Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Aksel Foss is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Aksel Foss.


The Lancet | 2002

Production of tissue factor by pancreatic islet cells as a trigger of detrimental thrombotic reactions in clinical islet transplantation

Lisa Moberg; H. Johansson; Agneta Lukinius; Christian Berne; Aksel Foss; Ragnar Källén; Ø Østraat; K Salmela; Annika Tibell; Gunnar Tufveson; Graciela Elgue; K Nilsson Ekdahl; Olle Korsgren; Bo Nilsson

BACKGROUND Intraportal transplantation of pancreatic islets offers improved glycaemic control and insulin independence in type 1 diabetes mellitus, but intraportal thrombosis remains a possible complication. The thrombotic reaction may explain why graft loss occurs and islets from more than one donor are needed, since contact between human islets and ABO-compatible blood in vitro triggers a thrombotic reaction that damages the islets. We investigated the possible mechanism and treatment of such thrombotic reactions. METHODS Coagulation activation and islet damage were monitored in four patients undergoing clinical islet transplantation according to a modified Edmonton protocol. Expression of tissue factor (TF) in the islet preparations was investigated by immunohistochemistry, immunoprecipitation, electron microscopy, and RT-PCR. To assess TF activity in purified islets, human islets were mixed with non-anticoagulated ABO-compatible blood in tubing loops coated with heparin. FINDINGS Coagulation activation and subsequent release of insulin were found consistently after clinical islet transplantation, even in the absence of signs of intraportal thrombosis. The endocrine, but not the exocrine, cells of the pancreas were found to synthesise and secrete active TF. The clotting reaction triggered by pancreatic islets in vitro could be abrogated by blocking the active site of TF with specific antibodies or site-inactivated factor VIIa, a candidate drug for inhibition of TF activity in vivo. INTERPRETATION Blockade of TF represents a new therapeutic approach that might increase the success of islet transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes, in terms of both the risk of intraportal thrombosis and the need for islets from more than one donor.


Kidney International | 2014

Long-term risks for kidney donors

Geir Mjøen; Stein Hallan; Anders Hartmann; Aksel Foss; Karsten Midtvedt; Ole Øyen; Anna Varberg Reisæter; Per Pfeffer; Trond Jenssen; Torbjørn Leivestad; Pål-Dag Line; Magnus Øvrehus; Dag Olav Dale; Hege Pihlstrøm; Ingar Holme; Friedo W. Dekker; Hallvard Holdaas

Previous studies have suggested that living kidney donors maintain long-term renal function and experience no increase in cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. However, most analyses have included control groups less healthy than the living donor population and have had relatively short follow-up periods. Here we compared long-term renal function and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in living kidney donors compared with a control group of individuals who would have been eligible for donation. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was identified in 1901 individuals who donated a kidney during 1963 through 2007 with a median follow-up of 15.1 years. A control group of 32,621 potentially eligible kidney donors was selected, with a median follow-up of 24.9 years. Hazard ratio for all-cause death was significantly increased to 1.30 (95% confidence interval 1.11-1.52) for donors compared with controls. There was a significant corresponding increase in cardiovascular death to 1.40 (1.03-1.91), while the risk of ESRD was greatly and significantly increased to 11.38 (4.37-29.6). The overall incidence of ESRD among donors was 302 cases per million and might have been influenced by hereditary factors. Immunological renal disease was the cause of ESRD in the donors. Thus, kidney donors are at increased long-term risk for ESRD, cardiovascular, and all-cause mortality compared with a control group of non-donors who would have been eligible for donation.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2002

The Impact of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease on Rejection Episodes in Renal Allograft Recipients

Solbjørg Sagedal; Knut P. Nordal; Anders Hartmann; Ståle Sund; Helge Scott; Miklos Degré; Aksel Foss; Torbjørn Leivestad; Kåre Osnes; Per Fauchald; Halvor Rollag

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease are potential risk factors for acute allograft rejection in renal transplant recipients. The present study specifically addresses this issue. From October 1994 to July 1997, 477 consecutive renal allograft recipients (397 first transplants and 80 retransplants) were included in the study. CMV infection (cytomegalovirus pp65 antigen in leukocytes) and disease (infection and clinical symptoms or signs of disease) were examined prospectively for 3 months. No CMV prophylaxis was given, and CMV disease was treated with intravenous (i.v.) ganciclovir. The retransplantation of four patients transplanted twice during the study and 22 patients receiving kidneys from human leucocyte antigen (HLA)‐identical siblings were excluded from statistical analysis. Rejections were evaluated clinically [277(61%)] and 173 (38%) also had a biopsy verified rejection. CMV infection occurred in 64% of the patients and 24% experienced CMV disease. In a multiple time‐dependent Cox analysis, CMV infection and CMV disease were independent significant predictors for clinical acute rejections, RR = 1.6 (1.1–2.5, p = 0.02) and RR = 2.5 (1.2–5.1, p = 0.01), respectively. Among 173 patients with biopsy verified rejection, 72% of the patients had tubulointerstitial rejection whereas 28% had a vascular rejection. CMV disease, but not CMV infection was a predictor of tubulointerstitial rejection, RR = 3.1 (1.1–9.3, p = 0.04). CMV infection and disease are independent risk factors for clinical acute rejection in kidney allograft recipients. CMV disease is an independent risk factor for biopsy verified acute tubulointerstitial rejection in kidney allograft recipients.


Diabetes | 2007

Islet Surface Heparinization Prevents the Instant Blood-Mediated Inflammatory Reaction in Islet Transplantation

Sanja Cabric; Javier Sanchez; Torbjörn Lundgren; Aksel Foss; Marie Felldin; Ragnar Källén; Kaija Salmela; Annika Tibell; Gunnar Tufveson; Rolf Larsson; Olle Korsgren; Bo Nilsson

OBJECTIVE—In clinical islet transplantation, the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) is a major factor contributing to the poor initial engraftment of the islets. This reaction is triggered by tissue factor and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, expressed by the transplanted pancreatic islets when the islets come in contact with blood in the portal vein. All currently identified systemic inhibitors of the IBMIR are associated with a significantly increased risk of bleeding or other side effects. To avoid systemic treatment, the aim of the present study was to render the islet graft blood biocompatible by applying a continuous heparin coating to the islet surface. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A biotin/avidin technique was used to conjugate preformed heparin complexes to the surface of pancreatic islets. This endothelial-like coating was achieved by conjugating barely 40 IU heparin per full-size clinical islet transplant. RESULTS—Both in an in vitro loop model and in an allogeneic porcine model of clinical islet transplantation, this heparin coating provided protection against the IBMIR. Culturing heparinized islets for 24 h did not affect insulin release after glucose challenge, and heparin-coated islets cured diabetic mice in a manner similar to untreated islets. CONCLUSIONS—This novel pretreatment procedure prevents intraportal thrombosis and efficiently inhibits the IBMIR without increasing the bleeding risk and, unlike other pretreatment procedures (e.g., gene therapy), without inducing acute or chronic toxicity in the islets.


Transplantation | 2000

A prospective study of the natural course of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in renal allograft recipients.

Solbjørg Sagedal; Knut P. Nordal; Anders Hartmann; Miklos Degré; Ellen Holter; Aksel Foss; Kåre Osnes; Torbjørn Leivestad; P. Fauchald; Halvor Rollag

Background. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the single most frequent infectious complication inrenal transplant recipients. Because no CMV-prophylaxis is given and ganciclovir is used only as deferred therapy for CMV disease at our center, we have been able to study the natural course of CMV infections. The aim was to assess risk factors for CMV infection and disease and thus identify subgroups of patients likely to benefit from CMV prophylaxis or preemptive therapy. Methods. Between October 1994 and July 1997, 477 consecutive renal transplant recipients (397 first transplants and 80 retransplants) were included in the study. The patients were followed prospectively for 3 months with serial measurements of CMV pp65 antigen for monitoring activity of CMV infections. Results. The incidence of CMV infections in first transplants was 68% in D+R− and D±R+ serostatus groups, whereas the incidence of CMV disease was higher in D+R− (56%) than in D±R+ (20%, P <0.001). No difference in severity of CMV disease in D+R− and D±R+ was seen except for an increased incidence of hepatitis in primary infections. One of 14 deaths could be associated with CMV disease in a seropositive recipient. Cox regression analysis showed that rejection (RR 2.5, P <0.01) and serostatus group D+R− (RR 3.9, P <0.001) were significant risk factors for development of CMV disease. The maximum CMV pp65 antigen count had significant correlation to disease only in CMV seropositive recipients, P <0.001. Conclusion. Renal transplant recipients can safely be given deferred ganciclovir therapy for CMV disease if they are intensively monitored for CMV infection. Patients with primary CMV infection (D+R−), CMV infected patients undergoing anti-rejection therapy and R+ patients with high CMV pp65 counts seem to have a particular potential for benefit from preemptive anti-CMV-therapy.


Diabetologia | 2008

Optimising islet engraftment is critical for successful clinical islet transplantation

Olle Korsgren; Torbjörn Lundgren; Marie Felldin; Aksel Foss; Bengt Isaksson; Johan Permert; Nils H. Persson; Ehab Rafael; Mikael Rydén; Kaija Salmela; Annika Tibell; Gunnar Tufveson; Bo Nilsson

Clinical islet transplantation is currently being explored as a treatment for persons with type 1 diabetes and hypoglycaemia unawareness. Although ‘proof-of-principle’ has been established in recent clinical studies, the procedure suffers from low efficacy. At the time of transplantation, the isolated islets are allowed to embolise the liver after injection in the portal vein, a procedure that is unique in the area of transplantation. A novel view on the engraftment of intraportally transplanted islets is presented that could explain the low efficacy of the procedure.


Transplantation | 2001

Sustained improvement of renal graft function for two years in hypertensive renal transplant recipients treated with nifedipine as compared to lisinopril

Karsten Midtvedt; Anders Hartmann; Aksel Foss; Per Fauchald; Knut P. Nordal; Kjell Rootwelt; Hallvard Holdaas

BACKGROUND Treatment of posttransplant hypertension is still a matter of debate. Calcium antagonists may ameliorate renal side effects of cyclosporin. Angiotensin converting enzyme- (ACE) inhibitors may be more effective in sustaining renal function in native chronic renal disease. We prospectively compared the effect of controlled release nifedipine and lisinopril on long-term renal function in hypertensive kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporin. METHODS A total of 154 renal transplant patients presenting with hypertension (diastolic blood pressure >or=95 mmHg) during the first 3 weeks after transplantation were randomised to receive double-blind nifedipine 30 mg or lisinopril 10 mg once daily. A total of 123 patients completed 1 year of treatment (69 nifedipine, 54 lisinopril) and 64 patients completed 2 years of double-blind treatment (39 nifedipine, 25 lisinopril). Baseline glomerular filtration rate was measured as 99 mTc-diethylene-triaminepentaacetate clearance in a stable phase 2 to 5 weeks after inclusion and repeated at 1 and 2 years. RESULTS Baseline glomerular filtration rates were similar (46+/-16 ml/min with nifedipine, 43+/-14 ml/min with lisinopril). The changes in glomerular filtration rates from baseline were statistically significant between the groups after 1 year (9.6 ml/min mean treatment difference (95% confidence interval [CI]s 5.5-13.7 ml/min, P=0.0001) and remained statistically significant also after 2 years (10.3 ml/min mean difference (95% CIs 4.0-16.6], P=0.0017). After 1 year glomerular filtration rates averaged 56+/-19 ml/min in the nifedipine group and 44+/-14 ml/min in the lisinopril group. CONCLUSIONS Both nifedipine and lisinopril were safe and effective in treatment of hypertension in renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporin. Patients receiving nifedipine but not lisinopril improved kidney transplant function over a period of 2 years.


Transplantation | 2003

Nicotinamide inhibits tissue factor expression in isolated human pancreatic islets: Implications for clinical islet transplantation

Lisa Moberg; Annika Olsson; Christian Berne; Marie Felldin; Aksel Foss; Ragnar Källén; K Salmela; Annika Tibell; Gunnar Tufveson; Bo Nilsson; Olle Korsgren

Background. Islet-produced tissue factor (TF) triggers an adverse clotting reaction, the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR), providing a likely explanation for the need of tissue from multiple donors in clinical islet transplantation. In this study, the authors investigated whether compounds previously shown to affect TF and macrophage chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 expression in monocytes and endothelial cells have the same effect in human islet cells. Methods. Islets were cultured in the presence of l-arginine, cyclosporine A, enalapril, or nicotinamide for 48 hr, after which the TF content and MCP-1 expression were assessed. The effect of nicotinamide on IBMIR was evaluated by exposing the treated islets to fresh human ABO-compatible blood in an in vitro loop model. Results. Nicotinamide was the only compound that significantly reduced both TF and MCP-1. This reduction was dose-dependent. The level of MCP-1 was strongly correlated with TF expression (r2=0.98). In addition, the level of TF was also correlated with the ability of the islets to initiate IBMIR (r2=0.94). Conclusions. TF and MCP-1 expression in human islets can be decreased by adding nicotinamide to the culture medium. These observations indicate that the adverse effects of IBMIR in clinical islet transplantation could be reduced without endangering the recipient using antithrombotic drugs.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2009

Positron emission tomography in clinical islet transplantation.

Olof Eriksson; Torsten Eich; Anders Sundin; Annika Tibell; Gunnar Tufveson; Helene H. Andersson; M Felldin; Aksel Foss; Lauri Kyllönen; Bengt Långström; Bo Nilsson; Olle Korsgren; Torbjörn Lundgren

The fate of islets in clinical transplantation is unclear. To elude on this positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed for 60 min during islet transplantation in five patients receiving six transplants.


Annals of Surgery | 2013

Liver Transplantation for Neuroendocrine Tumors in Europe—Results and Trends in Patient Selection A 213-Case European Liver Transplant Registry Study

Yves Patrice Le Treut; Emilie Gregoire; Jürgen Klempnauer; Jacques Belghiti; Elisabeth Jouve; Jan Lerut; Denis Castaing; Olivier Soubrane; O. Boillot; Georges Mantion; Kia Homayounfar; Manuel Bustamante; Daniel Azoulay; P. Wolf; Marek Krawczyk; Andreas Pascher; Bertrand Suc; Laurence Chiche; Jorge Ortiz De Urbina; Vladimir Mejzlik; Manuel Pascual; J. Peter A. Lodge; Salvatore Gruttadauria; François Paye; François-René Pruvot; Stefan Thorban; Aksel Foss; René Adam

Objective:The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes and indications in a large cohort of patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for liver metastases (LM) from neuroendocrine tumors (NET) over a 27-year period. Background:LT for NET remains controversial due to the absence of clear selection criteria and the scarcity and heterogeneity of reported cases. Methods:This retrospective multicentric study included 213 patients who underwent LT for NET performed in 35 centers in 11 European countries between 1982 and 2009. One hundred seven patients underwent transplantation before 2000 and 106 after 2000. Mean age at the time of LT was 46 years. Half of the patients presented hormone secretion and 55% had hepatomegaly. Before LT, 83% of patients had undergone surgical treatment of the primary tumor and/or LM and 76% had received chemotherapy. The median interval between diagnosis of LM and LT was 25 months (range, 1–149 months). In addition to LT, 24 patients underwent major resection procedures and 30 patients underwent minor resection procedures. Results:Three-month postoperative mortality was 10%. At 5 years after LT, overall survival (OS) was 52% and disease-free survival was 30%. At 5 years from diagnosis of LM, OS was 73%. Multivariate analysis identified 3 predictors of poor outcome, that is, major resection in addition to LT, poor tumor differentiation, and hepatomegaly. Since 2000, 5-year OS has increased to 59% in relation with fewer patients presenting poor prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis of the 106 cases treated since 2000 identified the following predictors of poor outcome: hepatomegaly, age more than 45 years, and any amount of resection concurrent with LT. Conclusions:LT is an effective treatment of unresectable LM from NET. Patient selection based on the aforementioned predictors can achieve a 5-year OS between 60% and 80%. However, use of overly restrictive criteria may deny LT to some patients who could benefit. Optimal timing for LT in patients with stable versus progressive disease remains unclear.

Collaboration


Dive into the Aksel Foss's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pål-Dag Line

Oslo University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tom H. Karlsen

Oslo University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hanne Scholz

Oslo University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge