Akihiro Sako

Level of arterial ligation in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery.

BackgroundCurative resection of sigmoid colon and rectal cancer includes “high tie” of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). However, IMA ligation compromises blood flow to the anastomosis, which may increase the leakage rate, and it is unclear whether this confers a survival advantage. Accordingly, the IMA may be ligated at a point just below the origin of the left colic artery (LCA) “low tie” combined with lymph node dissection (LND) around the origin of the IMA (low tie with LND). However, no study has investigated the detailed prognostic results between “high tie” and “low tie with LND.” The aim of this study was to assess the utility of “low tie with LND” on survival in patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.MethodsA total of 189 sigmoid colon or rectal cancer patients who underwent curative operation from 1997 to 2007 were enrolled in this study. The patient’s medical records were reviewed to obtain clinicopathological information. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with differences assessed using log-rank test.ResultsForty-two and 147 patients were ligated at the origin of the IMA (high tie) and just below the origin of the LCA combined with LND around the origin of the IMA (low tie with LND), respectively. No significant differences were observed in the complication rate and OS and RFS rates in the two groups. Further, no significant difference was observed in the OS and RFS rates in the lymph node-positive cases in the two groups.Conclusions“Low tie with LND” is anatomically less invasive and is not inferior to “high tie” with prognostic point of view.

Successful utilization of coronary covered stents to treat a common hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm secondary to pancreatic fistula after Whipple’s procedure: Report of a case

A 73-year-old man underwent a pylorus-preserving Whipple’s procedure for distal cholangiocarcinoma. His postoperative course was complicated by the formation of a pancreatic fistula, which was initially managed conservatively. On postoperative day (POD) 86, he lost 100 ml of blood from the site of the pancreatic fistula. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed a pseudoaneurysm, 12 mm in diameter, in the common hepatic artery. The diameter of the pseudoaneurysm increased to 15 mm on POD 89, so we implanted coronary covered stents to prevent massive bleeding from rupture and to retain hepatic arterial flow. Six days after implantation, computed tomography findings confirmed a thrombosed pseudoaneurysm as well as patent hepatic arterial flow. Follow-up CT 18 months after surgery showed patent hepatic arterial flow. There have been no signs of rebleeding or abnormal liver function.

Laparoscopic treatment of a vesicointestinal fistula due to a Meckel’s diverticulum: a case report and review of the literature

While there have been numerous reports about colovesical fistulas and ruptured intestinal diverticula, there have been far fewer reports about vesicointestinal fistulas caused by Meckel’s diverticula. Most Meckel’s diverticula are asymptomatic. Furthermore, they seldom cause vesicointestinal fistulas, and the associated complications are non-specific. Thus, their preoperative diagnosis is difficult. We experienced a case in which a vesicointestinal fistula was caused by a Meckel’s diverticulum and was treated with laparoscopic surgery. A 46-year-old male was referred to our hospital after exhibiting hematuria. Cystoscopy revealed a fistula between the small intestine and bladder. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed a diverticulum in the ileum and a fistula between the ileum and bladder, which passed through the diverticulum. A Meckel’s diverticulum was suspected. We conducted a laparoscopic operation. We dissected the Meckel’s diverticulum with an automatic suturing device and removed it together with part of the ileum. The patient’s postoperative course was good. We experienced a case in which a vesicointestinal fistula was caused by a Meckel’s diverticulum and was successfully treated with laparoscopic surgery. In selected cases of Meckel’s diverticulum, the dissection of the diverticulum with an automatic suturing device is appropriate.