Akihito Kiyama

Cavitation onset caused by acceleration

Significance In this paper we propose an alternative derivation of the cavitation number and validate the threshold. The proposed dimensionless number is more suitable to predict the cavitation onset caused by a sudden acceleration rather than a large velocity as prescribed by the traditional cavitation number. Systematic experiments were conducted for validation, confirming that the alternative cavitation number predicts the threshold at which cavitation will occur (Ca<1). Striking the top of a liquid-filled bottle can shatter the bottom. An intuitive interpretation of this event might label an impulsive force as the culprit in this fracturing phenomenon. However, high-speed photography reveals the formation and collapse of tiny bubbles near the bottom before fracture. This observation indicates that the damaging phenomenon of cavitation is at fault. Cavitation is well known for causing damage in various applications including pipes and ship propellers, making accurate prediction of cavitation onset vital in several industries. However, the conventional cavitation number as a function of velocity incorrectly predicts the cavitation onset caused by acceleration. This unexplained discrepancy leads to the derivation of an alternative dimensionless term from the equation of motion, predicting cavitation as a function of acceleration and fluid depth rather than velocity. Two independent research groups in different countries have tested this theory; separate series of experiments confirm that an alternative cavitation number, presented in this paper, defines the universal criteria for the onset of acceleration-induced cavitation.

Enhancement of Focused Liquid Jets by Surface Bubbles

We investigate the enhancement of the velocity of focused liquid jets by surface bubbles preformed on the inner surface of the container. The focused jets are created from the impact on a liquid-filled cylindrical tube at cavitation numbers of 0.37 (strong impact where cavitation is likely to occur on unprocessed surfaces) and 2.1 (weak impact where cavitation does not occur from the impact). The bubbles with a base diameter up to hundreds of micrometers were formed via the process of solvent exchange using air-equilibrated ethanol and water. Our measurements by high-speed imaging show that at both cavitation numbers, the jet velocities with preformed bubbles are significantly higher than those without preformed bubbles. Furthermore, our results show that after the process of solvent exchange, a large number of expanding bubbles are observed at cavitation number of 0.37, indicating that possibly both sub-millimeter and sub-micrometer bubbles on the surface contribute to the jet velocity enhancement. At the cavitation number of 2.1, the surface bubbles are observed to oscillate immediately after the impact. The measurements of the liquid pressure after the impact reveal that at both cavitation numbers, the negative pressure is damped by the preformed surface bubbles, contributing to the increase of the jet velocity. This work sheds light on the crucial role of surface bubbles on the impulsive motion of liquids. Our findings have significant implications for the focusing jet technology, opening the opportunities for jetting fragile samples such as biological samples.