Alejandro Mazal

Experimental determination and verification of the parameters used in a proton pencil beam algorithm

We present an experimental procedure for the determination and the verification under practical conditions of physical and computational parameters used in our proton pencil beam algorithm. The calculation of the dose delivered by a single pencil beam relies on a measured spread-out Bragg peak, and the description of its radial spread at depth features simple specific parameters accounting individually for the influence of the beam line as a whole, the beam energy modulation, the compensator, and the patient medium. For determining the experimental values of the physical parameters related to proton scattering, we utilized a simple relation between Gaussian radial spreads and the width of lateral penumbras. The contribution from the beam line has been extracted from lateral penumbra measurements in air: a linear variation with the distance collimator-point has been observed. Analytically predicted radial spreads within the patient were in good agreement with experimental values in water under various reference conditions. Results indicated no significant influence of the beam energy modulation. Using measurements in presence of Plexiglas slabs, a simple assumption on the effective source of scattering due to the compensator has been stated, leading to accurate radial spread calculations. Dose measurements in presence of complexly shaped compensators have been used to assess the performances of the algorithm supplied with the adequate physical parameters. One of these compensators has also been used, together with a reference configuration, for investigating a set of computational parameters decreasing the calculation time while maintaining a high level of accuracy. Faster dose computations have been performed for algorithm evaluation in the presence of geometrical and patient compensators, and have shown good agreement with the measured dose distributions.

The prediction of output factors for spread-out proton Bragg peak fields in clinical practice

The reliable prediction of output factors for spread-out proton Bragg peak (SOBP) fields in clinical practice remained unrealized due to a lack of a consistent theoretical framework and the great number of variables introduced by the mechanical devices necessary for the production of such fields. These limitations necessitated an almost exclusive reliance on manual calibration for individual fields and empirical, ad hoc, models. We recently reported on a theoretical framework for the prediction of output factors for such fields. In this work, we describe the implementation of this framework in our clinical practice. In our practice, we use a treatment delivery nozzle that uses a limited, and constant, set of mechanical devices to produce SOBP fields over the full extent of clinical penetration depths, or ranges, and modulation widths. This use of a limited set of mechanical devices allows us to unfold the physical effects that affect the output factor. We describe these effects and their incorporation into the theoretical framework. We describe the calibration and protocol for SOBP fields, the effects of apertures and range-compensators and the use of output factors in the treatment planning process.

In vivo dose verification from back projection of a transit dose measurement on the central axis of photon beams

PURPOSE In vivo dose verification is used to prevent major deviations between the prescribed dose and the dose really delivered to the patient. This work presents a quick and simple alternative method for verification of dose delivered to the patient using photon beams. During the treatment session, a transit dose is measured with the EPID and the dose in the patient is estimated from back projection of the portal dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS The formalism for dose calculation is described. It is independent of the detector and has been validated for different beam energies using an ionization chamber (IC). Central axis doses estimated by this formalism were compared with measured dose. Subsequently, the IC was replaced by the EPID appropriately calibrated. The feasibility of the method and its applicability in clinical use has been evaluated on 3 8 patients treated with conformal therapy for various localizations. RESULTS Ratios between stated and measured doses are reported. They are within the accepted tolerance of classical in vivo dosimetry (SD of 3.5%). CONCLUSIONS The proposed method for in vivo dose verification is very simple to implement and to use in clinics. Measurements can be repeated during several sessions giving the opportunity to built new strategies for the validation by statistical evaluation of the data. The trending of in vivo dose along the treatment becomes also possible. The number of checkable beams is also increased by this method.

Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A new protocol for calibration of proton beams was established by the ICRU in report 59 on proton dosimetry. In this paper we report the results of an international proton dosimetry intercomparison, which was held at Loma Linda University Medical Center. The goals of the intercomparison were, first, to estimate the level of consistency in absorbed dose delivered to patients if proton beams at various clinics were calibrated with the new ICRU protocol, and second, to evaluate the differences in absorbed dose determination due to differences in 60Co-based ionization chamber calibration factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eleven institutions participated in the intercomparison. Measurements were performed in a polystyrene phantom at a depth of 10.27 cm water equivalent thickness in a 6-cm modulated proton beam with an accelerator energy of 155 MeV and an incident energy of approximately 135 MeV. Most participants used ionization chambers calibrated in terms of exposure or air kerma. Four ionization chambers had 60Co-based calibration in terms of absorbed dose-to-water. Two chambers were calibrated in a 60Co beam at the NIST both in terms of air kerma and absorbed dose-to-water to provide a comparison of ionization chambers with different calibrations. RESULTS The intercomparison showed that use of the ICRU report 59 protocol would result in absorbed doses being delivered to patients at their participating institutions to within +/-0.9% (one standard deviation). The maximum difference between doses determined by the participants was found to be 2.9%. Differences between proton doses derived from the measurements with ionization chambers with N(K)-, or N(W) - calibration type depended on chamber type. CONCLUSIONS Using ionization chambers with 60Co calibration factors traceable to standard laboratories and the ICRU report 59 protocol, a distribution of stated proton absorbed dose is achieved with a difference less than 3%. The ICRU protocol should be adopted for clinical proton beam calibration. A comparison of proton doses derived from measurements with different chambers indicates that the difference in results cannot be explained only by differences in 60Co calibration factors.

A model for the lateral penumbra in water of a 200‐MeV proton beam devoted to clinical applications

An experimental approach for modeling the lateral penumbra of a proton beam has been investigated. Measurements were made with a silicon diode in a water tank. Several geometrical configurations (phantom position, collimator-to-surface distance, collimator diameter, bolus thickness, air gap, etc.) and beam characteristics (range, modulation, etc.) have been studied. The results show that the lateral penumbra is almost independent of the beam modulation and the diameter of the collimator. The use of scaled variables for depth and penumbra allows us to represent the increase in penumbra with depth for any configuration with a second order polynomial function, provided that the penumbra at the entrance of the medium and at the depth of the range are known.

Practice Patterns Analysis of Ocular Proton Therapy Centers: The International OPTIC Survey.

PURPOSE To assess the planning, treatment, and follow-up strategies worldwide in dedicated proton therapy ocular programs. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten centers from 7 countries completed a questionnaire survey with 109 queries on the eye treatment planning system (TPS), hardware/software equipment, image acquisition/registration, patient positioning, eye surveillance, beam delivery, quality assurance (QA), clinical management, and workflow. RESULTS Worldwide, 28,891 eye patients were treated with protons at the 10 centers as of the end of 2014. Most centers treated a vast number of ocular patients (1729 to 6369). Three centers treated fewer than 200 ocular patients. Most commonly, the centers treated uveal melanoma (UM) and other primary ocular malignancies, benign ocular tumors, conjunctival lesions, choroidal metastases, and retinoblastomas. The UM dose fractionation was generally within a standard range, whereas dosing for other ocular conditions was not standardized. The majority (80%) of centers used in common a specific ocular TPS. Variability existed in imaging registration, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) rarely being used in routine planning (20%). Increased patient to full-time equivalent ratios were observed by higher accruing centers (P=.0161). Generally, ophthalmologists followed up the post-radiation therapy patients, though in 40% of centers radiation oncologists also followed up the patients. Seven centers had a prospective outcomes database. All centers used a cyclotron to accelerate protons with dedicated horizontal beam lines only. QA checks (range, modulation) varied substantially across centers. CONCLUSIONS The first worldwide multi-institutional ophthalmic proton therapy survey of the clinical and technical approach shows areas of substantial overlap and areas of progress needed to achieve sustainable and systematic management. Future international efforts include research and development for imaging and planning software upgrades, increased use of MRI, development of clinical protocols, systematic patient-centered data acquisition, and publishing guidelines on QA, staffing, treatment, and follow-up parameters by dedicated ocular programs to ensure the highest level of care for ocular patients.

Calibration of CT Hounsfield units for proton therapy treatment planning: use of kilovoltage and megavoltage images and comparison of parameterized methods

Proton beam range is of major concern, in particular, when images used for dose computations are artifacted (for example in patients with surgically treated bone tumors). We investigated several conditions and methods for determination of computed tomography Hounsfield unit (CT-HU) calibration curves, using two different conversion schemes. A stoichiometric methodology was used on either kilovoltage (kV) or megavoltage (MV) CT images and the accuracy of the calibration methods was evaluated. We then studied the effects of metal artifacts on proton dose distributions using metallic implants in rigid phantom mimicking clinical conditions. MV-CT images were used to evaluate relative proton stopping power in certain high density implants, and a methodology is proposed for accurate delineation and dose calculation, using a combined set of kV- and MV-CT images. Our results show good agreement between measurements and dose calculations or relative proton stopping power determination (<5%). The results also show that range uncertainty increases when only kV-CT images are used or when no correction is made on artifacted images. However, differences between treatment plans calculated on corrected kV-CT data and MV-CT data remained insignificant in the investigated patient case, even with streak artifacts and volume effects that reduce the accuracy of manual corrections.

Use of gEUD for predicting ear and pituitary gland damage following proton and photon radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between the dose to the inner ear or pituitary gland and radiation-induced late effects of skull base radiation therapy. METHODS 140 patients treated between 2000 and 2008 were considered for this study. Hearing loss and endocrine dysfunction were retrospectively reviewed on pre- and post-radiation therapy audiometry or endocrine assessments. Two normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models were considered (Lyman-Kutcher-Burman and log-logistic) whose parameters were fitted to patient data using receiver operating characteristics and maximum likelihood analysis. The method provided an estimation of the parameters of a generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD)-based NTCP after conversion of dose-volume histograms to equivalent doses. RESULTS All 140 patients had a minimum follow up of 26 months. 26% and 44% of patients experienced mild hearing loss and endocrine dysfunction, respectively. The fitted values for TD50 and γ50 ranged from 53.6 to 60.7 Gy and from 1.9 to 2.9 for the inner ear and were equal to 60.6 Gy and 4.9 for the pituitary gland, respectively. All models were ranked equal according to Akaikes information criterion. CONCLUSION Mean dose and gEUD may be used as predictive factors for late ear and pituitary gland late complications after skull base proton and photon radiation therapy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE In this study, we have reported mean dose effects and dose-response relationship of small organs at risk (partial volumes of the inner ear and pituitary gland), which could be useful to define optimal dose constraints resulting in an improved therapeutic ratio.

An experimental approach to the design of a scattering system for a proton therapy beam line dedicated to opthalmological applications

PURPOSE The development of a scattering system for a proton therapy beam line dedicated to ophthalmological applications. METHODS AND MATERIALS A protontherapy beam line has been developed for the treatment of uveal melanoma at the Orsay synchrocyclotron. The original 200 MeV proton beam is degraded to 76 MeV and the final beam characteristics (range, modulation, flatness, collimation) are obtained with beam modifiers in the treatment room. A passive scattering system is used to obtain a uniform dose distribution in the beam cross-section throughout 30 mm in diameter, with minimal losses in energy and dose rate. We have used an experimental approach for the scattering study. RESULTS An elliptical ring shaped from 0.1-mm thick lead is the solution we have adopted for the scattering system. For a modulated beam, a flatness of 1% is obtained on transverse profiles. The energy loss introduced by this scatterer is only 0.5 MeV, with no appreciable change in the range over the treatment field. For an unmodulated beam, 21% of intensity is lost when the scatterer is used. The distal and the lateral dose fall-off (90-10%) for a modulated beam are 2.6 mm. These last values are independent of the range and the modulation currently used for the ophthalmic applications. CONCLUSION A specific passive scattering system can be adapted to a particular beam emittance. A systematic experimental approach can easily be undertaken to obtain the scatterer adapted for small irradiation fields in proton therapy.

Practical use of Gafchromic(®) EBT films in electron beams for in-phantom dose distribution measurements and monitor units verification.

PURPOSE The possibility of using the Gafchromic(®) EBT films parallel to incident electron beams was assessed in order to facilitate quality assurance tests for electron dose calculation algorithms. MATERIALS AND METHODS Calibration curves were made for electron energies of 6, 9 and 12MeV. A set-up was suggested for EBT film irradiation parallel to the beam, and the dose measurements were compared to Ionization Chamber (IC) measurements in standard and small electrons beams. A more complex Quality Assurance (QA) set-up was performed with the cylindrical CARPET(®) phantom in order to test our Treatment Planning System (TPS) (Eclipse, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California) for the clinical situation of a chest wall electron beam therapy. Two dimensional dose distribution and gamma index results were compared to the calculated distribution given by the TPS. RESULTS The reproducibility was found to be better than 1.5%. We found that applying strong pressure and aligning carefully the film edge with the phantom surface, as recommended for radiographic films, did not completely eliminate the air gap effect. Adding an ultrasound transmission gel and 2 complementary EBT films on the surface gave satisfactory results. The absolute dose for the reference 10×10cm(2) field was always within 1% of IC measurements and for smaller elongated fields (5×10, 4×10 and 3×10cm(2)) the mean difference was -1.4% for the three energies. The mean difference with the IC measurements in R(100), R(90) and R(50) was 0.9mm for all fields and for the three energies. The mean difference in the width of the 90% and the 50% isodoses at R(100) was 0.6mm. With the CARPET(®) phantom set-up very good agreement was found in the 2D dose distribution; 99% of the points satisfied the γ<1 criteria (3%-3mm). CONCLUSION EBT films parallel to the beam axis could be used for absolute measurements of 2D dose distribution if ultrasound gel and overlying perpendicular films are added on the phantom surface.