Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alan H. Rosenstein.
American Journal of Nursing | 2005
Alan H. Rosenstein; Michelle O’Daniel
Overview: Providing safe, error-free care is the number-one priority of all health care professionals. Excellent outcomes have been associated with procedural efficiency, the implementation of evidence-based standards, and the use of tools designed to reduce the likelihood of medical error (such as computerized medication orders and bar-coded patient identification). But the impact of work relationships on clinical outcomes isn’t as well documented. The current survey was designed as a follow-up to a previous VHA West Coast survey that examined the prevalence and impact of physicians’ disruptive behavior on the job satisfaction and retention of nurses (see “Nurse–Physician Relationships: Impact on Nurse Satisfaction and Retention,” June 2002). Based on the findings of that survey and subsequent comments on it, the follow-up survey examined the disruptive behavior of both physicians and nurses, as well as both groups’ and administrators’ perceptions of its effects on providers and its impact on clinical outcomes. Surveys were distributed to 50 VHA hospitals across the country, and results from more than 1,500 survey participants were evaluated. Nurses were reported to have behaved disruptively almost as frequently as physicians. Most respondents perceived disruptive behavior as having negative or worsening effects, in both nurses and physicians, on stress, frustration, concentration, communication, collaboration, information transfer, and workplace relationships. Even more disturbing was the respondents’ perceptions of negative or worsening effects of disruptive behavior on adverse events, medical errors, patient safety, patient mortality, the quality of care, and patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that the consequences of disruptive behavior go far beyond nurses’ job satisfaction and morale, affecting communication and collaboration among clinicians, which may well, in turn, have a negative impact on clinical outcomes. Strategies aimed at reducing the incidence and impact of disruptive behavior are recommended.
Neurology | 2008
Alan H. Rosenstein; Michelle O'daniel
Disruptive behavior can have a significant impact on care delivery, which can adversely affect patient safety and quality outcomes of care. Disruptive behavior occurs across all disciplines but is of particular concern when it involves physicians and nurses who have primary responsibility for patient care. There is a higher frequency of disruptive behavior in neurologists compared to most other nonsurgical specialties. Disruptive behavior causes stress, anxiety, frustration, and anger, which can impede communication and collaboration, which can result in avoidable medical errors, adverse events, and other compromises in quality care. Health care organizations need to be aware of the significance of disruptive behaviors and develop appropriate policies, standards, and procedures to effectively deal with this serious issue and reinforce appropriate standards of behavior. Having a better understanding of what contributes to, incites, or provokes disruptive behaviors will help organizations provide appropriate educational and training programs that can lessen the likelihood of occurrence and improve the overall effectiveness of communication among the health care team.
American Journal of Medical Quality | 2011
Alan H. Rosenstein
Disruptive behaviors have been shown to have a negative impact on work relationships, team collaboration, communication efficiency, and process flow, all of which can adversely affect patient safety and quality of care. Despite the growing recognition of the damage that can be done, there are still pockets of resistance to taking action to address the issue head-on. Given the new call to action from the Joint Commission accreditation standard and the growing public accountability for patient safety, organizations need to recognize the full impact of disruptive behaviors and implement appropriate policies, procedures, and educational programs to raise levels of awareness regarding the seriousness of the issue, hold individuals accountable for their behavior, and provide training and support not only to reduce the incidence and consequences of disruptive events but also to improve efficiency of communication and team collaboration in an effort to improve outcomes of care.
American Journal of Medical Quality | 2009
Alan H. Rosenstein; Michelle O'daniel; Susan White; Ken Taylor
Medicare has introduced a number of new payment initiatives that will have a profound effect on hospital reimbursement and quality and safety ratings. The new medical severity diagnosis—related group (MS-DRG) payment system adds a number of new DRG categories to more adequately account for patient severity. The new present-on-admission (POA) initiative is designed to withhold additional reimbursement for selected complications that were not recorded as being POA but that occurred during the course of the hospitalization. The recovery audit contract requires hospitals to repay Medicare for services deemed not clinically necessary based on retrospective chart review. Reimbursement and quality rankings for each of these initiatives are based on the extent and thoroughness of physician chart documentation. Physicians must understand the importance of their role and responsibilities in this process and embrace what needs to be done through appropriate education, coaching, and guidance, which leads to more effective chart documentation.
Nursing Management (springhouse) | 2005
Alan H. Rosenstein; Michelle O’Daniel
Overview:Providing safe, error-free care is the number-one priority of all health care professionals. Excellent outcomes have been associated with procedural efficiency, the implementation of evidence-based standards, and the use of tools designed to reduce the likelihood of medical error (such as computerized medication orders and bar-coded patient identification). But the impact of work relationships on clinical outcomes isn’t as well documented.The current survey was designed as a follow-up to a previous VHA West Coast survey that examined the prevalence and impact of physicians’ disruptive behavior on the job satisfaction and retention of nurses (see “Nurse–Physician Relationships: Impact on Nurse Satisfaction and Retention,”American Journal of Nursing, June 2002). Based on the findings of that survey and subsequent comments on it, the follow-up survey examined the disruptive behavior of both physicians and nurses, as well as both groups’ and administrators’ perceptions of its effects on providers and its impact on clinical outcomes.Surveys were distributed to 50 VHA hospitals across the country, and results from more than 1,500 survey participants were evaluated. Nurses were reported to have behaved disruptively almost as frequently as physicians. Most respondents perceived disruptive behavior as having negative or worsening effects, in both nurses and physicians, on stress, frustration, concentration, communication, collaboration, information transfer, and workplace relationships. Even more disturbing was the respondents’ perceptions of negative or worsening effects of disruptive behavior on adverse events, medical errors, patient safety, patient mortality, the quality of care, and patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that the consequences of disruptive behavior go far beyond nurses’ job satisfaction and morale, affecting communication and collaboration among clinicians, which may well, in turn, have a negative impact on clinical outcomes. Strategies aimed at reducing the incidence and impact of disruptive behavior are recommended.
American Journal of Nursing | 2002
Alan H. Rosenstein
American Journal of Nursing | 2005
Alan H. Rosenstein; Michelle O'daniel
American Journal of Nursing | 2002
Alan H. Rosenstein
The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety | 2008
Alan H. Rosenstein; Michelle O’Daniel
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2006
Alan H. Rosenstein; Michelle O’Daniel