Alan Brnabic

Does stage of illness impact treatment response in bipolar disorder? Empirical treatment data and their implication for the staging model and early intervention

OBJECTIVE The staging model suggests that early stages of bipolar disorder respond better to treatments and have a more favourable prognosis. This study aims to provide empirical support for the model, and the allied construct of early intervention. METHODS Pooled data from mania, depression, and maintenance studies of olanzapine were analyzed. Individuals were categorized as having had 0, 1-5, 6-10, or >10 prior episodes of illness, and data were analyzed across these groups. RESULTS Response rates for the mania and maintenance studies ranged from 52-69% and 10-50%, respectively, for individuals with 1-5 previous episodes, and from 29-59% and 11-40% for individuals with >5 previous episodes. These rates were significantly higher for the 1-5 group on most measures of response with up to a twofold increase in the chance of responding for those with fewer previous episodes. For the depression studies, response rates were significantly higher for the 1-5 group for two measures only. In the maintenance studies, the chance of relapse to either mania or depression was reduced by 40-60% for those who had experienced 1-5 episodes or 6-10 episodes compared to the >10 episode group, respectively. This trend was statistically significant only for relapse into mania for the 1-5 episode group (p=0.005). CONCLUSION Those individuals at the earliest stages of illness consistently had a more favourable response to treatment. This is consistent with the staging model and underscores the need to support a policy of early intervention.

A prospective study of the impact of smoking on outcomes in bipolar and schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND Tobacco smoking is more prevalent among people with mental illnesses, including bipolar disorder, than in the general community. Most data are cross-sectional, and there are no prospective trials examining the relationship of smoking to outcome in bipolar disorder. The impact of tobacco smoking on mental health outcomes was investigated in a 24-month, naturalistic, longitudinal study of 240 people with bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD Participants were interviewed and data recorded by trained study clinicians at 9 interviews during the study period. RESULTS Comparisons were made between participants who smoked daily (n = 122) and the remaining study participants (n = 117). During the 24-month study period, the daily smokers had poorer scores on the Clinical Global Impressions-Depression (P = .034) and Clinical Global Impressions-Overall Bipolar (P = .026) scales and had lengthier stays in hospital (P = .012), compared with nonsmokers. LIMITATIONS Smoking status was determined by self-report. Nicotine dependence was not measured. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that smoking is associated with poorer mental health outcomes in bipolar and schizoaffective disorder.

A prospective study of the impact of subthreshold mixed states on the 24-month clinical outcomes of bipolar I disorder or schizoaffective disorder.

OBJECTIVES The clinical significance of subthreshold mixed states is unclear. This study investigated the clinical outcomes in participants with bipolar I disorder or schizoaffective disorder, using the Cassidy and Benazzi criteria for manic and depressive mixed states, respectively. METHODS Participants (N=239) in a prospective observational study of treatment and outcomes in bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, were grouped based on study entry clinical presentation as having pure depression (n=63) if they satisfied DSM-IV-TR criteria for a Major Depressive Episode (MDE), depressive mixed state if they also had at least three concurrent hypomanic symptoms (n=33), or not depressed (n=143) if they did not satisfy the criteria for MDE. Participants were similarly grouped as having pure mania (n=3) if they satisfied DSM-IV criteria for a Manic Episode, manic mixed state if they also had at least two concurrent depressive symptoms (n=33), or not manic (n=203). Clinical data were collected by interview every 3 months over a 24-month period. RESULTS Measures of quality of life, mental and physical health over the 24-month period were significantly worse for participants who were classified as having mixed states at study entry on most outcome measures compared to participants who were not in an illness episode at study entry. A depressive mixed state was predictive of greater manic symptomatology over the 24 months compared to participants with pure depression. CONCLUSION In participants with a current episode of mood disorder, the presence of subthreshold symptoms of opposite polarity was associated with poorer clinical outcomes over a 24-month period.

Treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction with SSRIs and duloxetine: Effectiveness and functional outcomes over a 6-month observational period

Abstract Objective. To evaluate frequencies of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) treated with duloxetine or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) monotherapy for up to 6 months in a prospective, observational study. Methods. Sexually active MDD patients without sexual dysfunction at entry were enrolled from twelve countries (N = 1,647). TESD was assessed over the study period using the Arizona sexual experience (ASEX) scale. A priori-specified secondary 6-month clinical endpoints were also examined. Results. The frequency of TESD at 6 months with duloxetine was comparable to that with SSRI monotherapy (23.4 and 28.7%, respectively; P = 0.087). Improvements in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR16), Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) total scores, remission and sustained remission rates were statistically significantly greater with duloxetine than SSRI monotherapy at 6 months (P < 0.001 for each), but TESD attenuated improvements in quality of life measures. Four factors were consistently significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with TESD at week 8 and 6 months. Conclusions. Six-month TESD rates were comparable between duloxetine and SSRIs, with greater MDD effectiveness in favour of duloxetine. Improved recognition and management of TESD may improve quality of life for MDD patients in usual clinical practice.

Treatment and outcomes of an Australian cohort of outpatients with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder over twenty-four months: implications for clinical practice.

BackgroundThe Bipolar Comprehensive Outcomes Study (BCOS) is a 2-year, prospective, non-interventional, observational study designed to explore the clinical and functional outcomes associated with ‘real-world’ treatment of participants with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder. All participants received treatment as usual. There was no study medication.MethodsParticipants prescribed either conventional mood stabilizers (CMS; n = 155) alone, or olanzapine with, or without, CMS (olanzapine ± CMS; n = 84) were assessed every 3 months using several measures, including the Young Mania Rating Scale, 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions Scale – Bipolar Version, and the EuroQol Instrument. This paper reports 24-month longitudinal clinical, pharmacological, functional, and socioeconomic data.ResultsOn average, participants were 42 (range 18 to 79) years of age, 58%; were female, and 73%; had a diagnosis of bipolar I. Polypharmacy was the usual approach to pharmacological treatment; participants took a median of 5 different psychotropic medications over the course of the study, and spent a median proportion of time of 100%; of the study on mood stabilizers, 90%; on antipsychotics, 9%; on antidepressants, and 5%; on benzodiazepines/hypnotics. By 24 months, the majority of participants had achieved both symptomatic and syndromal remission of both mania and depression. Symptomatic relapse rates were similar for both the CMS alone (65%;) and the olanzapine ± CMS (61%;) cohorts.ConclusionsParticipants with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder in this study were receiving complex medication treatments that were often discordant with recommendations made in contemporary major treatment guidelines. The majority of study participants demonstrated some clinical and functional improvements, but not all achieved remission of symptoms or syndrome.

Treatment discontinuation and clinical outcomes in the 1-year naturalistic treatment of patients with schizophrenia at risk of treatment nonadherence

Background: This study aimed to improve physicians’ understanding of the treatment circumstances and needs of outpatients with schizophrenia at risk of nonadherence, by naturalistically assessing antipsychotic treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and health care service use in this little-studied patient population. Methods: In this one-year, prospective, multicenter, noninterventional, observational study, patients considered at risk of nonadherence by their physicians were switched from their primary oral antipsychotic to another oral or a depot antipsychotic at study entry. All cause treatment discontinuation (antipsychotic switch, augmentation, or discontinuation) during the study was assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and descriptive statistics. Patients’ illness severity, quality of life, attitude towards medication, patient-reported adherence, and health care resource utilization were assessed during the study. Results: Of the 406 enrolled patients, 43 (10.6%) were switched to depot and 363 (89.4%) were switched to oral antipsychotics at study entry. During the study, 99 (24.4%) patients switched, augmented, or discontinued their antipsychotic (all cause treatment discontinuation). Of the 99 patients who switched, augmented, or discontinued their antipsychotic, 8 (18.6%) were taking depot and 91 (25.0%) were taking oral antipsychotics. These patients were switched to either depot (n = 15) or oral (n = 78) antipsychotics, or discontinued their antipsychotic medication (n = 6). Inadequate response was the most frequently reported reason for medication discontinuation. During the study, patients’ clinical and functional status improved significantly and service use was low. Most patients considered themselves to be adherent at study entry, and this favorable self-perception increased during the study (from 68.5% to 88.1%). Conclusion: Although identified as at risk of nonadherence, few patients in this naturalistic study discontinued their prescribed antipsychotic medication during the study. The discrepancy between the physicians’ perception of their patient’s medication adherence and the patients’ self-perceived adherence highlights the need to better understand the underlying reasons for this phenomenon.

Medication discontinuation with depot and oral antipsychotics in outpatients with schizophrenia: comparison of matched cohorts from a 12-month observational study.

Aims:  This study compared all‐cause medication discontinuation (any switch, augmentation or medication discontinuation) in matched cohorts of patients with schizophrenia who were initiated on depot or oral antipsychotics. Other objectives included between‐group comparisons of resource use, and clinical and functional outcomes.

Frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction and treatment effectiveness during SSRI or duloxetine therapy: 8-week data from a 6-month observational study

Abstract Background. In randomised controlled trials, the frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) at week 8 was lower with duloxetine than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy. Methods. This 6-month, prospective, observational study compared the frequency of TESD (using the Arizona Sexual Experience [ASEX] scale) in MDD patients treated with duloxetine or SSRI monotherapy in the first 8 weeks in normal clinical practice. Results. Physician-assessed TESD frequency at week 8 was comparable with duloxetine and SSRI monotherapy (23.9 and 26.2%, respectively; P = 0.545). Improvements in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-Report) (QIDS-SR16), Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) total scores and remission rates were statistically significantly greater with duloxetine than SSRI monotherapy (P < 0.001, 0.010, <0.001, and 0.002, respectively), but TESD attenuated improvements in quality of life measures (EuroQoL questionnaire-5 dimensions [EQ-5D] and Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS] scores: ≤0.012). Several factors were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with TESD at week 8 in this study. Conclusions. TESD rates with duloxetine and SSRIs at week 8 were comparable, however, significant differences in effectiveness were observed in favour of duloxetine. Antidepressant tolerability with respect to TESD must be managed to maximize remission of depressed patients.

Lifestyle-Related Metabolic Disorders, Osteoporosis, and Fracture Risk in Asia: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND The prevalence of both lifestyle-related metabolic disorders and osteoporosis is increasing in Asia. OBJECTIVES To conduct a systematic review of the published literature to identify studies examining disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism (type 2 diabetes, hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, hyperlipidemia, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome [MetS], and atherosclerosis) as risk factors for osteoporosis and fracture in Asian populations. Studies examining the relationship between metabolic disorders and bone mineral density (BMD) were also included. METHODS EMBASE (including MEDLINE) and the Cochrane Library were searched. Studies conducted only within Asia, which reported multivariate analysis with a sample size of 200 or more subjects, were included. RESULTS A total of 32 studies were included. All six studies examining diabetes and fracture found that subjects with diabetes had a significantly higher risk of fracture than did subjects without diabetes (risk estimate range 1.26-4.73). Two studies found that subjects with atherosclerosis had a significantly higher risk of fracture (risk estimate range 1.10-2.52). Studies consistently reported that MetS is likely associated with osteoporosis or decreased BMD in men but not women. No consistent association was found for diabetes and BMD, with studies reporting contrasting results. There was limited evidence investigating lipid metabolism and hyperglycemia and risk of fracture or bone loss in Asian populations. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that diabetes is a risk factor for fracture in Asian populations. MetS may be associated with bone loss in Asian men and atherosclerosis associated with increased fractures; however, caution is needed interpreting these findings given limitations in study design.

Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine-Carboplatin-Paclitaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Operable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Background: The aim of this single-arm phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of the gemcitabine-carboplatin-paclitaxel combination as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients with stage IB, II, or IIIA NSCLC were given three cycles of chemotherapy followed by tumor resection. Each 21-day cycle consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1, and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1. Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled: 18.2% of patients had stage IB, 15.9% had stage II, and 65.9% had stage IIIA NSCLC. All patients received three cycles of treatment. The clinical tumor response rate was 76.2% (32 of 42 patients; 95% CI, 60.5–87.9%). Thirty-six patients had a complete tumor resection, five of whom had a complete pathological response with no viable tumor cells in the resected tumor on histological examination. Median time to progression was 13.6 months (95% CI, 8.9, >16 months), and 26 of 44 patients (59.1%) had progressed. The 1-year disease-free survival rate was 53.6% (95% CI, 38.7–68.5%), and the 1-year survival rate was 86.0% (95% CI, 75.7–96.4%). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia each occurred in 38.6% of patients, and grade 3 infection occurred in 2.3% of patients; grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 25.0% and 0% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: The gemcitabine-carboplatin-paclitaxel combination showed promising efficacy and seemed to be safe and feasible as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with operable-stage NSCLC.