Alain Woodtli

In-vivo fluence rate effect in photodynamic therapy of early cancers with tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin

Abstract— Several parameters affect clinical trials in photodynamic therapy and influence the therapeutic outcome. Beside drug dose, light dose, drug‐light interval and other variables, the fluence rate is a parameter that can influence the therapeutic results. In this study we have evaluated the fluence rate effect with a second‐generation photosensitizer, tetra(m‐hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC) using a 7,12‐dimethylbenz(a)anthracene induced early squamous cell carcinoma of the Syrian hamster cheek pouch as a tumor model. Following injection of 0.5 mg/kg of mTHPC, irradiation tests were performed at two drug‐light intervals, 4 and 8 days. Wavelength and light dose were adapted from those applied routinely in clinical trials. Irradiations at 652 nm were carried out with fluences ranging from 8 to 20 J/cm2 delivered at fluence rates of 15 and 150 mW/cm2. Similar tests were also performed at 514 nm with a fluence of 80 J/cm2 delivered at fluence rates ranging from 25 to 125 mW/cm2. At both wavelengths and drug‐light intervals for a given fluence, the higher fluence rates resulted in less tissue damage in tumor and healthy mucosae. However, the lower fluence rates yielded slightly less therapeutic selectivity. This study confirms that the fluence rate is of major importance in clinical PDT.

Photodynamic Therapy for 101 Early Cancers of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract, the Esophagus, and the Bronchi: A Single-Institution Experience

Cancer, when detected at an early stage, has a very good probability of being eradicated by surgery or radiotherapy. However, less aggressive treatments also tend to provide high rates of cure without the side effects of radical therapy. We report on the results of our clinical experience with photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of early carcinomas in the upper aerodigestive tract, the esophagus, and the tracheobronchial tree. Sixty-four patients with 101 squamous cell carcinomas were treated with three different photosensitizers: hematoporphyrin derivative (HPD), Photofrin II, and tetra (m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC). Seventy-seven (76%) tumors showed a complete rsponse with no recurrence after a mean follow-up period of 27 months. There was no significant difference in terms of cure rates among the three dyes. However, mTHPC has a stronger phototoxicity and induces a shorter skin photosensitization than either of the other photosensitizers. There were eight major complications: three esophagotracheal fistulae after illumination with red light in the esophagus, two esophageal stenoses following 360° circumferential irradiation, and three bronchial stenoses. Illumination with the less penetrating green light and the use of a 180° or 240° windowed cylindrical light distributor render the risk of complications in the esophagus essentially impossible, without reducing the efficacy of the treatment. Therefore, PDT may be considered as a safe and effective treatment for early carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract, the esophagus, and the tracheobronchial tree.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin in the hamster cheek pouch tumor model: comparison with clinical measurements

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of the photosensitizer tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC) was measured by optical fiber-based light-induced fluorescence spectroscopy (LIFS) in the normal and tumoral cheek pouch mucosa of 29 Golden Syrian hamsters with chemically induced squamous cell carcinoma. Similar measurements were carried out on the normal oral cavity mucosa of five patients up to 30 days after injection. The drug doses were between 0.15 and 0.3 mg per kg of body weight (mg/kg), and the mTHPC fluorescence in the tissue was excited at 420 nm. The PK in both human and hamster exhibited similar behavior although the PK in the hamster mucosa was slightly delayed in comparison with that of its human counterpart. The mTHPC fluorescence signal of the hamster mucosa was smaller than that of the human mucosa by a factor of about 3 for the same injected drug dose. A linear correlation was found between the fluorescence signal and the mTHPC dose in the range from 0.075 to 0.5 mg/kg at times between 8 and 96 h after injection. No significant selectivity in mTHPC fluorescence between the tumoral and normal mucosa of the hamsters was found at any of the applied conditions. The sensitivity of the normal and tumoral hamster cheek pouch mucosa to mTHPC photodynamic therapy as a function of the light dose was determined by light irradiation at 650 nm and 150 mW/cm2, 4 days after the injection of a drug dose of 0.15 mg/kg. These results were compared with irradiations of the normal oral and normal and tumoral bronchial mucosa of 37 patients under the same conditions. The reaction to PDT of both types of human mucosae was considerably stronger than that of the hamster cheek pouch mucosa. The sensitivity to PDT became comparable between hamster and human mucosa when the drug dose for the hamster was increased to 0.5 mg/kg. A significant therapeutic selectivity between the normal and neoplastic hamster cheek pouch was observed. Less selectivity was found following irradiations of normal mucosa and early carcinomas in the human bronchi. The pharmacodynamic behavior of mTHPC was determined by test irradiations of the normal mucosa of hamsters and patients between 6 h and 8 days after injection of 0.5 and 0.15 mg/kg in the hamsters and the patients, respectively. The normal hamster cheek pouch showed a maximum response to irradiation 6 h after injection and then decreased continuously to no observable reaction at 8 days after injection. The reaction of the normal human oral mucosa, however, showed an increasing sensitivity to the applied light between 6 h and 4 days after mTHPC injection and then decreased again at 8 days. The hamster model with the chemically induced early squamous cell cancer in the cheek pouch thus showed some similarity to the early squamous cell cancer of the human oral mucosa considering the PK. However, a quantitative difference in fluorescence signal for identical mTHPC doses as well as a significant difference in pharmacodynamic behavior were also observed. The suitability of this animal model for the optimization of PDT parameters in the clinic is therefore limited. Hence great care must be taken in screening new dyes for PDT of early squamous cell cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract based upon observables in the hamster cheek pouch model.

Interstitial photodynamic therapy with tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin: tumor versus striated muscle damage

PURPOSE The present study was initiated to determine the conditions under which a single photodynamic treatment would induce maximal damage to a tumor with no or at least minimal reversible damage to a normal striated muscle. METHODS AND MATERIALS The technique of interstitial light delivery was used after prior 0.5 mg/kg tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin administration in a hamster model. After having estimated the threshold light doses required for minimal muscle damage, the same light doses were applied to squamous cell carcinomas to evaluate the efficiency of interstitial photodynamic therapy. Sixteen and 96 h after the injection, irradiation at 650 nm was performed on the thigh muscle of the left hind leg. The applied light doses ranged between 0.3-15 J and were delivered at an intensity of 44 mW per cm of diffuser length. RESULTS The threshold of muscle damage was obtained using light doses of 1.5-3 J at two drug-light intervals of 16 and 96 h, respectively. More than 85% of the tumor mass was destroyed when lesions were illuminated using these threshold conditions. In terms of immediate short-term tumor response, this means that for the given irradiation conditions, a relatively low threshold energy of only 1.5 or 3 J, depending on the drug-light interval, is sufficient to induce massive tumor destruction with minimal muscle damage. CONCLUSION These results have implications for evaluating interstitial PDT for squamous cell cancers in unfavorable localization in the oral cavity or pharynx, such as at the base of the tongue.

A Light Distributor for Photodynamic Endometrial Ablation

Keywords: Photomedicine group Reference LPAS-CHAPTER-2000-001doi:10.1159/000062772 Record created on 2007-07-20, modified on 2016-08-08