Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alan C. Mikkelson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alan C. Mikkelson.


Communication Quarterly | 2005

Human Affection Exchange: VIII. Further Evidence of the Benefits of Expressed Affection

Kory Floyd; Jonathan A Hess; Lisa A Miczo; Kelby K Halone; Alan C. Mikkelson; Kyle James Tusing

Affection exchange theory speaks to the benefits that affectionate communication elicits, not only when it is received but also when it is communicated to others. Previous research has provided evidence for the individual and relational benefits of having a high trait affection level, yet these benefits may partially be accounted for by the affectionate behavior one elicits from others by being affectionate in the first place. We addressed the validity of this alternative hypothesis in this project, first by re-analyzing data in which we compared correlations between trait affection level and various benefits with the same correlations after controlling for received affection. Next, in three studies involving a total sample of 1,144 people, we further investigated the benefits of expressed affection, both on its own and when received affection is covaried out. Results indicated that affection expressed to others is associated with numerous individual and relational benefits, including increased happiness and self esteem, decreased fear of intimacy and susceptibility to depression, and higher relationship satisfaction. Many of these effects are attenuated—and some are intensified—when affection received from others is held constant.


Health Communication | 2007

Human affection exchange: XIII. Affectionate communication accelerates neuroendocrine stress recovery

Kory Floyd; Alan C. Mikkelson; Melissa Ann Tafoya; Lisa Farinelli; Angela G. La Valley; Jeff Judd; Mark T. Haynes; Kristin L. Davis; Jason Wilson

Contemporary theory in interpersonal communication and health psychology supports the prediction that engaging in affectionate behavior within established relationships has a direct effect on the alleviation of stress symptoms following exposure to an acute stressor. Participants in this study were exposed to a series of standard laboratory stressors and were subsequently assigned either to an experimental group or to 1 of 2 control groups. Those in the experimental group were instructed to write a letter to a loved one in which they expressed their feelings of affection for that person. Those in 1 control group thought about a loved one but did not engage in any communicative behavior, and those in the other control group simply sat quietly. All 3 conditions were compared with respect to their levels of salivary free cortisol, an adrenal steroid hormone that is instrumental in the bodys neuroendocrine stress response. Results indicated that, compared to the control groups, those in the experimental group experienced accelerated cortisol recovery following exposure to the acute stressors.


Journal of Family Communication | 2011

Differential Solicitude of Social Support in Different Types of Adult Sibling Relationships

Alan C. Mikkelson; Kory Floyd; Perry M. Pauley

The sibling relationship is one of the longest relationships in peoples lives, and it is one of the most diverse as it occurs in many different forms. The current investigation seeks to identify differences in the amount of social support received in adult sibling relationships. The sample consisted of 411 participants in 6 different types of sibling relationships: identical twins, fraternal twins, full biological siblings, half-biological siblings, stepsiblings, and adopted siblings. Employing of ideas of discriminative parental solicitude, we developed a hypothesis about which types of siblings receive the most social support from their siblings. The basic prediction was that siblings who are more genetically related to one another receive more social support than siblings who are less genetically related. Results supported these predictions, even when social and relational explanations were controlled.


Journal of Social Psychology | 2013

Maximizing Relationship Possibilities: Relational Maximization in Romantic Relationships

Alan C. Mikkelson; Perry M. Pauley

ABSTRACT Using Rusbults (1980) investment model and Schwartzs (2000) conceptualization of decision maximization, we sought to understand how an individuals propensity to maximize his or her decisions factored into investment, satisfaction, and awareness of alternatives in romantic relationships. In study one, 275 participants currently involved in romantic relationships completed measures of maximization, satisfaction, investment size, quality of alternatives, and commitment. In study two, 343 participants were surveyed as part of the creation of a scale of relational maximization. Results from both studies revealed that the tendency to maximize (in general and in relationships specifically) was negatively correlated with satisfaction, investment, and commitment, and positively correlated with quality of alternatives. Furthermore, we found that satisfaction and investments mediated the relationship between maximization and relationship commitment.


Business and Professional Communication Quarterly | 2015

Communication Competence, Leadership Behaviors, and Employee Outcomes in Supervisor-Employee Relationships

Alan C. Mikkelson; Joy A. York; Joshua Arritola

Supervisor communication competence and leadership style were used to predict specific employee outcomes. In the study, 276 participants working in various industries completed measures of communication competence and leadership styles about their direct supervisor along with measures of their job satisfaction, motivation, and organizational commitment. As predicted, effective and appropriate communication were both positively related to satisfaction, motivation, and organizational commitment. Furthermore, task- and relations-oriented leadership styles were both positively related to all three employee outcomes as well. Finally, regression analysis determined that effective communication and relations-oriented leadership were the best predictors of satisfaction, motivation, and organizational commitment.


Journal of Family Communication | 2014

Trait Affection Predicts Married Couples’ Use of Relational Maintenance Behaviors

Perry M. Pauley; Colin Hesse; Alan C. Mikkelson

The present study analyzed the role that trait affectionate communication, an individual-level trait, plays in dyads’ enactment of relational maintenance behaviors. We hypothesized that trait affection positively predicts both husbands and wives’ enactment of relational maintenance behaviors. In addition, we hypothesized that the relative contribution of wives’ trait affection to relational maintenance would be stronger than that of husbands. One hundred and forty-three married heterosexual couples completed questionnaires, and data were analyzed using the actor-partner interdependence model. Results revealed significant actor effects in 9 out of 10 cases. Results also revealed four partner effects. Husbands and wives’ trait affection mutually influenced their enactment of assurances, and husbands’ trait affection positively predicted wives’ enactment of positivity and network sharing. Results are discussed in terms of relational maintenance research and theories of affectionate interaction.


The Southern Communication Journal | 2009

Discussions of Religion and Relational Messages: Differences between Comfortable and Uncomfortable Interactions

Alan C. Mikkelson; Colin Hesse

Although many Americans consider religion important in their everyday lives, most feel uncomfortable when confronted with issues concerning religion and faith. The present study focused on the relational messages and contextual factors related to comfort levels in religious conversations. Using Burgoon and Hales (1984, 1987) relational topoi, it was hypothesized that messages of intimacy and composure would relate positively to comfort levels in religious conversations, whereas messages of dominance and formality would relate negatively to comfort levels. These hypotheses received support. Furthermore, contextual factors such as perceived religious similarity and relational closeness were both positively associated with comfort levels. A discriminant analysis of these variables revealed that relational messages, specifically affection/involvement, receptivity/trust, and dominance, were the strongest predictors whether participants perceived a conversation as comfortable or uncomfortable.


Communication Quarterly | 2006

The Influences of Brain Dominance and Biological Sex on Emotional Expressivity, Sensitivity, and Control

Alan C. Mikkelson; Lisa Farinelli; Angela G. La Valley

Nonverbal communication is the primary channel for the communication of emotion. The abilities to express, control, and decode emotions are important social skills. In this study, we investigated the effects of hemispheric brain dominance and sex on emotional social skills, specifically emotional expressivity, sensitivity, and control. Using the measurements of handedness, we classified participants as being standard, mixed, or anomalous dominant. We presumed that hemispheric brain dominance and sex would interact to influence emotional expressivity, sensitivity, and control. Analysis revealed that brain dominance and sex interacted to influence negative emotional expressivity and emotional control. Specifically, mixed dominant (MD) males scored highest in negative emotional expressivity and lowest in emotional control, whereas MD females scored lowest on negative emotional expressivity and second highest on emotional control. In general, MD men and women reported behaviors opposite of traditional sex differences in emotional expression.


Communication Quarterly | 2017

Affection Deprivation in Romantic Relationships

Colin Hesse; Alan C. Mikkelson

The current study examined the role of affection deprivation, the need for greater affection than an individual is currently receiving, in the context of romantic relationships. Using affection exchange theory, the authors hypothesized several testable relationships between affection deprivation and relational outcomes (relational satisfaction, closeness, and commitment). The study also examined the possible moderating roles of relational maximization and relational uncertainty. Overall, the results supported the predictions, with affection deprivation significantly related to satisfaction and closeness. Relational maximization moderated the significant relationships between deprivation and relational satisfaction and commitment. Relational uncertainty moderated the significant relationships between deprivation and closeness and commitment. Implications and possible directions for future research are discussed.


International journal of business communication | 2017

Relational Communication Messages and Leadership Styles in Supervisor/Employee Relationships:

Alan C. Mikkelson; David Sloan; Colin Hesse

The relational communication messages of intimacy and dominance were used to predict a task and relationship leadership style in supervisors. In the study, 307 participants working in various industries completed measures of relational communication and leadership styles about their direct supervisor. As predicted, intimacy messages were positively related to a relationship-oriented leadership style and dominance messages were positively related to a task-oriented leadership style. Intimacy messages were also linked to a task-oriented style and dominance messages were linked to relationship-oriented style. Regression analysis determined that receptivity/trust was the best predictor of a relationship-oriented style and influence was the best predictor of a task-oriented style. Overall, results demonstrate the need for both intimacy and dominance messages across leadership styles.

Collaboration


Dive into the Alan C. Mikkelson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Colin Hesse

Oregon State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kory Floyd

Arizona State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Perry M. Pauley

San Diego State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeff Judd

Arizona State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa Farinelli

Arizona State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jason Wilson

Arizona State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark T. Haynes

Arizona State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge