Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Alan R. Beals.
Current Anthropology | 1979
D. W. Attwood; Mahadev L. Apte; B. S. Baviskar; Alan R. Beals; Edwin Eames; J. V. Ferreira; Sylvia M. Hale; John Harriss; N. Krishnaji; M. K. Kudryavtsev; Jayant K. Lele; David G. Mandelbaum; Joan P. Mencher; Moni Nag; J. Albert Rorabacher; Hilary Standing; Zoltán Tagányi
To the extent that peasants, particularly Indian peasants, are ever considered to be economically mobile, they are generally seen from one of two perspectives: either the Malthusian perspective, which predicts that most landholdings will shrink over time, due to partitioning among multiple heirs; or the Marxian perspective, which predicts that a few landholdings will increase in size at the expense of the vast majority-the latter diminishing, in many cases, to nothing at all. These two perspectives can be used to generate a number of specific hypotheses concerning changes in the distribution of land in rural India. Naturally, some of the Malthusian hypotheses contradict Marxian ones, but there are others which are mutually congruent (the poor will generally get poorer, from either perspective, though the rich also get richer, according to the latter). In this paper, historical and contemporary data collected from a highly commercialized and densely populated village in western India are used to test a number of these hypotheses. Where the Malthusian and Marxian hypotheses are congruent, they sometimes appear to fit the data. However, most of these data are better explained by exogenous factors, such as migration, than by the hypotheses which they appear superficially to confirm. In addition, where the Malthusian and Marxian hypotheses contradict each other, the former show a better fit with the data. The reason is simply that the largest landholdings did not get larger, they got smaller. Moreover, while many of the smaller holdings also diminished, some got larger. The concentration of landholdings has not increased, contrary to the Marxian hypotheses. Most interestingly, neither set of hypotheses can explain the significant amount of upward mobility which has ocurred among smallholders, and even among those who were landless. Coupled with frequent downward mobility among landholders of all sizes, this means an unexpectedly low correlation between the size of a familys holding in 1920 and its size in 1970. The distribution of land is neither rigidly fixed by a static social system nor deteriorating according to a pattern predicted by the Malthusian or Marxian perspectives. Since the village in question has undergone intensive commercialization, this implies that commercialization as such is not necessarily a cause of increased poverty and inequality.
American Sociological Review | 1967
Alan R. Beals; Bernard J. Siegel
New updated! The latest book from a very famous author finally comes out. Book of divisiveness and social conflict an anthropological approach, as an amazing reference becomes what you need to get. Whats for is this book? Are you still thinking for what the book is? Well, this is what you probably will get. You should have made proper choices for your better life. Book, as a source that may involve the facts, opinion, literature, religion, and many others are the great friends to join with.
American Sociological Review | 1955
Ruth Hill Useem; McKim Marriott; Alan R. Beals; Bernard S. Cohn; E. Kathleen Gough; Oscar Lewis; David G. Mandelbaum; M. N. Srinivas; Gitel P. Steed; Robert Redfield; Milton Singer
By reading, you can know the knowledge and things more, not only about what you get from people to people. Book will be more trusted. As this village india studies in the little community, it will really give you the good idea to be successful. It is not only for you to be success in certain life you can be successful in everything. The success can be started by knowing the basic knowledge and do actions.
Technology and Culture | 1968
John W. Bennett; Bernard J. Siegel; Alan R. Beals
Find the secret to improve the quality of life by reading this biennial review of anthropology 1969. This is a kind of book that you need now. Besides, it can be your favorite book to read after having this book. Do you ask why? Well, this is a book that has different characteristic with others. You may not need to know who the author is, how well-known the work is. As wise word, never judge the words from who speaks, but make the words as your good value to your life.
American Sociological Review | 1961
Alan R. Beals; Adrian C. Mayer
The social, political and economic impact of the decline of the old colonial powers in Africa, India and the Middle East are still key areas of scholarly research and debate. Based on careful social observation and empirical research, these titles explore the tension between agriculture and industry in developing economies, and trace the complex political process of independence. Aimed at administrators and academics, these studies are central to Development Studies, and also present the work of renowned anthropologists such as Raymond Firth.
Archive | 1959
Bernard J. Siegel; Alan R. Beals
Technology and Culture | 1974
Robert F. G. Spier; Bernard J. Siegel; Alan R. Beals; Stephen A. Tyler
Man | 1967
G. D. Bartell; Alan R. Beals; Bernard J. Siegel
Current Anthropology | 1988
Alan R. Beals; Eric R. Wolf
Man | 1975
Adrian C. Mayer; Alan R. Beals