Albertus N. van Geel

Isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor and melphalan for limb salvage in 186 patients with locally advanced soft tissue extremity sarcomas: The cumulative multicenter European experience

OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to achieve limb salvage in patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas that can only be treated by amputation or functionally mutilating surgery by performing an isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) + melphalan (M) as induction biochemotherapy to obtain local control and make limb-sparing surgery possible. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA To increase the number of limb-sparing resections in the treatment of locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma, preoperative radiation therapy or chemotherapy or a combination of the two often are applied. The ILP with cytostatic agents alone is another option but rarely is used because of rather poor results. The efficacy of the application of TNF in ILP markedly has changed this situation. METHODS In 8 cancer centers, 186 patients were treated over a period of almost 4.5 years. There were 107 (57%) primary and 79 (43%) recurrent sarcomas, mostly high grade (110 grade III; 51 grade II; and 25 very large, recurrent, or multiple grade I sarcomas). The composition of this series of patients is unusual: 42 patients (23%) had multifocal primary or multiple recurrent tumors; median tumor size was very large (16 cm); 25 patients (13%) had known systemic metastases at the time of the ILP. Patients underwent a 90-minute ILP at 39 to 40 C with TNF + melphalan. The first 55 patients also received interferon-tau. A delayed marginal resection of the tumor remnant was done 2 to 4 months after ILP. RESULTS A major tumor response was seen in 82% of the patients rendering these large sarcomas resectable in most cases. Clinical response rates were: 33 complete response (CR) (18%), 106 partial response (PR) (57%), 42 no change (NC) (22%), and 5 progressive disease (PD) (3%). Final outcome was defined by clinical and pathologic response: 54 CR (29%), 99 PR (53%), 29 NC (16%), and 4 PD (2%). At a median follow-up of almost 2 years (22 months; range, 6-58 months), limb salvage was achieved in 82%. Regional toxicity was limited and systemic toxicity minimal to moderate, easily managed, with no toxic deaths. CONCLUSIONS In the setting of isolated limb perfusion, TNF is an active anticancer drug in patients. The ILP with TNF + melphalan can be performed safely in many centers and is an effective induction treatment with a high response rate that can achieve limb salvage in patients with locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

Outcome and prognostic factor analysis of 217 consecutive isolated limb perfusions with tumor necrosis factor‐α and melphalan for limb‐threatening soft tissue sarcoma

Extensive and mutilating surgery is often required for locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the limb. As it has become apparent that amputation for STS does not improve survival rates, the interest in limb‐preserving approaches has increased. Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF) and melphalan is successful in providing local tumor control and enables limb‐preserving surgery in a majority of cases. A mature, large, single‐institution experience with 217 consecutive ILPs for STS of the extremity is reported.

One hundred consecutive isolated limb perfusions with TNF-alpha and melphalan in melanoma patients with multiple in-transit metastases

Objective:The aim of this study is to describe the experience with 100 TNF-based ILP for locally advanced melanoma and to determine prognostic factors for response, time to local progression, and survival. Methods:One hundred TNF-based ILPs were performed between 1991 and 2003 in 87 patients for whom local control by surgery of in-transit melanoma metastases was impossible. In total, 62 iliac, 33 femoral, and 5 axillary ILPs were performed in mild hyperthermic conditions with 2 to 4 mg of TNF and 10 to 13 mg of melphalan per liter of limb volume. Results:Overall response was 95%, with 69% complete response, 26% partial response, and 5% no change. Complete response rate differed significantly for patients with IIIA disease versus IIIAB and IV. Local and systemic toxicity was mild to moderate in almost all cases, with no treatment-related death and one treatment-related amputation. Five-year overall survival was 32%; local progression occurred in 55% after a median of 16 months. In complete response patients, 5-year survival was 42% with local progression in 52% at a median of 22 months. Response rate and survival were significantly influenced by stage of disease; (local progression free) survival was influenced by response rate. Conclusions:TNF-based ILP results in excellent response rates in this patient population with unfavorable characteristics. Response on ILP predicts outcome in patients and reflects aggressiveness of the tumor.

The palliative value of tumor necrosis factor α-based isolated limb perfusion in patients with metastatic sarcoma and melanoma

Both patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and patients with melanoma have limited treatment possibilities once the tumor has metastasized systemically. In patients with extremity STS or bulky melanoma in‐transit metastases, the local tumor burden may be so problematic that, even in patients with systemically metastasized disease, an amputation may be inevitable. Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) has proven to be an excellent, local, limb‐saving treatment option in patients with locally advanced extremity tumors. In this study, the authors investigated the palliative value of the ILP procedure to avoid amputation in patients who had Stage IV STS and melanoma.

Long-Term Results of Tumor Necrosis Factor α– and Melphalan-Based Isolated Limb Perfusion in Locally Advanced Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas

PURPOSE Because there is no survival benefit of amputation for extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), limb-sparing surgery has become the gold standard. Tumor size reduction by induction therapy to render nonresectable tumors resectable or facilitate function-preserving surgery can be achieved by tumor necrosis factor α (TNF) -based and melphalan-based isolated limb perfusion (TM-ILP). This study reports the long-term results of 231 TM-ILPs for locally advanced extremity STS. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed 231 TM-ILPs in 208 consecutive patients (1991 to 2005), who were all candidates for functional or anatomic amputation for locally advanced extremity STS. All patients had a potential follow-up of up to 5 years. TM-ILP was performed under mild hyperthermic conditions with 1 to 4 mg of TNF and 10 to 13 mg/L of limb-volume melphalan. Almost all patients (85%) had intermediate- or high-grade tumors. RESULTS The overall response rate (ORR) was 71% (complete response, 18%; partial response, 53%). Multifocal sarcomas had a significantly better ORR of 83% (P = .008). The local recurrence rate was 30% (n = 70); local recurrence rates were highest for multifocal tumors (54%; P = .001) and after previous radiotherapy (54%; P < .001). Five-year overall survival rate was 42%. Survival was poorest in patients with large tumors (P = .01) and with leiomyosarcomas (P < .001). Limb salvage rate was 81%. CONCLUSION We demonstrated that TM-ILP results in a limb salvage rate of 81% in patients with locally advanced extremity STS who would otherwise have undergone amputation. Whenever an amputation is deemed necessary to obtain local control of an extremity STS, TM-ILP should be considered.

Fifty tumor necrosis factor-based isolated limb perfusions for limb salvage in patients older than 75 years with limb-threatening soft tissue sarcomas and other extremity tumors

Background: Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and melphalan is highly effective in treating limb-threatening soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and other bulky tumors. Because of fear of TNF-associated toxicity, ILP with TNF is not offered to older patients in some cancer centers, although especially in older patients, every attempt to avoid an amputation that may end their independence must be considered. Methods: Out of 306 TNF-based ILPs, 50 ILPs were performed for limb salvage in 43 patients >75 years old (range, 75–91 years): 29 STS and 14 melanoma patients. Results: In the STS patients, a response rate of 76% and a limb-salvage rate of 76% were achieved; in the melanoma patients, a 100% response rate and a 93% limb-salvage rate were achieved. Local toxicity was mild. The three postoperative deaths that occurred in the total series of 306 TNF-based ILPs in Rotterdam (&<1%) occurred in patients >75 years old after leakage-free perfusions and were not related to TNF but to extremely high-risk profiles in these three patients. Conclusions: Older patients should not be withheld a TNF-based ILP for limb salvage, because the procedure is safe and highly effective in these patients.Background: Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and melphalan is highly effective in treating limb-threatening soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and other bulky tumors. Because of fear of TNF-associated toxicity, ILP with TNF is not offered to older patients in some cancer centers, although especially in older patients, every attempt to avoid an amputation that may end their independence must be considered.Methods: Out of 306 TNF-based ILPs, 50 ILPs were performed for limb salvage in 43 patients >75 years old (range, 75–91 years): 29 STS and 14 melanoma patients.Results: In the STS patients, a response rate of 76% and a limb-salvage rate of 76% were achieved; in the melanoma patients, a 100% response rate and a 93% limb-salvage rate were achieved. Local toxicity was mild. The three postoperative deaths that occurred in the total series of 306 TNF-based ILPs in Rotterdam (&<1%) occurred in patients >75 years old after leakage-free perfusions and were not related to TNF but to extremely high-risk profiles in these three patients.Conclusions: Older patients should not be withheld a TNF-based ILP for limb salvage, because the procedure is safe and highly effective in these patients.

Local and intralesional therapy of in-transit melanoma metastases.

Regional relapse of melanoma may occur as satellite or in‐transit metastases proximal to the primary tumor in the direction of the lymph flow. The management of in‐transit metastases is challenging because the efficacy of treatment is largely dictated by the biological behavior of the patients melanoma. This review examines local treatment modalities. J. Surg. Oncol. 2011; 104:391–396.

Efficacy of Repeat Isolated Limb Perfusions With Tumor Necrosis Factor α and Melphalan for Multiple In-Transit Metastases in Patients with Prior Isolated Limb Perfusion Failure

BackgroundIsolated limb perfusion (ILP) is an effective treatment modality for multiple in-transit melanoma metastases confined to the limb. Recurrences after ILP, however, occur in approximately 50% of patients and are a challenge for further treatment. The efficacy of repeat ILPs to prolong local control in this patient category is evaluated in this article.MethodsWe used a prospective database in a tertiary referral center. Out of 100 tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-based ILPs with TNF and melphalan (TM-ILPs) in melanoma patients between March 1991 and July 2003, 25 repeat ILP procedures were performed in 21 patients in whom prior ILP treatment failed. All patients had bulky and/or numerous lesions and were treated with mild hyperthermic TM-ILP by using 2 to 4 mg of TNF and 10 to 13 mg/L of limb volume for the leg and arm, respectively.ResultsThe complete response rate was 76%, a partial response occurred in 20%, and no change was recorded in 4%. There was no difference in the complete response rate or local toxicity between first and repeat perfusions. Local recurrence occurred in 72%; the median time to local progression was 14 months. The 5-year survival rate was 47%, which compares favorably with known survival rates of stage IIIA/AB patients. The median follow-up of the patients was 26 months.ConclusionsPatients who experience treatment failure after previous ILP treatment respond very well to repeat perfusion, and prolonged local control can thus be obtained. The subgroup of patients qualifying for repeat ILP represents a relatively favorable biological behavior of the melanoma.

Isolated Limb Perfusion With Tumor Necrosis Factor and Melphalan Prevents Amputation in Patients With Multiple Sarcomas in Arm or Leg

BackgroundTreatment for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has shifted in recent years from amputation to local wide excision combined with irradiation. For multiple sarcomas, this limb-sparing approach is often not possible. To avoid amputations, isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumor necrosis factor and melphalan is an attractive treatment option for patients with multiple extremity sarcomas.MethodsWe investigated a prospective database at a tertiary referral institute. From July 1991 to July 2003, out of 217 ILPs, 64 ILPs were performed for either multifocal primary sarcomas or multiple sarcoma recurrences in 53 patients. All ILPs were performed under mild hyperthermic conditions by using 1 to 4 mg of tumor necrosis factor and 10 to 13 mg/L of limb volume for leg and arm perfusions, respectively.ResultsThe overall response was 88%, with 42% complete response, 45% partial response, 11% no change, and 2% progressive disease. This response rate is significantly better than our experience in 153 locally advanced single-STS cases (88% vs. 69%). The toxicity of the procedure was mild to moderate in almost all cases; no treatment-related amputation had to be performed. The time to local recurrence was 29 months and differed significantly between multiple primary and multiple recurrent STS. The 5-year survival rate was 39%. Limb salvage was achieved in 45 (82%) of 55 treated limbs.ConclusionsIn a group of patients who are uniformly candidates for amputation, ILP can achieve limb salvage in approximately four out of five patients. Because this treatment option provides excellent local control, it should be considered before an amputation is planned.

Isolated Limb Perfusion with TNF-α and Melphalan in Locally Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities

Limb-sparing surgery has become all the more important in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities since we learned that amputation does not improve survival of these patients. In bulky tumours, however, preoperative strategies to reduce tumour size are then required. Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) has been developed as a biochemotherapeutic therapy to act both on the tumour-associated vasculature and on the tumour itself. It has shown to be a very potent treatment modality, as in early reports response rates were around 80%. Limb salvage could then be achieved in a quite similar percentage. Many confirmatory studies have been performed since, with consistent results even in patients with multiple tumours, after extensive radiotherapy or with metastatic disease, all at the cost of very limited toxicity. This chapter gives an overview of the ILP studies performed in patients with soft tissue limb sarcoma, discusses the mechanism of TNF-mediated vasculotoxic effects on tumour vasculature, and places TNF-based ILP in the multimodality treatment of these patients with extensive STS of the extremities.