Alejandro Arenas-Pinto

Lactic acidosis in HIV infected patients: a systematic review of published cases

Objective: To describe the clinical, epidemiological, and biochemical characteristics of published cases of lactic acidosis (LA) and to generate hypotheses concerning risk factors associated with this complication. Methods: Systematic review of cases reported in the medical literature. Results: 217 published cases were identified, 90 of which fulfilled the study definition and had sufficient individual data on potential risk factors to be included. The 90 patients had a mean age of 40.1 years (range 16–69) and 53% were female. All 90 patients were taking nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) at the time of the episode. Among the 83 patients with details of their antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen 51 patients were taking stavudine, 29 zidovudine, 27 didanosine, and 25 lamivudine. Around 50% of the patients had abdominal pain, nausea, or vomiting. Hepatic steatosis was consistently reported (53/90) and in 36 (68%) there was histological evidence. The case fatality rate was 48%. Six cases were rechallenged with NRTI and three developed a further LA episode. Using data on the numbers of HIV infected individuals receiving care in the United States, we estimate that the risk of LA could be 2.5 times higher for women than men. Conclusions: NRTI use and female sex appear to be risk factors for the development of LA. What other factors are involved is still not clear but might include duration of NRTI therapy, specific drug use, and genetic predisposition. A case-control study is needed to better define risk factors for severe LA.

Protease inhibitor monotherapy for long-term management of HIV infection: a randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial

Summary Background Standard-of-care antiretroviral therapy (ART) uses a combination of drugs deemed essential to minimise treatment failure and drug resistance. Protease inhibitors are potent, with a high genetic barrier to resistance, and have potential use as monotherapy after viral load suppression is achieved with combination treatment. We aimed to assess clinical risks and benefits of protease inhibitor monotherapy in long-term clinical use: in particular, the effect on drug resistance and future treatment options. Methods In this pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled adults (≥18 years of age) positive for HIV attending 43 public sector treatment centres in the UK who had suppressed viral load (<50 copies per mL) for at least 24 weeks on combination ART with no change in the previous 12 weeks and a CD4 count of more than 100 cells per μL. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to maintain ongoing triple therapy (OT) or to switch to a strategy of physician-selected ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy (PI-mono); we recommended ritonavir (100 mg)-boosted darunavir (800 mg) once daily or ritonavir (100 mg)-boosted lopinavir (400 mg) twice daily, with prompt return to combination treatment if viral load rebounded. All treatments were oral. Randomisation was with permuted blocks of varying size and stratified by centre and baseline ART; we used a computer-generated, sequentially numbered randomisation list. The primary outcome was loss of future drug options, defined as new intermediate-level or high-level resistance to one or more drugs to which the patients virus was deemed sensitive at trial entry (assessed at 3 years; non-inferiority margin of 10%). We estimated probability of rebound and resistance with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, number ISRCTN04857074. Findings Between Nov 4, 2008, and July 28, 2010, we randomly allocated 587 participants to OT (291) or PI-mono (296). At 3 years, one or more future drug options had been lost in two participants (Kaplan-Meier estimate 0·7%) in the OT group and six (2·1%) in the PI-mono group: difference 1·4% (−0·4 to 3·4); non-inferiority shown. 49 (16·8%) participants in the OT group and 65 (22·0%) in the PI-mono group had grade 3 or 4 clinical adverse events (difference 5·1% [95% CI −1·3 to 11·5]; p=0·12); 45 (six treatment related) and 56 (three treatment related) had serious adverse events. Interpretation Protease inhibitor monotherapy, with regular viral load monitoring and prompt reintroduction of combination treatment for rebound, preserved future treatment options and did not change overall clinical outcomes or frequency of toxic effects. Protease inhibitor monotherapy is an acceptable alternative for long-term clinical management of HIV infection. Funding National Institute for Health Research.

Nevirapine increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration by stimulation of apolipoprotein A-I production.

Objective—The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanism by which the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) nevirapine (NVP) increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc) in treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1)–infected patients. Methods and Results—Twelve HIV-1 infected patients, with stably suppressed HIV-1 viral load using AZT/3TC/abacavir for ≥6 months, added NVP to their current antiretroviral regimen. Patients received a primed bolus infusion of the stable isotope L-[1-13C]-valine for 12 hours before, as well as 6 and 24 weeks after, the addition of NVP to study apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) kinetics. Absolute production rate (APR) and fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of apoA-I were calculated using SAAM-II modeling. Major HDLc-modulating enzymes were assessed. Plasma apoA-I and HDLc levels increased significantly after 24 weeks of treatment by, respectively, 13±4% (P=0.01) and 16±6% (P=0.015). Concomitantly, apoA-I production rate at 24 weeks increased by 17±7% (P=0.04). ApoA-I catabolism did not change. A modest increase of lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase and cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity was observed. Conclusions—NVP increases apoA-I production, which contributes to the HDLc increase after introduction of NVP-containing regimens. In view of the potent antiatherogenic effects of apoA-I, the observed increase may contribute to the favorable cardiovascular profile of NVP.

Why START? Reflections that led to the conduct of this large long-term strategic HIV trial

This monograph describes a cohort of 4685 HIV-positive persons, most of whom were recently infected, who volunteered to dedicate several years to being participants in a research study that addresses the question of when antiretroviral therapy (ART) should be initiated. Should it be started early after HIV infection occurs, or should it be deferred until the infection has started to impair immune function but before the risk of AIDS increases? There has been consensus based on robust data for many years that ART should be initiated following the development of AIDS. Also, within the past 6 to 7 years, data from randomized trials [1–3] and observational studies [4–7] emerged that supported the initiation of ART when the CD4 cell count declined to < 350 cells/μL among asymptomatic individuals. It has been hotly debated whether the clinical benefits of initiating ART at a CD4 cell count > 500 cells/ μL, compared with deferring ART until the CD4 cell count decreases to 350 cells/μL, as is being tested in the Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Treatment (START) study, outweigh the risks [8–10]. The debate is lively because the data available are not optimal. The fact that 4685 persons from 215 clinics in 35 countries volunteered to be randomized in START reflects the considerable uncertainty that many individuals with HIV infection and investigators around the world have about the answer to the question being addressed by START.

Neurocognitive Function in HIV Infected Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy

Objective To describe factors associated with neurocognitive (NC) function in HIV-positive patients on stable combination antiretroviral therapy. Design We undertook a cross-sectional analysis assessing NC data obtained at baseline in patients entering the Protease-Inhibitor-Monotherapy-Versus-Ongoing-Triple therapy (PIVOT) trial. Main outcome measure NC testing comprised of 5 domains. Raw results were z-transformed using standard and demographically adjusted normative datasets (ND). Global z-scores (NPZ-5) were derived from averaging the 5 domains and percentage of subjects with test scores >1 standard deviation (SD) below population means in at least two domains (abnormal Frascati score) calculated. Patient characteristics associated with NC results were assessed using multivariable linear regression. Results Of the 587 patients in PIVOT, 557 had full NC results and were included. 77% were male, 68% Caucasian and 28% of Black ethnicity. Mean (SD) baseline and nadir CD4+ lymphocyte counts were 553(217) and 177(117) cells/µL, respectively, and HIV RNA was <50 copies/mL in all. Median (IQR) NPZ-5 score was −0.5 (−1.2/−0) overall, and −0.3 (−0.7/0.1) and −1.4 (−2/−0.8) in subjects of Caucasian and Black ethnicity, respectively. Abnormal Frascati scores using the standard-ND were observed in 51%, 38%, and 81%, respectively, of subjects overall, Caucasian and Black ethnicity (p<0.001), but in 62% and 69% of Caucasian and Black subjects using demographically adjusted-ND (p = 0.20). In the multivariate analysis, only Black ethnicity was associated with poorer NPZ-5 scores (P<0.001). Conclusions In this large group of HIV-infected subjects with viral load suppression, ethnicity but not HIV-disease factors is closely associated with NC results. The prevalence of abnormal results is highly dependent on control datasets utilised. Trial registry ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01230580

Short- and long-term mortality and causes of death in HIV/tuberculosis patients in Europe

Mortality of HIV/tuberculosis (TB) patients in Eastern Europe is high. Little is known about their causes of death. This study aimed to assess and compare mortality rates and cause of death in HIV/TB patients across Eastern Europe and Western Europe and Argentina (WEA) in an international cohort study. Mortality rates and causes of death were analysed by time from TB diagnosis (<3 months, 3–12 months or >12 months) in 1078 consecutive HIV/TB patients. Factors associated with TB-related death were examined in multivariate Poisson regression analysis. 347 patients died during 2625 person-years of follow-up. Mortality in Eastern Europe was three- to ninefold higher than in WEA. TB was the main cause of death in Eastern Europe in 80%, 66% and 61% of patients who died <3 months, 3–12 months or >12 months after TB diagnosis, compared to 50%, 0% and 15% in the same time periods in WEA (p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, follow-up in WEA (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.12, 95% CI 0.04–0.35), standard TB-treatment (IRR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20–0.99) and antiretroviral therapy (IRR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14–0.77) were associated with reduced risk of TB-related death. Persistently higher mortality rates were observed in HIV/TB patients in Eastern Europe, and TB was the dominant cause of death at any time during follow-up. This has important implications for HIV/TB programmes aiming to optimise the management of HIV/TB patients and limit TB-associated mortality in this region. High TB-related death rates in HIV patients in Eastern Europe require measures to improve their clinical management http://ow.ly/q7XcD

Neurocognitive Function and Neuroimaging Markers in Virologically Suppressed HIV-positive Patients Randomized to Ritonavir-boosted Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy or Standard Combination ART: A Cross-sectional Substudy From the PIVOT Trial

BACKGROUND To determine whether treatment with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy is associated with detrimental effects on neurocognitive function or brain imaging markers compared to standard antiretroviral therapy (ART). METHODS Neuropsychological assessment and brain magnetic resonance imaging were performed at the last study visit in a subset of participants randomized to PI monotherapy (PI-mono group) or ongoing triple ART (OT group) in the PIVOT trial. We calculated a global z-score (NPZ-7) from the average of the individual test z-scores and the proportion of participants with symptomatic neurocognitive impairment (score >1 standard deviation below normative means in ≥2 cognitive domains and neurocognitive symptoms). In a subgroup, white matter hyperintensities, bicaudate index, global cortical (GCA) and medial temporal lobe atrophy scores and single voxel (basal ganglia) N-acetylaspartate (NAA)/Choline, NAA/Creatine and myo-inositol/Creatine ratios were measured. RESULTS 146 participants (75 PI-mono) had neurocognitive testing (median time after randomization 3.8 years), of whom 78 were imaged. We found no difference between arms in NPZ-7 score (median -0.4 (interquartile range [IQR] = -0.7; 0.1) vs -0.3 (IQR = -0.7; 0.3) for the PI-mono and OT groups respectively, P = .28), the proportion with symptomatic neurocognitive impairment (13% and 18% in the PI-mono and OT groups respectively; P = .41), or any of the neuroimaging variables (P > .05). Symptomatic neurocognitive impairment was associated with higher GCA score (OR = 6.2 per additional score; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-22.3 P = .005) but no other imaging variables. CONCLUSIONS Based on a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and brain imaging, PI monotherapy does not increase the risk of neurocognitive impairment in stable human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients.

Baseline prevalence and predictors of liver fibrosis among HIV‐positive individuals: a substudy of the INSIGHT Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Treatment (START) trial

Liver disease is increasingly recognized in HIV‐positive individuals, even among those without viral hepatitis, partly as a result of the recent availability of noninvasive methods of liver fibrosis assessment. The objective of this substudy is to compare the effects of early versus deferred antiretroviral therapy (ART) on liver fibrosis progression.

Factors associated with virological rebound in HIV-infected patients receiving protease inhibitor monotherapy

Objective:The Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Ongoing Triple Therapy (PIVOT) trial found that protease inhibitor monotherapy as a simplification strategy is well tolerated in terms of drug resistance but less effective than combination therapy in suppressing HIV viral load. We sought to identify factors associated with the risk of viral load rebound in this trial. Methods:PIVOT was a randomized controlled trial in HIV-positive adults with suppressed viral load for at least 24 weeks on combination therapy comparing a strategy of physician-selected ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy versus ongoing triple therapy. In participants receiving monotherapy, we analysed time to confirmed viral load rebound and its predictors using flexible parametric survival models. Results:Of 290 participants initiating protease inhibitor monotherapy (80% darunavir, 14% lopinavir, and 6% other), 93 developed viral load rebound on monotherapy. The risk of viral load rebound peaked at 9 months after starting monotherapy and then declined to approximately 5 per 100 person-years from 18 months onwards. Independent predictors of viral load rebound were duration of viral load suppression before starting monotherapy (hazard ratio 0.81 per additional year <50 copies/ml; P < 0.001), CD4+ cell count (hazard ratio 0.73 per additional 100 cells/&mgr;l for CD4+ nadir; P = 0.008); ethnicity (hazard ratio 1.87 for nonwhite versus white, P = 0.025) but not the protease inhibitor agent used (P = 0.27). Patients whose viral load was analysed with the Roche TaqMan-2 assay had a 1.87-fold risk for viral load rebound compared with Abbott RealTime assay (P = 0.012). Conclusion:A number of factors can identify patients at low risk of rebound with protease inhibitor monotherapy, and this may help to better target those who may benefit from this management strategy.

Neurocognitive Function in HIV-Infected Patients: Comparison of Two Methods to Define Impairment

Objective To compare two definitions of neurocognitive impairment (NCI) in a large clinical trial of effectively-treated HIV-infected adults at baseline. Methods Hopkins Verbal Learning test-Revised (HVLT-R), Colour Trail (CTT) and Grooved Pegboard (GPT) tests were applied exploring five cognitive domains. Raw scores were transformed into Z-scores and NCI defined as summary NPZ-5 score one standard deviation below the mean of the normative dataset (i.e. <−1SD) or Z-scores <−1SD in at least two individual domains (categorical scale). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to explore the contribution of individual tests to the total variance. Results Mean NPZ-5 score was −0.72 (SD 0.98) and 178/548 (32%) participants had NPZ-5 scores <−1SD. When impairment was defined as <−1SD in at least two individual tests, 283 (52%) patients were impaired. Strong correlations between the two components of the HVLT-R test (learning/recall) (r = 0.73), and the CTT and (attention/executive functioning) (r = 0.66) were observed. PCA showed a clustering with three components accounting for 88% of the total variance. When patients who scored <−1SD only in two correlated tests were considered as not impaired, prevalence of NCI was 43%. When correlated test scores were averaged, 36% of participants had NPZ-3 scores <−1SD and 32% underperformed in at least two individual tests. Conclusion Controlling for differential contribution of individual test-scores on the overall performance and the level of correlation between components of the test battery used appear to be important when testing cognitive function. These two factors are likely to affect both summary scores and categorical scales in defining cognitive impairment. Trial registration EUDRACT: 2007-006448-23 and ISRCTN04857074.