However, the differential sensitivity of N170 to eyes in isolation suggests that N170 may reflect the activation of an eye-sensitive region of cortex. The voltage distribution of N170 over the scalp is consistent with a neural generator located in the occipitotemporal sulcus lateral to the fusiform/inferior temporal region that generates N200.

Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus

The perception of faces is sometimes regarded as a specialized task involving discrete brain regions. In an attempt to identi

Dissociation of mnemonic and perceptual processes during spatial and nonspatial working memory using fMRI.

face-specific cortex, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure activation evoked by faces presented in a continuously changing montage of common objects or in a similar montage of nonobjects. Bilateral regions of the posterior fusiform gyrus were activated by faces viewed among nonobjects, but when viewed among objects, faces activated only a focal right fusiform region. To determine whether this focal activation would occur for another category of familiar stimuli, subjects viewed flowers presented among nonobjects and objects. While flowers among nonobjects evoked bilateral fusiform activation, flowers among objects evoked no activation. These results demonstrate that both faces and flowers activate large and partially overlapping regions of inferior extrastriate cortex. A smaller region, located primarily in the right lateral fusiform gyrus, is activated specifically by faces.

Localization of functional regions of human mesial cortex by somatosensory evoked potential recording and by cortical stimulation.

Neuroimaging studies in humans have consistently found robust activation of frontal, parietal, and temporal regions during working memory tasks. Whether these activations represent functional networks segregated by perceptual domain is still at issue. Two functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments were conducted, both of which used multiple‐cycle, alternating task designs. Experiment 1 compared spatial and object working memory tasks to identify cortical regions differentially activated by these perceptual domains. Experiment 2 compared working memory and perceptual control tasks within each of the spatial and object domains to determine whether the regions identified in experiment 1 were driven primarily by the perceptual or mnemonic demands of the tasks, and to identify common brain regions activated by working memory in both perceptual domains. Domain‐specific activation occurred in the inferior parietal cortex for spatial tasks, and in the inferior occipitotemporal cortex for object tasks, particularly in the left hemisphere. However, neither area was strongly influenced by task demands, being nearly equally activated by the working memory and perceptual control tasks. In contrast, activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) was strongly task‐related. Spatial working memory primarily activated the right middle frontal gyrus (MFG) and the IPS. Object working memory activated the MFG bilaterally, the left inferior frontal gyrus, and the IPS, particularly in the left hemisphere. Finally, activation of midline posterior regions, including the cingulate gyrus, occurred at the offset of the working memory tasks, particularly the shape task. These results support a prominent role of the prefrontal and parietal cortices in working memory, and indicate that spatial and object working memory tasks recruit differential hemispheric networks. The results also affirm the distinction between spatial and object perceptual processing in dorsal and ventral visual pathways. Hum. Brain Mapping 6:14–32, 1998.

Comparison of cortical activation evoked by faces measured by intracranial field potentials and functional MRI: Two case studies

We describe methods of localizing functional regions of the mesial wall, based on 47 patients studied intraoperatively or following chronic implantation of subdural electrodes. Somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded to stimulation of posterior tibial, dorsal pudendal, median, and trigeminal nerves. Bipolar cortical stimulation was performed, and in 4 cases movement-related potentials were recorded. The cingulate and marginal sulci formed the inferior and posterior borders of the sensorimotor areas and the supplementary motor area (SMA). The foot sensory area occupied the posterior paracentral lobule, while the genitalia were represented anterior to the foot sensory area, near the cingulate sulcus. The foot motor area was interior and superior to the sensory areas, but there was overlap in these representations. There was a rough somatotopic organization within the SMA, with the face represented anterior to the hand. However, there was little evidence of the pre-SMA region described in monkeys. Complex movements involving more than one extremity were elicited by stimulation of much of the SMA. The region comprising the supplementary sensory area was not clearly identified, but may involve much of the precuneus. Movement-related potentials did not provide additional localizing information, although in some recordings readiness potentials were recorded from the SMA that appeared to be locally generated.

Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements

The localization of neural processes contributing to face perception was studied in two patients using event‐related field potentials (ERPs) recorded from subdural strips and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Despite the differences in the physiological bases of the two techniques, and in the tasks used to elicit activation, good correspondence was obtained in the anatomical patterns of activation. Face‐specific ERPs (N200s) and fMRI activation by faces occurred at the same locations in the right ventral extrastriate region of both patients, and in a similar region of the left hemisphere of one patient. Some discrepancies were noted in the pattern of activation which may reflect the adequacy of the tasks in identifying face‐specific as opposed to face‐sensitive processing, and in the differential sensitivity of the methods to the temporal course of face processing. Hum. Brain Mapping5:298–305, 1997. Published 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.