Alberto Rancati

One-step breast reconstruction with polyurethane-covered implants after skin-sparing mastectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and immediate one-step breast reconstruction with implants has become an increasingly popular, effective treatment for selected patients with breast carcinoma. However, it is associated with high complication rates. Breast augmentation with polyurethane-covered implants (PCIs) has consistently had optimal short-term and long-term results with low rates of capsular contracture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and aesthetic outcomes of immediate one-step breast reconstruction with PCI after SSM in early breast cancer patients at a single institution. METHODS We reviewed the records of 221 consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent one-stage immediate reconstruction with PCI after SSM from 1995 through 2005. Patient and tumour characteristics, type of reconstruction, postoperative complications, aesthetic results and recurrence rate were analysed. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 52±11 years (range, 30-76; standard deviation (SD), 11). The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathologic stages were 0 (10%), I (63.3%) and II (26.7%). Thirty-nine (17.65%; confidence interval (CI)=13.04-23.1) of the 221 patients had complications; seven had prosthesis extrusion requiring an implant (five due to skin necrosis, one due to infection and one due to late haematoma). In six of these seven cases, the procedure was indicated for local recurrence after conservative breast surgery with adjunctive radiation therapy (rescue procedure). Thirty-two (14.4%) patients had minor complications: 12 had cutaneous rash, four had malpositioned implants and 16 had inadequate implant projection. At long-term follow-up, four (1.8%) patients had developed grade IV capsular contracture associated with postoperative radiation therapy. At a median follow-up of 98 months (range, 36-156), 14 (6.3%) patients had tumour recurrence and 12.2% had distant metastasis. Nineteen patients had died of cancer, and 192 (86.8%) remained disease free. CONCLUSION One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with PCI after SSM appears to be oncologically safe and provides a high level of patient satisfaction.

Propeller thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND The thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap has been described for breast reconstruction. This flap requires intramuscular dissection of the pedicle. A modification of the conventional TDAP surgical technique for breast reconstruction is described, utilizing instead a propeller TDAP flap. The authors present their clinical experience with the propeller TDAP flap in breast reconstruction alone or in combination with expanders or permanent implants. METHODS From January 2009 to February 2013, sixteen patients had breast reconstruction utilizing a propeller TDAP flap. Retrospective analysis of patient characteristics, clinical indications, procedure and outcomes were performed. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 48 months. RESULTS Sixteen patients had breast reconstruction using a TDAP flap with or without simultaneous insertion of an expander or implant. All flaps survived, while two cases required minimal resection due to distal flap necrosis, healing by second intention. There were not donor-site seromas, while minimal wound dehiscence was detected in two cases. CONCLUSIONS The propeller TDAP flap appears to be safe and effective for breast reconstruction, resulting in minimal donor site morbidity. The use of this propeller flap emerges as a true alternative to the traditional TDAP flap.

Oncoplastic options in breast conservative surgery

Conservative surgery has become the primary alternative in the treatment of breast cancer, and cosmetic outcome fundamental goal, as well as oncologic control. Different options to achieve these goals are presented. Oncoplastic treatment of breast cancer needs planning and knowledge of well-established plastic surgery techniques.

Oncoplastic surgery in the treatment of breast cancer

Advances in reconstructive breast surgery with new materials and techniques now allow us to offer our patients the best possible cosmetic results without the risks associated with oncological control of the disease. These advances, in both oncological and plastic surgery, have led to a new specialisation, namely oncoplastic breast surgery, which enables us to undertake large resections and, with advance planning, to prevent subsequent deformities. This is particularly important when more than 30% of the breast volume is removed, as it allows us to obtain precise information for conservative surgery according to the site of the lesion, and also allows us to set the boundary between conservative surgery and mastectomy. Given the existence of new alloplastic materials and new reconstructive techniques, it is essential for our patients that surgeons involved in breast cancer treatment are trained in both the oncological as well as the reconstructive and aesthetic fields, to enable them to provide the best loco-regional treatment with the best cosmetic results.

How to prevent complications in breast augmentation

No high-level evidences about the best technique or the best implant to use for obtaining the best outcomes in aesthetic breast augmentation, with low complications and re-interventions rates exist from available literature. In this paper we present the actual best evidence about the etiopathogenesis of main complications in aesthetic breast augmentation, identifying some basic rules to follow in order to reduce complication rates in our daily activity, minimizing re-interventions, obtaining long lasting results and high womens satisfaction levels.

Stacked Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction.

Summary: The thoracodorsal artery perforator flap is reliable and safe for breast reconstruction, but stacking bilateral thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps for unilateral reconstruction to achieve greater volumes has not been reported. To create a stacked thoracodorsal artery perforator flap, the ipsilateral flap is transferred as an island, and the contralateral flap is transferred as a microvascular free flap. In this article, the authors present their 8-year 14- patient experience with stacked thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Patients’ ages ranged from 33 to 72 years (mean, 52.6 years). Mean follow-up time was 48.1 months (range, 1 to 98 months). Flaps measured between 22 × 6 cm and 32 × 8 cm and weighed between 110 and 550 g. Two of the island flaps had steatofibrosis of the distal 3 cm, which was resected and closed directly. The rest of the island flaps and all 14 free flaps healed uneventfully. At the time of follow-up, all flaps appeared healthy, and the reconstructed breast had a similar appearance and volume as the contralateral side. The donor areas had almost no functional deficit, and the final scar was aesthetically acceptable, especially when the ascending oblique design was used. This represents the first description of stacked thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. This novel addition to the reconstructive surgeon’s selection of methods is a safe and reliable option for large-volume unilateral breast reconstruction. It allows for symmetry without requiring prostheses or reduction of the contralateral side.

Preoperative digital mammography imaging in conservative mastectomy and immediate reconstruction

BACKGROUND Digital mammography clearly distinguishes gland tissue density from the overlying non-glandular breast tissue coverage, which corresponds to the existing tissue between the skin and the Coopers ligaments surrounding the gland (i.e., dermis and subcutaneous fat). Preoperative digital imaging can determine the thickness of this breast tissue coverage, thus facilitating planning of the most adequate surgical techniques and reconstructive procedures for each case. METHODS This study aimed to describe the results of a retrospective study of 352 digital mammograms in 176 patients with different breast volumes who underwent preoperative conservative mastectomies. The breast tissue coverage thickness and its relationship with the breast volume were evaluated. RESULTS The breast tissue coverage thickness ranged from 0.233 to 4.423 cm, with a mean value of 1.952 cm. A comparison of tissue coverage and breast volume revealed a non-direct relationship between these factors. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative planning should not depend only on breast volume. Flap evaluations based on preoperative imaging measurements might be helpful when planning a conservative mastectomy. Accordingly, we propose a breast tissue coverage classification (BTCC).

Skin-sparing mastectomy

The surgical treatment of breast cancer has evolved rapidly in recent decades. Conservative treatment was adopted in the late 1970s, with rates above 70%, and this was followed by a period during which the indications for surgical intervention were expanded to those patients at high risk for BRCA1, BRCA2 mutations, and also due to new staging standards and use of nuclear magnetic resonance. This increase in the indications for mastectomy coincided with the availability of immediate breast reconstruction as an oncologically safe and important surgical procedure for prevention of sequelae. Immediate reconstruction was first aimed at correcting the consequences of treatment, and almost immediately, the challenge of the technique became the achievement of a satisfactory breast appearance and shape, as well as normal consistency. The skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) in conservation first and nipple-areola complex (NAC) later was a result of this shift that occurred from the early 1990s to the present. The objective of this review is to present all these developments specifically in relation to SSM and analyze our personal experience as well as the experience of surgeons worldwide with an emphasis on the fundamental aspects, indications, surgical technique, complications, oncological safety, and cosmetic results of this procedure.

Management of the Ischemic Nipple-Areola Complex After Breast Reduction.

Early and accurate diagnosis and treatment of nipple-areolar complex (NAC) ischemia and necrosis are fundamental to the practice of breast surgery. Knowledge of breast anatomy, risk factors, and proper technique is not sufficient for avoiding this complication in all cases. Management of this situation is dynamic; it depends on the time of detection, and knowledge of different surgical maneuvers for NAC reperfusion. Management of this complication will continue to improve with technologic advances and research.

Nipple-Areolar Complex Ischemia: Management During Aesthetic Mammoplasties

Partial or total nipple necrosis after aesthetic mammoplasty surgery can occur. Continuous nipple-areolar complex (NAC) checking and early identification of vascular compromise, followed by appropriate action, may help prevent total NAC loss. The authors describe the vascular anatomy of the breast, associated risk factors, preoperative information, vitality of the NAC during closure, NAC ischemia, intraoperative NAC perfusion evaluation, intraoperative NAC reperfusion and maneuvers, free NAC graft indications, when should a NAC free graft be considered, complications of free nipple grafting, postoperative care, wound care for NAC necrosis, protocol for sequelae treatment, can we predict NAC viability, and ICG intraoperative procedure.