Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alain Micaleff is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alain Micaleff.


Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety | 2014

Balancing benefit and risk of medicines: a systematic review and classification of available methodologies.

Shahrul Mt-Isa; Christine E. Hallgreen; Nan Wang; Torbjörn Callréus; Georgy Genov; Ian Hirsch; Stephen F. Hobbiger; Kimberley S. Hockley; Davide Luciani; Lawrence D. Phillips; George Quartey; Sinan B. Sarac; Isabelle Stoeckert; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Alain Micaleff; Deborah Ashby

The need for formal and structured approaches for benefit–risk assessment of medicines is increasing, as is the complexity of the scientific questions addressed before making decisions on the benefit–risk balance of medicines. We systematically collected, appraised and classified available benefit–risk methodologies to facilitate and inform their future use.


Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety | 2016

Recommendations for benefit–risk assessment methodologies and visual representations

Diana Hughes; Ed Waddingham; Shahrul Mt-Isa; Alesia Goginsky; Edmond Chan; Gerald Downey; Christine E. Hallgreen; Kimberley S. Hockley; Juhaeri Juhaeri; Alfons Lieftucht; Marilyn Metcalf; Rebecca Noel; Lawrence D. Phillips; Deborah Ashby; Alain Micaleff

The purpose of this study is to draw on the practical experience from the PROTECT BR case studies and make recommendations regarding the application of a number of methodologies and visual representations for benefit–risk assessment.


Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety | 2014

Benefit-risk assessment in a post-market setting: a case study integrating real-life experience into benefit-risk methodology.

Christine E. Hallgreen; Hendrika A. van den Ham; Shahrul Mt-Isa; Simon Ashworth; Richard C. Hermann; Steve Hobbiger; Davide Luciani; Alain Micaleff; Andrew Thomson; Nan Wang; Tjeerd van Staa; Gerald Downey; Ian Hirsch; Kimberley S. Hockley; Juhaeri Juhaeri; Marilyn Metcalf; Jeremiah Mwangi; Richard Nixon; Ruth Peters; Isabelle Stoeckert; Ed Waddingham; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Deborah Ashby; Lesley Wise

Difficulties may be encountered when undertaking a benefit–risk assessment for an older product with well‐established use but with a benefit–risk balance that may have changed over time. This case study investigates this specific situation by applying a formal benefit–risk framework to assess the benefit–risk balance of warfarin for primary prevention of patients with atrial fibrillation.


Drug Discovery Today: Technologies | 2011

Weighing benefit–risk of medicines: concepts and approaches

Shahrul Mt-Isa; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Torbjörn Callréus; Alain Micaleff; Deborah Ashby

Formal methods for decision-making based on benefit–risk analysis have existed for many years in various settings, but have only recently being explored in Medicine for use by various stakeholders including patients, physicians, regulators and pharmaceutical industry. We review the rationale for using these formal approaches; describe the basic concepts required; outline some competing approaches that have been proposed, illustrating them with examples, refer more briefly to other approaches and describe current initiatives in this domain.


Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety | 2016

Literature review of visual representation of the results of benefit–risk assessments of medicinal products

Christine E. Hallgreen; Shahrul Mt-Isa; Alfons Lieftucht; Lawrence D. Phillips; Diana Hughes; Susan Talbot; Alex Asiimwe; Gerald Downey; Georgy Genov; Richard C. Hermann; Rebecca Noel; Ruth Peters; Alain Micaleff; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Deborah Ashby

The PROTECT Benefit–Risk group is dedicated to research in methods for continuous benefit–risk monitoring of medicines, including the presentation of the results, with a particular emphasis on graphical methods.


Archive | 2014

IMI-PROTECT benefit-risk grouprecommendations report:recommendations for the methodology andvisualisation techniques to be used in theassessment of benefit and risk of medicines

Diana Hughes; Waddingham, Ed, A., J.; Shahrul Mt-Isa; Alesia Goginsky; Edmond Chan; Gerald Downey; Christine E. Hallgreen; Kimberley S. Hockley; Juhaeri Juhaeri; Alfons Lieftucht; Metcalfe, Marilyn, A.; Noel, Rebecca, A.; Lawrence D. Phillips; Deborah Ashby; Alain Micaleff


Archive | 2013

IMI work package 5: report 1:b:iii benefit - riskwave 1 case study report:Raptiva® (efalizumab)

Alain Micaleff; Tornbjorn Callreus; Lawrence D. Phillips; Diana Hughes; Kimberley S. Hockley; Nan Wang; David Luciani


Archive | 2013

Review of visualisation methods for therepresentation of benefit-risk assessment ofmedication: stage 2 of 2

Shahrul Mt-Isa; Hallgreen, Christine, E.; Alex Asiimwe; Gerry Downey; Georgy Genov; Richard C. Hermann; Diana Hughes; Alfons Lieftucht; Rebecca Noel; Ruth Peters; Lawrence D. Phillips; Susan Shepherd; Alain Micaleff; Deborah Ashby; Ioanna Tzoulak


Archive | 2013

IMI work package 5: report 2:b:ii benefit - riskwave 2 case study report: Rosiglitazone

Lawrence D. Phillips; B Amzal; Alex Asiimwe; Edmond Chan; Chen Chen; Diana Hughes; Juhaeri Juhaeri; Alain Micaleff; Shahrul Mt-Isa; Becky Noel; Susan Shepherd; Nan Wang

Collaboration


Dive into the Alain Micaleff's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lawrence D. Phillips

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nan Wang

Imperial College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge