Aiwen Zhang

HLA and MICA allosensitization patterns among patients supported by ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are increasingly being used as a bridge to transplantation and have been implicated as a risk factor for allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). We investigate the association between VAD and allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and major-histocompatibility-complex (MHC) class I-related Chain A (MICA) antigens. METHODS We considered all patients who received a VAD at our institution between 2000 and 2009; 89 of them had pre-VAD and post-VAD (≤6 months after implant) HLA antibody screening. A control group of non-VAD heart transplant candidates was constructed with at least 2 pre-transplant panel-reactive antibody (PRA) tests within 8 months. Two controls were randomly selected/VAD patient matched for year (n = 178). Patients and controls with available sera from these time-points were tested by Luminex/flow PRA single-antigen beads and by MICA antibody Luminex single-antigen beads. Medical records were reviewed for comparison of pre-transplant immunologic risk factors and post-transplant outcomes between the 2 groups. RESULTS Compared with controls, VAD patients had greater Class I differences between peak and initial PRA (18% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001) and higher peak PRA (24% vs. 6%, p < 0.0001). The differences between the 2 groups in Class II were less pronounced than in Class I. Of patients who had single-antigen testing, VAD implantation was significantly associated with development of new HLA antibody specificities (Class I and/or Class II) post-VAD with an increase in calculated PRA (cPRA) post-VAD compared with controls (16% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001). This risk was still present after adjusting for age, gender, pre-VAD PRA, transfusion and duration of follow-up in a multivariate analysis (p < 0.0001 and 0.02, respectively). There were no differences in development of MICA antibodies between the 2 groups (14% in both). There was no significant difference in the incidence of pre-transplant positive T-cell crossmatch, pre-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies, rejection episodes or graft survival between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that VAD is associated with significant HLA allosensitization independent of common risk factors.

MICA polymorphism identified by whole genome array associated with NKG2D-mediated cytotoxicity in T-cell large granular lymphocyte leukemia

Background Large granular lymphocyte leukemia is a semi-autonomous clonal proliferation of cytotoxic T cells accompanied by immune cytopenias and various autoimmune conditions. Due to the rarity of this disease and its association with autoimmune diseases, a theoretical germline or somatic mutation might have significant penetrance, thus enabling detection, even from samples of suboptimal size, through genome-wide association studies. Design and Methods To investigate a non-mendelian genetic predisposition to large granular lymphocyte leukemia, we used a step-wise method for gene discovery. First, a modified ‘random forests’ technique was used for candidate gene identification: this was followed by traditional allele-specific polymerase chain reaction, sequencing modalities, and mechanistic assays. Results Our analysis found an association with MICA, a non-peptide-presenting, tightly regulated, stress-induced MHC-like molecule and cognate receptor for NKG2D, found abundantly on large granular lymphocyte leukemia cells. Sequencing of germline DNA revealed a higher frequency of MICA*00801/A5.1 in patients with large granular lymphocyte leukemia than in matched controls (64% versus 41%, P<0.001, homozygous 40% versus 15%, P<0.001). Flow cytometry was employed to determine the expression of MICA within hematologic compartments, showing that the signal intensity of MICA was increased in granulocytes from neutropenic patients with large granular lymphocyte leukemia in comparison with that in controls (P=0.033). Furthermore, neutrophil counts were inversely correlated with MICA expression (R2=0.50, P=0.035). Finally, large granular lymphocyte leukemia cells were able to selectively kill MICA+ Ba/F3 lymphocytes transfected with human MICA*019 in a dose-dependent manner compared to naïve cells (P<0.001), an effect mitigated by administration of an anti-NKG2D antibody (P=0.033). Conclusions Our results illustrate that MICA-NKG2D played a role in disease pathogenesis in the majority of patients in our cohort of cases of large granular lymphocyte leukemia and further investigation into this signaling axis may provide potent therapeutic targets.

KIR and HLA Interactions Are Associated With Control of Primary CMV Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Killer immunoglobulin‐like receptors (KIR) are genetically polymorphic natural killer (NK) cell receptors important in antiviral responses. A retrospective, single‐center cohort study was performed to study the interaction of KIR genotype and primary control of CMV infection after transplantation. Time to first CMV viremia was determined for a cohort of 531 CMV serology donor positive/recipient negative solid organ transplant recipients. Of the KIR genes, KIR2DL3 and KIR2DS2 were most strongly associated with time to CMV viremia in random survival forest analysis. As KIR2DL3 and KIR2DS2 both interact with HLA‐C1, these interactions were evaluated. Seventy‐six recipients were found to be positive for both KIR2DL3 and KIR2DS2 and expressed only HLA‐C1 antigens in both recipient and donor. These patients had a substantially reduced hazard of CMV viremia in the first year after solid organ transplantation (hazard ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.27–0.72, p = 0.0012). In KIR2DL3+/KIR2DS2+/HLA‐C1/1 recipients who received an organ from a non‐C1/1 donor, this protective effect was not observed. These results improve our understanding of human NK cell function in primary CMV infection after transplant.

Synergistic Effect of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I–Related Chain A and Human Leukocyte Antigen–DPB1 Mismatches in Association with Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease after Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The clinical relevance of mismatches at the MHC class I-related chain A (MICA) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains unclear. We investigated the association of MICA donor/recipient mismatch and whether there is an interaction between these and HLA-DPB1 mismatch on clinical outcomes after unrelated donor HSCT. Our study included 227 patients who underwent unrelated donor allogeneic HSCT at our institution between 2000 and 2010. Among these, 177 (78%) received HSCT from a 10/10 HLA-matched donor. MICA genotyping was performed using commercially available kits. In univariable analysis, the risk of grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was greater for patients with MICA mismatch (hazard ratio [HR], 1.73; P = .02) than for those with HLA-DPB1 mismatch (HR, 1.62; P = .07). When MICA and HLA-DPB1 were assessed simultaneously, patients mismatched at both loci had the greatest risk (HR, 2.51; P < .01) and those mismatched at only 1 locus had somewhat greater risk (HR, 1.53; P = .12) than patients matched at both loci; this remained significant in multivariable analysis. The 100-day incidence was 66%, 45%, and 31%, respectively (P = .03). Results were similar for grade III and IV acute GVHD, with 100-day incidence 34%, 16%, and 8% (P = .01). These results are clinically pertinent to donor selection strategies and indicate that patients with mismatch at both MICA and HLA-DPB1 are at increased risk for acute GVHD.

MHC Class I Chain-Related Gene A (MICA) Donor-Recipient Mismatches and MICA-129 Polymorphism in Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantations Has No Impact on Outcomes in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Study

Single-center studies have previously reported associations of MHC Class I Chain-Related Gene A (MICA) polymorphisms and donor-recipient MICA mismatching with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In this study, we investigated the association of MICA polymorphism (MICA-129, MM versus MV versus VV) and MICA mismatches after HCT with 10/10 HLA-matched (n = 552) or 9/10 (n = 161) unrelated donors. Included were adult patients with a first unrelated bone marrow or peripheral blood HCT for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome that were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between 1999 and 2011. Our results showed that neither MICA mismatch nor MICA-129 polymorphism were associated with any transplantation outcome (P < .01), with the exception of a higher relapse in recipients of MICA-mismatched HLA 10/10 donors (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; P = .003). There was a suggestion of association between MICA mismatches and a higher risk of acute GVHD grades II to IV (HR, 1.4; P = .013) There were no significant interactions between MICA mismatches and HLA matching (9/10 versus 10/10). In conclusion, the findings in this cohort did not confirm prior studies reporting that MICA polymorphism and MICA mismatches were associated with HCT outcomes.

Description of two new MICA alleles: MICA*058 and MICA*002:03.

We describe two novel alleles, MICA*058 and MICA* 002:03.

Identification of three MICA alleles in the genotype of a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-related chain A gene (MICA) sequence-based genotyping (SBT) was attempted on a peripheral blood sample collected from a patient evaluated for hematopoietic stem cell retransplant. The electropherogram pattern of MICA SBT indicated the possibility of carrying more than two MICA alleles. Subsequent cloning and sequencing of the polymerase chain reaction products revealed the presence of three distinct MICA alleles: MICA*008:01/:04 (A5.1), MICA*007:01(A4), and MICA*002:01 (A9) in the genotype of this patient. The origin of the third extra MICA allele could not be determined and would require MICA genotyping information from other family members, which is unavailable.