Alan J. Townsend

Coordinated Action of Glutathione S-Transferases (GSTs) and Multidrug Resistance Protein 1 (MRP1) in Antineoplastic Drug Detoxification MECHANISM OF GST A1-1- AND MRP1-ASSOCIATED RESISTANCE TO CHLORAMBUCIL IN MCF7 BREAST CARCINOMA CELLS

To examine the role of multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1) and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) in cellular resistance to antineoplastic drugs, derivatives of MCF7 breast carcinoma cells were developed that express MRP1 in combination with one of three human cytosolic isozymes of GST. Expression of MRP1 alone confers resistance to several drugs representing the multidrug resistance phenotype, drugs including doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and mitoxantrone. However, co-expression with MRP1 of any of the human GST isozymes A1-1, M1-1, or P1-1 failed to augment MRP1-associated resistance to these drugs. In contrast, combined expression of MRP1 and GST A1-1 conferred ∼4-fold resistance to the anticancer drug chlorambucil. Expression of MRP1 alone failed to confer resistance to chlorambucil, showing that the observed protection from chlorambucil cytotoxicity was absolutely dependent upon GST A1-1 protein. Moreover, using inhibitors of GST (dicumarol) or MRP1 (sulfinpyrazone), it was shown that in MCF7 cells resistance to chlorambucil requires both intact MRP1-dependent efflux pump activity and, for full protection, GST A1-1 catalytic activity. These results are the first demonstration that GST A1-1 and MRP1 can act in synergy to protect cells from the cytotoxicity of a nitrogen mustard, chlorambucil.

Aldh3a1 protects human corneal epithelial cells from ultraviolet- and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-induced oxidative damage

Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3A1 (ALDH3A1) is one of the most abundant proteins found in corneal epithelial cells of mammalian species, with several postulated protective roles that include detoxification of peroxidic aldehydes, scavenging of free radicals, and direct absorption of ultraviolet (UV) radiation. In the present study, the protective role of ALDH3A1 against UV- and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal- (4-HNE-) induced oxidative damage was studied. For this purpose, human ALDH3A1 was stably transfected in a human corneal epithelial cell line (HCE) lacking endogenous enzyme. Cells transfected with ALDH3A1 were more resistant to UV- and 4-HNE-induced cytotoxicity than mock-transfected cells. DNA fragmentation assays revealed that both treatments induced apoptosis in mock-transfected cells, but not in ALDH3A1-expressing cells. Apoptosis appeared to occur via caspase-3 activation and subsequent PARP cleavage. The Michaelis-Menten constant (K(m)) for 4-HNE was 54 microM in ALDH3A1-transfected cells; the addition of 100 microM 4-HNE increased NAD(P)H levels by 50% above that in mock-transfected cells. We also found that ALDH3A1 expression prevented 4-HNE-induced protein adduct formation. Taken together, these data suggest that ALDH3A1 is a regulatory element of the cellular defense system that protects corneal epithelium against UV- and 4-HNE-induced oxidative damage.

Role of Multidrug Resistance Protein 1 (MRP1) and Glutathione S-Transferase A1-1 in Alkylating Agent Resistance KINETICS OF GLUTATHIONE CONJUGATE FORMATION AND EFFLUX GOVERN DIFFERENTIAL CELLULAR SENSITIVITY TO CHLORAMBUCIL VERSUSMELPHALAN TOXICITY

We investigated the role of phase II (conjugation) and phase III (efflux) detoxification of the anticancer drugs melphalan (MLP) and chlorambucil (CHB). Although both drugs are substrates of Alpha-class glutathioneS-transferases (GST) and the monoglutathionyl conjugates formed in these enzymatic reactions are transported by MRP1, we found that GSTA1-1 and MRP1 acted in synergy to confer resistance to CHB but not to MLP (Morrow, C. S., Smitherman, P. K., Diah, S. K., Schneider, E., and Townsend, A. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20114–20120). To explain this selectivity of MRP1/GST-mediated resistance, we report results of side-by-side experiments comparing the kinetics of MLP- versusCHB-glutathione conjugate: formation, product inhibition of GSTA1-1 catalysis, and transport by MRP1. The monoglutathionyl conjugate of CHB, CHB-SG, is a very strong competitive inhibitor of GSTA1-1 (K i 0.14 μm) that is >30-fold more potent than that of the corresponding conjugate of MLP, MLP-SG (K i 4.7 μm). The efficiency of GSTA1-1-mediated monoglutathionyl conjugate formation is more than 4-fold higher for CHB than MLP. Lastly, both CHB-SG and MLP-SG are efficiently transported by MRP1 with similarV max although the K m for CHB-SG (0.37 μm) is significantly lower than for MLP-SG (1.1 μm). These results indicate that MRP1 is required for GSTA1-1-mediated resistance to CHB in order to relieve potent product inhibition of the enzyme by intracellular CHB-SG formed. The kinetic properties of MRP1 are well suited to eliminate CHB-SG at pharmacologically relevant concentrations. For MLP detoxification, where product inhibition of GSTA1-1 is less important, GSTA1-1 does not confer resistance because of the relatively poorer catalytic efficiency of MLP-SG formation. Similar analyses can be useful for predicting the pharmacological and toxicological consequences of MRP and GST expression on cellular sensitivity to various other electrophilic xenobiotics.

Selective protection by stably transfected human ALDH3A1 (but not human ALDH1A1) against toxicity of aliphatic aldehydes in V79 cells.

Toxic medium chain length alkanals, alkenals, and 4-hydroxyalkenals that are generated during lipid peroxidation are potential substrates for aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) isoforms. We have developed transgenic cell lines to examine the potential for either human ALDH1A1 or ALDH3A1 to protect against damage mediated by these toxic aldehydes. Using crude cytosols from stably transfected cell lines, these aldehydes were confirmed to be excellent substrates for ALDH3A1, but were poorly oxidized by ALDH1A1. Expression of ALDH3A1 by stable transfection in V79 cells conferred a high level of protection against growth inhibition by the medium-chain length aldehyde substrates with highest substrate activity, including hexanal, trans-2-hexenal, trans-2-octenal, trans-2-nonenal, and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE). This was reflected in a parallel ability of ALDH3A1 to prevent depletion of glutathione by these aldehydes. Expression of hALDH3 completely blocked the potent induction of apoptosis by HNE in both V79 cells and in a RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line, consistent with the observed total prevention of HNE-protein adduct formation. Structure-activity studies indicated that the rank order of potency for the contributions of HNE functional groups to toxicity was aldehyde >/=C2=C3 double bond>>C4-hydroxyl group. Oxidation of the aldehyde moiety of HNE to a carboxyl by ALDH3A1 expressed in stably transfected cell lines drastically reduced its potency for growth inhibition and apoptosis induction. In contrast, ALDH1A1 expression provided only moderate protection against trans-2-nonenal (t2NE), and none against the other six-nine carbon aldehydes. Neither ALDH1A1 nor ALDH3A1 conferred any protection against acrolein, acetaldehyde, or chloroacetaldehyde. A small degree of protection against malondialdehyde was afforded by ALDH1A1, but not ALDH3A1. Paradoxically, cells expressing ALDH3A1 were 1.5-fold more sensitive to benzaldehyde toxicity than control V79 cells. These studies demonstrate that expression of class 3 ALDH, but not class 1 ALDH, can be an important determinant of cellular resistance to toxicity mediated by aldehydes of intermediate chain length that are produced during lipid peroxidation.

Role of glutathione S-transferase P1-1 in the cellular detoxification of cisplatin

Cells expressing elevated levels of allelic variants of human glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) and/or efflux transporters, MRP1 or MRP2, were used to evaluate the role of GSTP1-1 in cisplatin resistance. These studies revealed that GSTP1-1 confers low-level resistance (1.4- to 1.7-fold) to cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in MCF7 cells. However, expression of MRP1 (MCF7 cells) or MRP2 (HepG2 cells) failed to augment or potentiate GSTP1-1-mediated resistance in either cell line. To understand the mechanism by which variants of GSTP1-1 confer resistance to cisplatin, their relative abilities to catalyze conjugation of cisplatin with glutathione were examined. Enzymes encoded by all three alleles tested, GSTP1a (I104A113), GSTP1b (V104A113), and GSTP1c (V104V113), increased the formation rate of the mono-platinum/glutathione derivative of cisplatin with relative catalytic activities of 1.0 (GSTP1a-1a variant) and 1.8 to 1.9 (GSTP1b-1b and GSTP1c-1c variants). Although these data are consistent with the idea that very low level resistance to cisplatin may be conferred by GSTP1-1-mediated cisplatin/glutathione conjugation, two observations indicate that such catalysis plays a minor role in the protection from cisplatin toxicity. First, the rates of GSTP1-1-mediated conjugation are extremely slow (1.7-2.6 h−1 at 25°C). Second, despite an 80% to 90% increase in catalysis of cisplatin conjugation by GSTP1b-1b or GSTP1c-1c over GSTP1a-1a, we observed no discernable differences in relative resistances conferred by these alternative variants when expressed in MCF7 cells. We conclude that high-level cisplatin resistance attributed to GSTP1-1 in other studies is not likely due to catalysis of cisplatin conjugation but rather must be explained by other mechanisms, which may include GSTP1-mediated modulation of signaling pathways. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(10):3247–55]

ROLE OF MULTIDRUG- RESISTANCE PROTEIN 2 IN GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASE P1-1- MEDIATED RESISTANCE TO 4-NITROQUINOLINE 1-OXIDE TOXICITIES IN HEPG2 CELLS

Previous studies in our laboratory have shown that the phase III efflux transporter multidrug‐resistance protein (MRP)1 can act synergistically with the phase II conjugating glutathione S‐transferases (GST) to confer resistance to the toxicities of some electrophilic drugs and carcinogens. To determine whether the distinct efflux transporter MRP2 could also potentiate GST‐mediated protection from electrophilic toxins, we examined the effect of regulatable GSTP1‐1 expression in MRP2‐rich HepG2 cells on 4‐nitroquinoline 1‐oxide (4NQO)–induced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity (nucleic‐acid adduct formation). Expression of GSTP1‐1 was associated with a fourfold to tenfold protection from 4NQO‐induced cytotoxicity. Inhibition of MRP2‐mediated efflux activity by sulfinpyrazone or cyclosporin A completely reversed GSTP1‐1–associated resistance—a result indicating that GSTP1‐1–mediated cytoprotection is absolutely dependent on MRP2 efflux activity. Moreover, MRP2 efflux activity also augmented GSTP1‐1–mediated protection from 4NQO‐induced nucleic‐acid adduct formation. We conclude that MRP2‐mediated efflux of the glutathione conjugate of 4NQO and/or another toxic derivative of 4NQO is required to support GSTP1‐1–associated protection from 4NQO toxicities in HepG2 cells. Mol. Carcinog. 29:170–178, 2000.

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) inhibit transcriptional activation by the peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) ligand, 15-deoxy-delta 12,14prostaglandin J2 (15-d-PGJ2).

15-Deoxy-Delta(12,14)prostaglandin J(2) (15-d-PGJ(2)), a terminal metabolite of the J-series cyclopentenone prostaglandins, influences a variety of cellular processes including gene expression, differentiation, growth, and apoptosis. As a ligand of peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma), 15-d-PGJ(2) can transactivate PPAR gamma-responsive promoters. Previously, we showed that multidrug resistance proteins MRP1 and MRP3 attenuate cytotoxic and transactivating activities of 15-d-PGJ(2) in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Attenuation was glutathione-dependent and was associated with formation of the glutathione conjugate of 15-d-PGJ(2), 15-d-PGJ(2)-SG, and its active efflux by MRP. Here we have investigated whether the glutathione S-transferases (GST) can influence biological activities of 15-d-PGJ(2). MCF7 cells were stably transduced with human cytosolic GST isozymes M1a, A1, or P1a. These GSTs had no effect on 15-d-PGJ(2) cytotoxicity when expressed either alone or in combination with MRP1. However, expression of any of the three GSTs significantly inhibited 15-d-PGJ(2)-dependent transactivation of a PPAR gamma-responsive reporter gene. The degree of inhibition correlated with the level of GST expressed. Under physiologic conditions, the nonenzymatic rate of 15-d-PGJ(2) conjugation with glutathione was significant. Of the three GST isozymes, only GSTM1a-1a further stimulated the rate of 15-d-PGJ(2)-SG formation. Moreover, GSTM1a-1a rate enhancement was only a transient burst that was complete within 15 s. Hence, catalysis plays little, if any, role in GST inhibition of 15-d-PGJ(2)-dependent transactivation. In contrast, inhibition of transactivation was associated with strong GST/15-d-PGJ(2) interactions. Potent inhibition by 15-d-PGJ(2) and 15-d-PGJ(2)-SG of GST activity was observed with K(i) in the 0.15-2.0 microM range for the three GST isozymes, results suggesting avid associations between GST and 15-d-PGJ(2) or 15-d-PGJ(2)-SG. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI/MS) studies revealed no stable adducts of GST and 15-d-PGJ(2) indicating that GST/15-d-PGJ(2) interactions are primarily noncovalent. These results are consistent with a mechanism of GST-mediated inhibition of transactivation in which GST binds 15-d-PGJ(2) and 15-d-PGJ(2)-SG thereby sequestering the ligands in the cytosol away from their nuclear target, PPAR gamma.

Lung tumor promotion by curcumin

Curcumin exhibits anti-inflammatory and antitumor activity and is being tested in clinical trials as a chemopreventive agent for colon cancer. Curcumins chemopreventive activity was tested in a transgenic mouse model of lung cancer that expresses the human Ki-ras(G12C) allele in a doxycycline (DOX) inducible and lung-specific manner. The effects of curcumin were compared with the lung tumor promoter, butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and the lung cancer chemopreventive agent, sulindac. Treatment of DOX-induced mice with dietary curcumin increased tumor multiplicity (36.3 +/- 0.9 versus 24.3 +/- 0.2) and progression to later stage lesions, results which were similar to animals that were co-treated with DOX/BHT. Microscopic examination showed that the percentage of lung lesions that were adenomas and adenocarcinomas increased to 66% in DOX/BHT, 66% in DOX/curcumin and 49% in DOX/BHT/curcumin-treated groups relative to DOX only treated mice (19%). Immunohistochemical analysis also showed increased evidence of inflammation in DOX/BHT, DOX/curcumin and DOX/BHT/curcumin mice relative to DOX only treated mice. In contrast, co-treatment of DOX/BHT mice with 200 p.p.m. [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] of sulindac inhibited the progression of lung lesions and reduced the inflammation. Lung tissue from DOX/curcumin-treated mice demonstrated a significant increase (33%; P = 0.01) in oxidative damage, as assessed by the levels of carbonyl protein formation, relative to DOX-treated control mice after 1 week on the curcumin diet. These results suggest that curcumin may exhibit organ-specific effects to enhance reactive oxygen species formation in the damaged lung epithelium of smokers and ex-smokers. Ongoing clinical trials thus may need to exclude smokers and ex-smokers in chemopreventive trials of curcumin.

De Novo Expression of Transfected Human Class 1 Aldehyde Dehydrogenase (ALDH) Causes Resistance to Oxazaphosphorine Anti-cancer Alkylating Agents in Hamster V79 Cell Lines ELEVATED CLASS 1 ALDH ACTIVITY IS CLOSELY CORRELATED WITH REDUCTION IN DNA INTERSTRAND CROSS-LINKING AND LETHALITY

Human class 1 aldehyde dehydrogenase (hALDH-1) can oxidize aldophosphamide, a key aldehyde intermediate in the activation pathway of cyclophosphamide and other oxazaphosphorine (OAP) anti-cancer alkylating agents. Overexpression of class 1 ALDH (ALDH-1) has been observed in cells selected for survival in the presence of OAPs. We used transfection to induce de novo expression of human ALDH-1 in V79/SD1 Chinese hamster cells to clearly quantitate the role of hALDH-1 expression in OAP resistance. Messenger RNA levels correlated well with hALDH-1 protein levels and enzyme activities (1.5-13.6 milliunits/mg with propionaldehyde/NAD substrate, compared to < 1 milliunit/mg in controls) in individual clonal transfectant lines, and slot blot analysis confirmed the presence of the transfected cDNA. Expressed ALDH activity was closely correlated (r = 0.99) with resistance to mafosfamide, up to 21-fold relative to controls. Transfectants were cross-resistant to other OAPs but not to phosphoramide mustard, ifosfamide mustard, melphalan, or acrolein. Resistance was completely reversed by pretreatment with 25 μM diethylaminobenzaldehyde, a potent ALDH inhibitor. Alkaline elution studies showed that expression of ALDH-1 reduced the number of DNA cross-links commensurate with mafosfamide resistance, and this reduction in cross-links was fully reversed by the inhibitor. Thus, overexpression of human class 1 ALDH alone is sufficient to confer OAP-specific drug resistance.

Combined expression of multidrug resistance protein (MRP) and glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (GSTP1-1) in MCF7 cells and high level resistance to the cytotoxicities of ethacrynic acid but not oxazaphosphorines or cisplatin

We tested the hypothesis that combined increased expression of human glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (GSTP1-1), an enzyme that catalyzes the conjugation with glutathione of several toxic electrophiles, and the glutathione-conjugate efflux pump, multidrug resistance protein (MRP), confers high level resistance to the cytotoxicities of anticancer and other drugs. To accomplish this, we developed MCF7 breast carcinoma cell derivatives that express high levels of GSTP1-1 and MRP, alone and in combination. Parental MCF7 cells, which express no GSTP1-1 and negligible MRP, served as control cells. We found that either MRP or GSTP1-1 alone conferred significant resistance to ethacrynic acid cytotoxicity. Moreover, combined expression of GSTP1-1 and MRP conferred a high level of resistance to ethacrynic acid that was greater than resistance conferred by either protein alone. Increased MRP was also associated with modest resistance to the oxazaphosphorine compounds mafosfamide, 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, and 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide. However, coordinated expression of GSTP1-1 with MRP failed to augment this modest resistance. Similarly, GSTP1-1 had no effect on the sensitivities to cisplatin of MCF7 cells regardless of MRP expression. These results establish that coordinated expression of MRP and GSTP1-1 can confer high level resistance to the cytotoxicities of some drugs, including ethacrynic acid, but that such resistance is variable and does not apply to all toxic drugs that can potentially form glutathione conjugates in either spontaneous or GSTP1-1-catalyzed reactions.