Alan Chiem

Integration of Ultrasound in Medical Education at United States Medical Schools: A National Survey of Directors' Experiences.

Despite the rise of ultrasound in medical education (USMED), multiple barriers impede the implementation of such curricula in medical schools. No studies to date have surveyed individuals who are successfully championing USMED programs. This study aimed to investigate the experiences with ultrasound integration as perceived by active USMED directors across the United States.

Web‐based lectures, peer instruction and ultrasound‐integrated medical education

with the statement: ‘I would utilise a PBL case in the future to facilitate a group process.’ Half of the respondents reported that using the PBL case advanced the group process and half indicated that the PBL case helped in some ways and hindered in others. Generally, there was satisfaction with this approach related to its contribution towards facilitating group process and generating discussion. Members commented about having a clearer understanding of the mission statement. Conversely, the structured nature of PBL was seen by some as impeding brainstorming. The use of a PBL case was successful in providing structure to group members for a complex problemsolving and creative task. This approach provided an opportunity for all group members to participate in discussion, create a common understanding of the elements of the problem, and identify and seek clarification of learning issues as needed. It also helped the group to share a conceptual mental model as they progressed through the case. Although the task for this group was related to curriculum redesign, this is a process-based approach that can be adapted to multiple situations and medical school contexts in which problem solving is the goal.

Antibiotics-First Versus Surgery for Appendicitis: A US Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Allowing Outpatient Antibiotic Management

Study objective Randomized trials suggest that nonoperative treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis with antibiotics‐first is safe. No trial has evaluated outpatient treatment and no US randomized trial has been conducted, to our knowledge. This pilot study assessed feasibility of a multicenter US study comparing antibiotics‐first, including outpatient management, with appendectomy. Methods Patients aged 5 years or older with uncomplicated appendicitis at 1 US hospital were randomized to appendectomy or intravenous ertapenem greater than or equal to 48 hours and oral cefdinir and metronidazole. Stable antibiotics‐first‐treated participants older than 13 years could be discharged after greater than or equal to 6‐hour emergency department (ED) observation with next‐day follow‐up. Outcomes included 1‐month major complication rate (primary) and hospital duration, pain, disability, quality of life, and hospital charges, and antibiotics‐first appendectomy rate. Results Of 48 eligible patients, 30 (62.5%) consented, of whom 16 (53.3%) were randomized to antibiotics‐first and 14 (46.7%) to appendectomy. Median age was 33 years (range 9 to 73 years), median WBC count was 15,000/&mgr;L (range 6,200 to 23,100/&mgr;L), and median computed tomography appendiceal diameter was 10 mm (range 7 to 18 mm). Of 15 antibiotic‐treated adults, 14 (93.3%) were discharged from the ED and all had symptom resolution. At 1 month, major complications occurred in 2 appendectomy participants (14.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8% to 42.8%) and 1 antibiotics‐first participant (6.3%; 95% CI 0.2% to 30.2%). Antibiotics‐first participants had less total hospital time than appendectomy participants, 16.2 versus 42.1 hours, respectively. Antibiotics‐first‐treated participants had less pain and disability. During median 12‐month follow‐up, 2 of 15 antibiotics‐first‐treated participants (13.3%; 95% CI 3.7% to 37.9%) developed appendicitis and 1 was treated successfully with antibiotics; 1 had appendectomy. No more major complications occurred in either group. Conclusion A multicenter US trial comparing antibiotics‐first to appendectomy, including outpatient management, is feasible to evaluate efficacy and safety.

Integration of Ultrasound in Undergraduate Medical Education at the California Medical Schools A Discussion of Common Challenges and Strategies From the UMeCali Experience

Since the first medical student ultrasound electives became available more than a decade ago, ultrasound in undergraduate medical education has gained increasing popularity. More than a dozen medical schools have fully integrated ultrasound education in their curricula, with several dozen more institutions planning to follow suit. Starting in June 2012, a working group of emergency ultrasound faculty at the California medical schools began to meet to discuss barriers as well as innovative approaches to implementing ultrasound education in undergraduate medical education. It became clear that an ongoing collaborative could be formed to discuss barriers, exchange ideas, and lend support for this initiative. The group, termed Ultrasound in Medical Education, California (UMeCali), was formed with 2 main goals: to exchange ideas and resources in facilitating ultrasound education and to develop a white paper to discuss our experiences. Five common themes integral to successful ultrasound education in undergraduate medical education are discussed in this article: (1) initiating an ultrasound education program; (2) the role of medical student involvement; (3) integration of ultrasound in the preclinical years; (4) developing longitudinal ultrasound education; and (5) addressing competency.

Pelvic ultrasonography and length of stay in the ED: an observational study☆ , ☆☆ ,★

OBJECTIVES We compared emergency physician-performed pelvic ultrasonography (EPPU) with radiology department-performed pelvic ultrasonography (RPPU) in emergency department (ED) female patients requiring pelvic ultrasonography and their outcomes in relation to ED length of stay, ED readmission, and alternative diagnosis, within a 14-day follow-up period. METHODS This was a prospective, observational study of female patients of reproductive age who required either an EPPU or RPPU for their ED evaluation. We hypothesized that patients receiving EPPU would have a length of stay reduction greater than or equal to 60 minutes, as compared with RPPU. Statistical analyses included an independent-samples t test and multivariate regression modeling to control for factors associated with ED LOS. RESULTS Eighteen resident physicians performed EPPU, with 15 attending physicians supervising. Forty-eight patients received only EPPU, and 84 patients received only RPPU. In univariate analysis, those who received EPPU had an ED LOS 162 minutes less than those who received RPPU (95% confidence interval, 106-209 minutes). In multivariate analysis controlling for gynecologist consultation, disposition, and pregnancy status, patients who received EPPU had an ED LOS reduction of 108 minutes when compared with RPPU (95% confidence interval, 38-166 minutes). Five patients (10%) who had received EPPU and were discharged from the ED returned to the ED within 2 weeks, but none had alternative diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS Patients with EPPU had statistically and clinically significant reductions in ED LOS, even when controlling for disposition, gynecologist consultation in the ED, and pregnancy status. No patients in the study had an alternative diagnosis within 2 weeks of EPPU.

Point-of-care ultrasound versus radiology department pelvic ultrasound on emergency department length of stay.

BACKGROUND The study aimed to compare the time to overall length of stay (LOS) for patients who underwent point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) versus radiology department ultrasound (RDUS). METHODS This was a prospective study on a convenience sample of patients who required pelvic ultrasound imaging as part of their emergency department (ED) assessment. RESULTS We enrolled a total of 194 patients who were on average 32 years-old. Ninety-eight (51%) patients were pregnant (<20 weeks). Time to completion of RDUS was 66 minutes longer than POCUS (95%CI 60-73, P<0.01). Patients randomized to the RDUS arm experienced a 120 minute longer ED length of stay (LOS) (95%CI 66-173, P<0.01). CONCLUSION In patients who require pelvic ultrasound as part of their diagnostic evaluation, POCUS resulted in a significant decrease in time to ultrasound and ED LOS.

Simplified point-of-care ultrasound protocol to confirm central venous catheter placement: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND The current standard for confirmation of correct supra-diaphragmatic central venous catheter (CVC) placement is with plain film chest radiography (CXR). We hypothesized that a simple point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) protocol could effectively confirm placement and reduce time to confirmation. METHODS We prospectively enrolled a convenience sample of patients in the emergency department and intensive care unit who required CVC placement. Correct positioning was considered if turbulent flow was visualized in the right atrium on sub-xiphoid, parasternal or apical cardiac ultrasound after injecting 5 cc of sterile, non-agitated, normal saline through the CVC. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients were enrolled. POCUS had a sensitivity of 86.8% (95%CI 77.1%-93.5%) and specificity of 100% (95%CI 15.8%-100.0%) for identifying correct central venous catheter placement. Median POCUS and CXR completion were 16 minutes (IQR 10-29) and 32 minutes (IQR 19-45), respectively. CONCLUSION Ultrasound may be an effective tool to confirm central venous catheter placement in instances where there is a delay in obtaining a confirmatory CXR.

Utilizing left ventricular outflow tract velocity changes to predict fluid responsiveness in septic patients: a case report

Toxin-mediated vasodilation in the sepsis syndrome can lead to end-organ dysfunction and shock. Assessing for fluid responsiveness and preload optimization with intravenous fluids is a central tenet in the management of sepsis. Aggressive fluid administration can lead to pulmonary edema and heart failure, whereas premature inotropic or vasopressor support can worsen organ perfusion. Inferior vena cava ultrasonography is commonly used to assess for fluid responsiveness but has multiple limitations.

A National Point-of-Care Ultrasound Competition for Medical Students: SonoSlam

G aming is a teaching concept that is gaining momentum in the medical education community. Gamification events motivate asynchronous self-study of ultrasound (US), evidenced by the narrative comments received from surveys. Students and faculty from different specialties and multiple varied institutions have found value from this platform to exchange content, discuss curricula, highlight obstacles to implementation, and

Pilot Study to Determine Accuracy of Posterior Approach Ultrasound for Shoulder Dislocation by Novice Sonographers.

Introduction The goal of this study was to investigate the efficacy of diagnosing shoulder dislocation using a single-view, posterior approach point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) performed by undergraduate research students, and to establish the range of measured distance that discriminates dislocated shoulder from normal. Methods We enrolled a prospective, convenience sample of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute shoulder pain following injury. Patients underwent ultrasonographic evaluation of possible shoulder dislocation comprising a single transverse view of the posterior shoulder and assessment of the relative positioning of the glenoid fossa and the humeral head. The sonographic measurement of the distance between these two anatomic structures was termed the Glenohumeral Separation Distance (GhSD). A positive GhSD represented a posterior position of the glenoid rim relative to the humeral head and a negative GhSD value represented an anterior position of the glenoid rim relative to the humeral head. We compared ultrasound (US) findings to conventional radiography to determine the optimum GhSD cutoff for the diagnosis of shoulder dislocation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the derived US method were calculated. Results A total of 84 patients were enrolled and 19 (22.6%) demonstrated shoulder dislocation on conventional radiography, all of which were anterior. All confirmed dislocations had a negative measurement of the GhSD, while all patients with normal anatomic position had GhSD>0. This value represents an optimum GhSD cutoff of 0 for the diagnosis of (anterior) shoulder dislocation. This method demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI [82.4–100]), specificity of 100% (95% CI [94.5–100]), positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI [82.4–100]), and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI [94.5–100]). Conclusion Our study suggests that a single, posterior-approach POCUS can diagnose anterior shoulder dislocation, and that this method can be employed by novice ultrasonographers, such as non-medical trainees, after a brief educational session. Further validation studies are necessary to confirm these findings.