Alan A. Doucette

Gel-eluted liquid fraction entrapment electrophoresis: an electrophoretic method for broad molecular weight range proteome separation.

Although well-established as a technique for protein purification, the application of continuous elution tube gel electrophoresis to proteome fractionation remains problematic. Difficulties associated with sample collection, particularly at the high mass range or at low sample loadings, continue to plague the technique. Furthermore, an upper mass limit is imposed as slow-moving higher molecular weight proteins are progressively diluted during the collection phase. In short, with current technology, effective separation over a broad mass range has not been achieved. In this work, we present improved techniques for continuous elution tube gel electrophoresis to accommodate broad mass range separation of proteins. Our device enables rapid partitioning of a proteome into discrete mass range fractions in the solution phase. High recovery is achieved at submicrogram to milligram sample loadings. We demonstrate comprehensive, reproducible separations of protein mixtures, as well as separation of a proteome in as fast as 1 h, over mass ranges from below 10 to 250 kDa. Finally, we identified proteins from a prefractionated standard protein mixture using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) analysis.

Top-Down and Bottom-Up Proteomics of SDS-Containing Solutions Following Mass-Based Separation

SDS has recognized benefits for protein sample preparation, including solubilization and imparting molecular weight separation (e.g., SDS-PAGE). Here, we compare two proteome workflows which incorporate SDS for protein separation, namely, SDS-PAGE coupled to LC/MS (GeLC MS), along with a solution separation platform, GELFrEE, for intact proteome prefractionation and identification. Despite the clear importance of SDS in these and other proteome analysis workflows, the affect of SDS on an LC/MS proteome experiment has not been quantified. We first examined the influence of SDS on both a bottom-up as well as a top-down (intact protein) MS workflow. Surprisingly, at levels up to 0.01% SDS in the injected sample, reliable MS characterization is obtained. We subsequently explored organic precipitation protocols (chloroform/methanol/water and acetone) as a means of lowering SDS, and present a simple modified acetone precipitation protocol which consistently enables MS proteome characterizations from samples initially containing 2% SDS. With this effective strategy for SDS reduction, the GELFrEE MS workflow for bottom-up proteome analysis was characterized relative to GeLC MS. Remarkable agreement in the number and type of identified proteins was obtained from these two separation platforms, validating the use of SDS in solution-phase proteome analysis.

Multiplexed Size Separation of Intact Proteins in Solution Phase for Mass Spectrometry

Reliable size-based protein separation is an invaluable biological technique. Unfortunately, size separation in solution is underutilized, owing perhaps to the poor resolution of conventional techniques. Here, we report an enhanced multiplexed GELFrEE (gel-eluted liquid fraction entrapment electrophoresis) device which incorporates eight independent separation channels, operating with high repeatability. This enables simultaneous size separation of independent proteome samples, each into 16 well resolved liquid fractions, covering 10-150 kDa in 1.5 h. A novel strategy to increase sample loads while maintaining electrophoretic resolution is presented by distributing the sample among the eight channels with subsequent pooling of collected fractions. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis of the S. cerevisiae proteome following GELFrEE separation and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) removal demonstrates the resolution and high correlation achieved between molecular weight and fraction number for the identified proteins. This device is highly orthogonal to solution isoelectric focusing, enabling our disclosure of a fully multiplexed high-throughput two-dimensional liquid electrophoretic (2D LE) platform that separates analogously to 2D polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). With 2D LE, a total of 128 well-resolved liquid fractions are obtained from 1 mg of S. cerevisiae proteins covering ranges 3.8 < pI < 7.8 and 10 kDa < MW < 150 kDa in an unprecedented 3.25 h total separation time.

Maximizing recovery of water-soluble proteins through acetone precipitation.

Solvent precipitation is commonly used to purify protein samples, as seen with the removal of sodium dodecyl sulfate through acetone precipitation. However, in its current practice, protein loss is believed to be an inevitable consequence of acetone precipitation. We herein provide an in depth characterization of protein recovery through acetone precipitation. In 80% acetone, the precipitation efficiency for six of 10 protein standards was poor (ca. ≤15%). Poor recovery was also observed for proteome extracts, including bacterial and mammalian cells. As shown in this work, increasing the ionic strength of the solution dramatically improves the precipitation efficiency of individual proteins, and proteome mixtures (ca. 80-100% yield). This is obtained by including 1-30 mM NaCl, together with acetone (50-80%) which maximizes protein precipitation efficiency. The amount of salt required to restore the recovery correlates with the amount of protein in the sample, as well as the intrinsic protein charge, and the dielectric strength of the solution. This synergistic approach to protein precipitation in acetone with salt is consistent with a model of ion pairing in organic solvent, and establishes an improved method to recover proteins and proteome mixtures in high yield.

Rapid and effective focusing in a carrier ampholyte solution isoelectric focusing system: a proteome prefractionation tool.

Preparative (solution) isoelectric focusing (sIEF) is a proven technique for proteome prefractionation, but carries limitations which include the risk of protein loss from isoelectric precipitation, poor focusing, and excessively long separation times. This report describes a simple yet effective method to achieve rapid focusing (as fast as 1 h) and maximize protein recovery using a carrier ampholyte sIEF system. Cathodic drift was not present over the time course of the experiment using our eight-chamber device, and we demonstrate the effectiveness of this device for focusing proteome mixtures. We also discuss an MS-compatible acidic wash protocol, which is shown to enhance the recovery of proteins following sIEF, thus, improving detection by LC-MS/MS. These approaches overcome significant shortcomings of the technique, enabling effective prefractionation prior to MS analysis.

Intact proteome fractionation strategies compatible with mass spectrometry.

Proteome fractionation refers to separation at the level of intact proteins. Proteome fractionation may precede sample digestion and subsequent peptide-level separation and detection (i.e., bottom-up mass spectrometry [MS]). For top-down MS, proteome fractionation acts as a stand-alone separation platform, since intact proteins are directly analyzed by the mass spectrometer. Regardless of the MS identification strategy, separation of intact proteins has clear benefits as a result of decreasing sample complexity. However, this stage of the workflow also creates considerable challenges, which are generally absent from the counterpart peptide separation experiment. For example, maintaining protein solubility is a key concern before, during and after separation. To this end, surfactants such as sodium dodecyl sulfate may be employed during fractionation, so long as they are eliminated prior to MS. In this article, current strategies for proteome fractionation in a MS-compatible format are reviewed, illustrating the challenges and outlooks on this important aspect of proteomics.

Resolubilization of precipitated intact membrane proteins with cold formic acid for analysis by mass spectrometry.

Protein precipitation in organic solvent is an effective strategy to deplete sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) ahead of MS analysis. Here we evaluate the recovery of membrane and water-soluble proteins through precipitation with chloroform/methanol/water or with acetone (80%). With each solvent system, membrane protein recovery was greater than 90%, which was generally higher than that of cytosolic proteins. With few exceptions, residual supernatant proteins detected by MS were also detected in the precipitation pellet, having higher MS signal intensity in the pellet fraction. Following precipitation, we present a novel strategy for the quantitative resolubilization of proteins in an MS-compatible solvent system. The pellet is incubated at -20 °C in 80% formic acid/water and then diluted 10-fold with water. Membrane protein recovery matches that of sonication of the pellet in 1% SDS. The resolubilized proteins are stable at room temperature, with no observed formylation as is typical of proteins suspended in formic acid at room temperature. The protocol is applied to the molecular weight determination of membrane proteins from a GELFrEE-fractionated sample of Escherichia coli proteins.

Comparison of sodium dodecyl sulfate depletion techniques for proteome analysis by mass spectrometry.

In proteomics, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) is favored for protein solubilization and mass-based separation (e.g. GELFrEE or SDS PAGE). Numerous SDS depletion techniques are available to purify proteins ahead of mass spectrometry. The effectiveness of the purification has a controlling influence on the success of the analysis. Here we quantitatively assess eight approaches to SDS depletion: in-gel digestion; protein precipitation in acetone or with TCA; detergent precipitation with KCl; strong cation exchange; protein level and peptide level purification with Pierce detergent removal cartridges; and FASP II. Considering protein purity, FASP II showed the highest degree of SDS removal, matching that of in-gel digestion (over 99.99% depleted). Other methods (acetone, strong cation exchange, Pierce cartridges) also deplete SDS to levels amenable to LC-MS (>99%). Accounting for protein recovery, FASP II revealed significant sample loss (<40% yield); other approaches show even greater protein loss. We further assessed acetone precipitation, having the highest protein recovery relative to FASP II, to process GELFrEE fractionated Escherichia coli ahead of bottom-up mass spectrometry. Acetone precipitation yielded a 17% average increase in identified proteins, and 40% increase in peptides, indicating this approach as a favored strategy for SDS depletion in a proteomics workflow.

Implications of partial tryptic digestion in organic–aqueous solvent systems for bottom-up proteome analysis

For bottom-up MS, the digestion step is critical and is typically performed with trypsin. Solvent-assisted digestion in 80% acetonitrile has previously been shown to improve protein sequence coverage at shorter digestion times. This has been attributed to enhanced enzyme digestion efficiency in this solvent. However, our results demonstrate that tryptic digestion in 80% acetonitrile is less efficient than that of conventional (aqueous) digestion. This is a consequence of decreased enzyme activity beyond ~40% acetonitrile, increased enzyme autolysis and lower protein solubility in 80% acetonitrile. We observe multiple missed cleavages and reduced concentration of fully cleaved digestion products. Nonetheless we confirm, through room temperature solvent-assisted digestion, a consistent improvement in protein sequence coverage when analyzed by mass spectrometry. These results are explained through the increased number of unique digestion products available for detection. Thus, while solvent-assisted digestion has clear merits for proteome analysis, one should be aware of the inefficiency of protein digestion though this protocol, particularly with absolute protein quantitation experiments.

Chromatographic behaviour of peptides following dimethylation with H2/D2-formaldehyde:Implications for comparative proteomics.

The differential separation of deuterated and non-deuterated forms of isotopically substituted compounds in chromatography is a well-known but not well-understood phenomenon. This separation is relevant in comparative proteomics, where stable isotopes are used for differential labelling and the effect of isotope resolution on quantitation has been used to disqualify some deuterium labelling methods in favour of heavier isotopes. In this work, a detailed evaluation of the extent of isotopic separation and its impact on quantitation was performed for peptides labelled through dimethylation with H(2)/D(2) formaldehyde. The chromatographic behaviour of 71 labelled peptide pairs from quadruplicate tryptic digests of bovine serum albumin were analysed, focusing on differences in median retention times, resolution, and relative quantitation for each peptide. For 94% of peptides, the retention time difference (heavy-light) was less than 12s with a median value 3.4s. With the exception of a single anomalous pair, isotope resolution was below 0.6 with a median value 0.11. Quantitative assessment indicates that the bias in ratio calculation introduced by retention time shifts is only about 3%, substantially smaller than the variation in ratio measurements themselves. Computational studies on the dipole moments of deuterated labels indicate that these results are consistent with literature suggestions that retention time shifts are inversely related to the polarity of the label. This study suggests that the incorporation of deuterium isotopes through peptide dimethylation at amine residues is a viable route to proteome quantitation.