Alastair G. Rothwell

A New Zealand national joint registry review of 202 total ankle replacements followed for up to 6 years

Background and purpose There have been few reports of large series of ankle replacements. The aim of this study was to document and evaluate the early results of a nationwide series of total ankle replacements (TARs) performed using second- and third-generation implants. Methods Records of total ankle replacements performed between February 2000 and November 2005 were retrieved from the New Zealand National Joint Registry and retrospectively reviewed at a mean of 28 months after the primary procedure. At 6 months post surgery, patient scores were generated from questionnaires. Comparisons between patient scores and categorical variables were made using ANOVA. Regression analyses using Cox proportional-hazards modeling were performed to determine predictors of failure. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve was used to describe the rate of prosthetic survival. Results 202 total ankle replacements were performed in 183 patients. 14 prostheses (7%) failed. The overall cumulative 5-year failure-free rate was 86%. An unfavorable patient score at 6 months after the initial procedure turned out to be a good predictor of subsequent failure. The cumulative 5-year failure-free rate was 65% at 5 years for patients with an unfavorable score, and 95% for those who had a favorable patient score. Each 1-point increase in the patient score (i.e. poorer outcome) corresponded to a 5% relative increase in the risk of failure (p < 0.05). In addition, longer operative time for the primary procedure was found in the group of TARs that subsequently failed (p < 0.05). Interpretation The National Joint Registry appears to be a useful tool for monitoring the trends in TAR surgery.

Upper-limb surgery for tetraplegia

We reviewed the results of reconstruction of 97 upper limbs in a consecutive series of 57 tetraplegic patients, treated from 1982 to 1990. Of these, 49 had functional and eight had cosmetic reconstructions. The principal functional objectives were to provide active elbow extension, hook grip, and key pinch. Elbow extension was provided in 34 limbs, using deltoid-to-triceps transfer. Hook grip was provided in 58 limbs, mostly using extensor carpi radialis longus to flexor pollicis longus transfer, and key pinch in 68, mostly using brachioradialis to flexor pollicis longus transfer. Many other procedures were employed. At an average follow-up of 37 months, 70% had good or excellent subjective results, and objective measurements of function compared favourably with other series. Revisions were required for 11 active transfers and three tenodeses, while complications included rupture of anastomoses and problems with thumb interphalangeal joint stabilisation and wound healing. We report a reliable clinical method for differentiating between the activity of extensor carpi radialis longus and brevis and describe a successful new split flexor pollicis longus tenodesis for stabilising the thumb interphalangeal joint. Bilateral simultaneous surgery gave generally better results than did unilateral surgery.

Does the use of laminar flow and space suits reduce early deep infection after total hip and knee replacement?: THE TEN-YEAR RESULTS OF THE NEW ZEALAND JOINT REGISTRY

We have investigated whether the use of laminar-flow theatres and space suits reduced the rate of revision for early deep infection after total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacement by reviewing the results of the New Zealand Joint Registry at ten years. Of the 51 485 primary THRs and 36 826 primary TKRs analysed, laminar-flow theatres were used in 35.5% and space suits in 23.5%. For THR there was a significant increase in early infection in those procedures performed with the use of a space suit compared with those without (p < 0.0001), in those carried out in a laminar-flow theatre compared with a conventional theatre (p < 0.003) and in those undertaken in a laminar-flow theatre with a space suit (p < 0.001) when compared with conventional theatres without such a suit. The results were similar for TKR with the use of a space suit (p < 0.001), in laminar-flow theatres (p < 0.019) and when space suits were used in those theatres (p < 0.001). These findings were independent of age, disease and operating time and were unchanged when the surgeons and hospital were analysed individually. The rate of revision for early deep infection has not been reduced by using laminar flow and space suits. Our results question the rationale for their increasing use in routine joint replacement, where the added cost to the health system seems to be unjustified.

Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: A SEVEN-YEAR ANALYSIS FROM THE NEW ZEALAND JOINT REGISTRY

We have reviewed the rate of revision of fully cemented, hybrid and uncemented primary total hip replacements (THRs) registered in the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and December 2006 to determine whether there was any statistically significant difference in the early survival and reason for revision in these different types of fixation. The percentage rate of revision was calculated per 100 component years and compared with the reason for revision, the type of fixation and the age of the patients. Of the 42 665 primary THRs registered, 920 (2.16%) underwent revision requiring change of at least one component. Fully-cemented THRs had a lower rate of revision when considering all causes for failure (p < 0.001), but below the age of 65 years uncemented THRs had a lower rate (p < 0.01). The rate of revision of the acetabular component for aseptic loosening was less in the uncemented and hybrid groups compared with that in the fully cemented group (p < 0.001), and the rate of revision of cemented and uncemented femoral components was similar, except in patients over 75 years of age in whom revision of cemented femoral components was significantly less frequent (p < 0.02). Revision for infection was more common in patients aged below 65 years and in cemented and hybrid THRs compared with cementless THRs (p < 0.001). Dislocation was the most common cause of revision for all types of fixation and was more frequent in both uncemented acetabular groups (p < 0.001). The experience of the surgeon did not affect the findings. Although cemented THR had the lowest rate of revision for all causes in the short term (90 days), uncemented THR had the lowest rate of aseptic loosening in patients under 65 years of age and had rates comparable with international rates of aseptic loosening in those over 65 years.

Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: THE NEW ZEALAND NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY

We reviewed the rate of revision of unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR) from the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2008. There were 4284 UKRs, of which 236 required revision, 205 to a total knee replacement (U2T) and 31 to a further unicompartmental knee replacement (U2U). We used these data to establish whether the survival and functional outcome for revised UKRs were comparable with those of primary total knee replacement (TKR). The rate of revision for the U2T cohort was four times higher than that for a primary TKR (1.97 vs 0.48; p < 0.05). The mean Oxford Knee Score was also significantly worse in the U2T group than that of the primary TKR group (30.02 vs 37.16; p < 0.01). The rate of revision for conversion of a failed UKR to a further UKR (U2U cohort) was 13 times higher than that for a primary TKR. The poor outcome of a UKR converted to a primary TKR compared with a primary TKR should contra-indicate the use of a UKR as a more conservative procedure in the younger patient.

An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry

We analysed data from the Oxford hip and knee questionnaires collected by the New Zealand Joint Registry at six months and five years after joint replacement, to determine if there was any relationship between the scores and the risk of early revision. Logistic regression of the six-month scores indicated that for every one-unit decrease in the Oxford score, the risk of revision within two years increased by 9.7% for total hip replacement (THR), 9.9% for total knee replacement (TKR) and 12.0% for unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). Our findings showed that 70% of the revisions within two years for TKR and 67% for THR and UKR would have been captured by monitoring the lowest 22%, 28% and 28%, respectively, of the Oxford scores. When analysed using the Kalairajah classification a score of < 27 (poor) was associated with a risk of revision within two years of 7.6% for THR, 7.0% for TKR and 24.3% for UKR, compared with risks of 0.7%, 0.7% and 1.8%, respectively, for scores > 34 (good or excellent). Our study confirms that the Oxford hip and knee scores at six months are useful predictors of early revision after THR and TKR and we recommend their use for the monitoring of the outcome and potential failure in these patients.

CHONDROCYTE MULTIPLICATION IN OSTEOARTHRITIC ARTICULAR CARTILAGE

1. Twelve trephine specimens of articular cartilage and subchondral bone taken from six fresh osteoarthritic femoral heads were incubated in a medium containing tritiated thymidine, and autoradiographs were prepared from serial sections five microns thick. 2. Scattered labelling of chondrocytes in sections from four of the six femoral heads was demonstrated. No more than four labelled cells were seen in any one section. About half were found in typical chondrocyte clusters. 3. The implications of this evidence of chondrocyte multiplication with regard to the repair of damaged articular cartilage are discussed.

A Multinational Assessment of Metal-on-Metal Bearings in Hip Replacement

There is emerging evidence that many metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings, when used with large femoral heads in conventional hip replacement and some resurfacing prostheses, are associated with increased rates of revision arthroplasty. Registries are the main sources of data on MoM prostheses. At the recent International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries (ICOR) meeting, data were presented from the Australian, England and Wales, and New Zealand registries. All registries reported an increased rate of revision for large femoral head MoM prostheses when prostheses were aggregated compared with the aggregated data of hip prostheses with other bearing surfaces. There was also evidence, however, that the outcome varied, depending on the type of prostheses used, in both large femoral head MoM conventional hip replacement as well as resurfacing hip replacement.The relevance of the recent isolated case reports on systemic metal toxicity was also discussed at the ICOR meeting. Although systemic metal toxicity appears to be a rare occurrence, there is a need to undertake appropriately designed studies to define the true prevalence of this phenomenon. There may be advantages in nesting these studies within registries. The ICOR meeting highlighted the implications of the MoM experience for the orthopaedic industry, regulators, and surgeons.

Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data.

There is increasing interest in measuring patient-reported outcomes as part of routine medical practice, particularly in fields like total joint replacement surgery, where pain relief, satisfaction, function, and health-related quality of life, as perceived by the patient, are primary outcomes. We review some well-known outcome instruments, measurement issues, and early experiences with large-scale collection of patient-reported outcome measures in joint registries. The patient-reported outcome measures are reviewed in the context of multidimensional outcome assessment that includes the traditional clinical outcome parameters as well as disease-specific and general patient-reported outcome measures.

Sauvé-kapandji procedure for disorders of the distal radioulnar joint: A simplified technique*

A simplified technique of the Sauvé-Kapandji (SK) procedure for disorders of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is described. The DRUJ is transfixed by a screw but is not formally exposed and fused, the periosteum of the distal ulna is not excised, and the pronator quadratus is not advanced into the pseudarthrosis. Stability of the ulna shaft is obtained by suturing the sheath of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) and periosteum as a single layer firmly over the ulnar stump and pseudarthrosis. The operating time averages 20 minutes. Review of 28 wrists demonstrated relief of pain in 27; 80 degrees or greater of pronation and supination in 19 and 20, respectively; fusion of the DRUJ in 18; and ulnar carpal shift in 3. The main complications were related to screw placement and length and prominence of the ECU tendon. The simplified SK procedure reliably relieves pain and restores movement at the DRUJ.