Alberto Cremonesi

Protected Carotid Stenting: Clinical Advantages and Complications of Embolic Protection Devices in 442 Consecutive Patients

Background and Purpose— Periprocedural embolization of debris during carotid stenting interventions may result in neurological deficit. This study was designed to evaluate in-hospital and 30-day adverse events in patients percutaneously treated for carotid artery disease with embolic protection devices. Methods— From 1999 to June 2002, a total of 442 consecutive patients underwent percutaneous angioplasty and/or stenting of the extracranial carotid artery. The endovascular procedure was conducted under embolic protection devices. Results— The percutaneous procedure was successful in 440 of 442 patients (99.5%). No periprocedural death occurred with any embolic protection device. All in-hospital stroke/death and 30-day ipsilateral stroke/death rate was 1.1%. The overall complication rate was 3.4%. Major adverse events included 1 major stroke (0.2%), 4 intracranial hemorrhages (0.9%), 1 carotid artery wall fissuration (0.2%), and 1 diffuse cardioembolism (0.2%). Minor adverse events included 4 minor strokes (0.9%) and 4 transient ischemic attacks (0.9%). The cerebral protection device–related complications were 4 (0.9%): 1 case of abrupt closure of the internal carotid artery because of spiral dissection (0.2%), 1 case of trapped guide wire (0.2%), and 2 cases of intimal dissection (0.5%). Transient loss of consciousness, tremors, and fasciculations were present in 6 of 40 patients (15%) in whom occlusive protection devices were used. Conclusions— Our data suggest that percutaneous stenting of the carotid artery when a cerebral protection device is used is feasible and effective but not without potential complications. However, a long learning curve may exist for the proper use of some embolic protection devices.

Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention: the Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) study.

AIMS Angiographic guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has substantial limitations. The superior spatial resolution of optical coherence tomography (OCT) could translate into meaningful clinical benefits. We aimed to compare angiographic guidance alone versus angiographic plus OCT guidance for PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients undergoing PCI with angiographic plus OCT guidance (OCT group) were compared with matched patients undergoing PCI with angiographic only guidance (Angio group) within 30 days. The primary endpoint was the one-year rate of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI). A total of 670 patients were included, 335 in the OCT group and 335 in the Angio group. OCT disclosed adverse features requiring further interventions in 34.7%. Unadjusted analyses showed that the OCT group had a significantly lower one-year risk of cardiac death (1.2% vs. 4.5%, p=0.010), cardiac death or MI (6.6% vs. 13.0%, p=0.006), and the composite of cardiac death, MI, or repeat revascularisation (9.6% vs. 14.8%, p=0.044). Angiographic plus OCT guidance was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiac death or MI even at extensive multivariable analysis adjusting for baseline and procedural differences between the groups (OR=0.49 [0.25-0.96], p=0.037) and at propensity-score adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS This observational study, the first ever formally to appraise OCT guidance for PCI decision-making, suggests that the use of OCT can improve clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PCI.

Long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents: two-year results of the REAL (REgistro AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia Romagna) multicenter registry.

Background— The long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) have been questioned recently. Methods and Results— Between July 2002 and June 2005, 10 629 patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention with either DES (n=3064) or bare-metal stents (BMS, n=7565) were enrolled in a prospective registry comprising 13 hospitals. We assessed the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, acute myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) and angiographic stent thrombosis during 2-year follow-up. A propensity score analysis to adjust for different baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics was performed. The 2-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 17.8% in the DES group and 21.0% in the BMS group (P=0.003 by log-rank test). Angiographic stent thrombosis was 1.0% in the DES group and 0.6% in the BMS group (P=0.09). After adjustment, the 2-year cumulative incidence of death was 6.8% in the DES group and 7.4% in the BMS group (P=0.35), whereas the rates were 5.3% in DES and 5.8% in BMS for acute myocardial infarction (P=0.46), 9.1% in DES and 12.9% in BMS for target-vessel revascularization (P<0.00001), and 16.9% in DES and 21.8% in BMS for major adverse cardiac events (P<0.0001). Independent predictors of target-vessel revascularization in the DES group were diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.76), renal failure (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.69), and reference vessel diameter (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.93). Conclusions— In this large real-world population, the beneficial effect of DES in reducing the need for new revascularization compared with BMS extends to 2 years without evidence of a worse safety profile.

A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing a Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Balloon With a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Small Coronary Vessels: The BELLO (Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization) Study

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) for the reduction of restenosis in small vessels. BACKGROUND DEB have been shown to be effective in the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis, but data are limited regarding their efficacy in de novo disease. METHODS BELLO (Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization) is a prospective, multicenter trial that randomized 182 patients with lesions located in small vessels (reference diameter <2.8 mm) to treatment with paclitaxel DEB and provisional bare-metal stenting (n = 90) or PES implantation (n = 92). The primary endpoint was noninferiority of angiographic in-stent (in-balloon) late loss with a delta of 0.25 mm. Secondary endpoints were angiographic restenosis, target lesion revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE; death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) at 6 months. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were well matched, except for a smaller vessel size in the DEB group (2.15 ± 0.27 mm vs. 2.25 ± 0.24 mm; p = 0.003). The majority (89%) of lesions involved vessels with a diameter <2.5 mm. Bailout stenting was required in 20% of lesions in the DEB group. The primary endpoint of in-stent (in-balloon) late loss was significantly less with DEB compared with PES (0.08 ± 0.38 mm vs. 0.29 ± 0.44 mm; difference -0.21; 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.09; p(noninferiority) < 0.001; p(superiority) = 0.001). At 6 months, DEB and PES were associated with similar rates of angiographic restenosis (10% vs. 14.6%; p = 0.35), [corrected] target lesion revascularization (4.4% vs. 7.6%; p = 0.37), and MACE (10% vs. 16.3%; p = 0.21). [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of small-vessel disease with a paclitaxel DEB was associated with less angiographic late loss and similar rates of restenosis and revascularization as a PES. (Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization [BELLO]; Study NCT01086579).

Carotid Artery Stenting First Consensus Document of the ICCS-SPREAD Joint Committee

Background and Purpose— The prevention of stroke and the correct treatment of carotid artery stenosis represent today a major debate in cardiovascular medicine. Beside carotid endarterectomy, carotid angioplasty and stenting is becoming more widely performed for the treatment of severe carotid obstructive disease, and is now accepted as a less invasive technique that may provide an alternative for selected patients, particularly those with significant comorbidities. An Italian multidisciplinary task force, in which converged the most representative scientific societies involved in carotid treatment, was created to provide neurologists, radiologist, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, and all those involved in prevention and treatment of carotid disease with a simple, clear and updated evidence-based consensus document. Summary of Review— This First Consensus Document of the ICCS (Italian Consensus Carotid Stenting)/SPREAD group addressed the main issues related to methodology, definition of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, indication and procedures for carotid artery stenting, including the use of devices for preventing procedural embolic complications. Special attention was paid to credentials and competency for physicians qualifications to perform vascular angioplasty and stent placement, including training, acceptable complication rates and certification. Conclusions— As any guideline or consensus statement, also this document is valid as long as the evidence on which it is based remains up-to-date. In such a fast-evolving field of medicine as the management of carotid stenosis, it is mandatory to stimulate a continuous and fruitful discussion among all the professionals involved in this very evolutionary field.

Safety and effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA® proximal cerebral protection device during carotid artery stenting: Results from the ARMOUR pivotal trial

Objective: The multicenter ARMOUR (ProximAl PRotection with the MO.MA Device DUring CaRotid Stenting) trial evaluated the 30‐day safety and effectiveness of the MO.MA® Proximal Cerebral Protection Device (Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy) utilized to treat high surgical risk patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). Background: Distal embolic protection devices (EPD) have been traditionally utilized during CAS. The MO.MA device acts as a balloon occlusion “endovascular clamping” system to achieve cerebral protection prior to crossing the carotid stenosis. Methods: This prospective registry enrolled 262 subjects, 37 roll‐in and 225 pivotal subjects evaluated with intention to treat (ITT) from September 2007 to February 2009. Subjects underwent CAS using the MO.MA device. The primary endpoint, myocardial infarction, stroke, or death through 30 days (30‐day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]) was compared to a performance goal of 13% derived from trials utilizing distal EPD. Results: For the ITT population, the mean age was 74.7 years with 66.7% of the cohort being male. Symptomatic patients comprised 15.1% and 28.9% were octogenarians. Device success was 98.2% and procedural success was 93.2%. The 30‐day MACCE rate was 2.7% [95% CI (1.0–5.8%)] with a 30‐day major stroke rate of 0.9%. No symptomatic patient suffered a stroke during this trial. Conclusions: The ARMOUR trial demonstrated that the MO.MA® Proximal Cerebral Protection Device is safe and effective for high surgical risk patients undergoing CAS. The absence of stroke in symptomatic patients is the lowest rate reported in any independently adjudicated prospective multicenter registry trial to date.

Proximal endovascular flow blockage for cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: results from a prospective multicenter registry.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting (CAS) using the Mo.Ma device, which prevents cerebral embolization by proximal endovascular blockage of blood flow in the internal and external carotid arteries. Methods: In 14 European centers, 157 patients (121 men; mean age 68.0±8.3 years) were enrolled in a prospective registry between March 2002 and March 2003. Eligible patients had a symptomatic (>50%) or asymptomatic (>70%) stenosis of the internal carotid artery suitable for carotid stenting. Protected carotid stenting was performed with the Mo.Ma system, which occludes both the common and external carotid arteries via 2 independently inflatable compliant low-pressure balloons before any device is advanced across the lesion. Blood is aspirated through the catheter intermittently or at the end of the procedure. Results: The device was successfully positioned and stents were implanted in all cases. Diameter stenosis was reduced from 84.1%±7.8% to 6.7%±5.1%. The mean duration of flow blockage was 7.6±5.9 minutes. In 12 (7.6%) patients, transient intolerance to flow blockade was observed, but the procedures were completed successfully. In 124 (79.6%) cases, there was macroscopic evidence of debris after filtering the aspirated blood. In-hospital complications included 4 (2.5%) minor strokes, 8 (5.1%) transient ischemic attacks, no deaths, and no major strokes, resulting in a 2.5% death/stroke rate at discharge. At 30-day follow-up, there was 1 cardiac death, 1 major stroke, and 3 minor strokes, for an overall 5.7% 30-day death/stroke rate and a 30-day major stroke and death rate of 1.3%. Conclusions: Cerebral protection with proximal endovascular blood flow blockage during CAS is feasible, with a high procedural success rate.

Clinical Evaluation of a Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: 12-Month Results From a Multicenter Italian Registry

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the use of a paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) for treatment of femoropopliteal arterial disease. BACKGROUND Conventional balloon angioplasty and stenting in this setting is associated with high restenosis rates within 12 months. Recent data suggest that PEB use may reduce restenosis. Twelve-month outcomes following PEB use with provisional stenting are described. METHODS This prospective registry enrolled patients (Rutherford class 2 to 4) with reference vessel diameter of 3 to 7 mm and lesion/occlusion length ≤ 15 cm. Endpoints included primary patency rate, target lesion revascularization, and changes in Rutherford class and ankle-brachial index. Walking capacity, absolute claudication distance, and quality of life were also assessed. RESULTS The registry enrolled 105 patients. Baseline ankle-brachial index was 0.56 ± 0.15. Baseline Rutherford classification was class 2 or 3 for most patients (91.5%). Most lesions were located in the superficial femoral artery (77.1%). Mean lesion length was 76.3 ± 38.3 mm; 29.8% of lesions were total occlusions. The device was successfully used in all patients and only 12.3% of lesions required stenting. At 12-month follow-up, 92 of 105 patients (87.6%) were evaluable; the primary patency rate was 83.7%; the target lesion revascularization rate was 7.6%; 85.6% of patients were Rutherford class 0 or 1; and mean ankle-brachial index was 0.86 ± 0.15. Quality of life and absolute claudication distance showed significant improvement from baseline to 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS PEB treatment of femoropopliteal arterial disease resulted in consistent clinical improvement across multiple endpoints with a low rate of stenting and target lesion revascularization.

Is carotid artery stenting in octogenarians really dangerous

Purpose: To evaluate (1) whether carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed in octogenarians increases the procedure-related risk and (2) the incidence of complex anatomy of the aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels in patients >80 years old, which can increase the technical difficulty of CAS. Methods: Between December 2000 and September 2005, 1053 patients (903 men; mean age 72±2.2 years, range 46–90) underwent 1222 CAS procedures in 2 centers for de novo (n=1192) and restenotic (n=30) lesions (139 staged bilateral procedures). Indications for treatment were the presence of a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis ≥70% (n=798, 65.3%) or an asymptomatic stenosis of at least 80%. The patients were separated into 2 age categories: under 80 (n=1078 procedures, 88.2%) and 80 or older (n=144 procedures, 11.8%) for this analysis. Data analysis included death and stroke rate at discharge and at 30 days. Anatomical characteristics evaluated were aortic arch elongation, arch and supra-aortic vessel calcification and tortuosity, anatomical tortuosity of the lesion, and carotid plaque composition. Results: Three lesions in octogenarians could not be treated because of failure to access the vessel in 1 case and extremely tortuous arteries in 2. The overall death and stroke rate at 30 days was 2.12% in the older group (2 fatal strokes, 1 minor stroke) and 1.11% in the younger group (3 deaths, 3 major strokes, 6 minor strokes); the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.40). Significantly higher frequencies of tortuosity and calcification of the arch and supra-aortic vessels and of type III aortic arch were observed in the older group (p<0.001). Conclusion: In our experience, CAS has proven to be safe and effective in elderly patients. Different age-related anatomical features can represent an adjunctive technical challenge, but these difficulties can be successfully managed without increased perioperative risk if CAS is performed in high-volume centers by highly skilled operators.

Impact of cerebral protection devices on early outcome of carotid stenting.

PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of cerebral protection devices on the procedural safety and outcome of carotid stent procedures. METHODS From June 1997 to July 2001, 275 consecutive patients (208 men; mean age 71 +/- 7.4 years) underwent percutaneous angioplasty and/or stenting of the extracranial carotid artery. In the first 125 (45.4%) patients, the procedures were performed without cerebral protection. After January 2000, protection devices were routinely used (150 [54.6%] patients), including the Angioguard filter, GuardWire occlusion system, TRAP Vascular Filtration System, EPI Filter Wire, NeuroShield, Parodi Anti-Embolism System, and Medicorp occlusive balloon. RESULTS The percutaneous procedures were effective in 273 (99.3%) patients. No death or major stroke occurred in either group. In the unprotected group, 5 (4.0%) complications occurred: 3 (2.4%) minor strokes, 1 (0.8%) transient ischemic attack (TIA), and 1 (0.8%) subarachnoid hemorrhage. In the patients treated under cerebral protection, there were 2 (1.3%) complications: 1 (0.7%) minor stroke and 1 (0.7%) subarachnoid hemorrhage. There were 4 (3.2%) periprocedural embolic complications in the unprotected group versus 1 (0.7%) in the protected patients. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that percutaneous dilation and stenting of the carotid arteries protected by cerebral protection devices is feasible and effective. In a consecutive series, the use of the cerebral protection systems reduced the acute neurological event rate related to embolic complications by 79%.