Alan L. Hinderliter
Duke University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alan L. Hinderliter.
Psychosomatic Medicine | 2003
Susan S. Girdler; Andrew Sherwood; Alan L. Hinderliter; Jane Leserman; Nancy L. Costello; Patricia A. Straneva; Cort A. Pedersen; Kathleen C. Light
Objective To examine the biological correlates associated with histories of sexual or physical abuse in women meeting DSM criteria for premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) and in healthy, non-PMDD controls. Methods Twenty-eight women with prospectively confirmed PMDD were compared with 28 non-PMDD women for cardiovascular and neuroendocrine measures at rest and in response to mental stressors, and for &bgr;-adrenergic receptor responsivity, during both the follicular and luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Structured interview was used to assess psychiatric history and prior sexual and physical abuse experiences. All subjects were free of current psychiatric comorbidity and medication use. Results More PMDD women had prior sexual and physical abuse experiences than controls (20 vs. 10, respectively). Relative to nonabused PMDD women, PMDD women with prior abuse (sexual or physical) exhibited significantly lower resting norepinephrine (NE) levels and significantly greater &bgr;1- and &bgr;2-adrenoceptor responsivity and greater luteal phase NE reactivity to mental stress. For non-PMDD control women, abuse was associated with blunted cortisol, cardiac output, and heart rate reactivity to mental stress relative to nonabused controls. Conclusions The results of this initial study suggest that a history of prior abuse is associated with alterations in physiological reactivity to subsequent mental stress in women, but that the biological correlates of abuse may be different for PMDD vs. non-PMDD women.
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics | 2012
Dawn E. Epstein; Andrew Sherwood; Patrick J. Smith; Linda W. Craighead; Carla Caccia; Pao-Hwa Lin; Michael A. Babyak; Julie Johnson; Alan L. Hinderliter; James A. Blumenthal
BACKGROUND Although the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet is an accepted nonpharmacologic treatment for hypertension, little is known about what patient characteristics affect dietary adherence and what level of adherence is needed to reduce blood pressure (BP). OBJECTIVE Our aim was to determine what factors predict dietary adherence and the extent to which dietary adherence is necessary to produce clinically meaningful BP reductions. DESIGN Ancillary study of the ENCORE (Exercise and Nutrition Interventions for Cardiovascular Health) trial--a 16-week randomized clinical trial of diet and exercise. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING Participants included 144 sedentary, overweight, or obese adults (body mass index 25 to 39.9) with high BP (systolic 130 to 159 mm Hg and/or diastolic 85 to 99 mm Hg). INTERVENTION Patients were randomized to one of three groups: DASH diet alone, DASH diet plus weight management, and Usual Diet Controls. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES Our primary outcomes were a composite index of adherence to the DASH diet and clinic BP. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED General linear models were used to compare treatment groups on post-treatment adherence to the DASH diet. Linear regression was used to examine potential predictors of post-treatment DASH adherence. Analysis of covariance was used to examine the relation of adherence to the DASH diet and BP. RESULTS Participants in the DASH diet plus weight management (16.1 systolic BP [SBP]; 95% CI 13.0 to 19.2 mm Hg and 9.9 diastolic BP [DBP]; 95% CI 8.1 to 11.6 mm Hg) and DASH diet alone (11.2 SBP; 95% CI 8.1 to 14.3 mm Hg and 7.5 DBP; 95% CI 5.8 to 9.3 mm Hg) groups showed significant reductions in BP in comparison with Usual Diet Controls participants (3.4 SBP; 95% CI 0.4 to 6.4 mm Hg and DBP 3.8; 95% CI 2.2 to 5.5 mm Hg). Greater post-treatment consumption of DASH foods was noted in both the DASH diet alone (mean = 6.20; 95% CI 5.83 to 6.57) and DASH diet plus weight management groups (mean = 6.23; 95% CI 5.88 to 6.59) compared with Usual Diet Controls (mean = 3.66; 95% CI 3.30 to 4.01; P<0.0001), and greater adherence to the DASH diet was associated with larger reductions in clinic SBP and DBP (P ≤ 0.01). Only ethnicity predicted dietary adherence, with African Americans less adherent to the DASH diet compared with whites (4.68; 95% CI 4.34 to 5.03 vs 5.83; 95% CI 5.50 to 6.11; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Greater adherence to the DASH diet was associated with larger BP reductions independent of weight loss. African Americans were less likely to be adherent to the DASH dietary eating plan compared with whites, suggesting that culturally sensitive dietary strategies might be needed to improve adherence to the DASH diet.
Journal of Hypertension | 2001
Kathleen C. Light; Alan L. Hinderliter; Sheila G. West; Karen M. Grewen; John F. Steege; Andrew Sherwood; Susan S. Girdler
Background Postmenopausal estrogen replacement, with or without progestins, has been related to lower cardiovascular risks. Objective We investigated whether the actions of estrogen on vascular resistance contribute to this cardioprotective effect. Design and methods In a 6-month double-blind study, pre- and post-treatment blood pressure, cardiac index, total vascular resistance index and plasma catecholamine responses during baseline and mental stressors were compared in 69 women (including 19 with mild hypertension but no history of heart disease). Women were randomized to receive either conjugated estrogens alone, estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone, or placebo. Results Both groups on active hormone replacement showed similar decreases in vascular resistance and modest blood pressure reductions, which differed from the unchanged responses of those on placebo (P < 0.05) after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Hypertensive women showed greater reductions in vascular resistance than normotensives (P < 0.05) and their blood pressure reductions tended to be larger. Women receiving hormone replacement showed increased stroke volume and cardiac index at 6 months, particularly among hypertensives and those receiving medroxyprogesterone (P < 0.05). Hormone replacement was also related to decreases in plasma norepinephrine. Finally, in 33 women receiving hormone replacement, significant 5 and 3% decreases in echocardiographic measures of left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness were evident at 6 months (P < 0.05), while 20 placebo-treated women showed no reliable echocardiographic improvements (P = NS). Conclusions These findings suggest that estrogen-mediated reductions in hemodynamic load on the heart may contribute to the reduced risk of cardiovascular events in relatively healthy postmenopausal women who use hormone replacement.
American Journal of Cardiology | 1996
Alan L. Hinderliter; Andrew R. Sager; Andrew Sherwood; Kathleen C. Light; Susan S. Girdler; Park W. Willis
Previous studies have demonstrated significant ethnic differences in left ventricular structure in both normotensive and hypertensive subjects. To determine if these differences in ventricular geometry are associated with differences in vascular structure, we measured the minimum forearm vascular resistance in 30 healthy young African-American adults and in 30 whites matched for age, gender, and blood pressure. Average daytime blood pressure was determined by ambulatory monitoring during a typical work day. Minimum forearm vascular resistance was measured by plethysmography after 10 minutes of forearm ischemia. Indexed left ventricular mass and relative wall thickness were measured by 2-dimensional-directed M-mode echocardiography. The mean (+/-SD) ambulatory pressure was 126 +/- 11/79 +/- 8 mm Hg in African-Americans and 126 +/- 11/79 +/- 7 mm Hg in whites. The 2 groups were similar in body mass index and in family history of hypertension. African-Americans had a higher minimum forearm vascular resistance than did whites (2.39 +/- 0.75 vs 2.03 +/- 0.55 mm Hg, p <0.05). There was a trend toward a greater left ventricular relative wall thickness in African-Americans (0.38 +/- 0.07 vs 0.35 +/- 0.06, p=0.09). These results suggest that early vascular remodeling is present in African-Americans who do not have established hypertension, and that this ethnic difference in vascular structure is associated with a difference in ventricular geometry.
American Journal of Hypertension | 2002
Andrew Sherwood; Rebecca Thurston; Patrick R. Steffen; James A. Blumenthal; Robert A. Waugh; Alan L. Hinderliter
Blunting of the normal drop in blood pressure (BP) from day to night is emerging as a strong prognostic indicator of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated the effects of natural menopause on BP dipping in African American and white women. A total of 112 women (62 premenopausal and 50 postmenopausal) took part in the study. Pre- and postmenopausal groups were comparable in terms of clinic BP, body mass index, and ethnic composition. Ambulatory BP was recorded over 24 h during a typical workday, with measurements programmed to be taken every 15 min during waking hours and every 30-minutes during sleeping hours. Nocturnal BP dipping was defined as the difference between waking and sleep BP. Waking BP did not differ by menopausal status. However, nocturnal systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) dipping were attenuated in postmenopausal women, with both SBP (P < .05) and DBP (P < .05) higher during nighttime sleep in postmenopausal than in premenopausal women. Ethnicity was also related to BP dipping, with African American women tending to show blunted SBP dipping (P = .055) compared with white women; BP dipping was most blunted in postmenopausal African American women. These observations suggest that blunted nighttime BP dipping may contribute to increased cardiovascular disease risk in postmenopausal women.
North Carolina medical journal | 1999
James A. Blumenthal; Andrew Sherwood; Michael A. Babyak; Rebecca Thurston; Damon Tweedy; Anastasia Georgiades; Elizabeth C. D. Gullette; Parinda Khatri; P. Steffan; Robert A. Waugh; Kathleen C. Light; Alan L. Hinderliter
North Carolina medical journal | 1997
James A. Blumenthal; Christopher M. O'Connor; Alan L. Hinderliter; Fath K; Hegde Sb; Miller G; Puma J; Sessions W; Sheps D; Bosh Zakhary; Redford B. Williams
Psychosomatic Medicine | 1998
P. Straneva; H. Lenahan; Alan L. Hinderliter; E. Wells; Susan S. Girdler
The Handbook of Behavioral Medicine | 2014
Benson M. Hoffman; Andrew Sherwood; James A. Blumenthal; Alan L. Hinderliter
Psychosomatic Medicine | 1999
M. S. Adamian; Susan S. Girdler; Sheila G. West; Karen M. Grewen; S. H. Chung; J. Koo; Alan L. Hinderliter; Kathleen C. Light