Alejandra Martinez

Molecular Determination of Mycobacterium leprae Viability by Use of Real-Time PCR

ABSTRACT Mycobacterium leprae, the etiological agent of leprosy, is noncultivable on axenic media. Therefore, the viability of M. leprae for clinical or experimental applications is often unknown. To provide new tools for M. leprae viability determination, two quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) assays were developed and characterized. M. leprae sodA mRNA and 16S rRNA were used as RNA targets, and M. leprae repetitive element (RLEP) DNA was used to determine relative bacterial numbers in the same purified bacterial preparations or from crude biological specimens. Results demonstrated that both assays were good predictors of M. leprae viability during short-term experiments (48 h) involving rifampin (rifampicin) treatment in axenic medium, within rifampin-treated murine macrophages (MΦ), or within immune-activated MΦ. Moreover, these results strongly correlated those of other M. leprae viability assays, including radiorespirometry-based and Live/Dead BacLight viability assays. The 16S rRNA/RLEP assay consistently identified the presence of M. leprae in eight multibacillary leprosy patient biopsy specimens prior to multidrug therapy (MDT) and demonstrated a decline in viability during the course of MDT. In contrast, the sodA/RLEP assay was able to detect the presence of M. leprae in only 25% of pretreatment biopsy specimens. In conclusion, new tools for M. leprae viability determination were developed. The 16S rRNA/RLEP RT-PCR M. leprae viability assay should be useful both for short-term experimental purposes and for predicting M. leprae viability in biopsy specimens to monitor treatment efficacy, whereas the sodA/RLEP RT-PCR M. leprae viability assay should be limited to short-term experimental research purposes.

Role of Interleukin 6 in Innate Immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection

BACKGROUND Mycobacterium tuberculosis can grow in the hostile intracellular environment of macrophages by actively evading macrophage-associated antibacterial activities. The stress response factor SigH contributes to this process by modulating β-chemokine and interleukin 6 (Il6) expression. Hence, Il6 is of critical importance for acquired immunity against M. tuberculosis infection. Here, we attempted to better characterize the role of Il6 in the immune response to M. tuberculosis infection. METHODS A small interfering RNA-based approach was used to silence expression of the Il6 transcript in host macrophages infected with a wild-type strain of M. tuberculosis or an attenuated mutant strain of M. tuberculosis (Mtb:Δ-sigH). The outcome was measured by the analysis of bacterial burden and transcriptome-wide analysis of host gene expression. Transcriptome results were confirmed via quantitative polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS Wild type and Mtb:Δ-sigH infection of host macrophages in which Il6 had been silenced resulted in increased expression of interferon-inducible genes, especially those involved in type I interferon signaling. The expression of Ly-6 genes was significantly higher in cells infected with Mtb:Δ-sigH, compared with those infected with the wild-type strain (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS M. tuberculosis regulates host Il6 production to inhibit type I interferon signaling and, consequently, disease progression. Mtb:Δ-sigH is associated with delayed activation of macrophages, compared with the wild-type strain, and with delayed inflammatory stimuli as consequence. These findings have important implications for improving understanding of the mechanisms behind M. tuberculosis virulence and pathogenesis and provide an initial road map to further investigate the mechanisms that may account for the deleterious effects of type I interferons in M. tuberculosis infection.

Detection of Mycobacterium leprae DNA by polymerase chain reaction in the blood and nasal secretion of Brazilian household contacts

DNA samples from blood and nasal swabs of 125 healthy household contacts was submitted to amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a Mycobacterium leprae-specific sequence as a target for the detection of subclinical infection with M. leprae. All samples were submitted to hybridization analysis in order to exclude any false positive or negative results. Two positive samples were confirmed from blood out of 119 (1.7%) and two positive samples from nasal secretion out of 120 (1.7%). The analysis of the families with positive individuals showed that 2.5% (n = 3) of the contacts were relatives of multibacilary patients while 0.8% of the cases (n = 1) had a paucibacilary as an index case. All positive contacts were followed up and after one year none of them presented clinical signs of the disease. In spite of the PCR sensitivity to detect the presence of the M. leprae in a subclinical stage, this molecular approach did not seem to be a valuable tool to screen household contacts, since we determined a spurious association of the PCR positivity and further development of leprosy.

Increased CXC Ligand 10 Levels and Gene Expression in Type 1 Leprosy Reactions

ABSTRACT Type 1 reaction (T1R) is a systemic inflammatory syndrome causing substantial morbidity in leprosy. T1R results from spontaneously enhanced cellular immunity in borderline types of leprosy, but there are no established laboratory markers for the reaction. Preliminary studies have identified elevated circulating CXC ligand 10 (CXCL10) during T1R. Correlation of CXCL10 with clinical T1R was studied in repeated serum specimens obtained before, during, and after T1R. CXCL10 gene expression was assessed in biopsy specimens taken before and during T1R, and sections were stained for the cytokine using monoclonal antibodies. Sequential serum specimens revealed elevation of circulating CXCL10 associated with episodes of T1R (P = 0.0001) but no evidence of an earlier, predictive change in the level of the chemokine. Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR revealed elevated expression of CXCL10 transcripts during T1R, but not in patients who did not have T1R. No significant correlation between CXCL10 and gamma interferon (IFN-γ) mRNA levels was observed. Immunohistochemical staining of the skin biopsy specimens suggested an overall increase in CXCL10 but did not identify a particular strongly staining population of leukocytes. Increased CXCL10 in lesions and serum is characteristic of T1R. CXCL10 measurement offers new possibilities for laboratory diagnosis and monitoring of T1R. Studies of the regulation of CXCL10 may provide insight into the mechanisms of T1R and identify potential new drug targets for treatment.

PCR-based techniques for leprosy diagnosis: from the laboratory to the clinic.

In leprosy, classic diagnostic tools based on bacillary counts and histopathology have been facing hurdles, especially in distinguishing latent infection from active disease and diagnosing paucibacillary clinical forms. Serological tests and IFN-gamma releasing assays (IGRA) that employ humoral and cellular immune parameters, respectively, are also being used, but recent results indicate that quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a key technique due to its higher sensitivity and specificity. In fact, advances concerning the structure and function of the Mycobacterium leprae genome led to the development of specific PCR-based gene amplification assays for leprosy diagnosis and monitoring of household contacts. Also, based on the validation of point-of-care technologies for M. tuberculosis DNA detection, it is clear that the same advantages of rapid DNA detection could be observed in respect to leprosy. So far, PCR has proven useful in the determination of transmission routes, M. leprae viability, and drug resistance in leprosy. However, PCR has been ascertained to be especially valuable in diagnosing difficult cases like pure neural leprosy (PNL), paucibacillary (PB), and patients with atypical clinical presentation and histopathological features compatible with leprosy. Also, the detection of M. leprae DNA in different samples of the household contacts of leprosy patients is very promising. Although a positive PCR result is not sufficient to establish a causal relationship with disease outcome, quantitation provided by qPCR is clearly capable of indicating increased risk of developing the disease and could alert clinicians to follow these contacts more closely or even define rules for chemoprophylaxis.

Evaluation of qPCR-Based Assays for Leprosy Diagnosis Directly in Clinical Specimens

The increased reliability and efficiency of the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) makes it a promising tool for performing large-scale screening for infectious disease among high-risk individuals. To date, no study has evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of different qPCR assays for leprosy diagnosis using a range of clinical samples that could bias molecular results such as difficult-to-diagnose cases. In this study, qPCR assays amplifying different M. leprae gene targets, sodA, 16S rRNA, RLEP and Ag 85B were compared for leprosy differential diagnosis. qPCR assays were performed on frozen skin biopsy samples from a total of 62 patients: 21 untreated multibacillary (MB), 26 untreated paucibacillary (PB) leprosy patients, as well as 10 patients suffering from other dermatological diseases and 5 healthy donors. To develop standardized protocols and to overcome the bias resulted from using chromosome count cutoffs arbitrarily defined for different assays, decision tree classifiers were used to estimate optimum cutoffs and to evaluate the assays. As a result, we found a decreasing sensitivity for Ag 85B (66.1%), 16S rRNA (62.9%), and sodA (59.7%) optimized assay classifiers, but with similar maximum specificity for leprosy diagnosis. Conversely, the RLEP assay showed to be the most sensitive (87.1%). Moreover, RLEP assay was positive for 3 samples of patients originally not diagnosed as having leprosy, but these patients developed leprosy 5–10 years after the collection of the biopsy. In addition, 4 other samples of patients clinically classified as non-leprosy presented detectable chromosome counts in their samples by the RLEP assay suggesting that those patients either had leprosy that was misdiagnosed or a subclinical state of leprosy. Overall, these results are encouraging and suggest that RLEP assay could be useful as a sensitive diagnostic test to detect M. leprae infection before major clinical manifestations.

Ninjurin 1 asp110ala single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with protection in leprosy nerve damage

Leprosy is the major cause of non-traumatic neuropathy. Herein, we investigated the role of ninjurin 1, an adhesion molecule involved in nerve regeneration in leprosy. Our results demonstrated that M. leprae stimulates in vitro up-regulation of ninjurin mRNA in cultured Schwann and blood cells as well as in vivo mRNA and protein expression in leprosy nerve biopsies. A polymorphism (asp110ala) was investigated in a case-control study (1123 individuals) and no association was found with leprosy per se or with disseminated forms. Nevertheless, ala110 was associated with functional nerve impairment (OR=2.42; p=0.02 for ala/ala) and with lower mRNA levels. Our data suggests that asp110ala could be a valuable genetic marker of nerve damage in leprosy.

Estudo da mucosa nasal de contatos de hanseníase, com positividade para o antígeno glicolipídio fenólico 1

UNLABELLED Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. The disease more frequently affects the nasal mucosa and can occur independently of its clinical form or even before lesions on the skin or on other parts of the body. It is necessary to employ epidemiological surveillance of household contacts with new leprosy cases for early disease diagnosis. AIM identify specific and early leprosy lesions through endoscopic, baciloscopy, histopathology exams, and real time polymerase chain reaction of the nasal cavity mucosa on household and peridomiciliary contacts with positive serology for the phenolic glycolipid 1 antigen. METHODOLOGY Between 2003 at 2006 there was a prospective cross-sectional clinical study with 31 contacts with patients with leprosy with positive serology against PGL-1, 05 negative controls and 01 positive control. RESULTS Between seropositive contacts, real-time PCR was positive for M. leprae DNA in 06 (19.35%) of them and the higher number of genome copies were found in contacts who became sick. CONCLUSION Nasal mucosa tests alone did not enable the early diagnosis of Leprosy. However, through the combination of various methods, tests on the contacts can help identify subclinical infection and monitor the contacts that could be responsible for spreading the disease.

Detection of Mycobacterium leprae in Ocular Tissues by Histopathology and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Aim: To report detection of leprosy in ocular tissue by histopathology and its confirmation by genetic analysis. Methods: Excised tissue from a clinically-suspected ocular leprosy patient was processed and analyzed histopathologically. The DNA from the paraffin-embedded tissue was extracted, an 85 A-C intergenic region of Mycobacterium leprae was amplified using specific primers and analyzed by conventional as well as real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: With periodic acid-Schiff-hematoxylin (PAS-H) staining the specimen showed presence of a thin fibrinous layer of inflammatory cells. The majority of the tissue was fibrovascular with extensive infiltration by histiocytes having reticulated cytoplasm. Modified PAS-H and acid-fast staining (AFS) showed the presence of several acid-fast organisms within the cytoplasm of histiocytes and mast cells. Conventional PCR showed a 250-bp DNA from excised conjunctival tissue, which was in agreement with the positive controls for M. leprae. Through RT-PCR, it was calculated that the suspected tissue had 44.68 pg of M. leprae DNA, which is 8937.06 genome copies of M. leprae. Conclusions: Presence of inflammatory cells and AFS bacilli in tissue presented a typical picture of leprosy. M. leprae DNA can be detected using RT-PCR in ocular tissues when acid-fast bacteria are seen in histopathological sections. And when the diagnosis of leprosy is inconclusive and acid-fast bacteria are seen, RT-PCR for M. leprae DNA could be used as a rapid confirmatory test to identify the presence of M. leprae and, therefore, the diagnosis of leprosy.

ENCOMS: Argentinian survey in cost of illness and unmet needs in multiple sclerosis

UNLABELLED The objective of the study was to assess the cost of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in Argentina categorized by disease severity using a societal perspective. METHOD Cross-sectional study including MS patients from 21 MS centers in 12 cities of Argentina. Patients were stratified by disease severity using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) (group 1 with EDSS score between 0 and 3; group 2 with EDSS >3 and <7; group 3 with EDSS ≥7). Direct and indirect costs were analyzed for the second quarter of 2012 from public sources and converted to US Dollars. RESULTS 266 patients were included. Mean annual cost per MS patient was USD 36,025 (95%CI 31,985-38,068) for patients with an EDSS between 0-3; USD 40,705 (95%CI 37,199-46,300) for patients with EDSS >3 and <7, and USD 50,712 (95%CI 47,825-62,104) for patients with EDSS ≥7. CONCLUSIONS This is the first Argentine study evaluating the costs of MS considering disease severity.