Alain Soupart

Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia

Hyponatraemia, defined as a serum sodium concentration <135 mmol/l, is the most common disorder of body fluid and electrolyte balance encountered in clinical practice. It can lead to a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms, from subtle to severe or even life threatening, and is associated with increased mortality, morbidity and length of hospital stay in patients presenting with a range of conditions. Despite this, the management of patients remains problematic. The prevalence of hyponatraemia in widely different conditions and the fact that hyponatraemia is managed by clinicians with a broad variety of backgrounds have fostered diverse institution- and speciality-based approaches to diagnosis and treatment. To obtain a common and holistic view, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) and the European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA), represented by European Renal Best Practice (ERBP), have developed the Clinical Practice Guideline on the diagnostic approach and treatment of hyponatraemia as a joint venture of three societies representing specialists with a natural interest in hyponatraemia. In addition to a rigorous approach to methodology and evaluation, we were keen to ensure that the document focused on patient-important outcomes and included utility for clinicians involved in everyday practice.

Non-peptide arginine-vasopressin antagonists: the vaptans

Arginine-vasopressin is a hormone that plays an important part in circulatory and water homoeostasis. The three arginine-vasopressin-receptor subtypes--V1a, V1b, and V2--all belong to the large rhodopsin-like G-protein-coupled receptor family. The vaptans are orally and intravenously active non-peptide vasopressin receptor antagonists that are in development. Relcovaptan is a selective V1a-receptor antagonist, which has shown initial positive results in the treatment of Raynauds disease, dysmenorrhoea, and tocolysis. SSR-149415 is a selective V1b-receptor antagonist, which could have beneficial effects in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. V2-receptor antagonists--mozavaptan, lixivaptan, satavaptan, and tolvaptan--induce a highly hypotonic diuresis without substantially affecting the excretion of electrolytes (by contrast with the effects of diuretics). These drugs are all effective in the treatment of euvolaemic and hypervolaemic hyponatraemia. Conivaptan is a V1a/V2 non-selective vasopressin-receptor antagonist that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as an intravenous infusion for the inhospital treatment of euvolaemic or hypervolaemic hyponatraemia.

Successful Long-Term Treatment of Hyponatremia in Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone Secretion with Satavaptan (SR121463B), an Orally Active Nonpeptide Vasopressin V2-Receptor Antagonist

The effects of satavaptan (SR121463B), a novel long-acting orally active vasopressin V(2)-receptor antagonist, were investigated in patients with the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). In the first part of this randomized, double-blind study, 34 patients first were treated with satavaptan (versus placebo) for up to 5 d and then during 23 d of open-label dosage-adjustment period. In the second part of the study, long-term efficacy and safety of satavaptan was assessed in an open-label trial during at least 12 mo. Mean (+/-SD) serum sodium (SNa) levels before treatment were 127 +/- 2 mmol/L (placebo, n = 8), 125 +/- 6 mmol/L (25 mg, n = 14), and 127 +/- 5 mmol/L (50 mg, n = 12). Responders (patients SNa levels normalized or increased by at least 5 mmol/L from baseline during the double-blind period) were 79% in the 25-mg group (SNa 136 +/- 3 mmol/L; P = 0.006), 83% in the 50-mg group (SNa 140 +/- 6 mmol/L; P = 0.005), and 13% in the placebo group (SNa 130 +/- 5 mmol/L). No drug-related serious adverse events were recorded. During the long-term treatment, 15 of 18 enrolled patients achieved 6 mo and 10 achieved 12 mo of treatment. The SNa response was maintained during this time with a good tolerance. The new oral vasopressin V(2)-receptor antagonist satavaptan adequately corrects mild or moderate hyponatremia in patients with SIADH and has a good safety profile.

Treatment of Symptomatic Hyponatremia

Inadequate treatment of severe hyponatremia (<120 mEq/L) can be associated with severe neurological damage. In acute (<48 hours) hyponatremia, usually observed in the postoperative period, prompt treatment with hypertonic saline (3%) can prevent seizures and respiratory arrest. For patients with chronic (>48-72 hours) symptomatic hyponatremia, correction must be rapid during the first few hours (to decrease brain edema) followed by a slow correction limited to 10 mmol/L over 24 hours to avoid the development of osmotic demyelinating syndrome. In patients with asymptomatic hyponatremia, slow correction is the appropriate approach. When patients are overtreated, neurologic damage can be prevented by relowering the serum sodium (SNa) so that the daily increase in SNa remains below 10 mmol/L/24 hours. Frequent measurements of SNa during the correction phase of SNa are mandatory to avoid overcorrection. The use of urea to treat hyponatremia represents an advantageous alternative to hypertonic saline.

Treatment of euvolemic hyponatremia in the intensive care unit by urea

IntroductionHyponatremia in the intensive care unit (ICU) is most commonly related to inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). Fluid restriction is difficult to apply in these patients. We wanted to report the treatment of hyponatremia with urea in these patients.MethodsTwo groups of patients are reported. The first one is represented by a retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients with mild hyponatremia treated with urea. The second group is presented by a series of 35 consecutive patients with severe hyponatremia acquired outside the hospital (≤ 115 mEq/L) who where treated by isotonic saline and urea (0.5 to 1 g/kg/day), administered usually by gastric tube.ResultsIn the first group with mild hyponatremia (128 ± 4 mEq/L) the serum sodium (SNa) increased to a mean value of 135 ± 4 mEq/L (P < 0.001) after two days of urea therapy (46 ± 25 g/day), despite a large fluid intake (> 2 L/day). The mean duration of urea therapy was six days (from 2 to 42 days). Six patients developed hyponatremia again once the urea was stopped, which necessitated its reintroduction. Six patients developed hypernatremia (maximum value 155 mEq/L). In the second group, SNa increased from 111 ± 3 mEq/L to 122 ± 4 mEq/L in one day (P < 0.001). All the patients with neurological symptoms made a rapid recovery. No side effects were observed.ConclusionsThese data show that urea is a simple and inexpensive therapy to treat euvolemic hyponatremia in the ICU.

Efficacy and Tolerance of Urea Compared with Vaptans for Long-Term Treatment of Patients with SIADH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Vaptans (vasopressin V(2)-receptor antagonists) are a new approach for the treatment of hyponatremia. However, their indications remain to be determined, and their benefit compared with that of the usual treatments for the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) have not been evaluated. This prospective, long-term study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of two oral vaptans with those of oral urea in patients with SIADH. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Patients with chronic SIADH of various origins were treated first with vaptans for 1 year. After an 8-day holiday period, they received oral urea for an additional 1-year follow-up. Serum sodium was measured every 2 months, and drug doses were adjusted accordingly. RESULTS Thirteen participants were initially included in the study (serum sodium, 125±3 mEq/L); 12 completed the 2-year treatment period. Treatment with vaptans (satavaptan, 5-50 mg/d, n=10; tolvaptan, 30-60 mg/day, n=2) increased natremia (serum sodium, 135±3 mEq/L) during the 1-year vaptan period without escape. Hyponatremia recurred in the 12 participants when vaptans were stopped (holiday period). Urea improved the natremia with the same efficacy (serum sodium, 135±2 mEq/L) as vaptans during the 1-year urea treatment period. One participant treated with tolvaptan withdrew from the study early because of excessive thirst. Another patient receiving urea developed hypernatremia without complications. CONCLUSIONS Urea has efficacy similar to that of vaptans for treatment of chronic SIADH. Tolerance is generally good for both agents.

Re-induction of hyponatremia after rapid overcorrection of hyponatremia reduces mortality in rats.

Osmotic demyelination syndrome is a devastating neurologic disorder often seen after the rapid correction of chronic hyponatremia. The permeability of the blood-brain barrier is increased in experimental osmotic demyelination, and some have suggested that corticosteroids protect against this disorder by keeping the permeability of the blood-brain barrier low. We previously reported that re-lowering of the serum sodium after rapid correction of chronic hyponatremia was beneficial if performed early in the course (12 to 24 h). Here we compared mortality, blood-brain barrier permeability, and microglial activation in rats after the rapid correction of chronic hyponatremia. We studied three groups of rats after correction of chronic hyponatremia: and treated them with sodium chloride, with or without dexamethasone; or with sodium chloride followed by re-induction of hyponatremia. We found that treatment with dexamethasone or re-induction of hyponatremia effectively prevented the opening of the blood-brain barrier, reduced neurological manifestations, and decreased microglial activation; however, only re-induction of hyponatremia resulted in a significant decrease in mortality 5 days after the correction of chronic hyponatremia. Restoring the permeability of the blood-brain barrier to normal levels did not decrease mortality. Our results suggest that after inadvertent rapid correction of hyponatremia, treatment options should favor re-lowering serum sodium. The increased permeability of blood-brain barrier seen in osmotic demyelination syndrome may not be a primary pathophysiologic insult of this syndrome.

Brain myelinolysis following hypernatremia in rats.

Brain myelinolysis could develop after excessive correction (ΔSNa > 20–25 mEq/1/24 hour [h]) of chronic hyponatremia; however, this neurological event is not recognized as a complication of hypernatremia when arising from a normonatremic baseline. Previous animal studies were unable to reproduce these brain lesions in hypernatremia after acute increase of serum sodium to moderately hypernatremic levels. We hypothesize that to produce brain dehydration and myelinolysis from normonatremic baseline requires a more important osmotic gradient than when starting from hyponatremic state. Rapid and sustained hypernatremia (at least >6 to 12 h) was induced in male rats by i.p. administration of NaCl 2 M (3 injections at 6 h intervals). The NaCl doses were determined to define two groups of hypernatremic rats (moderate and severe hypernatremia) for further analysis of the neurological outcome. In group 1 (moderate hypernatremia, n = 26) 8 rats died early (<12 h) after the beginning of the NaCl administration without specific neurologic manifestations. All the surviving rats fared well and were asymptomatic at time of death (day 8). They were submitted for at least 6 to 12 h to a serum sodium gradient of 28 ± 6 mEq/l. Brain analysis was normal in all of them without brain demyelinating lesions. In group 2 (n = 51), 24 rats also died rapidly (<12 h). The surviving rats developed severe neurologic symptoms as typically encountered in hyponatremic rats with myelinolysis. The majority of them died before day 8. The hypernatremic gradient in this group was significantly higher than rats in group 1 that completely recovered (mean ASNa: 39 ± 8 mEq/1, p < 0.001). In the 7 surviving rats (mean ΔSNa: 33 ± 3 mEq/l) brain analysis demonstrated severe demyelinating lesions similar to the histologic changes observed in hyponatremia-related myelinolysis. We demonstrated for the first time that high and sustained levels of hypernatremia could induce brain myelinolysis and that the osmotic gradient necessary to produce brain lesions is higher for normonatremic than for hyponatremic rats

Reinduction of hyponatremia improves survival in rats with myelinolysis-related neurologic symptoms.

Brain myclinolysis occurs after excessive correction (ΔSNa > 20 mEq/1/24 hours) of chronic hyponatremia. However, we showed recently that the mechanisms leading to brain myelinolysis remain reversible. Indeed, reinduction of the hyponatremia by water administration despite 12 hours of sustained excessive correction could prevent the development of demyelination in rats still asymptomatic at that time. Whether this therapeutic maneuver could be also beneficial to rats with preexisting myelinolysis-related neurologic symptoms is unknown. Therefore we evaluated here the effect of reinduction of the hyponatremia on the survival and on brain damage in rats presenting obvious neurologic symptoms after excessive correction of hyponatremia. After 3 days of severe hyponatremia induced by 2.5 D-glucose in water and continuous infusion of AVP, rats were submitted to a large correction (ΔSNa ∼ 30 mEq/1) by 2 i.p. injections of hypertonic saline given over 24 hours. In group I(n = 15) the rats developing neurologic symptoms during the first 24 hours of correction received one i.p. injection of distilled water which rapidly decreased the natremia to a final correction gradient < 20 mEq/1/24 hour. In group II (n = 13, controls) the symptomatic rats were left permanently overcorrected. In group I, after water administration, the neurological manifestations were generally attenuated or disappeared. Seven of the 15 rats (47%) in this group survived up to day 10 with a mean survival time of 7.5 ± 2 days, an outcome clearly improved as compared to group II (controls): only 1 of the 13 rats (7%, p < 0.03) was still alive on day 10 and the mean survival time was 3.3 ± 2 days (p < 0.001) in this group II. The duration of the symptoms also influences the prognosis. In group I, in 9 rats the water administration was performed 4 hours after symptoms onset. These rats had a better outcome than the 6 rats with more sustained (8–10 hours) neurologic symptoms before water loading. Brain analysis in the 7 surviving rats of group I demonstrated demyelinating lesions in only 2 of them, suggesting the reversibility of the process even when neurologic manifestation developed. In conclusion, after exposure to an excessive correction of chronic hyponatremia, even when rats have developed myelinolysis-related neurologic symptoms, hypotonic fluids administration could improve survival and could prevent the subsequent development of brain myelinolysis.

Azotemia (48 h) decreases the risk of brain damage in rats after correction of chronic hyponatremia

Brain myelinolysis complicates excessive correction of chronic hyponatremia in man. Myelinolysis appear in rats for correction levels deltaSNa) > 20 mEq/l/24 h. We previously showed in rats that when chronic hyponatremia was corrected with urea, the incidence and the severity of brain lesions were significantly reduced compared to hypertonic saline. In man, hyponatremia is frequently associated with azotemia and hemo-dialysis usually corrects rapidly the serum sodium (SNa) but only few patients apparently develop demyelination. We hypothesize that uremic state protects brain against myelinolysis. This hypothesis was evaluated in rats developing azotemia by administration of mercuric chloride (HgCl2, 1.5 mg/kg). Severe (SNa < 120 mEq/l) hyponatremia (3 days) was induced by S.C. AVP and i.p. 2.5% D-glucose for 3 days. HgCl2 was injected on day 2. Hyponatremia was corrected on day 4 by i.p. injections of 5% NaCl in order to obtain a correction level largely above the toxic threshold for brain (deltaSNA approximately 30 mEq/l/24 h). Surviving rats were decapitated on day 10 for brain analysis. In the group with renal failure (Group I, n = 15, urea 59 mmol/l) the outcome was remarkably favourable with only three rats (3/15) dying before day 10 and only one of them (1/3) presenting myelinolysis-related neurologic symptoms. The 12 other rats (80%) survived in Group I without symptoms and brain analysis was normal in all of them despite large correction level (deltaSNa: 32 mEq/l/24 h). On the contrary in nine rats in which HgCl, did not produce significant azotemia (control 1, n = 9, urea: 11 mmol/l), all the rats developed severe neurologic symptoms and eight of them died before day 10. Similar catastrophic outcome was observed in the non-azotemic controls (control 2, no HgCl2 administration, n = 15, urea: 5 mmol/l). All of them developed myelinolysis-related neurologic symptoms and only four of them survived with severe brain lesions (survival 12/15 in Group I vs. 5/24 in pooled controls 1 and 2, p < 0.001). In conclusion, we showed for the first time that chronic hyponatremic rats with azotemia (48 h) tolerated large increases in SNa (approximately 30 mEq/l/24 h) without significant brain damage.