Alan J. Mears

Protein-truncation mutations in the RP2 gene in a North American cohort of families with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa.

We thank Drs. Sten Andreasson, David Birch, Nancy Carson, Bernie Chodirker, Mark Evans, Gerald Fishman, John Heckenlively, Dennis Hoffman, Maria Musarella, and Beth Spriggs and Mr. Eric L. Krivchenia for some of the patient samples that were included in the mutation screening. We acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Wolfgang Berger for providing the RP2 primer sequences. We thank Dr. Monika Buraczynska for organization of the patient registry; Dr. Radha Ayyagari for discussions; Dr. Beverly Yashar for counseling; Ms. Cara Coats for assistance in patient collection; Mr. Jason Cook, Ms. Patricia Forsythe, and Ms. Eve Bingham for technical assistance; and Ms. D. Giebel for secretarial assistance. This research was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants EY05627, EY06094, and EY07961 and by grants from the Foundation Fighting Blindness, the Chatlos Foundation, the Kirby Foundation, the Mackall Trust, and Research to Prevent Blindness. We also acknowledge NIH grants EY07003 (core) and M01-RR00042 (General Clinical Research Center) and a shared equipment grant from the Office of Vice President for Research (University of Michigan). A.S. is recipient of a Lew R. Wasserman Merit Award, and P.A.S., a Senior Scientific Investigator Award, both from Research to Prevent Blindness.

RDH12 Activity and Effects on Retinoid Processing in the Murine Retina

RDH12 mutations are responsible for early-onset autosomal recessive retinal dystrophy, which results in profound retinal pathology and severe visual handicap in patients. To investigate the function of RDH12 within the network of retinoid dehydrogenases/reductases (RDHs) present in retina, we studied the retinal phenotype of Rdh12-deficient mice. In vivo rates of all-trans-retinal reduction and 11-cis-retinal formation during recovery from bleaching were similar in Rdh12-deficient and wild-type mice matched for an Rpe65 polymorphism that impacts visual cycle efficiency. However, retinal homogenates from Rdh12-deficient mice exhibited markedly decreased capacity to reduce exogenous retinaldehydes in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo levels of the bisretinoid compound diretinoid-pyridinium-ethanolamine (A2E) were increased in Rdh12-deficient mice of various genetic backgrounds. Conversely, in vivo levels of retinoic acid and total retinol were significantly decreased. Rdh12 transcript levels in wild-type mice homozygous for the Rpe65-Leu450 polymorphism were greater than in Rpe65-Met450 mice and increased during postnatal development in wild-type mice and Nrl-deficient mice having an all-cone retina. Rdh12-deficient mice did not exhibit increased retinal degeneration relative to wild-type mice at advanced ages, when bred on the light-sensitive BALB/c background, or when heterozygous for a null allele of superoxide dismutase 2 (Sod2+/−). Our findings suggest that a critical function of RDH12 is the reduction of all-trans-retinal that exceeds the reductive capacity of the photoreceptor outer segments.

Multicriteria gene screening for analysis of differential expression with DNA microarrays

This paper introduces a statistical methodology for the identification of differentially expressed genes in DNA microarray experiments based on multiple criteria. These criteria are false discovery rate (FDR), variance-normalized differential expression levels (paired statistics), and minimum acceptable difference (MAD). The methodology also provides a set of simultaneous FDR confidence intervals on the true expression differences. The analysis can be implemented as a two-stage algorithm in which there is an initial screen that controls only FDR, which is then followed by a second screen which controls both FDR and MAD. It can also be implemented by computing and thresholding the set of FDR values for each gene that satisfies the MAD criterion. We illustrate the procedure to identify differentially expressed genes from a wild type versus knockout comparison of microarray data.

X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa: Current Status

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of retinal degenerative diseases, characterized by nightblindness, progressive restriction of the visual field and pigmentary retinopathy.1 At least 28 different genetic loci have been mapped for autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked forms of RP. [http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet/home.htm] The X-linked RP (XLRP) subtype is the most severe, with an early age of onset and more rapid progression, accounting for 10 to 20% of RP families.2,3 XLRP is also genetically heterogeneous with at least 5 mapped loci: RP2, RP3, RP6, RP23 and RP24, as schematically depicted in Figure 1. By linkage analysis, RP2 is predicted to account for 10–20% of XLRP and RP3 for 70–90%,4–6 depending on the population. Genes for these two major loci have now been cloned. Our laboratory has been involved in the mutational screening and functional analysis of the two identified XLRP genes (RPGR and RP2), as well as the positional cloning of two other XLRP loci (RP6 and RP24). This report summarizes these efforts as well as the current standing of XLRP research.

Five Novel RPGR Mutations in Families with X- Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa

X‐linked forms of retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) are among the most severe because of their early onset, often leading to significant visual impairment before the fourth decade. RP3, genetically localized at Xp21.1, accounts for 70% of XLRP in different populations. The RPGR (Retinitis Pigmentosa GTPase Regulator) gene that was isolated from the RP3 region is mutated in 20% of North American families with XLRP. From mutation analysis of 27 independent XLRP families, we have identified five novel RPGR mutations in 5 of the families (160delA, 789 A>T, IVS8+1 G>C, 1147insT and 1366 G>A). One of these mutations was detected in a family from Chile. Hum Mutat 17:151, 2001.

Erratum: Corrigendum: Establishment of a cone photoreceptor transplantation platform based on a novel cone-GFP reporter mouse line

Scientific Reports 6: Article number: 22867 ; published online: 11 March 2016; updated: 22 April 2016 The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the spelling of the author Yves De Repentigny, which was incorrectly given as Yves De Repentingy. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.