Alain Roussel

Preoperative radiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma: A meta-analysis using individual patient data (oesophageal cancer collaborative group)

PURPOSE The existing randomized evidence has failed to conclusively demonstrate the benefit or otherwise of preoperative radiotherapy in treating patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma. This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether there is benefit from adding radiotherapy prior to surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS This quantitative meta-analysis included updated individual patient data from all properly randomized trials (published or unpublished) comprising 1147 patients (971 deaths) from five randomized trials. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 9 years, the hazard ratio (HR) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.78-1.01) suggests an overall reduction in the risk of death of 11% and an absolute survival benefit of 3% at 2 years and 4% at 5 years. This result is not conventionally statistically significant (p = 0.062). No clear differences in the size of the effect by sex, age, or tumor location were apparent. CONCLUSION Based on existing trials, there was no clear evidence that preoperative radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. These results indicate that if such preoperative radiotherapy regimens do improve survival, then the effect is likely to be modest with an absolute improvement in survival of around 3 to 4%. Trials or a meta-analysis of around 2000 patients would be needed to reliably detect such an improvement (15-->20%).

Recurrences of rectal cancers: Results of a multimodal approach with intraoperative radiation therapy

PURPOSE Prognosis of recurrent rectal cancer remains poor, mainly because of the difficulties of achieving a satisfactory local control. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) allows for the delivery of a complementary single dose to the tumor residues or to the tumor bed and could be useful jn a multimodal treatment. In an attempt to evaluate this interest, a retrospective analysis of patients treated with IORT in six French hospitals has been performed. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data have been collected in 73 patients (41 men), with a mean age of 62 years, treated with IORT. Initial rectal tumors were large (mean diameter: 45 mm), partially or totally fixed to the contiguous structures in 39%, and with nodal involvement in 50% of the cases. Initial surgery had been a sphincter-sparing surgery in 67%; external radiation therapy had been delivered in 52%, and a chemotherapy had been given in 10% of the patients. Recurrences were isolated (without metastases) in 86%, and were posterior or posterolateral in 55% of the cases. Surgery allowed for a complete macroscopical resection in 57%, a partial resection with gross residual disease in 29%, and no resection in 14% of the recurrences. Intraoperative radiation therapy was delivered in a dose of 10 to 25 Gy (mean 18.5) through localizators of a mean diameter of 75 mm (60 to 110). External radiation therapy, either preoperative or postoperatively was given to 30 patients without prior radiation therapy. Ten patients received additional chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil. RESULTS Four postoperative deaths occurred. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 16 patients and some complications were probably related to the IORT procedure. Four long-term complications were observed. Overall actuarial survival occurred in 72.4% of the patients at 1 year, in 44.6% at 2 years, and in 30.6% at 3 years. Twenty-one local failures have been observed. Actuarial local control occurred in 71.3% of the patients at 1 year, 47.7% at 2 years, and 31.3% at 3 years. CONCLUSION Intraoperative radiation therapy is a complementary treatment for recurrences of rectal cancer. It provides encouraging results, particularly in some selected situations, when patients have not previously been treated with external radiation therapy. Further studies of multimodal treatments are necessary.

Intraoperative radiation therapy in recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix: Report of the French intraoperative group on 70 patients

PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility and oncologic results of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) for recurrent uterine cervical carcinoma in a cohort of patients treated in seven French institutions. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1985 to 1993, 70 patients with pelvic recurrences underwent IORT with/ without external radiation therapy (ERT) and chemotherapy (CT). Treatment modalities for recurrence were IORT alone (40 out of 70), IORT + ERT (30 out of 70), additional chemotherapy (20 out of 70). Gross complete resection (CR) was performed in 30 out of 70 cases, partial resection (PR) in 37 out of 70, and unspecified surgery in 3 out of 70. Sixty-five patients had electron beam IORT and 5, 100 KV photon IORT. Mean IORT cone size, electron beam energy, and dose (calculated at the 90% isodose line) were, respectively, 75 mm (40 to 90), 12 MeV (6 to 20), and 18 Gy (10 to 25) after CR and 80 mm (45 to 100), 15 MeV (7 to 24), and 19 Gy (10 to 30) after PR. RESULTS Mean follow-up after IORT was 15 months (2 to 69). One, 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 47, 17, and 8%, respectively; median survival was 11 months and local control, 21%. Median survival and local control rates increased after CR (13 months, 27%) vs. PR (10 months, 17%) and when initial treatment consisted of surgery (S) alone (15 months, 25%) vs. radiation therapy (RT +/- S) (10 months, 16%). However, these differences were not statistically significant. No death-related toxicity was observed. Grade 2 or 3 toxicity was observed in 19 out of 70 patients (27%), including 9 not directly IORT-related complications (13%) (three digestive tract fistulas, one rectal stricture, three urinary fistulas, two infections) and 10 directly IORT-related complications (14%) (five neuropathies, four ureteral obstructions, and one rectal stricture). CONCLUSION This retrospective study demonstrates the feasibility of IORT. The usefulness of IORT still needs to be evaluated in primary treatment of advanced stages of cervical carcinoma.

Palliative therapy of inoperable oesophageal carcinoma with radiotherapy and methotrexate: Final results of a controlled clinical trial☆

Between May 1976 and January 1982, 170 patients were entered in a randomized study comparing a combined treatment consisting of methotrexate followed by irradiation versus radiotherapy alone in patients with non metastatic inoperable oesophageal cancer. Methotrexate was administered subcutaneously in 4 days to a total dose of 24 mg/m2. Radiotherapy was performed, in both groups, at a dose of 56.25 Gy in 25 fractions (5 weeks). The administration of methotrexate did not lead to an increased intolerance to radiotherapy but severe hematological toxicities were observed in 7.8% of the cases. No difference in the duration of survival was detected. Initial performance status of the patients and their weight loss prior to entry on trial were the factors that were most predictive of the patients prognosis.

Controlled clinical trial for the treatment of patients with inoperable esophageal carcinoma: a study of the EORTC Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.

Radiotherapy is the usual treatment for inoperable esophageal carcinoma. Results published before 1976, when this trial was begun were very modest, except for those of Pearson [1], The 1-year survival rate varies from 15% to 30%, and 5-year survival rates were about 5% [2–7].

Prospective and Controlled Studies on Multidisciplinary Treatment in Gastrointestinal Cancer

The Gastrointestinal Tract Cooperative Group of the EORTC has been conducting prospective and controlled studies in multidisciplinary treatment since 1973. There are now 39 institutions in the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, France, Israel, and Belgium contributing to the various clinical trials. They have already registered 1,350 patients, of whom 950 are evaluable for the studies. Seven clinical trials are still in progress or already closed. The purpose of this paper is to review these studies briefly.