Airat Gubaev
University of Münster
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Airat Gubaev.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2008
Bettina Theissen; Anne Karow; Jürgen Köhler; Airat Gubaev; Dagmar Klostermeier
RNA helicases couple the energy from ATP hydrolysis with structural changes of their RNA substrates. DEAD box helicases form the largest class of RNA helicases and share a helicase core comprising two RecA-like domains. An opening and closing of the interdomain cleft during RNA unwinding has been postulated but not shown experimentally. Single-molecule FRET experiments with the Bacillus subtilis DEAD box helicase YxiN carrying donor and acceptor fluorophores on different sides of the interdomain cleft reveal an open helicase conformation in the absence of nucleotides, or in the presence of ATP, or ADP, or RNA. In the presence of ADP and RNA, the open conformation is retained. By contrast, cooperative binding of ATP and RNA leads to a compact helicase structure, proving that the ATP- and ADP-bound states of RNA helicases display substantially different structures only when the RNA substrate is bound. These results establish a closure of the interdomain cleft in the helicase core at the beginning of the unwinding reaction, and suggest a conserved mechanism of energy conversion among DEAD box helicases across kingdoms.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2011
Airat Gubaev; Dagmar Klostermeier
DNA gyrase introduces negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. DNA supercoiling is catalyzed by a strand-passage mechanism, in which a T-segment of DNA is passed through the gap in a transiently cleaved G-segment. Strand passage requires the coordinated closing and opening of three protein interfaces in gyrase, the N-gate, DNA-gate, and C-gate. We show here that DNA binding to the DNA-gate of gyrase and wrapping of DNA around the C-terminal domains of GyrA induces a narrowing of the N-gate. This half-closed state prepares capture of a T-segment in the upper cavity of gyrase. Subsequent N-gate closure upon binding of ATP then poises the reaction toward strand passage. The N-gate reopens after ATP hydrolysis, allowing for further catalytic cycles. DNA binding, cleavage, and wrapping and N-gate narrowing are intimately linked events that coordinate conformational changes at the DNA and the N-gate.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2009
Airat Gubaev; Manuel Hilbert; Dagmar Klostermeier
Gyrase is the only type II topoisomerase that introduces negative supercoils into DNA. Supercoiling is catalyzed via a strand-passage mechanism, in which the gate DNA (gDNA) is transiently cleaved, and a second DNA segment, the transfer DNA (tDNA), is passed through the gap before the gDNA is religated. Strand passage requires an opening of the so-called DNA-gate by ≈2 nm. A single-molecule FRET study reported equal populations of open and closed DNA-gate in topoisomerase II. We present here single-molecule FRET experiments that monitor the conformation of DNA bound to the DNA-gate of Bacillus subtilis gyrase and the conformation of the DNA-gate itself. DNA bound to gyrase adopts two different conformations, one slightly, one severely distorted. DNA distortion requires cleavage, but neither ATP nor the presence of a tDNA. At the same time, the DNA-gate of gyrase is predominantly in the closed conformation. In agreement with the single molecule data and with the danger of dsDNA breaks for genome integrity, <5% of cleavage complexes are detected in equilibrium. Quinolone inhibitors favor DNA cleavage by B. subtilis gyrase, but disfavor DNA distortion, and the DNA-gate remains in the closed conformation. Our results demonstrate that DNA binding, distortion and cleavage, and gate-opening are mechanistically distinct events. During the relaxation and supercoiling reactions, gyrase with an open DNA-gate is not significantly populated, consistent with gate-opening as a very rare event that only occurs briefly to allow for strand passage.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2014
Ulf Harms; Alexandra Z. Andreou; Airat Gubaev; Dagmar Klostermeier
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4A is a DEAD-box helicase that resolves secondary structure elements in the 5-UTR of mRNAs during ribosome scanning. Its RNA-stimulated ATPase and ATP-dependent helicase activities are enhanced by other translation initiation factors, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. DEAD-box proteins alternate between open and closed conformations during RNA unwinding. The transition to the closed conformation is linked to duplex destabilization. eIF4A is a special DEAD-box protein that can adopt three different conformations, an open state in the absence of ligands, a half-open state stabilized by the translation initiation factor eIF4G and a closed state in the presence of eIF4G and eIF4B. We show here that eIF4A alone does not measurably sample the closed conformation. The translation initiation factors eIF4B and eIF4G accelerate the eIF4A conformational cycle. eIF4G increases the rate of closing more than the opening rate, and eIF4B selectively increases the closing rate. Strikingly, the rate constants and the effect of eIF4B are different for different RNAs, and are related to the presence of single-stranded regions. Modulating the kinetics of the eIF4A conformational cycle is thus central for the multi-layered regulation of its activity, and for its role as a regulatory hub in translation initiation.
DNA Repair | 2014
Airat Gubaev; Dagmar Klostermeier
DNA topoisomerases inter-convert different DNA topoisomers in the cell. They catalyze the introduction or relaxation of DNA supercoils, as well as catenation and decatenation. Members of the type I topoisomerase family cleave a single strand of their double-stranded DNA substrate, whereas enzymes of the type II family cleave both DNA strands. Bacterial DNA gyrase, a type II topoisomerase, catalyzes the introduction of negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. Gyrase is not present in humans, and constitutes an attractive drug target for the treatment of bacterial and parasite infections. DNA supercoiling by gyrase is believed to occur by a strand passage mechanism, in which one segment of the double-stranded DNA substrate is passed through a (transient) break in a second segment. This mechanism requires the coordinated opening and closing of three protein interfaces, so-called gates, to ensure the directionality of strand passage toward negative supercoiling. Single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments are ideally suited to investigate conformational changes during the catalytic cycle of DNA topoisomerases. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the cascade of DNA- and nucleotide-induced conformational changes in gyrase that lead to strand passage and negative supercoiling of DNA. We discuss how these conformational changes couple ATP hydrolysis to DNA supercoiling in gyrase, and how the common mechanistic principle of coordinated gate opening and closing is modulated to allow for the catalysis of different reactions by different type II topoisomerases.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2012
Airat Gubaev; Dagmar Klostermeier
Background: ATP-dependent closure of the N-gate is a key step for negative DNA supercoiling by gyrase. Results: Potassium ions are required for efficient nucleotide-induced N-gate closure and DNA supercoiling but are dispensable for DNA relaxation. Conclusion: Potassium ions help coordinate the nucleotide cycle to gate movements of gyrase. Significance: Coordinated conformational changes are crucial for the function of ATP-driven molecular machines in general. DNA gyrase catalyzes ATP-dependent negative supercoiling of DNA by a strand passage mechanism that requires coordinated opening and closing of three protein interfaces, the N-, DNA-, and C-gates. ATP binding to the GyrB subunits of gyrase causes dimerization and N-gate closure. The closure of the N-gate is a key step in the gyrase catalytic cycle, as it captures the DNA segment to be transported and poises gyrase toward strand passage. We show here that K+ ions are required for DNA supercoiling but are dispensable for ATP-independent DNA relaxation. Although DNA binding, distortion, wrapping, and DNA-induced narrowing of the N-gate occur in the absence of K+, nucleotide-induced N-gate closure depends on their presence. Our results provide evidence that K+ ions relay small conformational changes in the nucleotide-binding pocket to the formation of a tight dimer interface at the N-gate by connecting regions from both GyrB monomers and suggest an important role for K+ in synchronization of N-gate closure and DNA-gate opening.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2016
Airat Gubaev; Daniela Weidlich; Dagmar Klostermeier
The topological state of DNA is important for replication, recombination and transcription, and is regulated in vivo by DNA topoisomerases. Gyrase introduces negative supercoils into DNA at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. It is the accepted view that gyrase achieves supercoiling by a strand passage mechanism, in which double-stranded DNA is cleaved, and a second double-stranded segment is passed through the gap, converting a positive DNA node into a negative node. We show here that gyrase with only one catalytic tyrosine that cleaves a single strand of its DNA substrate can catalyze DNA supercoiling without strand passage. We propose an alternative mechanism for DNA supercoiling via nicking and closing of DNA that involves trapping, segregation and relaxation of two positive supercoils. In contrast to DNA supercoiling, ATP-dependent relaxation and decatenation of DNA by gyrase lacking the C-terminal domains require both tyrosines and strand passage. Our results point towards mechanistic plasticity of gyrase and might pave the way for finding novel and specific mechanism-based gyrase inhibitors.
Journal of Molecular Biology | 2017
Simon Hartmann; Airat Gubaev; Dagmar Klostermeier
Topoisomerases catalyze the relaxation, supercoiling, catenation, and decatenation of DNA. Gyrase is a bacterial topoisomerase that introduces negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. The enzyme consists of two GyrB subunits, containing the ATPase domains, and two GyrA subunits. Nucleotide binding to gyrase B GyrB causes closing of the N-gate in gyrase, which orients bound DNA for supercoiling. N-gate re-opening after ATP hydrolysis, at the end of the supercoiling reaction, resets the enzyme for subsequent catalytic cycles. Gyrase binds and hydrolyzes two ATP molecules per catalytic cycle. Here, we dissect the role of these two binding and hydrolysis events using gyrase with one ATP-binding- and hydrolysis-deficient subunit, or with one binding-competent, but hydrolysis-deficient ATPase domain. We show that binding of a single ATP molecule induces N-gate closure. Gyrase that can only bind and hydrolyze a single ATP undergoes opening and closing of the N-gate in synchrony with ATP hydrolysis, and promotes DNA supercoiling under catalytic conditions. In contrast, gyrase that can bind two ATP molecules, but hydrolyzes only one, only supercoils DNA under stoichiometric conditions. Here, ATP bound to the hydrolysis-deficient subunit keeps the N-gate closed after hydrolysis of the other ATP and prevents further turnovers. Gyrase with only one functional ATPase domain hydrolyzes ATP with a similar rate to wild-type, but its supercoiling efficiency is reduced. Binding and hydrolysis of the second ATP may thus ensure efficient coupling of the nucleotide cycle with the supercoiling reaction by stabilizing the closed N-gate and by acting as a timer for N-gate re-opening.
Nucleic Acids Research | 2018
Jampa Tsedön Stelljes; Daniela Weidlich; Airat Gubaev; Dagmar Klostermeier
Abstract The topological state of DNA in vivo is regulated by topoisomerases. Gyrase is a bacterial topoisomerase that introduces negative supercoils into DNA at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. According to the strand-passage mechanism, a double-strand of the DNA substrate is cleaved, and a second double-stranded segment is passed through the gap, converting a positive DNA node into a negative node. The correct orientation of these DNA segments for strand passage is achieved by wrapping of the DNA around gyrase, which involves the C-terminal domains (CTDs) of both GyrA subunits in the A2B2 heterotetramer. Gyrase lacking both CTDs cannot introduce negative supercoils into DNA. Here, we analyze the requirements for the two CTDs in individual steps in the supercoiling reaction. Gyrase that contains a single CTD binds, distorts, and cleaves DNA similarly to wildtype gyrase. It also shows wildtype-like DNA-dependent ATPase activity, and undergoes DNA-induced movement of the CTD as well as N-gate narrowing. Most importantly, the enzyme still introduces negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction, with a velocity similar to wildtype gyrase, and decreases the linking number of the DNA in steps of two. One CTD is thus sufficient to support DNA supercoiling.
bioRxiv | 2017
Ekaterina Gubaeva; Airat Gubaev; Rebecca L. J. Melcher; Stefan Cord-Landwehr; Ratna Singh; Nour Eddine El Gueddari; Bruno M. Moerschbacher
Chitin, a linear polymer of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, and chitosans, fully or partially deacetylated derivatives of chitin, are known to elicit defense reactions in higher plants. We compared the ability of chitin and chitosan oligomers and polymers (chitin oligomers with degree of polymerization 3 to 8; chitosan oligomers with degree of acetylation 0% to 35% and degree of polymerization 3 to 15; chitosan polymers with degree of acetylation 1% to 60% and degree of polymerization ~1300) to elicit an oxidative burst indicative of induced defense reactions in A. thaliana seedlings. Fully deacetylated chitosans were not able to trigger a response; elicitor activity increased with increasing degree of acetylation of chitosan polymers. Partially acetylated chitosan oligomers required a minimum degree of polymerization of 6 and at least four N-acetyl groups to trigger a response. Invariably, elicitation of an oxidative burst required the presence of the chitin receptor AtCERK1. Our results as well as previously published studies on chitin and chitosan perception in plants are best explained by a new general model of LysM-containing receptor complexes where two partners form a long, but off-set chitin-binding groove and are, thus, dimerized by one chitin or chitosan molecule, sharing a central GlcNAc unit with which both LysM domains interact. To verify this model and to distinguish it from earlier models, we assayed elicitor and inhibitor activities of selected partially acetylated chitosan oligomers with fully defined structures. In contrast to the initial “continuous groove”, the original “sandwich”, or the current “sliding mode” models for the chitin/chitosan receptor, the here proposed “slipped sandwich” model - which builds on these earlier models and represents a consensus combination of these - is in agreement with all experimental observations.