Albert L. Merati
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Albert L. Merati.
Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery | 2013
Ron B. Mitchell; Heather M. Hussey; Gavin Setzen; Ian N. Jacobs; Brian Nussenbaum; Cindy Dawson; Calvin A. Brown; Cheryl Brandt; Kathleen Deakins; Christopher J. Hartnick; Albert L. Merati
Objective This clinical consensus statement (CCS) aims to improve care for pediatric and adult patients with a tracheostomy tube. Approaches to tracheostomy care are currently inconsistent among clinicians and between different institutions. The goal is to reduce variations in practice when managing patients with a tracheostomy to minimize complications. Methods A formal literature search was conducted to identify evidence gaps and refine the scope of this consensus statement. The modified Delphi method was used to refine expert opinion and facilitate a consensus position. Panel members were asked to complete 2 scale-based surveys addressing different aspects of pediatric and adult tracheostomy care. Each survey was followed by a conference call during which results were presented and statements discussed. Results The panel achieved consensus on 77 statements; another 39 were dropped because of lack of consensus. Consensus was reached on statements that address initial tracheostomy tube change, management of emergencies and complications, prerequisites for decannulation, management of tube cuffs and communication devices, and specific patient and caregiver education needs. Conclusion The consensus panel agreed on statements that address the continuum of care, from initial tube management to complications in children and adults with a tracheostomy. The panel also highlighted areas where consensus could not be reached and where more research is needed. This consensus statement should be used by physicians, nurses, and other stakeholders caring for patients with a tracheostomy.
Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology | 2005
Albert L. Merati; Seckin O. Ulualp; Hyun J. Lim; Robert J. Toohill
We report a meta-analysis of a series of studies in which 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring was performed in 1) normal subjects, 2) the normal control subjects in studies of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), and 3) the patients with LPR in these controlled studies. The statistical analysis utilized the fixed-effects model by Mantel-Haenszel and the random-effects mixed model. There were 16 studies from the past 12 years that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They involved 793 subjects (264 normal and 529 with LPR). The numbers of positive pharyngeal reflux events for normal subjects and for patients with LPR differed with a p value of <.0001. There was also a significant difference in the mean percentage of acid exposure times between normal subjects and patients with LPR (p = .003). We conclude that the upper probe gives accurate and consistent information in normal subjects and patients with LPR. The numbers of reflux events and acid exposure times are most important in distinguishing normal subjects from patients with LPR. The technology and methodology of probe testing is quite reliable and is consistent on a worldwide basis.
Laryngoscope | 2009
Lucian Sulica; Clark A. Rosen; Gregory N. Postma; Blake Simpson; Milan R. Amin; Mark S. Courey; Albert L. Merati
To identify contemporary indications, treatment principles, technique, injection materials, complications, and success rates of vocal fold injection augmentation.
Laryngoscope | 2012
Stacey L. Halum; Jonathan Y. Ting; Emily K. Plowman; Peter C. Belafsky; Claude Franklin Harbarger; Gregory N. Postma; Michael Pitman; Donna Lamonica; Augustine Moscatello; Sid Khosla; Christy E. Cauley; Nicole Maronian; Sami Melki; Cameron C. Wick; John T. Sinacori; Zrria White; Ahmed Younes; Dale C. Ekbom; Maya G. Sardesai; Albert L. Merati
To define the prevalence of tracheotomy tube complications and evaluate risk factors (RFs) associated with their occurrence.
Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery | 2009
Andrew Blitzer; Roger L. Crumley; Seth H. Dailey; Charles N. Ford; Mary Kay Floeter; Allen D. Hillel; Henry T. Hoffmann; Christy L. Ludlow; Albert L. Merati; Michael C. Munin; Lawrence R. Robinson; Clark A. Rosen; Keith G. Saxon; Lucian Sulica; Susan L. Thibeault; Ingo R. Titze; Peak Woo; Gayle E. Woodson
The Neurolaryngology Study Group convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts in neuromuscular physiology, electromyography, physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, and laryngology to meet with interested members from the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, the Neurolaryngology Subcommittee and the Neurolaryngology Study Group to address the use of laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) for electrodiagnosis of laryngeal disorders. The panel addressed the use of LEMG for: 1) diagnosis of vocal fold paresis, 2) best practice application of equipment and techniques for LEMG, 3) estimation of time of injury and prediction of recovery of neural injuries, 4) diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases of the laryngeal muscles, and, 5) differentiation between central nervous system and behaviorally based laryngeal disorders. The panel also addressed establishing standardized techniques and methods for future assessment of LEMG sensitivity, specificity and reliability for identification, assessment and prognosis of neurolaryngeal disorders. Previously an evidence-based review of the clinical utility of LEMG published in 2004 only found evidence supported that LEMG was possibly useful for guiding injections of botulinum toxin into the laryngeal muscles. An updated traditional/narrative literature review and expert opinions were used to direct discussion and format conclusions. In current clinical practice, LEMG is a qualitative and not a quantitative examination. Specific recommendations were made to standardize electrode types, muscles to be sampled, sampling techniques, and reporting requirements. Prospective studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of LEMG. Use of the standardized methods and reporting will support future studies correlating electro-diagnostic findings with voice and upper airway function.
Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology | 2010
David O. Francis; Ernest A. Weymuller; Upendra Parvathaneni; Albert L. Merati; Bevan Yueh
Objectives Dysphagia-related sequelae are common after head and neck cancer treatment. Our aims were 1) to document overall and site-specific dysphagia, stricture, and pneumonia rates in a Medicare population, 2) to calculate treatment-specific rates and adjusted odds of developing these complications, and 3) to track changes in rates between 1992 and 1999. Methods Head and neck cancer patients between 1992 and 1999 were identified in combined Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry and Medicare databases. Multivariate analyses determined odds of dysphagia, stricture, and pneumonia based on modality. Results Of 8,002 patients, 40% of experienced dysphagia, 7% stricture, and 10% pneumonia within 3 years of treatment. In adjusted analyses, patients treated with chemoradiation had more than 2.5-times-greater odds of dysphagia than did those treated with surgery alone. Combined therapy was associated with increased odds of stricture (p < 0.05). The odds of pneumonia were increased in patients treated with radiation with or without chemotherapy. Temporally, the dysphagia rates increased 10% during this period (p < 0.05). Conclusions Sequelae of head and neck cancer treatment are common and differ by treatment regimen. Those treated with chemoradiation had higher odds of experiencing dysphagia and pneumonia, whereas patients treated with any combined therapy more commonly experienced stricture. These sequelae represent major sources of morbidity and mortality in this population.
Laryngoscope | 2002
Dean Richard Lindstrom; James R. Wallace; Todd A. Loehrl; Albert L. Merati; Robert J. Toohill
Objective To determine the outcome of Nissen fundoplication surgery for the treatment of patients with chronic extraesophageal manifestations of reflux (EER).
Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology | 2007
Nikki Johnston; Clive Wells; Joel H. Blumin; Robert J. Toohill; Albert L. Merati
Objectives: Previous data suggest a mechanistic link between exposure to pepsin and cellular changes that lead to laryngopharyngeal disorders. Initial confocal microscopy analysis of pepsin uptake by cultured hypopharyngeal epithelial cells revealed that pepsin may be taken up by a specific process. The objective of this study was to use electron microscopy to confirm the initial confocal findings and to determine whether uptake of pepsin by laryngeal epithelial cells is receptor-mediated. Methods: Cultured human hypopharyngeal FaDu cells and human laryngeal biopsy specimens, taken from the posterior larynx of “control” patients without symptoms or findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux, were exposed to purified human pepsin 3b with or without transferrin (a marker for receptor-mediated endocytosis) in vitro. Uptake of pepsin was documented by electron microscopy. Results: Pepsin co-localized with transferrin in intracellular vesicles; this finding confirms that pepsin is taken up by laryngeal epithelial cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis. Conclusions: This is a novel finding that further defines the role and mechanism of pepsin-mediated injury in laryngopharyngeal reflux. The objective of ongoing research is to identify the receptor and investigate potential antagonists as a new therapeutic option for patients with reflux-attributed disease — In particular, those patients who have persistent symptoms despite acid suppression therapy.
Laryngoscope | 2009
Clark A. Rosen; Milan R. Amin; Lucian Sulica; C. Blake Simpson; Albert L. Merati; Mark S. Courey; Michael M. Johns; Gregory N. Postma
No abtracts.
Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America | 2012
Stephanie Misono; Albert L. Merati
This article discusses the causes and symptoms, evaluation, and management of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP). Cross-sectional imaging is appropriate in the work-up of idiopathic UVFP, but the routine use of serology is not well supported. The usefulness of laryngeal electromyography has remained controversial. Predictors of poor prognosis for functionally meaningful recovery include fibrillation potentials, positive sharp waves, and absent/reduced voluntary motor unit potentials. Voice therapy may be helpful. Injection and laryngeal framework surgery (medialization thyroplasty) improve vocal quality. The vocal impact of laryngeal reinnervation is comparable with that of medialization. Some patients may benefit from multiple procedures.
Collaboration
Dive into the Albert L. Merati's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs