Akanksha Prakash
Georgia Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Akanksha Prakash.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual Meeting | 2012
Cory Ann Smarr; Akanksha Prakash; Jenay M. Beer; Tracy L. Mitzner; Charles C. Kemp; Wendy A. Rogers
Many older adults value their independence and prefer to age in place. Robots can be designed to assist older people with performing everyday living tasks and maintaining their independence at home. Yet, there is a scarcity of knowledge regarding older adults’ attitudes toward robots and their preferences for robot assistance. Twenty-one older adults (M = 80.25 years old, SD = 7.19) completed questionnaires and participated in structured group interviews investigating their openness to and preferences for assistance from a mobile manipulator robot. Although the older adults were generally open to robot assistance for performing home-based tasks, they were selective in their views. Older adults preferred robot assistance over human assistance for many instrumental (e.g., housekeeping, laundry, medication reminders) and enhanced activities of daily living (e.g., new learning, hobbies). However, older adults were less open to robot assistance for some activities of daily living (e.g., shaving, hair care). Results from this study provide insight into older adults’ attitudes toward robot assistance with home-based everyday living tasks.
International Journal of Social Robotics | 2015
Akanksha Prakash; Wendy A. Rogers
Ample research in social psychology has highlighted the importance of the human face in human–human interactions. However, there is a less clear understanding of how a humanoid robot’s face is perceived by humans. One of the primary goals of this study was to investigate how initial perceptions of robots are influenced by the extent of human-likeness of the robot’s face, particularly when the robot is intended to provide assistance with tasks in the home that are traditionally carried out by humans. Moreover, although robots have the potential to help both younger and older adults, there is limited knowledge of whether the two age groups’ perceptions differ. In this study, younger (
human-robot interaction | 2014
Akanksha Prakash; Charles C. Kemp; Wendy A. Rogers
57th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting - 2013, HFES 2013 | 2013
Akanksha Prakash; Wendy A. Rogers
N=32
58th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2014 | 2014
Akanksha Prakash; Ayah Mostafa; David B. Mitchell; Wendy A. Rogers
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, HFES 2012 | 2012
Jenay M. Beer; Akanksha Prakash; Cory Ann Smarr; Tracy L. Mitzner; Charles C. Kemp; Wendy A. Rogers
N=32) and older adults (
58th International Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2014 | 2014
Cory Ann Smarr; Shelby K. Long; Akanksha Prakash; Tracy L. Mitzner; Wendy A. Rogers
human-robot interaction | 2012
Jenay M. Beer; Cory Ann Smarr; Tiffany L. Chen; Akanksha Prakash; Tracy L. Mitzner; Charles C. Kemp; Wendy A. Rogers
N=32
International Journal of Social Robotics | 2014
Cory Ann Smarr; Tracy L. Mitzner; Jenay M. Beer; Akanksha Prakash; Tiffany L. Chen; Charles C. Kemp; Wendy A. Rogers
Archive | 2011
Jenay M. Beer; Akanksha Prakash; Tracy L. Mitzner; Wendy A. Rogers
N=32) imagined interacting with a robot in four different task contexts and rated robot faces of varying levels of human-likeness. Participants were also interviewed to assess their reasons for particular preferences. This multi-method approach identified patterns of perceptions across different appearances as well as reasons that influence the formation of such perceptions. Overall, the results indicated that people’s perceptions of robot faces vary as a function of robot human-likeness. People tended to over-generalize their understanding of humans to build expectations about a human-looking robot’s behavior and capabilities. Additionally, preferences for humanoid robots depended on the task although younger and older adults differed in their preferences for certain humanoid appearances. The results of this study have implications both for advancing theoretical understanding of robot perceptions and for creating and applying guidelines for the design of robots.