Alba Ribera

High doses of daptomycin (10 mg/kg/d) plus rifampin for the treatment of staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection managed with implant retention: a comparative study.

We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of high doses of daptomycin (10 mg/kg/d) plus rifampin (D10 + R) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This was an observational retrospective multicenter study (2010-2012) including all patients with acute PJI by fluoroquinolone-resistant staphylococci managed with implant retention and D10 + R. Twenty cases were included: 2 (10%) were withdrawn due to toxicity, leaving 18 cases for efficacy evaluation: 13 (72%) women, age 79 years (range 58-90). Clinical failure was observed in 9 (50%) patients: in 5 cases, staphylococci were recovered (28% of microbiological failures); no modification of daptomycin-MIC was observed. These 18 cases were compared with 44 matched historical cases: failure rate was similar, but whereas in the historical series, failure occurred fundamentally during therapy, in the present series, it was recorded after discontinuation of antibiotics. In summary, D10 + R may be the initial treatment of choice for PJI by fluoroquinolone-resistant staphylococci managed with implant retention.

Short- versus long-duration levofloxacin plus rifampicin for acute staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection managed with implant retention: a randomised clinical trial.

Levofloxacin plus rifampicin (L+R) is the treatment of choice for acute staphylococcal prosthetic joint infection (PJI) managed with debridement and implant retention (DAIR). Long courses have been empirically recommended, but some studies have suggested that shorter treatments could be as effective. Our aim was to prove that a short treatment schedule was non-inferior to the standard long schedule. An open-label, multicentre, randomised clinical trial (RCT) was performed. Patients with an early post-surgical or haematogenous staphylococcal PJI, managed with DAIR and initiated on L+R were randomised to receive 8 weeks of treatment (short schedule) versus a long schedule (3 months or 6 months for hip or knee prostheses, respectively). The primary endpoint was cure rate. From 175 eligible patients, 63 were included (52% women; median age, 72 years): 33 patients (52%) received the long schedule and 30 (48%) received the short schedule. There were no differences between the two groups except for a higher rate of polymicrobial infection in the long-schedule group (27% vs. 7%; P = 0.031). Median follow-up was 540 days. In the intention-to-treat analysis, cure rates were 58% and 73% in patients receiving the long and short schedules, respectively (difference -15.7%, 95% CI -39.2% to 7.8%). Forty-four patients (70%) were evaluable per-protocol: cure rates were 95.0% and 91.7% for the long and short schedules, respectively (difference 3.3%, 95% CI -11.7% to 18.3%). This is the first RCT suggesting that 8 weeks of L+R could be non-inferior to longer standard treatments for acute staphylococcal PJI managed with DAIR.

Osteoarticular infection caused by MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the benefits of combination therapy with colistin plus β-lactams

OBJECTIVES In the era of emergence of MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, osteoarticular infections (OIs) add more difficulties to its treatment. The role of β-lactams (BLs) is questioned and older drugs need to be reconsidered. The objective of this study was to describe our experience in the management of OIs caused by MDR P. aeruginosa and evaluate different therapeutic options. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort (2004-13) of patients with OI caused by MDR P. aeruginosa. We created two groups: (i) Group A (more difficult to treat), prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and osteoarthritis (OA) managed with device retention; and (ii) Group B (less difficult to treat), OA managed without device retention. Antibiotic treatment was administered according to clinician criteria: monotherapy/combined therapy; and BL used by intermittent bolus (IB)/continuous infusion. RESULTS Of 34 patients, 15 (44.1%) had PJI and 19 (55.9%) had OA (8 related to an orthopaedic device). Twenty-three cases (68%) were caused by XDR P. aeruginosa. The initial management included removal of an orthopaedic device in 14 cases, together with antibiotic [alone, 19 (55.9%; 4 colistin, 14 BL-IB and 1 BL continuous infusion); and in combination, 15 (44.1%; 5 BL-IB and 10 BL continuous infusion)]. The overall cure rate was 50% (39% and 63% in Groups A and B, respectively), ranging from 31.6% with monotherapy to 73.3% with combined therapy (P = 0.016), with special interest within Group A (cure rate with combined therapy 71.4%, P = 0.049). After rescue therapy, which included removal of remaining devices, the cure rate reached 85.3%. CONCLUSIONS We suggest that the BL/colistin combination is an optimized therapy for OI caused by MDR P. aeruginosa, together with an appropriate surgical treatment.

Daptomycin combinations as alternative therapies in experimental foreign-body infection caused by meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Whilst levofloxacin (LVX) in combination with rifampicin (RIF) is considered the optimal treatment for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), no therapeutic alternatives have been accurately evaluated. Based on the high effectiveness of the combination of daptomycin (DAP) plus RIF against meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in this setting, in this study the efficacy of DAP+RIF and DAP+LVX combinations was tested as alternative therapies for foreign-body infections (FBIs) caused by MSSA. A tissue-cage infection model was performed using an MSSA strain. Male Wistar rats were treated for 7 days with LVX, DAP, RIF or the combinations LVX+RIF, DAP+RIF and DAP+LVX. Antibiotic efficacy was evaluated by bacterial counts from tissue cage fluid (TCF) and the cure rate was determined from adhered bacteria. Resistance was screened. Monotherapies were less effective than combinations (P<0.05), and resistance to DAP and RIF emerged. DAP+RIF (decrease in bacterial counts in TCF, -4.9logCFU/mL; cure rate, 92%) was the most effective therapy (P<0.05). There were no differences between LVX+RIF (-3.4logCFU/mL; 11%) and DAP+LVX (-3.3logCFU/mL; 47%). No resistant strains appeared with combined therapies. In conclusion, the combinations DAP+RIF and DAP+LVX showed good efficacy and prevented resistance. DAP+RIF provided higher efficacy than LVX+RIF. These DAP combinations were efficacious alternatives therapies for MSSA FBI. Further studies should confirm whether DAP+RIF may be useful as a first-line therapy in the setting of PJI caused by MSSA.

Measurement of ceftazidime concentration in human plasma by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Application to critically ill patients and patients with osteoarticular infections.

Ceftazidime is an antibiotic belonging to the third generation of the cephalosporin family. It is indicated in the treatment of serious, simple or mixed bacterial infections, and its administration in continuous or intermittent infusion allows optimization of the concentration of antibiotic to keep it above the minimum inhibitory concentration. We developed and validated a chromatographic method by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to measure ceftazidime concentration in human plasma. Following extraction with acetonitrile and 1,2-dichloroethane, the chromatographic separation was achieved using an Acquity ® UPLC ® BEH(TM) (2.1 × 100 mm i.d., 1.7 µm) reverse-phase C18 column, with a water-acetonitrile linear gradient containing 0.1% formic acid at a 0.4 mL/min flow rate. Ceftazidime and its internal standard (cefotaxime) were detected by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in positive ion multiple reaction monitoring mode using mass-to-charge transitions of 547.0 → 467.9/396.1 and 456.0 → 395.8/324.1, respectively. The limit of quantification was 0.58 mg/L and linearity was observed in the range 0.58-160 mg/L. Coefficients of variation and absolute relative biases were <9.8 and 8.4%. The mean recovery for ceftazidime was 74.4 ± 8.1%. Evaluation of the matrix effect showed ion enhancement, and no carry-over was observed. The validated method could be applied to daily clinical laboratory practice to measure the concentration of ceftazidime in plasma.

Comparative Efficacies of Cloxacillin-Daptomycin and the Standard Cloxacillin-Rifampin Therapies against an Experimental Foreign-Body Infection by Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

ABSTRACT We compared the efficacies of daptomycin (doses equivalent to 8 to 10 mg/kg of body weight/day in humans) and cloxacillin alone with those of cloxacillin-rifampin and cloxacillin-daptomycin combinations, using a tissue cage methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection model. Monotherapies were less effective than combinations (P < 0.05), and daptomycin resistance emerged. Cloxacillin-daptomycin proved as effective as cloxacillin-rifampin and prevented the appearance of resistance; this combination may be an alternative anti-MSSA therapy, which may offer greater benefits in the early treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJI).

Evaluation of linezolid or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in combination with rifampicin as alternative oral treatments based on an in vitro pharmacodynamic model of staphylococcal biofilm

Combinations of linezolid (LZD) or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) plus rifampicin (RIF) are alternative oral treatments for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) when fluoroquinolones are not possible to use, but there is limited evidence regarding their activity. This study evaluated the efficacy of LZD and SXT, alone and in combination with RIF, against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic biofilm model. Using the CDC Biofilm Reactor® system, simulated regimens of LZD (600 mg every 12 h), SXT (160/800 mg every 8 h) and levofloxacin (LVX) (750 mg/day), alone and in combination with RIF (600 mg/day), were evaluated against one methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and one methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strain. Antibiotic efficacy was evaluated by the decrease in planktonic bacterial counts from medium and biofilm-embedded bacteria from coupons over 56 h. Resistant strains were screened. In both strains, SXT alone was ineffective and LZD presented low activity, but no resistance emerged. Combinations with RIF significantly increased the antibiofilm efficacy against MSSA (Δlog CFU/mL 56h-0h: SXT + RIF, -2.9 and LZD + RIF, -3.1), but RIF-resistant strains appeared with SXT + RIF. Against MRSA, LZD + RIF (-3.1) protected against the emergence of resistance and was more effective than SXT + RIF (-0.6; P <0.05), in which RIF-resistant strains were again detected. LVX + RIF confirmed its high efficacy against biofilm-embedded bacteria, this being the most effective therapy (-5.1 against MSSA). The emergence of RIF-resistant strains with SXT + RIF poses serious concerns for its use in clinical practice. Interestingly, LZD + RIF appears to be an appropriate alternative for PJI caused by LVX-resistant S. aureus.

Non-intravenous, carbapenem-sparing antibiotics for the treatment of bacteremia due to ESBL or AMP-C β-lactamase: A propensity score study

Introduction Carbapenems are considered the treatment of choice for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) or Amp-C β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia. Data on the effectiveness of non-intravenous carbapenem-sparing antibiotic options are limited. Objective To compare the 30 day-mortality and clinical failures associated with the use of carbapenems vs an alternative non-intravenous antibiotic for the definitive treatment of ESBL/Amp-C positive Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia. Methods This is a 12-year retrospective study (2004 – 2015) including all patients with bacteremia due to ESBL/Amp-C-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Given the lack of randomization of the initial therapies, a propensity score for receiving carbapenems was calculated. Results There were 1115 patients with a first episode of bacteremia due to E. coli or K. pneumoniae, of which 123 were ESBL/Amp C-positive (11%). There were 101 eligible patients: 59 in the carbapenem group and 42 in the alternative treatment group (cotrimoxazole 59.5%, quinolones 21.4%). The most frequent sources of infection were urinary (63%) and biliary (15%). Compared to the carbapenem group, patients treated with the alternative regimen had a shorter hospital stay (median [IQR]: 7 days [5-10] vs 12 days [9-18], p<0,001). The use of an alternative non-IV treatment did not increase mortality (OR 27; 95% CI 0.05-1.61; p=.15). After controlling for confounding factors with the propensity score, the adjusted OR of carbapenem treatment was 4.95; 95% CI (0.9426.01, p=.059). Conclusion Alternative non-IV carbapenem-sparing antibiotics could have a role in the definitive treatment of ESBL/Amp-C-positive Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections, allowing a reduction in carbapenem use. The use of cotrimoxazole in this setting has shown favourable results. ESBL Extended-spectrum β-lactamase Amp-C Amp-C β-lactamase BL/BLIs β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations IV Intravenous TMP-SMX Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Some of the data contained in this article were presented at the 55th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) and at the 28th International Congress of Chemotherapy Meeting (ICC), San Diego, USA, 2015.

Analysis of mortality in a cohort of 650 cases of bacteremic osteoarticular infections

OBJECTIVES The mortality of patients with bacteremic osteoarticular infections (B-OAIs) is poorly understood. Whether certain types of OAIs carry higher mortality or interventions like surgical debridement can improve prognosis, are unclarified questions. METHODS Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of patients with B-OAIs treated at a teaching hospital in Barcelona (1985-2014), analyzing mortality (30-day case-fatality rate). B-OAIs were categorized as peripheral septic arthritis or other OAIs. Factors influencing mortality were analyzed using logistic regression models. The association of surgical debridement with mortality in patients with peripheral septic arthritis was evaluated with a multivariate logistic regression model and a propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS Among 650 cases of B-OAIs, mortality was 12.2% (41.8% of deaths within 7 days). Compared with other B-OAI, cases of peripheral septic arthritis were associated with higher mortality (18.6% vs 8.3%, p < 0.001). In a multiple logistic regression model, peripheral septic arthritis was an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.12; 95% CI: 1.22-3.69; p = 0.008). Cases with peripheral septic arthritis managed with surgical debridement had lower mortality than those managed without surgery (14.7% vs 33.3%; p = 0.003). Surgical debridement was associated with reduced mortality after adjusting for covariates (adjusted OR 0.23; 95% CI: 0.09-0.57; p = 0.002) and in the propensity score matching analysis (OR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.96; p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with B-OAIs, mortality was greater in those with peripheral septic arthritis. Surgical debridement was associated with decreased mortality in cases of peripheral septic arthritis.

Epidemiology of Prosthetic Joint Infection

While the risk of prosthetic infection in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty is low, the high frequency of these procedures translates these low risks into a substantial burden of infection. Prosthetic joint infections are a devastating complication and are associated with major patient morbidity and healthcare and societal costs. A better knowledge of the risk factors, microbial aetiology and pathogenesis of prosthetic joint infections may help to prevent these dreaded complications.