Alan McGee

The Reliability of Nonreconstructed Computerized Tomographic Scans of the Abdomen and Pelvis in Detecting Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries in Blunt Trauma Patients with Altered Mental Status

BACKGROUND Computerized tomography, traditionally utilized to evaluate and detect visceral abdominal and pelvic injuries in multiply injured patients with altered mental status, also has been useful for detecting thoracolumbar spine fractures and dislocations. The purpose of the present study was to test the reliability of nonreconstructed computerized tomography of the abdomen and pelvis as a screening tool for thoracolumbar spine injuries in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status. METHODS The study consisted of fifty-nine consecutive patients with altered mental status who were admitted to a Level-II trauma center. Each patient had a nonreconstructed computerized tomographic scan of the abdomen and pelvis (5-mm slices), and of the chest when indicated, as well as anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine. Reconstructed computerized tomographic scans dedicated to the spine (< or =2-mm slices) were completed. With use of the reconstructions as the gold standard, sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to assess the diagnostic accuracy of using the nonreconstructed computerized tomographic scans and the radiographs. RESULTS Reconstructions of the spine detected seventy-two thoracolumbar spine fractures, whereas nonreconstructed computerized tomographic scans of the abdomen and pelvis detected fifty-eight and those of the chest detected sixteen. With use of the reconstructions as the standard, computerized tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis had a sensitivity of 89% (95% confidence interval, 65% to 96%) and a specificity of 85% (95% confidence interval, 65% to 96%) for the detection of all fractures, compared with 37% and 76% for plain radiographs, respectively. Computerized tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was 100% sensitive and specific for the detection of whether a patient had any fracture at all, whereas radiographs were 54% sensitive and 86% specific. No fractures that were missed on nonreconstructed computerized tomography required surgery or other interventions. CONCLUSIONS Nonreconstructed computerized tomography detected fractures of the thoracolumbar spine more accurately than plain radiographs did and is recommended for the diagnosis of thoracolumbar spine fractures in acute trauma patients with altered mental status. Reconstructions do not need to be ordered unless an abnormality that is found on the nonreconstructed computerized tomographic scan needs additional elucidation.

Changes in Driving Performance Following Shoulder Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND With this study, we sought to quantify perioperative changes in driving performance among patients who underwent anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS Using a driving simulator, 30 patients (20 anatomic and 10 reverse total shoulder arthroplasties) were tested preoperatively and at 2 weeks (PO2), 6 weeks (PO6), and 12 weeks (PO12) postoperatively. The total number of collisions, centerline crossings, and off-road excursions (when the vehicle traversed the lateral road edge), and scores on a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) were recorded at each driving trial. RESULTS The mean number of collisions increased from 5.9 preoperatively to 7.4 at PO2 and subsequently decreased to 5.6 at PO6 and 4.0 at PO12 (p = 0.0149). In addition, the number of centerline crossings decreased from 21.4 preoperatively to 16.3 at PO12 (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis of the data demonstrated that increased VAS for pain scores, older age, and less driving experience had a negative impact on driving performance. CONCLUSIONS Driving performance returned to preoperative levels at 6 weeks after shoulder arthroplasty. By 12 weeks postoperatively, patients demonstrated improved driving performance compared with preoperative performance. On the basis of our findings, clinicians can suggest a window of 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively for the gradual return to driving. However, for patients of older age, with less driving experience, or with greater pain, a return to driving at closer to 12 weeks postoperatively should be recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Change in driving performance following arthroscopic shoulder surgery

The current study aimed to measure perioperative changes in driving performance following arthroscopic shoulder surgery using a validated driving simulator.21 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff or labral pathology were tested on a driving simulator preoperatively, and 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. An additional 21 subjects were tested to establish driving data in a control cohort. The number of collisions, centerline crossings, and off-road excursions were recorded for each trial. VAS and SPADI scores were obtained at each visit.The mean number of collisions in the study group significantly increased from 2.05 preoperatively to 3.75 at 6 weeks (p<0.001), and significantly decreased to 1.95 at 12 weeks (p<0.001). Centerline crossings and off-road excursions did not significantly change from preoperative through 12 weeks, although centerline crossings were statistically different from the controls at each time point (p<0.001). Surgery on the dominant driving arm resulted in greater collisions at 6 weeks than surgery on the non-dominant driving arm (p<0.001).Preliminary data shows that driving performance is impaired for at least 6 weeks postoperatively, with a return to normal driving by 12 weeks. Driving is more profoundly affected in conditions that require avoiding a collision and when the dominant driving arm is involved.

Dynamometer Elbow Strength and Endurance Testing After Distal Biceps Reconstruction w/Allograft

Objectives: The purpose of the current study is to investigate the functional strength outcomes of late distal biceps reconstruction using allograft tissue. Methods: Patients who underwent distal biceps reconstruction with allograft tissue between May 2007 and May 2013 were identified. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for post-operative complications, gross flexion and supination strength, and range of motion (ROM). Isokinetic strength and endurance in elbow flexion and forearm supination were measured in both arms. Tests were conducted using a dynamometer at 60o per second for isokinetic strength and 240o per second for endurance. Isometric strength testing was also measured for elbow flexion and forearm supination. Paired t tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: Ten patients with a mean age of 48 years (range 42 - 61 years) were included in the study. Distal biceps reconstruction was performed using an Achilles tendon allograft in 9 patients and a combination of tibialis anterior allograft and gracilis allograft in 1 patient. Of the reconstructions, 50% involved the dominant arm. Full ROM was observed in all patients at the time of their final follow up assessment. The mean follow-up for dynamometer strength testing was 34 months (range 13-81 months). No statistical differences were noted between data obtained from operative and contralateral extremities. The average peak torque of the operative limb (38.5± 5.9 Nm) was 91.7% of that of the contralateral limb (41.8±4.9 Nm) in flexion and 93.4% (operative, 5.7±1.3 Nm; contralateral, 6.1± 1.0 Nm) in supination. No significant differences were found in fatigue index between operative or contralateral limbs for flexion (operative, 34.1±17.1%; contralateral, 30.8±17.1%; p = 0.29) or supination (operative, 38.2±16.5%; contralateral, 42.1±11.9%; p = 0.65). . The only complication observed was a transient PIN palsy in one patient which resolved by 3 months post-operatively. All patients reported postoperative cosmetic deformity but found their gross appearance acceptable. Conclusion: Late reconstruction for chronic distal biceps rupture using allograft tissue is a safe and effective solution for symptomatic patients with functional demands in forearm supination and elbow flexion. Dynamometer testing shows near normal return of strength and endurance of both elbow flexion and supination following the procedure.

Reply to letter to the editor: subchondral calcium phosphate is ineffective for bone marrow edema lesions in adults with advanced osteoarthritis.

W e thank Dr. Wyland and appreciate his interest in our study. We would like to respond to the concerns raised in his letter to the editor [2]. We agree with Dr. Wyland that reporting the outcome in five separate subscales (symptoms; pain; function, daily living; function, sports and recreational activities; quality of life), enhances interpretation. However, as stated by Roos and colleagues [7], even though it makes it impossible to closely monitor the stages of rehabilitation, the calculation of a total KOOS score can show an improvement. Due to the fact that our objective was to report the general patient-relevant outcome at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively (and not to optimize rehabilitation), we decided to report a single score in this initial retrospective case series. Dr. Wyland noted that ‘‘the grading system described by Mitsou et al. and previously by Tegner actually evaluated the success of ACL reconstruction, not knee osteoarthritis treatments.’’ Due to lack of a specific patient-reported outcome score for treatment evaluation of subchondral bone marrow edema lesions, we decided to use the Tegner-Lysholm Score which, as correctly stated by Dr. Wyland, was initially developed and validated for ACL injuries. The rationale behind our decision lies in the fact that in up to 80% of ACL-ruptured knees, bone marrow edema lesions are present [3, 4]. We also feel that the critique by Bengsston and colleagues [1] on the sensitivity of the Tegner Lysholm Score regarding ACL injuries and other lower extremity conditions corroborates as opposed to discredits our choice. The grading of the score allows a more critical analysis of the outcome [1]. Dr. Wyland also correctly noted that ‘‘... there was no discussion of surgical revisions in evaluating clinical failure or surgeon learning curve, which one would expect to influence failure rates.’’ Within the confines of manuscript length, we reported the followup data that was available for this retrospective study; none of the patients had revisions. However, three patients were lost to followup. Also, the minimum followup to be included in this (RE: Chatterjee D, McGee A, Strauss E, Youm T, Jazrawi L. Subchondral calcium phosphate is ineffective for bone marrow edema lesions in adults with advanced osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:2334–2342). Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. D. Chatterjee MD (&), A. McGee MD, E. Strauss MD, T. Youm MD, L. Jazrawi MD Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 333 East 38th Street 4th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA e-mail: Dipal.Chatterjee@nyumc.org; dipal.chatterjee@gmail.com Reply to Letter to the Editor Published online: 24 September 2015 The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons1 2015